An Exploration of Nurses' Attitudes and Beliefs on Reporting Medication Errors.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors in health care are prevalent. Nurses play an important role in reporting; however errors remain underreported in incident reporting systems. Understanding the perspective of nurses will inform strategies to improve reporting and build systems to reduce errors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions and attitudes of medication error reporting practices. METHODS: This qualitative study used direct content analysis to analyze interview sessions with 21 total nurses. RESULTS: Participant's description of medication error reporting practices fell into 2 themes. Internal factors described circumstances within nurses themselves that affect reporting. External factors described outside influences from processes or places. CONCLUSIONS: Medication error reporting is a multidimensional phenomenon with internal and external factors impacting nurses' attitudes and willingness to report errors. Nurses need support from leadership to understand that reporting medication errors can improve practice and impact patient outcomes.

Acute Perioperative Pain Management of the Orthopaedic Patient: Guidance for Operationalizing Evidence Into Practice.

Orthopaedic surgery often results in pain, with less than half of patients reporting adequate relief. Unrelieved acute pain occurring after surgery increases the risk of negative sequelae, including delayed healing, increased morbidity, pulmonary complications, limited rehabilitation participation, anxiety, depression, increased length of stay, prolonged duration of opioid use, and the development of chronic pain. Interventions that are individualized, evidence-informed, and applied within an ethical framework improve healthcare delivery for patients, clinicians, and healthcare organizations. Recommendations for using the principles of effective pain management from preoperative assessment through discharge are detailed, including recommendations for addressing barriers and challenges in applying these principles into clinical practice.

Original Research: Exploring Medication Safety Practices from the Nurse's Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Medication preparation and administration are complex tasks that nurses must perform daily within today's complicated health care environment. Despite more than two decades of efforts to reduce medication errors, it's well known that such errors remain prevalent. Obtaining insight from direct care nurses may clarify where opportunities for improvement exist and guide future efforts to do so. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to explore direct care nurses' perspectives on and experiences with medication safety practices and errors. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among direct care nurses employed across a large health care system. Data were collected using semistructured interview questions with participants in focus groups and one-on-one meetings and were analyzed using qualitative direct content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 direct care nurses participated. Four major themes emerged that impact the medication safety practices of and errors by nurses: the care environment, nurse competency, system influences, and the error paradigm. These themes were often interrelated. Most participants depicted chaotic environments, heavy nursing workloads, and distractions and interruptions as increasing the risk of medication errors. Many seemed unsure about what an error was or could be. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of medication safety practices makes it difficult to implement improvement strategies. Understanding the perspectives and experiences of direct care nurses is imperative to implementing such strategies effectively. Based on the study findings, potential solutions should include actively addressing environmental barriers to safe medication practices, ensuring more robust medication management education and training (including guidance regarding the definition of medication errors and the importance of reporting), and revising policies and procedures with input from direct care nurses.

Exploring Nurses' Attitudes, Skills, and Beliefs of Medication Safety Practices.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors exist within health care systems despite efforts to reduce their incidence. These errors may result in patient harm including morbidity, mortality, and increased health care costs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore direct care nurses' attitudes, skills, and beliefs about medication safety practice. METHODS: Researchers conducted a descriptive exploratory study using the Nurses' Attitudes and Skills around Updated Safety Concepts (NASUS) scale and the Nurse Beliefs about Errors Questionnaire (NBEQ). RESULTS: Responses from 191 surveys were analyzed. Of the participants, 70% were bachelor's prepared registered nurses and 88% were female. Results of the NASUS scale revealed the median of means of the Perceived Skills subscale was 79.2 out of 100 and the Attitudes subscale was 65.8 out of 100. The mean of the belief questions related to severity of error was 7.66 out of 10; most participants agreed with reporting of severe errors, reporting errors with moderate or major adverse events, and reporting of incorrect intravenous fluids. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding direct care nurses' attitudes, skills, and beliefs about medication safety practices provides a foundation for development of improvement strategies.

Position Statement: Acute Perioperative Pain Management Among Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing and The National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses.

Patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery may experience pain that is acute, chronic or a combination of the two, with less than half of all surgical patients reporting adequate pain relief. The National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses (NAON) and the American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) have partnered to provide evidence-informed guidance to empower nurses to employ effective pain management. Understanding and applying ethical, evidence-informed, patient-focused, interprofessional interventions will improve outcomes for patients, clinicians, and healthcare organizations. Together, we encourage nurses to embrace the guiding principles presented in this Position Statement to provide optimal pain management for the orthopaedic patient.

Impact of Bundled Care on Outcomes Following Elective Primary Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Standardized approaches to care and care pathways for patients with joint replacement have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS), improve patient participation in education, decrease patient anxiety while improving perception of care, and lead to overall efficiency and improved care and outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a standardized bundle approach to care influenced the outcomes after total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). METHODS: A retrospective, quasi-experimental before- and after-design study was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Two hospitals implemented a standardized bundle of care for patients undergoing THA or TKA that included preoperative patient education, day of surgery mobilization, and a total joint group physical therapy session (Full Bundle). Data analyses were completed on a convenience sample of 2,200 patients who underwent THA or TKA. Outcomes data measured were LOS, discharge disposition, costs, and readmission rate. RESULTS: Patients receiving the Full Bundle had significant reduction in LOS of roughly 1 day (OR = 1.687, 95% CI [1.578, 1.797]) versus group not receiving all elements (OR = 2.706; 95% CI [2.623, 2.789]). Full Bundle patients were 6 times more likely to be discharged home compared with the Partial Bundle group (OR = 6.01, 95% CI [4.01, 9.03]). Full Bundle group had significantly lower total direct costs, F(1) = 4.06, p = .046, partial η = 0.003. There were no differences in readmission rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who had all elements of the THA/TKA bundle had the best outcomes. By improving efficiencies of care through the use of the bundle, the 2 hospitals positively impacted the care and outcomes of THA and TKA patients.