Patient Perceived Impact of Outpatient Group Substance Use Disorder Treatment in a Hybrid Model or Virtual-Only Model Relative to In-Person Delivery.

Purpose: Telehealth use has grown tremendously since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the benefits of virtual care delivery are numerous, little is known about patient experiences in group treatment settings when members join both virtually and in person with the counselor (a hybrid model). We sought to fill this gap by comparing patient survey data across care delivery models. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with a substance use disorder enrolled at one of seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota voluntarily completed a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction, perceived therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, and insight gained from treatment. Starting 7/1/2021, groups were either all virtual, all in-person, or a hybrid model. The survey began on 1/1/2022. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tested for differences among treatment groups. Separate models were used for each survey question, where the dependent variable was the survey response, the test of interest being treatment group-type, with covariates of length of stay and age. Model estimates and model-based standard deviations were used to calculate the Cohen's d effect size. Results: Survey results from a total of 1037 individuals were included, one survey per respondent. Data was deidentified upon receipt of the survey, preventing specific demographic comparisons. For the hybrid groups, no significant differences were noted with survey responses relative to in-person, with negligible to small effect sizes seen. When comparing virtual to in-person, virtual was rated as significantly worse than in-person on 6 of the 8 questions; effect size estimates exceeded the small effect size cut-off, and the 95% CI exceeded the moderate cut-off. Conclusion: Creating a group model where patients can attend both virtually and in-person together appears to improve perceived therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, and treatment insight, compared to virtual-only groups, which may have a negative effect relative to in-person.

Examining the effect of prescription drug monitoring program integration and mandatory use policies on the distribution of methadone and buprenorphine for opioid use disorder, United States, 2009-2021.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been shown to reduce opioid prescribing for pain, but it is not well understood whether PDMPs influence utilization of medications for opioid use disorder. PDMP integration and mandatory use policies are two approaches implemented by states to increase use of PDMPs by prescribers. This study examined the effect of these approaches on distribution of methadone and buprenorphine from 2009 to 2021 for 50 states and DC. METHODS: The effect of PDMP integration and mandatory use policies on four outcomes (distribution of buprenorphine to opioid treatment programs, distribution of buprenorphine to pharmacies, distribution of methadone to opioid treatment programs, and the total combined distribution of methadone and buprenorphine) was estimated using a Callaway and Sant'Anna difference-in-differences model, controlling for co-occurring opioid-related state policies. RESULTS: Distribution of buprenorphine to pharmacies decreased 8 % (95 % CI -14 %, -1 %) following implementation of mandatory use policies. Distribution of methadone to opioid treatment programs increased 17 % (95 % CI 4 %, 34 %) and the total combined distribution of methadone and buprenorphine increased 6 % (95 % CI -0 %, 14 %) following the joint implementation of both approaches. CONCLUSION: Distribution of methadone and buprenorphine has increased since 2009, but less than a quarter of people with opioid use disorder currently receive these medications. We observed a small net benefit of PDMP integration and mandatory use policies on distribution of methadone and buprenorphine. Policymakers should continue to assess the impact of PDMPs on access to medications for opioid use disorder and consider additional approaches to increase access to treatment.

State inequities: Gaps in planned treatment for criminal legal referrals with opioid use disorder across two decades of US treatment admissions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Criminal-legal (CL) referrals to addiction treatment have historically had low utilization of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). While state differences have been reported, an in-depth longitudinal analysis of state-by-state differences is lacking. METHODS: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Treatment Episode Dataset-Admissions 2000-2020 provided data for individuals entering their initial treatment with an opioid as their primary substance. Outcome was planned use of MOUD, assessing odds ratio (OR) of CL referrals relative to non-CL referrals cumulatively over the 21-year period and as incremental change (change in relative disparity) using effect sizes, stratified by each state. RESULTS: 2,187,447 cases met the criteria. Planned MOUD occurred in 37.7% of non-CL clients versus 6.5% of CL clients (OR = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.12). For all clients, planned MOUD increased from 2000 (33.9%) to 2020 (44.8%). This increase was blunted within CL clients, increasing from 2000 (6.4%) to 2020 (13.3%). Rhode Island saw the greatest improvements in equity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: While rates of planned MOUD increased over the 21 years, a significant disparity persisted among CL clients in most states. As opioid use disorders and opioid-related overdoses are more prevalent among those involved with the CL system, improving this has high impact. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Provides the most comprehensive analysis of state-by-state inequities in MOUD access for CL relative to non-CL referrals over a 21-year period through use of a national data set. Positive outliers are used as case examples for others to follow in pursuit of more equitable care.

Therapeutic Content of Mobile Phone Applications for Substance Use Disorders: An Umbrella Review.

Mobile phone applications (MPAs) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment are increasingly used by patients. Although pilot studies have shown promising results, multiple previous systematic reviews noted insufficient evidence for MPA use in SUD treatment-many of the previously published reviews evaluated different trials. Subsequently, we aimed to conduct an umbrella review of previously published reviews investigating the efficacy of MPAs for SUD treatment, excluding nicotine/tobacco because umbrella reviews have been done in this population and the nicotine/tobacco MPA approach often differs from SUD-focused MPAs. No previous reviews have included a statistical meta-analysis of clinical trials to quantify an estimated overall effect. Seven reviews met inclusion criteria, and 17 unique studies with available data were taken from those reviews for the meta-analysis. Overall, reviews reported a lack of evidence for recommending MPAs for SUD treatment. However, MPA-delivered recovery support services, cognitive behavioral therapy, and contingency management were identified across multiple reviews as having promising evidence for SUD treatment. Hedges g effect size for an MPA reduction in substance use-related outcomes relative to the control arm was insignificant (0.137; 95% CI, -0.056 to 0.330; P=.16). In subgroup analysis, contingency management (1.29; 95% CI, 1.088-1.482; τ 2=0; k=2) and cognitive behavioral therapy (0.02; 95% CI, 0.001-0.030; τ 2=0; k=2) were significant. Although contingency management's effect was large, both trials were small (samples of 40 and 30). This review includes an adapted framework for the American Psychiatric Association's MPA guidelines that clinicians can implement to review MPAs critically with patients.

State-level factors associated with implementation of prescription drug monitoring program integration and mandatory use policies, United States, 2009-2020.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been widely adopted as a tool to address the prescription opioid epidemic in the United States. PDMP integration and mandatory use policies are 2 approaches states have implemented to increase use of PDMPs by prescribers. While the effectiveness of these approaches is mixed, it is unclear what factors motivated states to implement them. This study examines whether opioid dispensing, adverse health outcomes, or other non-health-related factors motivated implementation of these PDMP approaches. METHODS: Time-to-event analysis was performed using lagged state-year covariates to reflect values from the year prior. Extended Cox regression estimated the association of states' rates of opioid dispensing, prescription opioid overdose deaths, and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome with implementation of PDMP integration and mandatory use policies from 2009 to 2020, controlling for demographic and economic factors, state government and political factors, and prior opioid policies. RESULTS: In our main model, prior opioid dispensing (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.17, 4.57), neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome hospitalizations (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.09, 2.19), and number of prior opioid policies (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.13, 4.00) were associated with mandatory use policies. Prior prescription opioid overdose deaths (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08, 1.35) were also associated with mandatory use policies in a model that did not include opioid dispensing or neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. No study variables were associated with implementation of PDMP integration. CONCLUSION: Understanding state-level factors associated with implementing PDMP approaches can provide insights into factors that motivate the adoption of future public health interventions.

Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model.

Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181-255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020-2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18-40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50-2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.

Evidence of "Repeated Admission Bias" Among Those Who Use Injection Drugs Across 2 Decades of US Treatment Admissions: 2000-2020.

OBJECTIVES: Encounter-based datasets like the Treatment Episode Dataset-Admissions (TEDS-A) are used for substance use-related research. Although TEDS-A reports the number of previous treatment admissions, a limitation is this reflects encounters, not people. We sought to quantify the methodologic bias incorporated by using all encounters versus initial encounters and assess if this risk is evenly distributed across all routes of drug administration. METHODS: TEDS-A 2000-2020 dataset with nonmissing primary substance data was used. Of the data, 3.17% were missing the usual administration route, and 11.9% were missing prior admission data. Prior admissions are documented as 0 through 4, then binned for 5 or greater (5+). Risk of admission bias was defined as odds ratio (OR RAB ): odds of total admissions relative to the odds of the first admission. Bootstrap confidence intervals were generated (5000 iterations) across administration routes and demographics; however, their widths were <0.0055 and not reported. RESULTS: There were 38,238,586 admissions over the 21 years, with 13,865,517 (41.2%) first admissions. Of all admissions, 15.7% indicated injection drug use (IDU); 26.3% of encounters reporting IDU were in the 5+ group. This resulted in an OR RAB of 1.77. White enrollees had an elevated OR RAB (1.05), whereas among Latinos, OR RAB was low (0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Using encounter-based datasets can introduce bias when including all admissions versus exclusively initial treatment episodes. This report is the first to quantify this bias and shows that individuals with IDU are at highest risk for returning to treatment, thereby over-representing this method of use when all encounters are used.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation or direct current stimulation with pharmacotherapy for treatment of substance use disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have evidence for their potential in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). Medication for addiction treatment (MAT) is underutilized and not always effective. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case studies that evaluated the effectiveness of TMS or tDCS used concurrently with MAT in SUD treatment. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on 6/1/2023 by a medical librarian. Craving-related scales were extracted for an effect size calculation. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale assessed study quality. RESULTS: Eight studies (7 RCT, 1 case) including 253 individuals were published from 2015 to 2022, 5 of which had available data for meta-analysis. TMS or tDCS combined with MAT significantly reduced craving-related measures relative to sham stimulation (Hedges' g = -0.42, confidence interval: -0.73 to -0.11, p < .01). Opioid use disorder, methadone, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were the most commonly studied SUD, MAT, and target region. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant effect; however, is limited by a small number of studies with heterogeneous methodology across intervention methods and SUDs. Additional trials are needed to fully assess the clinical impact and mechanisms of combined brain stimulation and pharmacotherapy. We discuss a possible mechanism for synergism from these treatment combinations. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Adds the first systematic review of combination treatment with TMS or tDCS and MAT in SUD patients to the literature and estimates its overall effect size.

Mortality in Treatment-seeking Older Adults Receiving Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Older adults (OAs; age 55+ years) are increasingly seeking specialty treatment of opioid use disorder. Previous analyses of the Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D) database have reported higher rates of in-treatment mortality for those receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We evaluate current trends in mortality for treatment-seeking OAs. METHODS: Using the 2020 TEDS-D, logistic regression predicted in-treatment mortality for OAs from planned MOUD, service level, and interaction terms. RESULTS: Of the 26,993 OA treatment discharges, 679 people were discharged due to death (2.52%). OAs with MOUD (3.65%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.37%-3.95%) were significantly more likely to discharge due to death than those without MOUD (0.82%; 95% CI, 0.66%-1.01%). Most records were for nonintensive outpatient (83.7%; n = 22,588), which had the highest mortality (2.89%; 95% CI, 2.68%-3.11%); intensive services (n = 4405) had a mortality rate of 0.61% (95% CI, 0.42%-0.89%). Among OAs, planned MOUD with nonintensive outpatient services had a mortality rate of 4.17% (95% CI, 3.56%-4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This TEDS-D analysis extends previous literature highlighting a significant interaction between planned MOUD and service intensity on in-treatment mortality for OAs. Additional research is needed to address the causal mechanisms behind these interactions and inform the delivery of safe effective care in the growing OA population.

Collaborative decision making improves interpersonal psychotherapy efficiency: A randomized clinical trial with postpartum women.

Background: Randomized controlled trials of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) and other psychotherapies for depression have required strict adherence to protocol and do not allow for clinical judgment in deciding frequency of sessions. To determine if such protocols were more effective than allowing therapists to use their clinical judgment, we compared "Clinician-Managed" IPT (CM-IPT), in which clinicians and patients with postpartum depression were allotted 12 sessions and determined collaboratively when to use them, to a once weekly 12 session protocol ("Standard IPT"). We hypothesized that CM-IPT would be more efficient, requiring fewer sessions to reach an equivalent acute outcome, and that CM-IPT would be superior over 12 months because "saved" sessions could be used for maintenance treatment. Method: We conducted a clinical trial including 140 postpartum outpatients with DSM-IV major depression who were randomly assigned to "Standard" IPT (N= 69) or CM-IPT (N= 71). Results: Both CM-IPT and S-IPT were highly efficacious with similar outcomes by 12 weeks but CM-IPT group utilized significantly fewer sessions. Both were superior to a waitlist control. Superiority comparisons at 12 months did not favor the CM-IPT condition. Limitations: Results should be replicated in a more diverse sample to increase generalizability. Conclusions: CM-IPT is more efficient in treating acute depression than mandated weekly IPT. Further, permitting clinicians and patients to use their collaborative judgment is likely to be a more efficient and effective way to conduct future research and to implement evidence-based psychotherapy in the community.

Evidence of telescoping in females across two decades of US treatment admissions for injection drug use: 2000-2020.

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) have an increased risk of soft tissue infection, drug overdose and death. Females may be particularly vulnerable due to barriers to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment entry, stigma, and telescoping, or the greater severity in substance use-related comorbidity and consequences despite a shorter history of use. We set out to identify sex differences in United States injection drug use (IDU). Methods: The Treatment Episode Dataset-Admission (2000-2020) provided data to identify PWID undergoing their initial SUD treatment admission. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, and Spearman correlations were used for ordinal variables, categorical variables, and to assess similarity of male/female trends over the 21 years, respectively. The probabilistic index (PI) and Cramer's V provided effect sizes for Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square tests, respectively. Results: A total of 13,612,978 records existed for cases entering their initial treatment. Mapping to a history of IDU left 1,458,695 (561,793 females). Females had a higher prevalence among PWID across all 21 years; IDU trends were essentially identical between males and females (r = 0.97). Females endorsed beginning their primary substance later in life (PI = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and entered treatment after a shorter period of substance use (PI = 0.57, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: We saw evidence of telescoping among PWID with a SUD entering their initial episode of treatment. Interventions should be implemented prior to the transition to IDU, and this window of opportunity is shortened in females. Utilizing gender-responsive treatment options may be a way to increase treatment-seeking earlier in the disease course.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (CCL) in "Kasabach-Merritt syndrome" (KMS) (Kaposi-tumor like hemangioendothelioma with case-specific perioperative management).

Objectives: The Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS) is characterized by the occurrence of hemangioendothelioma (giant hemangioma with thrombosis leading to thrombocytopenia), which can be associated with disseminated intravasal coagulation. Specific aim: Based on (i) selective references from the current scientific literature and derived recommendations as well as (ii) own experiences obtained in the diagnostic and perioperative management of a representative case from daily practice in abdominal surgery, the specific case undergoing elective cholecystectomy (CCE) in KMS is to be described by means of scientific case report. Case presentation: (Patient-, finding- and treatment-specific characteristics): - Medical history: 72-years old female patient with a known KMS of the left arm and upper thorax, recurrent thrombophlebitis of the left arm and thoracic veins, previous upper GI bleeding (Mallory-Weiss syndrome in 2006, chronic anemia in lack of vitamin B12, type-A gastritis, former bleeding complications after teeth extraction/open appendectomy 1962/Caesarean section 1968 with need of transfusion [60 red blood cell packages]), intraabdominal adhesions, hypothyreosis, initial liver cirrhosis. - Symptomatology: Characteristic for cholecystolithiasis (CCL). - Diagnostic: Abdominal ultrasound shows CCL, fibroscan does not confirm suspicious cirrhosis. Laboratory parameters showed: Activation of intravasal coagulation with elevated prothrombin fragments, D-dimers and reduced antiplasmin concentration. Accelerated fibrinolysis capacity; currently, no secondary thrombocytopenia or factor-13 decrease. In addition, fibrinogen concentration within normal range, no hint onto the manifestation of an aquired von-Willebrand's syndrome. - Diagnosis: Chronic fibrosing cholecystitis in CCL after former acute cholecystitis (3 months ago) with indication for surgical intervention. - Therapy: Laparoscopic CCE including careful exploration of upper abdominal cavity for KMS manifestation (with no revision of bile duct) and peritoneal adhesiolysis (histological finding, chronic fibrosing cholecystitis with thickening of the wall of the gall bladder but no hint of malignancy) under perioperative prophylaxis with antibiotics and temporary cessation of platelet medication for 7 d preoperatively, "bridging" with low molecular weight heparin (Clexane, 1 × 40 mg s.c.; Sanofi-Aventis, Frankfurt/Main, Germany); 1 h preoperatively, 15-20 mg/kg body weight Cyclocapron i.v. (once again 6-8 h postoperatively; thereafter, 500 mg of Cyclocapron 4×/d until the 3rd postoperative day). - Intraoperatively: Congestion of veins but not at the immediate surgical field (gall bladder, hepatic bed of the gall bladder, Calot's triangle). - Outcome: Uneventful, in particular, no (bleeding) complications. Conclusions: If surgical approach is indicated, the intervention should be thoroughly planned (in particular, under elective circumstances) with regard to hemangioma site and extension as well as distance to the surgical field and possible surgical alternative options (surgical access site, open/laparoscopic approach etc.) to prevent - at the best possible rate - bleeding complications intra-/postoperatively and, thus, to provide adequate patient safety.

Recovery Capital Correlates With Less Methamphetamine Use and Crime in the Community.

OBJECTIVES: Reentry postcorrectional involvement is a high-risk time for patients with a history of addiction. We investigated whether participation in an addiction medicine clinic with active case management led to improvements in patients' recovery capital and whether there were associated changes in criminal activity and co-occurring methamphetamine or alcohol use. METHODS: Participants (n = 136) were patients with an opioid or stimulant use disorder who had Department of Corrections involvement in the preceding year, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and reported criminal activity and days of methamphetamine or alcohol use twice over a 6-month study. Three logistic regression models were used to assess changes in total ARC with criminal activity, alcohol use, and methamphetamine use over the previous 30 days. RESULTS: Baseline mean (SD) ARC scores were 34.1 (11.1) and increased to a mean (SD) score of 40.3 (9.4) at study end. A 1-SD shift in ARC was significantly protective across outcomes, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.32, 0.18, and 0.34 for any past 30-day criminal activity, alcohol use, or methamphetamine use. There was no significant difference in baseline ARC, crimes committed, days of alcohol use, or days of methamphetamine use for study completers versus noncompleters; however, unmeasured confounders may have had a differential impact on retention. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery capital provides an additional framework to help address patients' substance use and criminal activity in a multifaceted way, which is especially important in the postincarceration community. Recovery capital is dynamic and has multiple areas to target psychosocial interventions.

Recovery Capital Gains May Precede Craving Reduction in Opioid Use Disorder.

Purpose: Cravings for drugs and alcohol have been significantly associated with worse treatment outcomes. We investigated if improvements in recovery capital (RC) (eg, a measure of social capital/network, financial resources, education, and cultural factors) over time were associated with decreased reported cravings. Patients and Methods: The original cohort consisted of 133 participants (63 females) with opioid use disorder seeking outpatient treatment, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) (range 0 to 50) and the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) thrice over the 6-month study. Intervention was medication and case management. Analysis included one-way mixed models testing change over time for ARC total scores and single question craving rating (5-point Likert scale). Cross-lagged panel estimates used structural equation models with variables z-scored, allowing for path coefficient evaluation as standard deviations (sd). Results: Total ARC significantly increased over the study (χ2 = 33.77, df = 2, p < 0.0001), with baseline of 36.6 (n = 114, sd = 11.1) and 6-month of 41.2 (n = 107, sd = 9.5). Craving also changed significantly (χ2 = 8.51, df = 2, p < 0.015), with baseline of 1.1 (n = 101, sd = 1.2) and 6-month of 0.9 (n = 107, sd = 1.1). The cross-lag from baseline RC to 3-month craving was significant (ß = -0.28, SE = 0.11, z = -2.53, p < 0.011). The converse was not true; baseline craving did not affect later RC. Results were similarly significant when comparing 3-month to 6-month. The majority of sample was on buprenorphine. Conclusion: As RC improves, the reported cravings at both 3- and 6-month study time points are significantly reduced. When evaluated inversely, there was not a significant association with baseline cravings and follow-up RC. Significant path coefficients provide an estimation of a directional effect from increased RC towards craving reduction.

Sex Differences in Recovery Capital Gains Post-Incarceration.

BACKGROUND: People with substance use disorders are highly prevalent in the carceral system. Recovery capital (RC) is the resources available to an individual to initiate or maintain substance use cessation. Sex differences have been identified in RC during both active substance use and recovery in the general population, however, less is known about these sex differences in the post-incarceration population. METHODS: Participants (n = 136) were those with an opioid or stimulant use disorder with past year involvement with the Iowa criminal justice system (USA), who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) twice over a six-month cohort study. Participants were involved in an addiction clinic that utilized active case management. Analysis of covariance evaluated changes in ARC during the study. Separate models compared total ARC and individual ARC domains, with sex as the independent variable of interest. Model means were generated for interpretation based on sex, comparing baseline and study endpoint ARC scores. RESULTS: There were no baseline sex differences in total ARC. ARC increased significantly for the group, however, males showed disproportionate growth. Females ended the study with a mean ARC of 37.8 (SD= 9.3) and males finished at 41.6 (SD= 9.3), which was a significant difference (p = 0.044); this significant difference was driven by ARC subdomains of 'Psychological Health' and 'Physical Health.' CONCLUSIONS: People post-incarceration are at high risk for return to substance use. Treatment that is informed by sex-based differences may have the potential to decrease the differing rates of growth in RC between sexes.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities and Prevalence in Prescription Drug Misuse, Illicit Drug Use, and Combination of Both Behaviors in the United States.

This study examines racial and ethnic disparities and prevalence in prescription drug misuse, illicit drug use, and the combination of both behaviors in the United States. Using five waves of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH, 2015-2019; n = 276,884), a multinomial logistic regression model estimated the outcomes of prescription drug misuse, illicit drug use, and the combination of both behaviors. Participants' age was considered as an interaction effect. Approximately 5.4%, 2.9%, and 2.5% misused prescription drug, used illicit drug, or had both behaviors, respectively. Compared with White participants, Black (AOR = 0.69, 99.9 CI: 0.61, 0.79) and Asian (AOR = 0.60, 99.9% CI: 0.42, 0.87) participants had significantly lower odds of reporting prescription drug misuse. Individuals who were classified as others had higher odds of reporting illicit drug use (AOR = 1.31; 99.9% CI: 1.05, 1.64), compared with White participants. Black (AOR = 0.40, 99.9% CI: 0.29, 0.56) and Hispanic (AOR = 0.71, 99.9% CI: 0.55, 0.91) participants were significantly less likely to have both prescription drug misuse and illicit drug use behaviors. Interaction analysis showed that Black participants between 18 and 49 years old were less likely to participate in prescription drug misuse. However, Black participants who were 50 years of age or above were more likely to engage in illicit drug use and the combination of both prescription drug misuse and illicit drug use (all p < 0.001). Hispanic adult participants between 18 and 49 years old were more likely to engage in illicit drug use. Successful intervention and cessation programs may consider the cultural and age disparities among different racial and ethnic groups.

Improvements in recovery capital are associated with decreased alcohol use in a primary opioid use disorder treatment-seeking cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Comorbid substance use can negatively impact multiple aspects of treatment for patients with an opioid use disorder (OUD). We investigated if treatment for OUD led to improvements in patients' recovery capital (RC) overtime, and whether there were associated changes in co-occurring alcohol use. METHODS: Participants (n = 133) were patients with OUD seeking outpatient treatment, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and reported drinking days per 30-day period thrice over the 6-month study. No specific treatments targeting alcohol were used. Two different models were employed to assess changes in total ARC score and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for past 30-day abstinence. RESULTS: Baseline mean ARC scores were 36.6 and significantly increased to mean score of 41.2 at study end. Ninety-one participants (68.4%) reported no alcohol use at baseline, and 97 (78.9%) reported no use in the previous 30 days at study endpoint. For each increase in ARC, there was an aOR 1.07 (confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.13) for past 30-day abstinence. Considering ARC standard deviation of 10.33 over all measurements, this equates to an aOR of 2.10 (CI: 1.22-3.62) for past 30-day abstinence. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: We saw significantly increased aOR for past 30-day abstinence as RC improved in an OUD treatment-seeking population. This difference was not caused by differences in ARC between study completers and noncompleters. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Showcases how RC growth may be protective of past 30-day alcohol use in an OUD cohort and adds specific aOR for abstinence per ARC increase.

Language considerations for children of parents with substance use disorders.

Parents with substance use disorders are highly stigmatized by multiple systems (e.g., healthcare, education, legal, social). As a result, they are more likely to experience discrimination and health inequities [1, 2]. Children of parents with substance use disorders often do not fare any better, as they frequently experience stigma and poorer outcomes by association [3, 4]. Calls to action for person-centered language for alcohol and other drug problems have led to improved terminology [5-8]. Despite a long history of stigmatizing, offensive labels such as "children of alcoholics" and "crack babies," children have been left out of person-centered language initiatives. Children of parents with substance use disorders can feel invisible, shameful, isolated, and forgotten-particularly in treatment settings when programming is centered on the parent [9, 10]. Person-centered language is shown to improve treatment outcomes and reduce stigma [11, 12]. Therefore, we need to adhere to consistent, non-stigmatizing terminology when referencing children of parents with substance use disorders. Most importantly, we must center the voices and preferences of those with lived experience to enact meaningful change and effective resource allocation.