Challenge Accepted: Lead Extraction in a Patient with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Right Superior Vena Cava Occlusion.

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is an anatomic variant that is relatively uncommon in the general population. Lead extraction through PLSVC is extremely rare. Due to unusual anatomy, the procedure carries challenges that require special considerations and careful planning. The authors report a case of lead extraction through a PLSVC with occluded right superior vena cava and highlight the challenges and outcomes of the procedure.

Dissecting antibiotic effects on the cell envelope using bacterial cytological profiling: a phenotypic analysis starter kit.

Phenotypic analysis assays such as bacterial cytological profiling (BCP) have become increasingly popular for antibiotic mode of action analysis. A plethora of dyes, protein fusions, and reporter strains are available and have been used for this purpose, enabling both rapid mode of action categorization and in-depth analysis of antibiotic mechanisms. However, non-expert researchers may struggle choosing suitable assays and interpreting results. This is a particular problem for antibiotics that have multiple or complex targets, such as the bacterial cell envelope. Here, we set out to curate a minimal set of accessible and affordable phenotypic assays that allow distinction between membrane and cell wall targets, can identify dual-action inhibitors, and can be implemented in most research environments. To this end, we employed BCP, membrane potential, fluidity, and cell wall synthesis assays. To assess specificity and ease of interpretation, we tested three well-characterized and commercially available reference antibiotics: the potassium ionophore valinomycin, the lipid II-binding glycopeptide vancomycin, and the dual-action lantibiotic nisin, which binds lipid II and forms a membrane pore. Based on our experiments, we suggest a minimal set of BCP, a membrane-potentiometric probe, and fluorescent protein fusions to MinD and MreB as basic assay set and recommend complementing these assays with Laurdan-based fluidity measurements and a PliaI reporter fusion, where indicated. We believe that our results can provide guidance for researchers who wish to use phenotypic analysis for mode of action studies but do not possess the specialized equipment or expert knowledge to employ the full breadth of possible techniques.IMPORTANCEPhenotypic analysis assays using specialized fluorescence fusions and dyes have become increasingly popular in antibiotic mode of action analysis. However, it can be difficult to implement these methods due to the need for specialized equipment and/or the complexity of bacterial cell biology and physiology, making the interpretation of results difficult for non-experts. This is especially problematic for compounds that have multiple or pleiotropic effects, such as inhibitors of the bacterial cell envelope. In order to make phenotypic analysis assays accessible to labs, whose primary expertise is not bacterial cell biology, or with limited equipment and resources, a set of simple and broadly accessible assays is needed that is easy to implement, execute, and interpret. Here, we have curated a set of assays and strains that does not need highly specialized equipment, can be performed in most labs, and is straightforward to interpret without knowing the intricacies of bacterial cell biology.

Alleviation of C⋠C Mismatches in DNA by the Escherichia coli Fpg Protein.

DNA polymerase III mis-insertion may, where not corrected by its 3'→ 5' exonuclease or the mismatch repair (MMR) function, result in all possible non-cognate base pairs in DNA generating base substitutions. The most thermodynamically unstable base pair, the cytosine (C)⋅C mismatch, destabilizes adjacent base pairs, is resistant to correction by MMR in Escherichia coli, and its repair mechanism remains elusive. We present here in vitro evidence that C⋅C mismatch can be processed by base excision repair initiated by the E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) protein. The k cat for C⋅C is, however, 2.5 to 10 times lower than for its primary substrate 8-oxoguanine (oxo8G)⋅C, but approaches those for 5,6-dihydrothymine (dHT)⋅C and thymine glycol (Tg)⋅C. The K M values are all in the same range, which indicates efficient recognition of C⋅C mismatches in DNA. Fpg activity was also exhibited for the thymine (T)⋅T mismatch and for N 4- and/or 5-methylated C opposite C or T, Fpg activity being enabled on a broad spectrum of DNA lesions and mismatches by the flexibility of the active site loop. We hypothesize that Fpg plays a role in resolving C⋅C in particular, but also other pyrimidine⋅pyrimidine mismatches, which increases survival at the cost of some mutagenesis.

Analysis of Tuberculosis Meningitis Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Tuberculosis (TB) is the most prevalent infectious disease in the world. In recent years there has been a significant increase in the incidence of TB due to the emergence of multidrug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) and the increased numbers of highly susceptible immuno-compromised individuals. Central nervous system TB, includes TB meningitis (TBM-the most common presentation), intracranial tuberculomas, and spinal tuberculous arachnoiditis. Individuals with TBM have an initial phase of malaise, headache, fever, or personality change, followed by protracted headache, stroke, meningismus, vomiting, confusion, and focal neurologic findings in two to three weeks. If untreated, mental status deteriorates into stupor or coma. Delay in the treatment of TBM results in, either death or substantial neurological morbidity. This review provides latest developments in the biomedical research on TB meningitis mainly in the areas of host immune responses, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease.

An innovative approach to identifying learning needs for intrinsic CanMEDS roles in continuing professional development.

CONTEXT: The CanMEDS framework promotes the development of competencies required to be an effective physician. However, it is still not well understood how to apply such frameworks to CPD contexts, particularly with respect to intrinsic competencies. OBJECTIVE: This study explores whether physician narratives around challenging cases would provide information regarding learning needs that could help guide the development of CPD activities for intrinsic CanMEDS competencies. METHODS: We surveyed medical and surgical specialists from Southern Ontario using an online survey. To assess perceived needs, participants were asked, 'Describe three CPD topic you would like to learn about in the next 12 months'. To identify learning needs that may have arisen from problems encountered in practice, participants were asked, 'Describe three challenging situations encountered in the past 12 months.' Responses to the two open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Responses were received from 411 physicians, resulting in 226 intrinsic CanMEDS codes for perceived learning needs and 210 intrinsic codes for challenges encountered in practices. Discrepancies in the frequency of intrinsic roles were observed between the two questions. Specifically, Leader (28%), Scholar (43%), and Professional (16%) roles were frequently described perceived learning needs, as opposed to challenges in practice (Leader: 3%; Scholar: 2%; and Professional: 8%. Conversely, Communicator 39%, Health Advocate 39%, and to a lesser extent Collaborator 11%) roles were frequently described in narratives surrounding challenges in practice, but appeared in <10% of descriptions of perceived learning needs (Communicator: 4%; Health Advocate 6%; Collaborator: 3%). CONCLUSION: The present study provides insight into potential learning needs associated with intrinsic CanMEDS competencies. Discrepancies in the frequency of intrinsic CanMEDS roles coded for perceived learning needs and challenges encountered in practice may provide insight into the selection and design of CPD activities.

Excision of the doubly methylated base N4,5-dimethylcytosine from DNA by Escherichia coli Nei and Fpg proteins.

Cytosine (C) in DNA is often modified to 5-methylcytosine (m5C) to execute important cellular functions. Despite the significance of m5C for epigenetic regulation in mammals, damage to m5C has received little attention. For instance, almost no studies exist on erroneous methylation of m5C by alkylating agents to doubly or triply methylated bases. Owing to chemical evidence, and because many prokaryotes express methyltransferases able to convert m5C into N4,5-dimethylcytosine (m N4,5C) in DNA, m N4,5C is probably present in vivo We screened a series of glycosylases from prokaryotic to human and found significant DNA incision activity of the Escherichia coli Nei and Fpg proteins at m N4,5C residues in vitro The activity of Nei was highest opposite cognate guanine followed by adenine, thymine (T) and C. Fpg-complemented Nei by exhibiting the highest activity opposite C followed by lower activity opposite T. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a repair enzyme activity at a further methylated m5C in DNA, as well as the first alkylated base allocated as a Nei or Fpg substrate. Based on our observed high sensitivity to nuclease S1 digestion, we suggest that m N4,5C occurs as a disturbing lesion in DNA and that Nei may serve as a major DNA glycosylase in E. coli to initiate its repair.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Frontiers in epigenetic chemical biology'.

Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The presence of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device has long been a contraindication for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We established a prospective registry to determine the risks associated with MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla for patients who had a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) that was "non-MRI-conditional" (i.e., not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for MRI scanning). METHODS: Patients in the registry were referred for clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at a field strength of 1.5 tesla. Devices were interrogated before and after MRI with the use of a standardized protocol and were appropriately reprogrammed before the scanning. The primary end points were death, generator or lead failure, induced arrhythmia, loss of capture, or electrical reset during the scanning. The secondary end points were changes in device settings. RESULTS: MRI was performed in 1000 cases in which patients had a pacemaker and in 500 cases in which patients had an ICD. No deaths, lead failures, losses of capture, or ventricular arrhythmias occurred during MRI. One ICD generator could not be interrogated after MRI and required immediate replacement; the device had not been appropriately programmed per protocol before the MRI. We observed six cases of self-terminating atrial fibrillation or flutter and six cases of partial electrical reset. Changes in lead impedance, pacing threshold, battery voltage, and P-wave and R-wave amplitude exceeded prespecified thresholds in a small number of cases. Repeat MRI was not associated with an increase in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, device or lead failure did not occur in any patient with a non-MRI-conditional pacemaker or ICD who underwent clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at 1.5 tesla, was appropriately screened, and had the device reprogrammed in accordance with the prespecified protocol. (Funded by St. Jude Medical and others; MagnaSafe ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00907361 .).

Focal impulse and rotor modulation: Acute procedural observations and extended clinical follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) was based on the premise that atrial fibrillation (AF) is sustained by rotors that are sufficiently stable to be eliminated by targeted ablation. Early experience reported high success as compared to conventional strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report on a single-center experience with extended follow-up by using FIRM in a variety of patients with AF. METHODS: All FIRM-guided ablation procedures were included. During spontaneous or induced AF, FIRM software constructed phase maps to identify putative AF sources, then targeted for radiofrequency ablation, with adjunctive pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), if needed. All mapped rotors and/or sources were eliminated on the basis of repeated FIRM mapping. RESULTS: Of 47 patients, sustained AF was not present or induced in 4 patients who did not undergo FIRM ablation. Of the remaining 43 patients, prior AF was paroxysmal in 9 (21%) and 72% had a median of 1 prior PVI. Spontaneous AF (n = 22, 52%) and induced AF (n = 21, 49%) were mapped, and all patients had rotors identified (1.8 ± 0.8 per patient; 70% in the left atrium). AF termination occurred in 2 patients (5%) and none organized to atrial tachycardia. Touch-up redo PVI was also performed in 31 patients (72%). At 16.0 ± 10.7 months (range 1-34 months), only 9 patients (21%) were free of recurrent AF; and only 5 patients (12%) were free of AF and off antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSION: Long-term clinical results after FIRM ablation in this diverse challenging cohort showed poor efficacy. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical utility of the FIRM ablation approach for treating AF.

Risk Stratification for Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Pre-Excitation: A Systematic Review for the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature systematically to determine whether noninvasive or invasive risk stratification, such as with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation, reduces the risk of arrhythmic events and improves patient outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all January 1, 1970, through August 31, 2014) were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies examining noninvasive or invasive risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation. Studies were rejected for low-quality design or the lack of an outcome, population, intervention, or comparator of interest or if they were written in a language other than English. RESULTS: Of 778 citations found, 9 studies met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this paper. Of the 9 studies, 1 had a dual design-a randomized controlled trial of ablation versus no ablation in 76 patients and an uncontrolled prospective cohort of 148 additional patients-and 8 were uncontrolled prospective cohort studies (n=1594). In studies reporting a mean age, the range was 32 to 50 years, and in studies reporting a median age, the range was 19 to 36 years. The majority of patients were male (range, 50% to 74%), and <10% had structural heart disease. In the randomized controlled trial component of the dual-design study, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of arrhythmic events were 7% among patients who underwent ablation and 77% among patients who did not undergo ablation (relative risk reduction: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.33; P<0.001). In the observational cohorts of asymptomatic patients who did not undergo catheter ablation (n=883, with follow-up ranging from 8 to 96 months), regular supraventricular tachycardia or benign atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval >250 ms) developed in 0% to 16%, malignant atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval ≤250 ms) in 0% to 9%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0% to 2%, most of whom were children in the last case. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence suggests risk stratification with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation may be beneficial, along with consideration of accessory-pathway ablation in those deemed to be at high risk of future arrhythmias. Given the limitations of the existing data, well-designed and well-conducted studies are needed.

Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation: A systematic review for the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature systematically to determine whether noninvasive or invasive risk stratification, such as with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation, reduces the risk of arrhythmic events and improves patient outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all January 1, 1970, through August 31, 2014) were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies examining noninvasive or invasive risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation. Studies were rejected for low-quality design or the lack of an outcome, population, intervention, or comparator of interest or if they were written in a language other than English. RESULTS: Of 778 citations found, 9 studies met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this paper. Of the 9 studies, 1 had a dual design-a randomized controlled trial of ablation versus no ablation in 76 patients and an uncontrolled prospective cohort of 148 additional patients-and 8 were uncontrolled prospective cohort studies (n=1,594). In studies reporting a mean age, the range was 32 to 50 years, and in studies reporting a median age, the range was 19 to 36 years. The majority of patients were male (range, 50% to 74%), and <10% had structural heart disease. In the randomized controlled trial component of the dual-design study, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of arrhythmic events were 7% among patients who underwent ablation and 77% among patients who did not undergo ablation (relative risk reduction: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.33; p<0.001). In the observational cohorts of asymptomatic patients who did not undergo catheter ablation (n=883, with follow-up ranging from 8 to 96 months), regular supraventricular tachycardia or benign atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval >250 ms) developed in 0% to 16%, malignant atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval ≤250 ms) in 0% to 9%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0% to 2%, most of whom were children in the last case. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence suggests risk stratification with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation may be beneficial, along with consideration of accessory-pathway ablation in those deemed to be at high risk of future arrhythmias. Given the limitations of the existing data, well-designed and well-conducted studies are needed.

Risk Stratification for Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Pre-Excitation: A Systematic Review for the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature systematically to determine whether noninvasive or invasive risk stratification, such as with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation, reduces the risk of arrhythmic events and improves patient outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all January 1, 1970, through August 31, 2014) were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies examining noninvasive or invasive risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation. Studies were rejected for low-quality design or the lack of an outcome, population, intervention, or comparator of interest or if they were written in a language other than English. RESULTS: Of 778 citations found, 9 studies met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this paper. Of the 9 studies, 1 had a dual design-a randomized controlled trial of ablation versus no ablation in 76 patients and an uncontrolled prospective cohort of 148 additional patients-and 8 were uncontrolled prospective cohort studies (n=1,594). In studies reporting a mean age, the range was 32 to 50 years, and in studies reporting a median age, the range was 19 to 36 years. The majority of patients were male (range, 50% to 74%), and <10% had structural heart disease. In the randomized controlled trial component of the dual-design study, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of arrhythmic events were 7% among patients who underwent ablation and 77% among patients who did not undergo ablation (relative risk reduction: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.33; p<0.001). In the observational cohorts of asymptomatic patients who did not undergo catheter ablation (n=883, with follow-up ranging from 8 to 96 months), regular supraventricular tachycardia or benign atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval >250 ms) developed in 0% to 16%, malignant atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval ≤250 ms) in 0% to 9%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0% to 2%, most of whom were children in the last case. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence suggests risk stratification with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation may be beneficial, along with consideration of accessory-pathway ablation in those deemed to be at high risk of future arrhythmias. Given the limitations of the existing data, well-designed and well-conducted studies are needed.

Sex Differences in Device Therapies for Ventricular Arrhythmias or Death in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that women with ischemic heart disease are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). We evaluated the influence of sex on arrhythmic events or death in subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arrhythmic event rates, defined as VT/VF treated with defibrillator therapy or all-cause death, were determined among 1,790 subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT with documented 3-year follow-up. Predictors of VT/VF/death were identified using multivariate analysis. Ninety-one (21%) women and 466 (35%) men experienced VT/VF/death over the follow-up period. The overall probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women versus men (HR 0.62; P < 0.001). The probability of VT/VF/death was the lowest in women with ischemic heart disease (HR 0.51; P = 0.003). In ICD subjects, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was lower in ischemic women versus men (P = 0.021), and in nonischemic women versus men (P = 0.049). The probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women (HR 0.52; P = 0.007) and men (HR 0.74; P = 0.018) with LBBB who received CRT-D. Appropriate shock therapy strongly correlated with increased risk of death during postshock follow-up in women (HR 5.18; P = 0.001) and men (HR 1.63; P = 0.033); interaction P value of 0.034. CONCLUSION: In this substudy of MADIT-CRT, sex, etiology of heart disease and type of device implanted significantly influenced subsequent risk for VT/VF or death. Women with ischemic heart disease and women with LBBB who received CRT-D had the lowest incidence of VT/VF or death when compared to men. Appropriate shock therapy was a strong predictor of death, particularly in women.

Multicenter experience with extraction of the Riata/Riata ST ICD lead.

BACKGROUND: In November 2011, the Food and Drug Administration issued a class I recall of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Management recommendations regarding the recall have remained controversial. OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the safety and feasibility of extraction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads are limited. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing extraction of Riata/Riata ST leads at 11 centers. RESULTS: Between July 2003 and April 2013, 577 Riata/Riata ST leads were extracted from 577 patients (Riata 467, [84%]; Riata ST 89, [16%]). Complete procedural success achieved in 99.1%. The cohort was 78% men, with a mean age of 60 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 34% ± 14%. The mean implant duration was 44.7 months (range 0-124.6 months). The majority of leads extracted were for infection (305 [53.0%]) and 220 (35.7%) for lead malfunction. Evaluation for lead integrity was performed in 295 cases. Of these, 34.9% were found to have externalized cables. Implant duration was significantly longer in leads with externalized cables (P < .0001). No difference in lead integrity was noted between Riata and Riata ST leads (11.7% vs. 17.7% failure; P = .23). Among leads in which cable externalization was noted, laser sheaths were used more frequently (P = .01). Major complications included 3 superior vena cava/right ventricular perforations requiring surgical intervention with 1 death 12 days after the procedure and 1 pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous drainage (0.87%). CONCLUSION: Extraction of the Riata/Riata ST leads can be challenging, and leads with externalized cables may require specific extraction techniques. Extraction of the Riata/Riata ST leads can be performed safely by experienced operators at high-volume centers with a complication rate comparable to published data.

Comparative safety of periablation anticoagulation strategies for atrial fibrillation: data from a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: There are a variety of periprocedural anticoagulation strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, including the use of dabigatran. It is unclear which strategy is superior. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with uninterrupted warfarin, dabigatran, and warfarin with heparin bridging in patients undergoing ablation of AF at four experienced centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis, 882 patients (mean age: 61 ± 11 years) underwent ablation of AF using uninterrupted warfarin (n = 276), dabigatran (n = 374), or warfarin with heparin bridging (n = 232) for periprocedural anticoagulation. The rate of total complications was 23/276 (8.3%) in the uninterrupted warfarin group, 30/374 (8.0%) in the dabigatran group, and 29/232 (12.5%) in the bridged group (P = 0.15). Major complications were more frequent in the uninterrupted warfarin group 12/276 (4.3%) compared with 3/374 (0.8%) in dabigatran and 6/232 (2.6%) in the bridged group (P = 0.01). The most common major complication was the need for transfusion or occurrence of major bleeding. Minor complications did not differ among the three groups. On multivariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.19, P = 0.011), bridging heparin (OR 2.13, CI 1.100-3.941, P = 0.016), use of triple antithrombotic therapy (OR 1.77, CI 1.05-2.98, P = 0.033), and prior myocardial infarction (OR 2.40, CI 1.01-5.67, P = 0.046) independently predicted total complications. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the use of uninterrupted warfarin, dabigatran, and warfarin with heparin bridging in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF, dabigatran was not associated with increased risk, major complications were more common in the uninterrupted warfarin group, and after adjustment, warfarin with bridging increased total complications.

Very long-term outcome after initially successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using pulmonary vein isolation is indicated when patients do not respond favorably to medical therapy. Successful procedures are accomplished in the majority of patients, but the outcome after many years of follow-up after ablation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term recurrence rate and pattern of AF after successful ablation. METHODS: A prospectively identified cohort of 445 patients who demonstrated freedom from AF for at least 1 year postablation (single procedure in 391 [87.9%]) was followed for 66.0 ± 34.0 months. Patients were seen at least annually as outpatients and underwent regular electrocardiographic monitoring. RESULTS: At 40.7 ± 27.0 months postablation, 97 (21.8%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of recurrent AF. The vast majority of events were symptomatic, and no serious clinical events were associated with AF recurrence (eg, stroke). There was a steady attrition rate reaching 16.3% and 29.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 29 patients (29.5%) of the patients, recurrences were self-limited; the remainder required either medical therapy or repeat ablation. By multivariate analysis, persistent AF (hazard ratio 3.08; P < .0001) and hypertension (hazard ratio 1.08; P = .009) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of AF. The presence of both factors placed the patient at high risk of recurrence: 37.6% at 5 years and 68.8% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Over the decade after a successful ablation of AF, most patients continue to demonstrate freedom from AF. At the highest risk of very late recurrence is the subset of patients with hypertension and prior persistent AF.

Comparison of endovascular versus epicardial lead placement for resynchronization therapy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve survival and symptoms in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, congestive heart failure, and prolonged QRS duration. LV lead placement is achieved by placing the lead in the coronary sinus, an endovascular approach, or by a minimally invasive robotic-assisted thoracoscopic epicardial approach. There are no data directly comparing the 2 methods. Patients eligible for CRT were randomized to the endovascular and epicardial arms. Coronary sinus lead placement was achieved using the standard technique, and epicardial leads were placed using a minimally invasive robotic-assisted thoracoscopic approach. The primary end point was a decrease in LV end-systolic volume index at 6 months. The secondary end points included 30-day mortality rate, measures of clinical improvement, 1-year electrical lead performance, and 1-year survival rate. The relative improvement of LV end-systolic volume index from baseline to 6 months was similar between the arms (28.8% for the transvenous [n = 12] vs 30.5% for the epicardial (n = 9) arm, p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points between the 2 groups. In conclusion, there were no differences in echocardiographic and clinical outcomes comparing a conventional endovascular approach versus robotic-assisted surgical epicardial LV lead placement for CRT in patients with heart failure. Surgical approaches are still a viable alternative when a transvenous procedure has failed or is not technically feasible.

Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence, risk factors, and the effect of the AigisRx antibacterial envelope.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and risk factors for CIED infection, to develop a scoring index for risk stratification, and to analyze the effect of the AIGISRx envelope on infection rates. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a CIED procedure were identified and surveyed for 6 months for the development of an infection necessitating removal of all implanted hardware. RESULTS: In the pre-envelope era, an infection occurred in 25 (1.5%) of 1651 patients. After its availability, an envelope was used in 275 (22%) of 1240 patients; an infection occurred in 8 (0.6%) patients in this era (P = .029 vs pre-envelope). In the overall cohort of 2891 patients, the infection rate was 1.2% and 3.5% in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device, respectively (P = .018); in these patients, 7 independent risk factors predicted infection: early pocket re-exploration, male sex, diabetes, upgrade procedure, heart failure, hypertension, and glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min. A composite risk score (0-25; C index 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) was created by weight, adjusting these 7 factors: 3 groups emerged-low risk (score 0-7; 1% infection), medium risk (score 8-14; 3.4% infection), and high risk (score ≥15; 11.1% infection). The envelope reduced infections by 79% and 100% in the medium- and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CIED infection most commonly occurred in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device. A composite score based on clinical variables appeared feasible for infection risk stratification. The AIGISRx envelope significantly lowered the risk of CIED infection. Randomized clinical data are warranted.

Correlation of QT interval correction methods during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.

The calculation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) is particularly problematic in patients during atrial fibrillation (AF). The aims of this study were to compare the QTc calculated using Bazett's formula in AF and sinus rhythm (SR) and determine whether alternative methods for QT correction were superior to Bazett's, in an effort to define the optimal method for QT correction in patients with AF. We evaluated consecutive patients with persistent AF admitted for initiation of dofetilide. The QT interval was corrected according to the following formulas: Bazett's, Fridericia, and Framingham. We compared the QTc interval on the last electrocardiogram in AF to the first electrocardiogram in SR. The cohort included 54 patients (age 60 ± 10 years, 80% men) with persistent AF for a median of 36 months. Bazett's overestimated QTc during AF compared with SR (464 ± 34 vs 445 ± 38 ms, p = 0.008); in contrast, Framingham underestimated it (385 ± 48 vs 431 ± 40 ms, p <0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the QTc interval in AF and SR when assessed by Fridericia (435 ± 33 vs 440 ± 35 ms, p = 0.46). There were 24 dofetilide dose reductions based on Bazett's QTc; this would have been avoided in 33% of patients had Fridericia been used. In conclusion, the commonly used Bazett's formula leads to an overestimation of the QTc during AF. This may result in unnecessary reduction in antiarrhythmic doses and thus drug efficacy. These data suggest that the Fridericia most closely approximates the QTc during AF to QTc during SR.

Long-term ECG monitoring using an implantable loop recorder for the detection of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial flutter who undergo cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring may identify new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: To ascertain, through the use of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) with a dedicated AF detection algorithm, the incidence, duration, and burden of new AF in these patients and to develop an optimal postablation ECG monitoring strategy. METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients with flutter, a CHADS2 score of 2-3, and no prior episode of AF. After cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, we implanted an ILR, which was interrogated routinely; all stored ECGs were adjudicated. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 382 ± 218 days, 3 patterns were observed. First, in 11 (55%) patients, stored ECGs confirmed AF at 62 ± 38 days after ablation. Second, in 4 (20%) patients, although the ILR suggested AF, episodes actually represented sinus rhythm with frequent premature atrial contractions and/or oversensing. Third, in 5 (25%) patients, no AF was observed. Episodes <4 hours were associated with low AF burden (<1%) or false detections. The 1-year freedom from any episode of AF >4 and >12 hours was 52% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that many (but not all) patients develop new AF within the first 4 months of flutter ablation. Since external ECG monitoring for this duration is impractical, the ILR has an important role for long-term AF surveillance. Future research should be directed toward identifying the relationship between duration/burden of AF and stroke and improving existing ILR technology.