RESUMO
Introduction Infertility affects approximately 10-15% of couples worldwide. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy are two newer modalities available for the evaluation of infertility and are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. Each provides useful information that the other may not have and each has its advantages. Materials and methods A total of 75 patients of female infertility (study group) in the age group of 18-40 years from the Outpatient Department (OPD) were recruited. Infertility was defined as one year of unprotected intercourse without pregnancy. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy were carried out in each patient at the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Hysteroscopic findings were compared with laparoscopic findings for uterine and tubal pathology. Hysteroscopy as a procedure was also compared with laparoscopy as a one-step procedure for diagnostic accuracy in investigating a case of female infertility. The data was analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 29.0, Armonk, NY). Observations and results In our study, out of a total of 75 cases evaluated for infertility, primary infertility patients were 48 (64%) and secondary infertility patients were 27 (36%). In our study, both tubes were patent on chromopertubation in primary infertility (PI) vs secondary infertility (SI) in 49.33% vs 21.33% of total cases. Both tubes were blocked in PI vs SI in 9.33% vs 8% of total cases. In our study, 20 patients (26.66%) underwent hysteroscopic intervention. Adhesiolysis was the commonest procedure required in seven (9.33%) followed by hysteroscopic cannulation in six (8%). In our study, a total of 30 procedures were performed in 20 patients during laparoscopy. The most common procedure required was ovarian drilling in 22.66% (17/75) followed by surgery for endometriosis in 10.66% (8/75). Adhesiolysis was required in 5/75 (6.66%). Both laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were normal in 44/75 cases for uterine findings. Conclusion Thus, hysterolaparoscopy as "one step" had various advantages in our study, more accuracy in the findings and therapeutic intervention in the same sitting reducing the cost. The addition of hysteroscopy to laparoscopy is invaluable in the infertility workup as it has a definite edge in the detection of uterine pathology, as well as being therapeutic at the same time. More accuracy in the diagnostic findings and therapeutic intervention in the same setting will help in reducing the time and cost of treatment.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Biópsia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Pós-MenopausaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Host immune responses are unable to fully suppress HIV-1 replication in lymphoid tissues. Microanatomic relationships between HIV-1-producing cells and CD8+ cells in lymphoid tissues were analyzed to determine whether there was evidence for an immune privileged site or impaired recognition of virus-producing cells. METHODS: CD8+ cell phenotypes were determined on disaggregated inguinal lymph node cells by flow cytometry for seven untreated HIV-1-infected subjects. Microanatomic relationships between HIV-1-producing cells and CD8+ cells were analyzed in lymph node sections from 15 HIV-1-infected individuals using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Most (median, 96%) lymph node CD8+ cells coexpressed CD3. Frequencies of virus-producing cells detected by in situ hybridization correlated with plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration (Spearman rho = 0.70; p =.02; n = 11). The percentage of lymph node cells adjacent to virus-producing cells that were CD8+ (median, 29%) was not statistically different from the percentage of CD8+ cells in lymphoid tissue overall (median, 34%; p =.09). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple explanations could account for the observation that CD8+ cells do not preferentially accumulate around virus-producing cells including the possibility that HIV-1-specific CD8+ cells cannot recognize virus-producing cells. Further studies are necessary to determine whether HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cells aggregate around virus-producing cells in lymphoid tissue.
Assuntos
Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , HIV-1/fisiologia , Tecido Linfoide/imunologia , Tecido Linfoide/virologia , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/imunologia , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Linfonodos/citologia , Linfonodos/imunologia , Linfonodos/virologia , Tecido Linfoide/citologia , Masculino , RNA Viral/metabolismoAssuntos
Proteínas de Drosophila , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/fisiologia , Receptores de Superfície Celular/fisiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Animais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Células Dendríticas/fisiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/etiologia , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/química , Neoplasias/terapia , Receptores de Superfície Celular/química , Receptores Toll-LikeRESUMO
All cells maintain continuous communication. Hormones derive constitutively from specialized cells to effect total body homeostasis. Conversely, cytokines are produced sporadically from almost all nucleated cells in response to surgical ischemia/septic challenge. Surgical patients are a stew of pulsating cytokines, which serve as the language between all surgically stressed somatic and myeloid cells. Therapeutic manipulation of cytokines has already generated some exhilarating success stories and some crushing disappointments. This introduction to surgically relevant cytokines is presented with the conviction that cytokine-based therapies of surgical patients will (in the future) prove as beneficial to our patients as antibiotics have in the past.
Assuntos
Citocinas/metabolismo , Estresse Fisiológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Quimiocinas/metabolismo , Homeostase/fisiologia , Humanos , Interleucinas/metabolismo , Receptores de Citocinas/metabolismo , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismoRESUMO
Fifteen years ago, an experimental effort to magnify a myocardial infarction, with preinfarction episodes of transient ischemia, proved paradoxically protective. In the ensuing years, surgeons have learned to discriminate a biochemical/metabolic/functional spectrum of cardiac states ranging from healthy myocardium to "stunned" or "hibernating" heart to the modes of "apoptotic" or "necrotic" cardiomyocyte death. It is now clear that "protective cardiac preconditioning" influences all of these cardiac states. The cellular mechanisms of preconditioning (PC) are now sufficiently understood to permit clinical application. Ligation of adrenergic, adenosine, bradykinin or opioid receptors involves signaling via both tyrosine and calcium-dependent protein kinases (PKC), which activate mitochondrial ATP-dependent potassium channels. Subsequently, the release of oxygen radicals induces nuclear translocation of transcriptional regulators, which transform the cardiomyocyte into a more resilient cell. Although preconditioning was initially recognized as protecting only against infarction, PC also limits postischemic dysrhythmias and enhances contractile function. Phase I (safety) and phase II (efficacy) clinical trials now persuasively support pharmacological preconditioning as a safe mode of preventing postcardiac surgical complications. Indeed, preconditioning is currently being proposed as adjunctive to hypothermic perfusates in protecting against the obligate organ ischemia during transplantation.