Defining Collective Priorities: Research and Learning Agendas for Family Planning Across 6 Countries.

Evidence should be the foundation for a well-designed family planning (FP) program, but existing evidence is rarely aligned with and/or synthesized to speak directly to FP programmatic needs. Based on our experience cocreating FP research and learning agendas (FP RLAs) in Côte d'Ivoire, Malawi, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, and Uganda, we argue that FP RLAs can drive the production of coordinated research that aligns with national priorities.To cocreate FP RLAs, stakeholders across 6 countries conducted desk reviews of 349 documents and 106 key informant interviews, organized consultation meetings in each country to prioritize evidence gaps and generate research and learning questions, and, ultimately, formed 6 FP RLAs comprising 190 unique questions. We outline the process for consensus-driven development of FP RLAs and communicate the results of an analysis of the questions in each FP RLA across 4 technical areas: self-care, equity, high impact practices, and youth. Each question was categorized as a learning versus research question, the former indicating an opportunity to synthesize existing evidence and the latter to conduct new research to answer the question. Themes emerging from the data shed light on shared evidence gaps across the 6 countries. We argue that similarities and differences in the questions in each FP RLA reflect the unique implementation experience and context, as well as each country's placement on the FP S-curve. Early uses of the FP RLAs include informing the development of FP costed implementation plans and FP2030 commitments. FP RLAs have also been discussed in multiple thematic working groups. For FP stakeholders, these FP RLAs represent a consensus-based agenda that can guide the generation and synthesis of evidence to answer each country's most pressing questions, ultimately driving progress toward increasingly evidence-based programming and policy.

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Nepal and International Travellers' Travel-Health Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Tourism is one of the main sectors in Nepal, contributing in its economic growth. It is influenced by various factors including the situation of water, sanitation and hygiene and water, sanitation and hygiene practices. For travelers, poor water, sanitation and hygiene provisions are considered risk factors for different food and water-borne diseases. This study aims to describe the perceptions of international travelers regarding their experiences on WASH facilities or practices, and how it influences their health, and travel experiences. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional pilot study conducted among 150 international travelers in Nepal. The travelers were selected conveniently from the Kathmandu valley. The data on different water, sanitation and hygiene related variables, travelers' health and travel experiences were collected using semi-structured questionnaire. The quantitative data was entered into SPSS for descriptive analysis and qualitative data was transcribed through thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 150 international travelers, about 2/3rd of the travelers had inadequate perception of water, sanitation and hygiene condition. Nearly 23% of them experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, including diarrhea in the past week during their visit. Among those travelers who experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, 21.4% of them reported of their travel plans being affected. CONCLUSIONS: Perception and experience with water, sanitation and hygiene facilities was found inadequate among international travelers visiting Nepal. Such facilities seem to have affected the travelers' health (nearly a quarter of them experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, including diarrhea) and their travel plan. Hence, this pilot study demonstrates that there is an urgent need to improve the water, sanitation and hygiene facilities in the travel and tourism sector of Nepal.

Socioeconomic Determinants of Inequalities in the Use of Modern Contraception among Currently Married Women.

BACKGROUND: Despite interventions for over four decades, the unmet need for family planning is high in Nepal. This study aims to examine the status and the socioeconomic determinants of inequalities in modern contraception among currently married women. METHODS:  We applied a mixed-method design. We interviewed key informants for qualitative information and analyzed secondary data from the Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, 2019, and different rounds of Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys. We calculated ratios, differences in percentages, and concentration indices to analyse the inequality. We ran a binary logistic regression model to estimate the adjusted effect of each factor on the use of modern contraception. RESULTS:  The richest-to-poorest difference in using modern contraception has decreased over 13 years. The richest-to-poorest difference decreased from 23.6 percentage points in 2006 to 13.3 percentage points in 2011 and further to 1.2 percentage points in 2016. The richest-to-poorest difference was negative in 2019, indicating poor people are using more contraception than the richest. Multivariate analysis showed the wealth is a significant predictor for using contraception. Women of richer households (aOR=1.29, 95% CI=1.13-1.48), middle (aOR=1.21, 95% CI=1.05-1.40), poorer (aOR=1.36, 95% CI 1.17-1.58) and poorest (aOR=1.18, 95% CI=1.05-1.34) were more likely to use contraception than women from the richest households. CONCLUSIONS: Poor people are increasingly using the modern contraception, and the gap between the poor and rich people has decreased. However, the trend of contraception use in each wealth quintile indicates that Nepal struggles to meet the sustainable development goal target of reducing the unmet need for family planning to less than 10% by 2030.

A prospective cohort study to assess the acceptability of Sayana Press among 18-49-year-old women in Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: We compared acceptability and continuation of Sayana Press, a subcutaneous formulation of depot-medroxyprogesteone acetate (DMPA) in a Uniject injection system, to intramuscular (IM) DMPA, among both current users of DMPA-IM and new users in Nepal. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited women seeking injectable contraception at 14 public health facilities in Nepal selected for geographic diversity. We enrolled women who self-selected either Sayana Press or DMPA-IM and used structured interviews to obtain baseline demographics and assess satisfaction and continuation rates at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-four women (71%) selected and received Sayana Press, while 318 women (28.6%) selected and received DMPA-IM. One hundred and seventy-eight (48%) women continuing Sayana Press injection reported that they experienced "no possible side effects" compared to 29 (22%) among DMPA-IM selectors during the previous 6 months. The continuation rate of Sayana Press at 6 months was higher than DMPA-IM (Sayana Press 46.5% vs DMPA-IM 34.4%; p < 0.001). Selection of Sayana Press method (ORadj. 1.74; 95% confidence interval 1.32-2.3) and approval from husband (ORadj. 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.09) were associated with injection continuation. CONCLUSION: Sayana Press is acceptable to women in Nepal with the preference for Sayana Press over DMPA-IM (higher proportion chose the method when counseled and given the option, better continuation). IMPLICATIONS: The potential for self-injection with Sayana Press® may have implications for continuation and opportunity for future research and strategies to roll out this innovative technology must be explored.