Does the degree of preoperative gait disturbance remain after tumor resection in patients with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the degree of preoperative gait disturbance remains following surgical resection in patients with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors (IDEMSCTs), and to investigate any factors that may influence poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance. SETTING: The single institution in Japan. METHODS: In total, 78 IDEMSCTs patients who required surgical excision between 2010 and 2019 were included. According to the degree of preoperative gait disturbance using modified McCormick scale (MMCS) grade, they were divided into the Mild and Severe groups. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 50.7 ± 17.9 months. Data on demographic and surgical characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of age at surgery, sex, tumor size, surgical time, estimated blood loss, tumor histopathology, and postoperative follow-up period between the Mild and Severe groups. At the final follow-up, 84.6% of IDEMSCTs patients were able to walk without support. Gait disturbance improved after surgery in most of the patients with preoperative MMCS grades II-IV, but remained in approximately half of patients with preoperative MMCS grade V. Age at surgery was correlated with poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance in the Severe group. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the degree of preoperative gait disturbance, it improved after tumor resection in most of the IDEMSCTs patients. However, in the preoperative MMCS grade III-V cases, older age at surgery would be an important factor associated with poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance.

Incidence and predictive factors of shoulder imbalance after selective anterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: No study has assessed the incidence or predictors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF). This study evaluated the incidence and predictors of shoulder imbalance after selective ASF for Lenke type 5C AIS. Methods: In total, 62 patients with Lenke type 5C AIS (4 men and 58 women, mean age at surgery of 15.5 ± 1.5 years) were included and divided into the following two groups according to the radiographic shoulder height (RSH) at the final follow-up: PSI and non-PSI groups. All patients in this study underwent a whole-spine radiological evaluation. Various spinal coronal and sagittal profiles on radiographs were compared between the 2 groups. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires. Results: The mean final follow-up duration was 8.6 ± 2.7 years. PSI was observed in 10 patients (16.1%) immediately after surgery; however, in the long-term follow-up period, PSI improved in 3 patients spontaneously, whereas the remaining 7 patients had residual PSI. The preoperative RSH and correction rates of the major curve immediately after surgery or at the final follow-up were significantly larger in the PSI group than in the non-PSI group (p=.001, p=.023, and p=.019, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the cutoff values for preoperative RSH and the correction rates immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up were 11.79 mm (p=.002; area under the curve [AUC], 0.948), 71.0% (p=.026; AUC, 0.822), and 65.4% (p=.021; AUC, 0.835), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the preoperative and final follow-up SRS-22 scores in any domain between the PSI and non-PSI groups. Conclusions: Paying attention to the preoperative RSH and avoiding excessive correction of the major curve can prevent the occurrence of shoulder imbalance after selective ASF for Lenke type 5C AIS.

Circumferential Bone Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity via Combination of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Grade 2 Posterior Column Osteotomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The combination of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) with grade 2 posterior column osteotomy (PCO) is an effective treatment for adult spinal deformity. However, grade 2 PCO may lead to pseudoarthrosis because it involves complete removal of the bilateral posterior facet joints. The main study objective was to determine the achievement rate of anterior and posterolateral fusion resulting in circumferential fusion in patients who underwent combined OLIF and grade 2 PCO. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent OLIF and grade 2 PCO. The group comprised a long fusion group, with fusion from the thoracic level to the ilium, and a short fusion group, with fusion within the lumbar region. The OLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw insertion group was also used for reference. The Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification was used to assess interbody fusion and Lenke classification for assessment of posterolateral fusion. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with 109 lumbar levels were included in the study. We observed 100% anterior fusion in all 3 groups. The fusion rate for posterolateral fusion between the OLIF-grade 2 PCO group was 97%, with very low (3%) non-circumferential fusion (pseudoarthrosis only at the osteotomy site). In most cases, solid posterolateral fusions (Lenke A) occurred within 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of OLIF and grade 2 PCO resulted in circumferential fusion for most (97%) of the cases within 24 months. OLIF and grade 2 PCO are considered a good combination treatment to achieve sufficient lumbar lordosis and solid bone fusion.

Selective Anterior Fusion Surgery Does Not Influence Global Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in global spinal sagittal alignment (GSSA) following selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF) in patients with Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have assessed the changes in postoperative GSSA, including cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral sagittal alignment in AIS patients with major thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve who underwent selective ASF. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with Lenke type 5 AIS (two males and 50 females, mean age at surgery of 16.4 ±â€Š3.1 years) were included in this study. The average final follow-up was 8.3 ±â€Š3.1 years after surgery. The variations of outcome variables were analyzed in various spinal sagittal profiles using radiographic outcomes (pre-operation, immediate post-operation, and final follow-up). The clinical outcomes at the final follow-up were assessed using Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle of the main TL/L and minor thoracic curve was significantly improved after selective ASF, which was maintained up to the final follow-up. However, in all cases, the various sagittal parameters examined (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], C2-7 SVA, C2-7 lordosis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, T10-L2 kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope), did not significantly change in the immediate postoperative period, and all GSSA parameters were maintained up to the final follow-up. Furthermore, the magnitude of coronal curve correction and fused levels did not affect each GSSA parameter postoperatively. During the period up to the final follow-up, no significant clinical symptoms were observed. The final SRS-22 global score was 4.5 ±â€Š0.3, and ODI scored 0.8 ±â€Š2.4. CONCLUSION: Selective ASF did not influence various GSSA parameters postoperatively and could maintain excellent correction for coronal deformity with satisfactory final functional and clinical outcomes confirmed by long-term follow-up.Level of Evidence: 4.

Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: An anterior surgical approach for severe infectious spondylodiscitis in the lumbar region is optimal but not always atraumatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimal anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach, also known as a surgical approach for oblique lumbar interbody fusion, for cases with severe infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent anterior debridement and spinal fusion with an autologous strut bone graft for infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects were reviewed retrospectively. Eleven patients underwent the minimal retroperitoneal approach (Group M), and 13 underwent the conventional open approach (Group C). Peri- and postoperative clinical outcomes, that is, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), creatine kinase (CK) level, visual analog scale (VAS), and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation, were evaluated, and the differences between both groups were assessed statistically. RESULTS: Mean EBL, serum CK on the 1st postoperative day, and VAS on the 14th postoperative day were 202.1 mL, 390.9 IU/L, and 9.5 mm in Group M and 648.3 mL, 925.5 IU/L, and 22.3 mm in Group C, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in OT and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior debridement and spinal fusion using the minimal retroperitoneal approach is a useful and safe surgical technique. Although a preponderance of the minimal approach regarding early bone union is not validated, this technique has the advantages of conventional open surgery, but reduces blood loss, muscle injury, and pain postoperatively.

Characterization of Patients with Poor Risk for Clinical Outcomes in Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 159 surgically treated consecutive adult symptomatic lumbar deformity (ASLD) (65 ±â€Š9 years, female: 94%) from a multicenter database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the risk of a poor clinical outcome in ASLD surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Poor-risk patients with ASLD remain poorly characterized. METHODS: ASLD was defined as age >40 years with a lumbar curve ≥30° or C7SVA ≥5 cm and Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS22) pain or function <4. Poor outcome was defined as 2y SRS22 total <4 or pain, function or satisfaction ≤3. The outcomes of interest included age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density, Schwab-SRS type, frailty, history of arthroplasty, upper-instrumented vertebral, lower-instrumented vertebral, levels involved, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, lumbar interbody fusion, sagittal alignment, global alignment and proportion (GAP) score, baseline SRS22r score, estimated blood loss, time of surgery, and severe adverse event (SAE). Poisson regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risks for poor clinical outcome. A patient was considered at poor risk if the number of risks was >4. RESULTS: All SRS22 domains were significantly improved after surgery. In total, 21% (n = 34) reported satisfaction ≤3 and 29% (n = 46) reported pain or function ≤3. Poisson regression analysis revealed that frailty (odds ratio [OR]: 0.2 [0.1-0.8], P = .03), baseline mental-health (OR: 0.6 [0.4-0.9], P = .01) and function (OR: 1.9 [1.0-3.6], P < .01), GAP score (OR: 4.6 [1.1-18.7], P = .03), and SAE (OR: 3.0 [1.7-5.2], P < .01) were identified as independent risk for poor clinical outcome. Only 17% (n = 6) of the poor-risk patients reached SRS22 total score >4.0 at 2 years. CONCLUSION: The overall clinical outcome was favorable for ASLD surgery. Poor-risk patients continue to have inferior outcomes, and alternative treatment strategies are needed to help improve outcomes in this patient population. Recognition and optimization of modifiable risk factors, such as physical function and mental health, and reduced SAEs may improve overall clinical outcomes of ASLD surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Combination of sacral-alar-iliac screw and cortical bone trajectory screw techniques for lumbosacral fixation: technical note.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbosacral fixation plays an important role in the management of devastating spinal pathologies, including osteoporosis, fracture, infection, tumor resection, and spinal deformities, which require long-segment fusion constructs to the sacrum. The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique has been developed as a promising solution to facilitate both minimal invasiveness and strong fixation. The rationale for SAI screw insertion is a medialized entry point away from the ilium and in line with cranial screws. The divergent screw path of the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) provides a higher amount of cortical bone purchase and strong screw fixation and has the potential to harmoniously align with SAI screws due to its medial starting point. However, there has been no report on the combination of these two techniques. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this combination technique. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 17 consecutive patients with a mean age of 74.2 ± 4.7 years who underwent posterior lumbosacral fixation for degenerative spinal pathologies using the combination of SAI and CBT fixation techniques. There were 8 patients with degenerative scoliosis, 7 with degenerative kyphosis, 1 with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture at L5, and 1 with vertebral metastasis at L5. Fusion zones included T10-sacrum in 13 patients, L2-sacrum in 2, and L4-sacrum in 2. RESULTS: No patients required complicated rod bending or the use of a connector for rod assembly in the lumbosacral region. Postoperative CT performed within a week after surgery showed that all lumbosacral screws were in correct positions and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The lumbosacral bone fusion was confirmed in 81.8% of patients at 1-year follow-up based on fine-cut CT scanning. No patient showed a significant loss of spinal alignment or rod fracture in the lumbosacral transitional region. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first paper on the feasibility of a combination technique using SAI and CBT screws. This technique could be a valid option for lumbosacral fixation due to the ease of rod placement with potential reductions in operative time and blood loss.

Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Cost-effectiveness in Surgically Treated Adult Spinal Deformity Over 70 Years: A Propensity score-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicentered retrospective study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical correction for the adult spinal deformity (ASD) is effective but carries substantial risks for complications. The diverse pathologies of ASD make it difficult to determine the effect of advanced age on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess how advanced age affects outcomes and cost-effectiveness for corrective surgery for ASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from a multicenter database to conduct propensity score-matched comparisons of 50 patients who were surgically treated for ASD when at least 50 years old and were followed for at least 2 years, to clarify whether advanced age is a risk factor for inferior health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Patients were grouped by age, 50-65 years (M group: 59±4 y) or >70 years (O group: 74±3 y), and were propensity score-matched for sex, body mass index, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, the use of pedicle-subtraction osteotomy, and sagittal alignment. Cost-effectiveness was determined by cost/quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) pain and self-image at the 2-year follow-up were significantly inferior in the O group (Oswestry Disability Index: 32±9% vs. 25±13%, P=0.01; SRS-22 pain: 3.5±0.7 vs. 3.9±0.6, P=0.05; SRS-22 self-image: 3.5±0.6 vs. 3.8±0.9, P=0.03). The O group had more complications than the M group (55% vs. 29%). The odds ratios in the O group were 4.0 for postoperative complications (95% confidence interval: 1.1-12.3) and 4.9 for implant-related complications (95% confidence interval: 1.2-21.1). Cost-utility analysis at 2 years after surgery indicated that the surgery was less cost-effective in the O group (cost/quality-adjusted life year: O group: $211,636 vs. M group: 125,887, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for corrective surgery for ASD were inferior in geriatric patients compared with middle-aged patients, in whom the extent of spinal deformity and the operation type were adjusted similarly. Special attention is needed when considering surgical treatment for geriatric ASD patients.

Feasibility of using tapping torque during lumbar pedicle screw insertion to predict screw fixation strength.

BACKGROUND: Rigid pedicle screw fixation is mandatory for achieving successful spinal fusion; however, there is no reliable method predicting screw fixation before screw insertion. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of measurement of tapping torque to predict pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: First, different densities of polyurethane foam were used to measure tapping torque. The insertional torque during pedicle screw insertion and axial pullout strength were measured and compared between under-tapped and same-tapped groups. Next, for in vivo study, the tapping and insertional torque of lumbar pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory technique were measured intraoperatively in 45 consecutive patients. Then, correlations between tapping torque, the bone mineral density of the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae, and insertional torque were investigated. RESULTS: Ex vivo tapping torque significantly correlated with the insertional torque and pullout strength regardless of tapping sizes (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). The mean in vivo tapping and insertional torque were 1.48 ± 0.73 and 2.48 ± 1.25 Nm, respectively (p < 0.001). Insertional torque significantly correlated with tapping torque and two BMD parameters, and the correlation coefficient of tapping torque (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) was higher than those of femoral neck BMD (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and lumbar BMD (r = 0.39, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tapping torque is a reliable predictor of pedicle screw fixation and allows surgeons to improve the integrity of the bone-screw interface by making modification prior to actual screw insertion.

Incidences and Risk Factors for Postoperative Non-Union after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Closed-Box Titanium Spacers.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center clinical study with follow-up of more than 24 months. PURPOSE: To evaluate the union rates and relevant risk factors for non-union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using porous-coated closed-box titanium spacers. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although the use of a closed-box interbody spacer for PLIF could avoid potential complications associated with the harvesting of autologous bone, few studies have reported detailed follow-up of fusion progression and risk factors for non-union in the early postoperative period. METHODS: PLIF using closed-box spacers without filling the autologous bone was performed in 78 (88 levels) consecutive patients. Surgical procedures included PLIF using traditional pedicle screw fixation (PLIF, n=37), PLIF using cortical bone trajectory screw fixation (CBT-PLIF, n=30), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with traditional pedicle screw fixation (TLIF, n=11). Lateral dynamic radiography and computed tomography findings were investigated, and the relationship between the union status and variables that may be related to the risk of non-union was tested statistically. RESULTS: The overall bone union rates at 12 and 24 months were 68.0% and 88.5%, respectively. Incidences of bone cyst formation, subsidence, and retropulsion of spacers were 33.3%, 47.4%, and 14.1%, respectively. Union rates at 24 months were 94.6% in PLIF, 80.0% in CBT-PLIF, and 90.9% in TLIF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that at 12 months postoperatively, the risk factor for non-union was age >75 years (p =0.02). In contrast, no significant risk factor was observed at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated the efficacy of interbody closed-box spacers for PLIF without the need to fill the spacer with autologous bone. However, the risk of non-union should be considered in elderly patients, especially intra-operatively and during the early postoperative stage.

Risk, Recovery, and Clinical Impact of Neurological Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To report the risks, recovery, and clinical impact of neurological complications (NCs) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although recent studies have reported the incidence of NCs in ASD surgery, few have addressed the recovery from and clinical impacts of NC. METHODS: We reviewed records from a multicenter database for 285 consecutive surgically treated ASD patients who had reached a 2-year follow-up. NCs were categorized as sensory only or motor deficit (MD). Recovery was noted as none, partial, or complete, during hospitalization and at every postoperation visit. Uni- and multivariate risk analyses were performed to identify risk factors for MD. RESULTS: NC developed in 29 (10%) patients within 30 days of surgery, of which 11 were permanent deficits (seven no recovery, and four partial recovery). MD developed in 14 (5%) patients, including one spinal cord injury. Seven MD patients required physical assistance at the latest follow-up. While NC patients experienced significant improvements in health-related quality of life at the 2-year follow-up, the health-related quality of life was significantly worse for the NC versus no-NC group at this time point. Univariate analyses revealed that Schwab-SRS types N and L, pelvic tilt, modified frailty index physical function, and an inferior SRS22 function domain at baseline were risk factors for MD. Among them, modified frailty index physical function, which represented a preoperative decline in activities of daily living, was identified as an independent risk factor for MD (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.2-13.5, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: NC developed in 10% of ASD surgery patients, with permanent deficits occurring in 4%. Half of the patients who developed MD required physical assistance, which contributed to the inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention should be considered before severe activities of daily living decline to prevent NCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Is Predictive of Severe Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 281 consecutive cases of adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery (age 55 ±â€Š19 yrs, 91% female, follow-up 4.3 ±â€Š1.9 yrs) from a multicenter database. OBJECTIVE: To compare the value and predictive ability of the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) to the conventional 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) for severe adverse events (SAEs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several recent studies have described associations between frailty and surgical complications. However, the predictive power and usefulness of the mFI-5 have not been proven. METHODS: SAEs were defined as: Clavien-Dindo grade >3, reoperation required, deterioration of motor function at discharge, or new motor deficit within 2 years. The patients' frailty was categorized by the mFI-5 and mFI-11 (robust, prefrail, or frail). Spearman's rho was used to assess correlation between the mFI-5 and mFI-11. Univariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses were conducted to analyze the relative risk of mFI-5 and mFI-11 as a predictor for SAEs in ASD surgery. Age, sex, and baseline sagittal alignment (Schwab-SRS classification subcategories) were used to adjust the baseline variance of the patients. RESULTS: Of the 281 patients, 63 (22%) had developed SAE at 2 years. The weighted Kappa ratio between the mFI-5 and mFI-11 was 0.87, indicating excellent concordance across ASD surgery. Frailty was associated with increased total complications, perioperative complications, implant-related complications, and SAEs. Adjusted and unadjusted models showed similar c-statistics for mFI-5 and mFI-11 and a strong predictive ability for SAEs in ASD surgery. As the mFI-5 increased from 0 to ≥2, the rate of SAEs increased from 17% to 63% (P < 0.01), and the relative risk was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.3-3.7). CONCLUSION: The mFI-5 and the mFI-11 were equally effective predictors of SEA development in ASD surgery. The evaluation of patient frailty using mFI-5 may help surgeons optimize procedures and counsel patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Treatment for Frailty Does Not Improve Complication Rates in Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter database review of 240 consecutive patients at least 21 years of age (mean 58 ±â€Š17, range 22-79) who underwent surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) and were followed at least 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how treatment for frailty affects complications in surgery for ASD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several recent studies have focused on associations between frailty and surgical complications. However, it is not clear whether treating frailty affects complication rates in surgery for ASD. METHODS: Patients were categorized as robust (R group), prefrail, or frail based on the modified frailty index (mFI); prefrail and frail patients were divided by good control of frailty (G group), defined as treatment following the appropriate guidelines for each mFI factor, or poorly controlled frailty (PC group). We compared clinical outcomes and perioperative and 2-year complications between the three groups. RESULTS: Of the 240 patients, 142 (59%) were robust, 81 (34%) were prefrail, and 17 (7%) were frail. Among the frail and prefrail patients, 71 (72%) were classified as G and 27 (28%) as PC. The perioperative complication rate was similar in the G and PC groups (32% vs. 37%) but was significantly lower in the R group (15%, P < 0.01). The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio for 2-year complications was not different in the P group when the G group was referenced (odds ratio 1.3 [0.5-3.2], P = 0.63). In the G and PC groups, which had similar 2-year outcomes, the Scoliosis Research Society-22 function and total scores were significantly lower than in the R group (function: R 3.9 ±â€Š0.7, G 3.5 ±â€Š0.7, P 3.3 ±â€Š0.6; total: R 3.9 ±â€Š0.6, 3.7 ±â€Š0.7, 3.4 ±â€Š0.6; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Regardless of its treatment status, frailty increases the risk of complications and inferior clinical outcomes in ASD surgery. Surgeons should routinely evaluate frailty and inform patients of frailty-related risks when considering surgery for ASD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Surgical Outcomes for Drop Body Syndrome in Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective case series of patients treated surgically for adult spinal deformity (ASD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between propensity score matched ASD patients with or without drop body syndrome (DBS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DBS is an extreme primary sagittal-plane deformity often seen in Asian countries. Although the importance of sagittal alignment is widely recognized, surgical outcomes for deformities purely in the sagittal plane are poorly understood. METHODS: This study included 243 consecutive patients (age 66 ±â€Š17 years; range 22-78) who were treated surgically for ASD and were followed at least 2 years (mean follow-up 3.7 ±â€Š2.3 years). DBS was defined as a primary lumbar kyphosis with PI-LL >40°, Cobb angle <30°, and multifidus cross-sectional area <300 mm. DBS patients were matched with non-DBS patients by propensity scores for age, gender, lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) level, and number of levels fused. Demographics, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between DBS and non-DBS patients. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with ASD, 34 had DBS (14%); 28 of these were propensity-matched with ASD patients without DBS. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), and frailty were similar in DBS and non-DBS patients. Baseline sagittal alignment was worse in DBS than in non-DBS patients [C7SVA 14 ±â€Š5 vs. 8 ±â€Š5 cm; pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) 60 ±â€Š14 vs. 36 ±â€Š20°], and scoliosis research society (SRS)22 scores were also worse for DBS patients (2.5 ±â€Š0.6 vs. 2.9 ±â€Š0.8). Although DBS patients had more complications (20 DBS vs. 16 non-DBS), the clinical outcomes were similarly improved in both groups after surgery. At the 2-year follow-up, the spinopelvic malalignment was worse in DBS than non-DBS patients (PI-LL 17 ±â€Š16° vs. 8 ±â€Š13°, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DBS affected 14% of 234 ASD patients. Although DBS patients had inferior baseline SRS22 scores than non-DBS patients, ASD surgery resulted in similar clinical improvement in both groups. Future studies should examine the influence of lifestyle and genetics on clinical outcomes after surgery for DBS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Predictive model for major complications 2 years after corrective spine surgery for adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: ASD surgery improves a patient's health-related quality of life, but it has a high complication rate. The aim of this study was to create a predictive model for complications after surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD), using spinal alignment, demographic data, and surgical invasiveness. METHODS: This study included 195 surgically treated ASD patients who were > 50 years old and had 2-year follow-up from multicenter database. Variables which included age, gender, BMI, BMD, frailty, fusion level, UIV and LIV, primary or revision surgery, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, spinal alignment, Schwab-SRS type, surgical time, and blood loss were recorded and analyzed at least 2 years after surgery. Decision-making trees for 2-year postoperative complications were constructed and validated by a 7:3 data split for training and testing. External validation was performed for 25 ASD patients who had surgery at a different hospital. RESULTS: Complications developed in 48% of the training samples. Almost half of the complications developed in late post-op period, and implant-related complications were the most common complication at 2 years after surgery. Univariate analyses showed that BMD, frailty, PSO, LIV, PI-LL, and EBL were risk factors for complications. Multivariate analysis showed that low BMD, PI-LL > 30°, and frailty were independent risk factors for complications. In the testing samples, our predictive model was 92% accurate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.963 and 84% accurate in the external validation. CONCLUSION: A successful model was developed for predicting surgical complications. Our model could inform physicians about the risk of complications in ASD patients in the 2-year postoperative period. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Surgical risk stratification based on preoperative risk factors in adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) improves health-related quality of life but has high complication rates. Predicting a patient's risk of perioperative and late postoperative complications is difficult, although several potential risk factors have been reported. PURPOSE: To establish an accurate, ASD-specific model for predicting the risk of postoperative complications, based on baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical invasiveness data in a retrospective case series. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicentered retrospective review and the surgical risk stratification. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred fifty-one surgically treated ASD at our hospital for risk analysis and model building and 89 surgically treated ASD at 2 other our hospitals for model validation. OUTCOME MEASURES: HRQoL measures and surgical complications. METHODS: We analyzed demographic and medical data, including complications, for 151 adults with ASD who underwent surgery at our hospital and were followed for at least 2years. Each surgical risk factor identified by univariate analyses was assigned a value based on its odds ratio, and the values of all risk factors were summed to obtain a surgical risk score (range 0-20). We stratified risk scores into grades (A-D) and analyzed their correlations with complications. We validated the model using data from 89 patients who underwent ASD surgery at two other hospitals. RESULTS: Complications developed in 48% of the patients in the model-building cohort. Univariate analyses identified 10 demographic, physical, and surgical risk indicators, with odds ratios from 5.4 to 1.4, for complications. Our risk-grading system showed good calibration and discrimination in the validation cohort. The complication rate increased with and correlated well with the risk grade using receiver operating characteristic curves. CONCLUSIONS: This simple, ASD-specific model uses readily accessible indicators to predict a patient's risk of perioperative and postoperative complications and can help surgeons adjust treatment strategies for best outcomes in high-risk patients.

Impact of Frailty and Comorbidities on Surgical Outcomes and Complications in Adult Spinal Disorders.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of surgically treated 481 adult patients with spinal disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect of frailty and comorbidities on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and complication rates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elective surgeries for spinal disorders not only improve clinical outcomes but also have high complication rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of consecutive elective spine surgeries for 156 adult spinal deformities (ASDs: 65 ±â€Š9 years), 152 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS: 64 ±â€Š10 years), or 173 lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS: 71 ±â€Š9 years) with follow-up of at least 2 years. Modified Frailty Index (mFI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined from baseline demographics. We compared the prevalence and the influence of mFI and CCI on postoperative outcomes and complication rates. RESULTS: The mFI and CCI were significantly worse in ASD than in others (mFI: ASD 0.09 ±â€Š0.12, DS 0.06 ±â€Š0.06, LSCS 0.04 ±â€Š0.05, P < 0.01. CCI: ASD 2.1 ±â€Š1.6, DS 1.4 ±â€Š0.7, LSCS 1.6 ±â€Š0.9, P < 0.01). Postoperative HRQoL deteriorated as mFI worsened in ASD (nofrail: Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] 26 ±â€Š11, Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire [SRS] 3.7 ±â€Š0.7; prefrail: ODI 32 ±â€Š12, SRS 3.6 ±â€Š0.6; frail: ODI 42 ±â€Š15, SRS 3.2 ±â€Š0.7). In DS and LSCS, however, SF-36 physical component score and mental component score improved regardless of mFI and CCI. The 2-year major complications rate increased with frailty (36%, 58%, and 81%) in ASD, but not in others. CONCLUSION: ASDs were more frail and had more comorbidities than the other populations. In ASD, postsurgical outcomes and complication rates deteriorated as frailty and CCI increased, whereas surgery produced favorable outcomes and acceptable complication rates in DS and LSCS regardless of frailty and CCI. Careful patient selection and treatment of comorbidities before surgery may decrease complications and improve outcomes for the surgical treatment of ASD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Fine-tuning the Predictive Model for Proximal Junctional Failure in Surgically Treated Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To validate and improve the predictive model for proximal junctional failure (PJF) with or without the bone mineral density (BMD) score. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJF is a serious complication of surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A predictive model for PJF was recently reported that has good accuracy, but does not include BMD, a known PJF risk factor, as a variable. METHODS: We included 145 surgically treated ASD patients who were older than 50 at the time of surgery and had been followed up for at least 2 years. Variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), fusion level, upper and lower instrumented vertebral (UIV and LIV) level, primary or revision surgery, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), Schwab-SRS type, and BMD. PJF was defined as a ≥ 20° increase from baseline (immediately postoperative) of the proximal junctional angle with concomitant deterioration of at least 1 SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade, or any proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision. Decision-making trees were constructed using the C5.0 algorithm with 10 different bootstrapped models, and validated by a 7:3 data split for training and testing; 112 patients were categorized as training and 33 as testing samples. RESULTS: PJF incidence was 20% in the training samples. Univariate analyses showed that BMD, BMI, pelvic tilt (PT), UIV level, and LIV level were PJF risk factors. Our predictive model was 100% accurate in the testing samples with an AUC of 1.0, indicating excellent fit. The best predictors were (strongest to weakest): PT, BMD, LIV level (pelvis), UIV level (lower thoracic), PSO, global alignment, BMI, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and age. CONCLUSION: A successful model was developed for predicting PJF that included BMD. Our model could inform physicians about patients with a high risk of developing PJF in the perioperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Low Bone-Mineral Density Is a Significant Risk for Proximal Junctional Failure After Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A propensity-matched comparison of risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), which is a symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis developing after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of bone strength for developing PJF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJF, a devastating complication of corrective surgery for ASD, often recurs even after revision surgery. Most studies of risk factors for PJF are retrospective and have a selection bias in surgical strategy, making it difficult to identify modifiable PJF risk factors. METHODS: We conducted propensity-matched comparisons of 113 surgically treated ASD patients who were followed for at least 2 years, to elucidate whether low bone-mineral density (BMD) was a true risk factor for PJF in a uniform population from a multicenter database. Patients were grouped as having mildly low to normal BMD (M group; T-score≧ - 1.5) or significantly low BMD (S group; T-score <  -1.5), and were propensity-matched for age, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, history of spine surgery, and Schwab-Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) ASD classification. PJF was defined as a ≥20° increase from the baseline proximal junction angle with a concomitant deterioration of at least one SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade, or any type of proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision. RESULTS: PJF developed in 22 of 113 patients (19%). There were 48 propensity-matched patients in the M and S groups (24 in each) with similar parameters for age, body mass index, number of vertebrae involved, C7SVA, pelvic incidence  - LL, and SRS-Schwab type. In this propensity-matched population, the incidence of PJF was significantly higher in the S group (33% vs. 8%, P < 0.01, odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI: 1.2-32.3). CONCLUSION: Low BMD was a significant risk factor for PJF in this propensity-matched cohort (odds ratio 6.4). Surgeons should consider prophylactic treatments when correcting ASD in patients with low BMD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of late decompression surgery for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) with pre-existing cord compression. SETTING: Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo, Japan. METHODS: In total 78 patients with traumatic CSCI without bone injury hospitalized in 2012-2015 in our institute for rehabilitation after initial emergency care were divided into four groups according to the compression rate (CR) of the injured level and whether or not decompression surgery was performed. Neurological status was evaluated by American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), Barthel index, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). RESULTS: In the severe compression group (CR ≥ 40%), >2 grade improvement in the AIS was observed in 30% of patients with surgical treatment, although it was not observed in any patient without surgery. The SCIM improvement rate at discharge was 60% in the surgical treatment group and 20% in the non-surgical treatment group. In the minor compression group (CR < 40%), >2 grade improvement in the AIS was observed in 18% of patients with surgical treatment and in 11% without surgery. The SCIM improvement rate at discharge was 52% in the surgical treatment group and 43% in the non-surgical treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that surgical treatment has an advantage for patients following traumatic CSCI with severe cord compression. In contrast, surgical efficacy is not proved for CSCI patients without severe cord compression.