International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024.

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT): 2024 infection definitions for durable and acute mechanical circulatory support devices.

Infections remain a significant concern in patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS), encompassing both durable and acute devices. This consensus manuscript provides updated definitions for infections associated with durable MCS devices and new definitions for infections in acute MCS, integrating a comprehensive review of existing literature and collaborative discussions among multidisciplinary specialists. By establishing consensus definitions, we seek to enhance clinical care, facilitate consistent reporting in research studies, and ultimately improve outcomes for patients receiving MCS.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients from hepatitis C viremic donors.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest the transplantation of Hepatitis C (HCV) hearts from viremic donors is associated with comparable 1 year survival to nonviremic donors. Though HCV viremia is a known risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis, data on cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) outcomes are limited. We compared the incidence of CAV in heart transplant recipients from HCV viremic donors (nucleic acid amplification test positive; NAT+) compared to non-HCV infected donors (NAT-). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed annual coronary angiograms with intravascular ultrasound from April 2017 to August 2020 at two large cardiac transplant centers. CAV was graded according to ISHLT guidelines. Maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥ 0.5 mm was considered significant for subclinical disease. RESULTS: Among 270 heart transplant recipients (mean age 54; 77% male), 62 patients were transplanted from NAT+ donors. CAV ≥ grade 1 was present in 8.8% of the NAT+ versus 16.8% of the NAT- group at 1 year, 20% versus 28.8% at 2 years, and 33.3% versus 41.5% at 3 years. After adjusting for donor age, donor smoking history, recipient BMI, recipient, hypertension, and recipient diabetes, NAT+ status did not confer increased risk of CAV (HR.80; 95% CI.45-1.40, p = 0.43) or subclinical IVUS disease (HR.87; 95% CI.58-1.30, p = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in the presence of rapidly progressive lesions on IVUS. CONCLUSION: Our data show that NAT+ donors conferred no increased risk for early CAV or subclinical IVUS disease following transplantation in a cohort of heart transplant patients who were treated for HCV, suggesting the short-term safety of this strategy to maximize the pool of available donor hearts.

Phage resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and bidirectional effects impacting antibiotic susceptibility.

OBJECTIVES: Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a promising anti-infective option to combat antimicrobial resistance. However, the clinical utilization of phage therapy has been severely compromised by the potential emergence of phage resistance. Although certain phage resistance mechanisms can restore bacterial susceptibility to certain antibiotics, a lack of knowledge of phage resistance mechanisms hinders optimal use of phages and their combination with antibiotics. METHODS: Genome-wide transposon screening was performed with a mutant library of Klebsiella pneumoniae MKP103 to identify phage pKMKP103_1-resistant mutants. Phage-resistant phenotypes were evaluated by time-kill kinetics and efficiency of plating assays. Phage resistance mechanisms were investigated with adsorption, one-step growth, and mutation frequency assays. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined with broth microdilution and population analysis profiles. RESULTS: We observed a repertoire of phage resistance mechanisms in K pneumoniae, such as disruption of phage binding (fhuA::Tn and tonB::Tn), extension of the phage latent period (mnmE::Tn and rpoN::Tn), and increased mutation frequency (mutS::Tn and mutL::Tn). Notably, in contrast to the prevailing view that phage resistance re-sensitizes antibiotic-resistant bacteria, we observed a bidirectional steering effect on bacterial antibiotic susceptibility. Specifically, rpoN::Tn increased susceptibility to colistin while mutS::Tn and mutL::Tn increased resistance to rifampicin and colistin. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that K pneumoniae employs multiple strategies to overcome phage infection, which may result in enhanced or reduced antibiotic susceptibility. Mechanism-guided phage steering should be incorporated into phage therapy to better inform clinical decisions on phage-antibiotic combinations.

A simple solid media assay for detection of synergy between bacteriophages and antibiotics.

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) has necessitated the development of alternative therapies to deal with this global threat. Bacteriophages (viruses that target bacteria) that kill ARB are one such alternative. Although phages have been used clinically for decades with inconsistent results, a number of recent advances in phage selection, propagation, and purification have enabled a reevaluation of their utility in contemporary clinical medicine. In most phage therapy cases, phages are administered in combination with antibiotics to ensure that patients receive the standard-of-care treatment. Some phages may work cooperatively with antibiotics to eradicate ARB, as often determined using non-standardized broth assays. We sought to develop a solid media-based assay to assess cooperativity between antibiotics and phages to offer a standardized platform for such testing. We modeled the interactions that occur between antibiotics and phages on solid medium to measure additive, antagonistic, and synergistic interactions. We then tested the method using different bacterial isolates and identified a number of isolates where synergistic interactions were identified. These interactions were not dependent on the specific organism, phage family, or antibiotic used. A priori susceptibility to the antibiotic or the specific phage were not requirements to observe synergistic interactions. Our data also confirm the potential for the restoration of vancomycin to treat vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) when used in combination with phages. Solid media assays for the detection of cooperative interactions between antibiotics and phages can be an accessible technique adopted by clinical laboratories to evaluate antibiotic and phage choices in phage therapy.IMPORTANCEBacteriophages have become an important alternative treatment for individuals with life-threatening antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) infections. Because antibiotics represent the standard-of-care for treatment of ARB, antibiotics and phages often are delivered together without evidence that they work cooperatively. Testing for cooperativity can be difficult due to the equipment necessary and a lack of standardized means for performing the testing in liquid medium. We developed an assay using solid medium to identify interactions between antibiotics and phages for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. We modeled the interactions between antibiotics and phages on solid medium, and then tested multiple replicates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and Stenotrophomonas in the assay. For each organism, we identified synergy between different phage and antibiotic combinations. The development of this solid media assay for assessing synergy between phages and antibiotics will better inform the use of these combinations in the treatment of ARB infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventricular assist device infections: findings from ineffective phage therapies in five cases.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used for management of heart failure; infection remains a frequent complication. Phage therapy has been successful in a variety of antibiotic refractory infections and is of interest in treating LVAD infections. We performed a retrospective review of four patients that underwent five separate courses of intravenous (IV) phage therapy with concomitant antibiotic for treatment of endovascular Pseudomonas aeruginosa LVAD infection. We assessed phage susceptibility, bacterial strain sequencing, serum neutralization, biofilm activity, and shelf-life of phage preparations. Five treatments of one to four wild-type virulent phage(s) were administered for 14-51 days after informed consent and regulatory approval. There was no successful outcome. Breakthrough bacteremia occurred in four of five treatments. Two patients died from the underlying infection. We noted a variable decline in phage susceptibility following three of five treatments, four of four tested developed serum neutralization, and prophage presence was confirmed in isolates of two tested patients. Two phage preparations showed an initial titer drop. Phage biofilm activity was confirmed in two. Phage susceptibility alone was not predictive of clinical efficacy in P. aeruginosa endovascular LVAD infection. IV phage was associated with serum neutralization in most cases though lack of clinical effect may be multifactorial including presence of multiple bacterial isolates with varying phage susceptibility, presence of prophages, decline in phage titers, and possible lack of biofilm activity. Breakthrough bacteremia occurred frequently (while the organism remained susceptible to administered phage) and is an important safety consideration.

Quality measures in pre-liver transplant care by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.

Designing and analyzing studies of coronavirus disease 2019 and post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 among immunocompromised individuals.

Observational studies of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among transplant candidates and recipients remain important as immunocompromised patients formed a very small proportion of patients included in COVID-19 trials and large database analyses. We discuss methods that have been used in such analyses to evaluate the impact of vaccination on the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 in such patients and on the probability of developing post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 after the onset of infection. We also propose future directions for research and discuss the methods that will be useful to conduct such investigations. The study design and analytical issues that we consider have the potential to be helpful not only for COVID-19 research but also for other infections as well.

Using HCV-viremic organs for lung transplantation does not confer higher rejection rates compared to HCV-negative organs.

BACKGROUND: National data demonstrate that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected organ donors are increasingly being used in the US, including for lung transplantation. We aimed to assess whether there were any differences in the acute or chronic rejection rates at 1 year following lung transplantation from HCV-viremic versus uninfected donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients at our institution from April 1, 2017 to October 1, 2020 and then assessed various outcomes between those who received a transplant from HCV-viremic donors versus HCV-negative donors. Primary outcome was to determine if there was a higher incidence of acute and/or chronic allograft rejection when using HCV NAT+ lung donation. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We transplanted 135 patients during the study period, including 18 from HCV-viremic donors. Standard induction therapy with basiliximab and maintenance triple drug immunosuppression was utilized per UC San Diego protocol. All 17 patients receiving HCV-viremic organs developed acute HCV infection and were treated in the postoperative period with 12 weeks of direct acting antivirals (DAA). HCV genotypes included 1, 2, and 3. DAA used included glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1), and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (2) with drug choice determined by patient's medical insurance coverage. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of DAA therapy (SVR12), indicative of a cure, was achieved in all (100%) recipients. No recipient had a serious adverse event related to HCV infection. The lung transplant recipient (LTR) HCV-viremic donors had lower rates of clinically significant rejection (5.9% vs. 11% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors), and no chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 1 year (vs. 5.9% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors). One-year survival was 100% in the LTR HCV-viremic donors compared to 95.8% in the LTR HCV-nonviremic donors. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and success of using HCV NAT + donors with excellent results and without a higher incidence of rejection. Longer term follow-up and a larger sample size are needed to allow this to be a more widely accepted practice for lung transplant programs and payors.