Incidence and Predictors of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve (from the Nationwide Readmissions Database).

Patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation (AF) at baseline have higher mortality than those without AF. Data on new-onset AF (NOAF) after TEER are limited. Using the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified a cohort of patients who underwent TEER and classified them into 3 groups based on AF presence during the study period. The primary end point was the incidence and timing of NOAF up to 6 months after TEER. Logistic regression modeling identified independent predictors of NOAF at readmission. Of the 6,861patients that underwent TEER, 4,134 (59.9%) had AF at baseline, and 239 (3.5%) developed NOAF. Median time-to-NOAF admission was 47 days (interquartile range 16 to 113), and 37% of patients with NOAF presented within 30 days after TEER. Patients with NOAF experienced costlier and longer index-TEER hospitalization and had more co-morbidities. Chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 2.20), fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.52), and heart failure (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.44) were identified as independent predictors of NOAF. Hypertensive complications and heart failure were the leading causes of readmission. In conclusion, those patients that developed NOAF after TEER tended to be an overall sicker group at baseline compared with the remainder of the study cohort. These data, obtained from a nationally representative cohort, highlight a particular group of patients subject to developing NOAF and their association with increased rehospitalization in the post-TEER setting. Predictors of NOAF can be screened for during TEER workup to identify patients at increased risk.

Expediting Time from Symptoms to Medical Contact Utilizing a Telemedicine Call Center.

BACKGROUND: No definitive solution has been forthcoming for the often dangerously long interval between symptom onset and seeking medical care in the prehospital setting. We examined the implementation of telemedicine technology and characterization of its utilizers for its efficacy in reducing this possibly life-threatening time lag. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on the working database of an operational telemedicine facility that included all subscribers. Time-to-contact measurements throughout 2012 were retrieved from its medical files, and data on age, gender, medical history, and main complaint were analyzed. RESULTS: Throughout 2012, 22,274 of a total of 46,556 calls (47.8%) were made ≤60 min from symptom onset. It is important that 26.9% of all calls (12,522/46,556) were made in <15 min. Significantly more males (10,794/22,229 [49%]) contacted in ≤60 min compared with females (11,480/24,327 [47%], p<0.03). Subjects <60 years of age (2,889/5,717 [51%]) called earlier than those >60 years (19,386/40,839 [47%], p<0.001). Patients with prior resuscitation and/or myocardial infarction contacted significantly more rapidly than those with other cardiac diseases. Over one-half of patients with cardiac complaints contacted the call center ≤60 min from symptom onset, as did those who suffered physical trauma, but not patients with gastrointestinal symptoms or pain elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: A telemedicine system with rapid accessibility to a professional call center and prompt triage thereafter could be an additional promising strategy for shortening the interval between symptom onset and call for medical assistance. Implementation of a widespread telemedicine infrastructure may bridge the unmet gap between occurrence of symptoms to initiation of medical treatment.

Renal impairment according to acute kidney injury network criteria among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention: a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Conflicting data exists regarding the frequency and significance of acute kidney injury (AKI) in ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients. The acute kidney injury network (AKIN) classification has been shown to predict mortality in various critically ill patients; however, limited information is available regarding its use and its clinical relevance among STEMI patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 1,033 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). AKI was identified on the basis of the changes in serum creatinine during hospitalization according to the AKIN criteria. Patients were assessed for in-hospital adverse outcomes as well as all-cause mortality up to 5 years. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients (9.6 %) developed AKI: 79 patients (79 %) had stage 1, 14 patients (14 %) developed stage 2, and 7 patients (7 %) developed stage 3 AKI. Patients with AKI had more complications during hospitalization, with higher 30 days (11 vs 1 %; p < 0.001) and 5-year all-cause mortality (29 vs 6 %; p < 0.001) compared to those without AKI. The adjusted risk of death increased proportionally to AKI severity. Compared to patients with no AKI, the adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 6.68 (95 % confidence interval: 2.1-21.6, p = 0.002) in patients with AKI. Age, hypertension, chronic kidney injury and low left ventricular ejection fraction were independent predictors of developing AKI. CONCLUSION: In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, AKI assessed by AKIN criteria is a frequent complication, associated with an increased risk of both short- and long-term mortality.