Renal safety and survival among acutely ill hospitalized patients treated by blockers of the Renin-Angiotensin axis or loop diuretics: a single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the renal safety of blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) during acute illness, especially in the presence of volume depletion and hemodynamic instability. METHODS: We explored the impact of loop diuretics and RAS blockers on the likelihood of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) or acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) among inpatients. Adjusted odds ratio for AKI, AKR and mortality was calculated, using logistic regression models, with subgroup analysis for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, corrected for blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: 53,289 patients were included. RAS blockade was associated with reduced adjusted odds ratio for both AKI (0.76, CI 0.70-0.83) AKR (0.55, 0.52-0.58), and mortality within 30 days (0.44, 0.41-0.48), whereas loop diuretics were associated with increased risk of AKI (3.75, 3.42-4.12) and mortality (1.71, 1.58-1.85) and reduced AKR (0.71, 0.66-0.75). Comparable impact of RAS blockers and loop diuretics on renal outcomes and death was found among 6,069 patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2. RAS inhibition and diuretics tended to increase the adjusted odds ratios for AKI and to reduce the likelihood of AKR in hypotensive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced blood pressure, RAS blockers and diuretics affect the odds of developing AKI or AKR among inpatients, suggesting possible disruption in renal functional reserve (RFR). As long as blood pressure is maintained, RAS inhibition seems to be safe and renoprotective in this population, irrespective of kidney function upon admission, and is associated with reduced mortality.

Preoperative localization modalities in primary hyperparathyroidism: Correlation with postoperative cure.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative localization is critical to the success of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. This investigation aimed to assess the correlation among preoperative imaging results, intraoperative findings, and postoperative cure rates in patients undergoing operation for primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operation for primary hyperparathyroidism between June 2010 and March 2016 was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 398 patients underwent parathyroidectomy. The overall cure rate was 97.5%. The ultrasonography performed by the surgeon was superior to the ultrasonography performed by the radiologist and to the sestamibi scan in lateralizing the adenoma correctly (80% vs 62% vs 70%, P < .001, respectively), and had the greatest sensitivity (93%) and accuracy (80%) among all tests (P < .001). Age ≥65 was found to be associated with lesser cure rates (94% vs 99.2%, P = .003). The number of positive preoperative studies correlated with cure rate, ranging from 80% for patients with 0 positive studies, to 100% in those with 4 positive studies (P = .0004). In patients with a negative sestamibi and an ultrasonography performed by the radiologist, there was no significant difference in the cure rates among those with no preoperative computed tomography, a positive preoperative computed tomography, or a negative preoperative computed tomography. CONCLUSION: An ultrasonography performed by an experienced surgeon is an extremely valuable preoperative localization modality. The cure rate obtained is proportional to the number of positive imaging studies. In patients with negative ultrasonography performed by a nonexperienced radiologist and a negative sestamibi scan, the performance of computed tomography does not seem to increase cure rate. Patients with no positive preoperative scans represent a challenging subgroup, with cure rates of approximately 80%.