Effectiveness of a neonatal intensive care unit-specific antimicrobial stewardship program: A ten-year review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in consumption of specific antibiotics in a neonatal intensive care unit after the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2010, and December 31,2019. SETTING: The neonatal intensive care unit at British Columbia Women's Hospital (Vancouver Canada), a tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Admitted neonates prescribed antibiotics. METHODS: We implemented an ASP with an early implementation phase starting in January 2014 (period 2) and a later phase starting in January 2017 (period 3). Patient demographics were collected, including birth weight, gestational age, history of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and surgical operations from existing databases. Interrupted time-series analysis was used, and comparison of antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) averages were conducted across the preimplementation period (period 1), period 2, and period 3 regarding total patients and subgroups. RESULTS: We identified 4,512 infants. There was a significant decrease in DOT from 472 (95% confidence interval [CI], 431-517) in period 1 to 405 (95% CI, 367-446) in period 2 to 313 (95% CI, 280-350) in period 3. We detected a significant decrease in the use of ampicillin, aminoglycosides, cloxacillin, and linezolid but not in vancomycin or cefotaxime. Subgroup analyses of infants <1,500 g and those without NEC or surgery showed decreases in the use of cloxacillin, aminoglycosides, and linezolid. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an ASP was associated with a significant decrease in the overall DOT and use of certain antibiotics. This study presents important targets for ongoing ASP work.

Vitamin D Toxicity from an Unusual and Unexpected Source: A Report of 2 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Hypervitaminosis D is a relatively uncommon etiology of hypercalcemia. Toxicity is usually caused by very high doses, mostly secondary to erroneous prescription or administration of vitamin D, and less commonly, contaminated foods or manufacturing errors of vitamin D-containing supplements. CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old male, previously healthy, presented with 2-week history of nonspecific symptoms (fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints). Investigations showed acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia (total calcium 3.81 mmol/L). Further diagnostic workup revealed markedly elevated 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (1,910 nmol/L). He denied taking any vitamin D supplements; however, he reported consumption of creatine and protein supplements. Mass spectrometry analysis of the creatine supplement estimated a vitamin D content of 425,000 IU per serving (100 times the upper tolerable daily dose). A few months later, another previously healthy adolescent presented with severe hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury secondary to hypervitaminosis D. He was also using a creatine supplement, from the same manufacturer brand and lot. Both patients were treated with intravenous hydration, calcitonin, and pamidronate. They maintained normocalcemia after their initial presentation but required low-calcium diets and laboratory testing for months after this exposure. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We present 2 cases of hypervitaminosis D caused by a manufacturing error of a natural health product which did not claim to contain vitamin D. The use of dietary supplements is highly prevalent; this should be incorporated while taking medical history, and considered a potential source of toxicity when an alternative source cannot be found, regardless of the product label.

What does mainstream media say about enzyme replacement therapies?

INTRODUCTION: Enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) are expensive drugs that can be used to treat certain inherited diseases. ERTs are not universally covered across provinces and costs are beyond the means of most patients. Media reports are commonly used to lobby for provincial ERT funding for specific patients. As physicians may be confronted with these media reports by patients, this study explored medical reporting regarding ERTs in print media. METHODS: Canadian Newsstream database was searched for articles about three ERTs-Elaprase™, Naglazyme™ and Vimizim™. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed for data regarding efficacy and adverse events, mention of role of health care professionals and medical information sources. Thematic analysis explored how efficacy was described within the articles. Data from product monographs and recent meta-analyses served as a basis for comparison. RESULTS: Of 57 articles retained for the study, 9% mentioned clinical trial data regarding drug efficacy; 7% mentioned adverse events. Only 23% of opinions about medical necessity or efficacy of the drug were from a physician. The majority were those of politicians. Information describing the condition was accurate in 90% of cases, although usually incompletely. DISCUSSION: Incomplete or inaccurate reporting about efficacy and safety may influence families that appear to be candidates for ERT. Poor reporting of medical information may also influence the social pressures placed on the government and affect funding approval for these drugs. Physicians should be aware that their patients may be exposed to misleading information.