Future needs for continuing innovation in hemophilia: improving outcomes for individuals of all severities, including women and those in resource-constrained regions.

Over recent decades, management of people with hemophilia (PwH) has been greatly improved by scientific advances that have resulted in a rich and varied therapeutic landscape. Nevertheless, treatment limitations continue to drive innovation, and emerging options have the potential to realize further improvement. We advocate four general principles to optimize benefits from innovation: individualizing the treatment approach, targeting 'normal,' making the most of available resources, and considering treatment affordability. Ultimately, all PwH-men and women, of all ages and severities, and worldwide-should have access to treatment that fully prevents bleeding, while allowing personal, social, family, and professional lives of choice. Clearly, we are not there yet, but developing goals/milestones based on the principles we describe may help to achieve this.

Gene Therapy with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec in Adults with Hemophilia B.

BACKGROUND: Fidanacogene elaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene-therapy vector for hemophilia B containing a high-activity human factor IX variant (FIX-R338L/FIX-Padua), was associated with sustained factor IX activity in a phase 1-2a study. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 open-label study of fidanacogene elaparvovec at a dose of 5×1011 vector genome copies per kilogram of body weight. Men 18 to 65 years of age with hemophilia B and a factor IX level of 2% or less were eligible for screening if they had received at least 6 months of therapy with prophylactic factor IX concentrate. The primary end point, tested for noninferiority, was the annualized bleeding rate (treated and untreated bleeding episodes) from week 12 to month 15 after treatment with fidanacogene elaparvovec as compared with the prophylaxis lead-in period. Superiority, additional efficacy end points, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 316 men who underwent screening for the lead-in study, 204 (64.6%) were not eligible; 188 (59.5%) of those were ineligible owing to the presence of anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies. Of the 45 participants who received fidanacogene elaparvovec, 44 completed at least 15 months of follow-up. The annualized rate of bleeding for all bleeding episodes decreased by 71%, from 4.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80 to 7.05) at baseline to 1.28 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.98) after gene therapy, a treatment difference of -3.15 episodes (95% CI, -5.46 to -0.83; P = 0.008). This result shows the noninferiority and superiority of fidanacogene elaparvovec to prophylaxis. At 15 months, the mean factor IX activity was 26.9% (median, 22.9%; range, 1.9 to 119.0) by one-stage SynthASil assay. A total of 28 participants (62%) received glucocorticoids for increased aminotransferase levels or decreased factor IX levels (or both) starting between 11 and 123 days. No infusion-related serious adverse events, thrombotic events, development of factor IX inhibitors, or malignant conditions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fidanacogene elaparvovec was superior to prophylaxis for the treatment of participants with hemophilia B, leading to reduced bleeding and stable factor IX expression. (Funded by Pfizer; BENEGENE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03861273.).

Primary prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint outcomes in Swedish haemophilia A patients.

INTRODUCTION: Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard in severe haemophilia A (SHA) but time to escalate the prophylaxis regimen varies. AIM: Assess prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint health outcomes in SHA with primary prophylaxis. METHODS: Adult male patients born after 1980, with SHA on primary prophylaxis, started before the age of 3 years and second joint bleed, and no history of FVIII inhibitors, were enrolled. Repeated joint-health examinations were performed with HJHS or HEAD-US; VERITAS-PRO assessed adherence. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled with, at inclusion, median age 33.5 years, annualized bleed rate and joint bleed rate 0, and FVIII consumption 4232 IU/kg/year, respectively. The median age was 1.2 years, at prophylaxis start once weekly with a median FVIII dose of 47.7 IU/kg, and 1.7 years, by the time escalation to a final regimen had occurred, with a median infusion frequency of thrice weekly and FVIII dose 41.7 IU/kg, respectively. Older age correlated with later transition to escalated prophylaxis (p < .001). Longer time to escalated prophylaxis correlated to more bleeds (p < .001). Median HJHS increased slowly, reaching 4 at 35-40 years. HJHS at 15-20 years correlated with higher HJHS afterwards. Median total HEAD-US score was 1 and correlated with HJHS (p < .001). Median VERITAS-PRO score was 36, indicating good treatment adherence. CONCLUSION: Primary prophylaxis is effective but does not completely prevent the gradual development of arthropathy in SHA. Joint assessments with HJHS should start at an early age, as they correlate with arthropathy in later life. Prophylaxis escalation should proceed expeditiously to prevent bleeds.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B (HOPE-B): 24-month post-hoc efficacy and safety data from a single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Etranacogene dezaparvovec, the first gene therapy approved for haemophilia B treatment, was shown to be superior to treatment with continuous prophylactic factor IX in terms of bleeding protection 18 months after gene therapy in a phase 3 trial. We report post-hoc 24-month efficacy and safety data from this trial to evaluate the longer-term effects of etranacogene dezaparvovec in individuals with haemophilia B. METHODS: The phase 3 HOPE-B trial enrolled males aged 18 years or older with inherited haemophilia B, classified as severe (plasma factor IX activity level <1%) or moderately severe (plasma factor IX activity level ≥1% and ≤2%), with a severe bleeding phenotype and who were on stable continuous factor IX prophylaxis. Participants were treated with a single infusion of etranacogene dezaparvovec (2 × 1013 genome copies per kg of bodyweight). The primary endpoint, reported previously, was non-inferiority of the annualised bleeding rate (ABR) during the 52 weeks following stable factor IX expression (defined as months 7-18 after treatment) versus an at least 6-month lead-in period in which participants received their usual continuous factor IX prophylaxis, and is updated here up to month 24. Additional, post-hoc efficacy analyses, including adjusted ABR, factor IX activity, participants within factor IX ranges, and factor IX use, and safety analyses were performed at 24 months after gene therapy. Data were analysed in the full analysis set, which comprised the 54 patients who received at least a partial dose of gene therapy. The trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03569891. FINDINGS: The study began on June 27, 2018, and participants were treated between January, 2019, and March, 2020; the date of data cutoff was April 21, 2022. 54 adult males (40 White, two Asian, one Black or African American, 11 other or missing) received a single intravenous infusion of etranacogene dezaparvovec and were followed for a median of 26·51 months (IQR 24·54-27·99), after a lead-in period of 7·13 months (6·51-7·82). In the updated analysis comparing months 7-24 after gene therapy to the lead-in period, mean adjusted ABR significantly reduced from 4·18 to 1·51 (p=0·0002) for all bleeds and from 3·65 to 0·99 (p=0·0001) for factor IX-treated bleeds. During each 6-month period after gene therapy, at least 67% of participants experienced no bleeding (36 of 54 during months 0-6 and stable thereafter), compared with 14 (26%) of 54 during the lead-in period. 24 months after gene therapy, 1 (2%) participant had one-stage factor IX activity less than 5%, whereas 18 (33%) had factor IX activity more than 40% (non-haemophilia range), with mean factor IX activity stable and sustained at 36·7% (SD 19·0%). 52 (96%) of 54 participants expressed endogenous factor IX, remaining free of factor IX prophylaxis at month 24. No new safety concerns were identified and no treatment-related serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. The most common treatment-related adverse events were an increase in alanine aminotransferase (nine [17%] of 54 patients), headache (eight [15%]), influenza-like illness (seven [13%]), and an increase in aspartate aminotransferase (five [9%]). INTERPRETATION: By providing durable disease correction throughout the 24 months after gene therapy, etranacogene dezaparvovec provides a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B. FUNDING: uniQure and CSL Behring.

Health-related quality of life and physical activity in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A and B (the MoHem study).

INTRODUCTION: The impact of moderate haemophilia on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical activity (PA) is not well known. In previous studies, persons with factor VIII/factor IX activity (FVIII/FIX:C) below 3 IU/dL were associated with a more severe bleeding phenotype than predicted. AIM: To explore HRQoL and PA in patients with moderate haemophilia A (MHA) and B (MHB). METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicentre study covering patients with MHA and MHB in Sweden, Finland, and Norway. HRQoL was assessed with the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) form and PA with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire among participants aged ≥15 years. RESULTS: We report on 104 patients aged 15-84 years from the MoHem study. Overall, EQ-5D utility was .85 (median) (Q1-Q3 0.73-1.0) with corresponding visual analogue scale (VAS) 80 (70-90), which were similar regardless of treatment modality, FVIII/FIX:C, and MHA or MHB. Pain and mobility were most frequently affected dimensions. Utility (r = -.54), VAS (r = -.42), and PA (r = -.32) correlated negatively with arthropathy (HJHS). Only patients aged 41-50 years displayed lower utility (p = .02) and VAS (p < .01) than the Norwegian population norm. Patients on prophylaxis aged 35-54 years reported higher PA than those treated on-demand (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Haemophilic arthropathy had negative impact on HRQoL and PA in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia. Middle-aged patients captured lower utility and VAS than observed in the general population. Tailored prophylaxis and improved joint health may influence positively on HRQoL and PA also in moderate haemophilia.

Infrastructural considerations of implementing gene therapy for hemophilia in the Nordic context.

Background: Despite improvements in hemophilia care, challenges remain, including treatment burden and impaired quality of life. Gene therapy may overcome these. However, its introduction presents a challenge. Objectives: To outline a function-based gene therapy working model describing critical milestones associated with gene therapy handling, administration, and follow-up to facilitate and implement an effective infrastructure for gene therapy introduction. Design: Literature review and consensus discussion among Hemophilia Comprehensive Care centers (HCCCs) in the Nordic region. Methods: Representatives from six HCCCs sought to pinpoint milestones and key stakeholders for site readiness at the pre-, peri-, and post-infusion stages, including authority and genetically modified organism (GMO) product requirements, awareness, medical eligibility, logistics and product handling for infusion, laboratory monitoring, and follow-up. Results: A gene therapy transit map was developed with key stakeholders identified. The approach to prepare the vector will differ between the Nordic centers, but the contracted pharmacy unit will be a key stakeholder. Therefore, a pharmacy checklist for the implementation of gene therapy was developed. For the future, Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product centers will also be implemented. Patients' expectations, commitments, and concerns need to be addressed repeatedly and education of patients and the expanded health-care professionals team will be the key to successful and optimal clinical management. Eligibility testing according to the product's summary of product characteristics and frequent follow-up and monitoring post-infusion according to the World Federation of Hemophilia chart will be crucial. Conclusion: The approach to deliver gene therapy in the Nordic region will differ partly between the hemophilia centers, but the defined road map with checklists for the implementation of this advanced therapy will be applicable to all. The map may also serve as a platform for the use of future GMO product options both within and outside the area of hemophilia.

Implementing gene therapy for hemophilia in the Nordic context Why was this study done? • Despite improvements in hemophilia care, challenges remain including treatment burden and impaired quality of life. • Gene therapy may overcome these challenges. • The introduction of gene therapy presents a challenge in many ways. What did the researchers do? • We, as representatives from six Hemophilia Comprehensive Care Centers in the Nordic region, sought to pinpoint milestones and key stakeholders for site readiness at the pre-, peri- and post-infusion stages, including authority and genetically modified organism (GMO) product requirements, awareness, medical eligibility, logistics and product handling for infusion, laboratory monitoring, plus follow-up. What did the researchers find? • We developed a gene therapy transit map and identified key stakeholders. • The approach to prepare the vector will differ between the Nordic centers, but the pharmacy unit will be a key stakeholder. We therefore developed a pharmacy checklist for the implementation of gene therapy. • For the future, Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product centers will be implemented. • Patients' expectations, commitments and concerns need to be addressed repeatedly. • Education of patients and the expanded health care professionals team will be the key to successful and optimal clinical management. • Eligibility testing according to the product's summary of product characteristics and close follow-up and monitoring post-infusion according to the World Federation of Hemophilia chart will be crucial. • Access to both chromogenic and one-stage factor activity assay results from a specialized coagulation laboratory with a short turn-around time is important. What do the findings mean? • The approach to delivering gene therapy in the Nordic region will differ partly between the hemophilia centers, but the defined road map with checklists for the implementation will be applicable to all. • The map may also serve as a platform for the use of future GMO product options both within and outside the area of hemophilia.

Recombinant factor IX Fc prophylaxis reduces pain and increases levels of physical activity, with sustained, long-term improvements in patients with hemophilia B: post hoc analysis of phase III trials using patient-reported outcomes.

Background: Pain is a common symptom of hemophilia that may adversely affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Previous post hoc analyses of prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) have been published for adults and adolescents, demonstrating improvements in health-related QoL (HRQoL) when assessed by the haemophilia-specific QoL (HaemAQoL) questionnaire. Objective: To describe in depth the evolution of QoL, pain- and activity-related domains and questions for pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with hemophilia B treated with rFIXFc prophylaxis. Design: A post hoc analysis of data from a series of clinical trials. Methods: This post hoc, long-term analysis assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the Kids B-LONG (NCT01440946: pediatric) and B-LONG (NCT01027364: adults and adolescents) parent studies and the B-YOND (NCT01425723: all age groups) extension study. Results: Ninety-two adult and adolescent patients that started in the B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (range) duration of follow-up of 58.9 (0.0-78.4) months. The Haem-A-QoL total score was significantly reduced from baseline by 4.45 (p ⩽ 0.01), as were the subdomains 'physical health' (9.10; p = 0.001), 'sports and leisure' (11.25; p ⩽ 0.01), 'treatment' (2.69; p = 0.05), and 'view of self' (5.81; p = 0.002). Thirty pediatric patients that started in the Kids B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (min-max) duration of follow-up of 36.7 (9.0-59.9) months. The high level of satisfaction demonstrated by the PROs at baseline was maintained. Conclusion: rFIXFc prophylaxis reduced perceived pain and increased levels of physical activity with sustained, long-term improvements in QoL in adult and adolescent patients with hemophilia B and maintained high QoL scores in pediatric patients.

Helping to reduce pain and increase physical activity in patients with hemophilia B People with hemophilia B do not produce factor IX (FIX) that works properly, so they need to be given additional FIX to help their blood clot. Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc), is an extended half-life (meaning it remains active for longer than standard, unmodified FIX) treatment for hemophilia B. People with hemophilia B can experience episodes of bleeding, which can result in other symptoms, including pain, difficulty participating in sport, and poor mental health. This study shows that regularly taking rFIXFc over approximately 5 years to prevent or treat bleeds could also help to make these other symptoms better.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of bleeding outcomes in severe haemophilia A: Comparing valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy, emicizumab prophylaxis, and FVIII replacement prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Head-to-head evaluation of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, the first gene therapy approved for haemophilia A, with emicizumab is not available. Therefore, phase 3 trial data were indirectly compared. AIM: To compare bleeding rates in trials evaluating 6 × 1013  vg/kg valoctocogene roxaparvovec (GENEr8-1; NCT03370913), 1.5 mg/kg emicizumab dosed every week (HAVEN 3; NCT02847637), and FVIII prophylaxis (270-902) in participants with severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤1 IU/dL). METHODS: Valoctocogene roxaparvovec versus emicizumab and FVIII prophylaxis as used in 270-902 versus emicizumab cross-trial comparisons were performed using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Individual participant data from GENEr8-1 and 270-902 were weighted to equalise aggregate participant baseline characteristics from HAVEN 3. After MAIC weighting, annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and proportions of participants without bleeds were compared for treated bleeds, all bleeds, treated joint bleeds, and treated spontaneous bleeds. RESULTS: After MAIC weighting, ABR for all bleeds was statistically significantly lower with valoctocogene roxaparvovec than emicizumab (rate ratio [95% CI], .55 [.33-.93]). Additionally, significantly higher proportions of participants had no treated joint bleeds (odds ratio [95% CI], 2.75 [1.20-6.31]) and no treated bleeds (3.25 [1.53-6.90]) with valoctocogene roxaparvovec versus emicizumab. When compared with the mainly standard half-life FVIII prophylaxis regimens in 270-902, mean ABRs (except for all bleeds) were significantly lower, and significantly higher proportions reported 0 bleeds for all outcomes with emicizumab. CONCLUSION: Valoctocogene roxaparvovec provided generally lower bleeding rates and higher probability of no bleeds, including treated joint bleeds, than emicizumab. Emicizumab was more effective than FVIII prophylaxis regimens used in 270-902.

Impact of timing of prophylaxis commencement, F8 genotype and age on factor consumption and health-related quality of life in patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: The timing of prophylaxis and F8 genotype can impact treatment outcomes in adults with severe haemophilia A (HA). AIM: To investigate how F8 genotype, timing, and type of prophylaxis influence arthropathy, bleeding rates, factor consumption and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with severe HA were enrolled. Bleeding events were recorded retrospectively during median 12.5 months. F8 gene variants were classified as null or non-null. Joint health and HRQoL were assessed with HJHS and EQ-5D-5L, respectively. RESULTS: The median age at prophylaxis start was 1.25 years in the primary prophylaxis group (N = 15, median age 26 years) and 31.5 years in the secondary group (N = 22, 45 years), respectively. There were significant differences in the medians of HJHS (4 vs. 20, p < .001), EQ-5D-5L index (0.9647 vs. 0.904, p = .022), EQ VAS (87 vs. 75, p = .01) and FVIII consumption (3883 vs. 2737 IU/kg/year, p = .02), between the primary and secondary groups, respectively. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0 for both groups. Twenty-five null and thirteen non-null F8 gene variants were identified. In the secondary prophylaxis group, lower median FVIII consumption (1926 vs. 3370 IU/kg/year) was shown for non-null compared to null variants, respectively, with similar ABR and HJHS. CONCLUSION: Delayed prophylaxis start with intermediate dose intensity prevents bleeds but at a cost of more arthropathy and reduced HRQoL, compared to higher intensity primary prophylaxis. Non-null F8 genotype may allow lower factor consumption with similar HJHS and bleeding rates, compared to null genotype.

Considerations for shared decision management in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A or B.

Recent advances in therapeutics are now providing a wide range of options for adults and children living with hemophilia. Although therapeutic choices are also increasing for the youngest individuals with severe disease, challenges remain about early management decisions, as supporting data are currently limited. Parents and healthcare professionals are tasked with helping children achieve an inclusive quality of life and maintain good joint health into adulthood. Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard to optimize outcomes and is recommended to start before 2 years of age. A range of topics need to be discussed with parents to aid their understanding of the decisions they can make and how these will affect the management of their child/children. For those with a family history of hemophilia, prenatal considerations include the possibility of genetic counseling, prenatal investigations, and planning for delivery, together with monitoring of the mother and neonate, as well as diagnosis of the newborn and treatment of any birth-associated bleeding. Subsequent considerations, which are also applicable to families where infant bleeding has resulted in a new diagnosis of sporadic hemophilia, involve explaining bleed recognition and treatment options, practical aspects of initiating/continuing prophylaxis, dealing with bleeds, and ongoing aspects of treatment, including possible inhibitor development. Over time, optimizing treatment efficacy, in which individualizing therapy around activities can play a role, and long-term considerations, including retaining joint health and tolerance maintenance, become increasingly important. The evolving treatment landscape is creating a need for continually updated guidance. Multidisciplinary teams and peers from patient organizations can help provide relevant information. Easily accessible, multidisciplinary comprehensive care remains a foundation to care. Equipping parents early with the knowledge to facilitate truly informed decision-making will help achieve the best possible longer-term health equity and quality of life for the child and family living with hemophilia. Plain language summary: Points to be taken into account to help families make decisions to best care for children born with hemophilia Medical advances are providing a range of treatment options for adults and children with hemophilia. There is, however, relatively limited information about managing newborns with the condition. Doctors and nurses can help parents to understand the choices for infants born with hemophilia. We describe the various points doctors and nurses should ideally discuss with families to enable informed decision-making. We focus on infants who require early treatment to prevent spontaneous or traumatic bleeding (prophylaxis), which is recommended to start before 2 years of age. Families with a history of hemophilia may benefit from discussions before pregnancy, including how an affected child would be treated to protect against bleeds. When mothers are pregnant, doctors can explain investigations that can provide information about their unborn child, plan for the birth, and monitor mother and baby to minimize bleed risks at delivery. Testing will confirm whether the baby is affected by hemophilia. Not all infants with hemophilia will be born to families with a history of the condition. Identification of hemophilia for the first time in a family (which is 'sporadic hemophilia') occurs in previously undiagnosed infants who have bleeds requiring medical advice and possibly hospital treatment. Before any mothers and babies with hemophilia are discharged from hospital, doctors and nurses will explain to parents how to recognize bleeding and available treatment options can be discussed. Over time, ongoing discussions will help parents to make informed treatment decisions:• When and how to start, then continue, prophylaxis.• How to deal with bleeds (reinforcing previous discussions about bleed recognition and treatment) and other ongoing aspects of treatment. ○ For instance, children may develop neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to treatment they are receiving, requiring a change to the planned approach.• Ensuring treatment remains effective as their child grows, considering the varied needs and activities of their child.

[Factor XIII deficiency - not only a congenital bleeding disorder]. / Koagulationsfaktor XIII ­ inte bara ett kongenitalt blödningsproblem.

Factor XIII (FXIII) cross-links fibrin monomers to strengthen clots. The congenital severe autosomal type of FXIII deficiency with <5 percent of normal FXIII activity is an extremely rare bleeding disorder with <10 cases in Sweden. It often debuts at birth with prolonged umbilical cord bleedings and an increased risk for bleeding throughout life. Patients with severe congenital FXIII deficit have an established FXIII concentrate treatment, both for prophylaxis and at bleeding episodes. Acquired autoantibodies against FXIII are also rare, with high bleeding risks. Quantitative FXIII analyses are only available in few laboratories in Sweden. Sometimes more complex antigen/antibody/gene mutation tests are needed for diagnosis, but these are not available in Sweden. Other acquired FXIII deficiencies can occur in patients with several diseases and during surgery/trauma. Their treatment and diagnostic logistics are less defined. Recent European guidelines on perioperative bleeding have suggested FXIII concentrate treatment.

High use of pain, depression, and anxiety drugs in hemophilia: more than 3000 people with hemophilia in an 11-year Nordic registry study.

Background: Pain is a common feature of hemophilia, but prevalence of depression and anxiety is less studied. Registry data on prescription drugs can provide an objective measure of the magnitude of these complications. Objectives: To identify treatment patterns of prescribed pain, antidepressant, and antianxiety medications compared with those of matched controls in 4 Nordic countries. Methods: The MIND study (NCT03276130) analyzed longitudinal individual-level national data during 2007-2017. People with hemophilia (PwH) were identified from National Health Data Registers by diagnosis or factor replacement treatment and compared with population controls. Three subgroups were defined by the use of factor concentrates and sex (moderate-to-high factor consumption (factor VIII [FVIII] use of ≥40 IU/kg/week or FIX use of ≥10 IU/kg/week), low factor consumption, and women including carriers). Results: Data of 3246 PwH, representing 30,184 person-years, were analyzed. PwH (including children and adults) used more pain, depression, and anxiety medications compared with controls. This was most accentuated in the moderate-to-high factor consumption group and notably also observed in men with low factor consumption and women including carriers, usually representing a milder phenotype. A higher opioid use was observed across all age groups: 4- to 6-fold higher in the moderate-to-high factor consumption group and 2- to 4-fold higher in the low factor consumption group. Conclusion: The consistent higher use of pain, depression, and anxiety medications among PwH compared with population controls, regardless of age, sex, or factor consumption, in broad national data suggests a need for improved bleed protection and hemophilia care for all severities including mild hemophilia.

No difference in quality of life between persons with severe haemophilia A and B.

INTRODUCTION: Good health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important goal in the treatment of persons with haemophilia B (PwHB). Studies focusing on this population are limited, however, and data are insufficient. AIM: To assess the HRQoL in PwHB and to compare this to data on persons with haemophilia A (PwHA), as well as to evaluate the impact of joint health on HRQoL and to identify areas of insufficient care. METHODS: The B-NORD study enrolled persons with severe haemophilia B and matched controls with haemophilia A. HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire and joint health using Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS). RESULTS: The EQ-5D-3L was completed by 63 PwHB and 63 PwHA. Mobility problems were reported by 46% of PwHB and 44% of PwHA, pain/discomfort by 62% and 56%, and anxiety/depression by 33% and 17%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between PwHA and PwHB in EQ-5D profiles, level sum score, EQ-5D index (PwHB mean .80, PwHA mean .83, p = .24), or EQ VAS score (PwHB: mean 70, PwHA: mean 77, p = .061). Linear regression adjusted for age demonstrated that an increase in HJHS score was associated with a significant decrease in both EQ-5D index (B -.003, R2 .22) and EQ VAS score (B -.37, R2 .17). CONCLUSION: Despite the majority of patients being treated with prophylaxis, impaired HRQoL was reported in both PwHB and PwHA. No differences in HRQoL were found between the two groups. Impaired joint health had a significant negative impact on HRQoL.

Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe hemophilia B is treated with lifelong, continuous coagulation factor IX replacement to prevent bleeding. Gene therapy for hemophilia B aims to establish sustained factor IX activity, thereby protecting against bleeding without burdensome factor IX replacement. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 study, after a lead-in period (≥6 months) of factor IX prophylaxis, we administered one infusion of adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) vector expressing the Padua factor IX variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec; 2×1013 genome copies per kilogram of body weight) to 54 men with hemophilia B (factor IX activity ≤2% of the normal value) regardless of preexisting AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. The primary end point was the annualized bleeding rate, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis comparing the rate during months 7 through 18 after etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment with the rate during the lead-in period. Noninferiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% Wald confidence interval of the annualized bleeding rate ratio that was less than the noninferiority margin of 1.8. Superiority, additional efficacy measures, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: The annualized bleeding rate decreased from 4.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.22 to 5.45) during the lead-in period to 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.82) during months 7 through 18 after treatment, for a rate ratio of 0.36 (95% Wald CI, 0.20 to 0.64; P<0.001), demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec as compared with factor IX prophylaxis. Factor IX activity had increased from baseline by a least-squares mean of 36.2 percentage points (95% CI, 31.4 to 41.0) at 6 months and 34.3 percentage points (95% CI, 29.5 to 39.1) at 18 months after treatment, and usage of factor IX concentrate decreased by a mean of 248,825 IU per year per participant in the post-treatment period (P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Benefits and safety were observed in participants with predose AAV5 neutralizing antibody titers of less than 700. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy was superior to prophylactic factor IX with respect to the annualized bleeding rate, and it had a favorable safety profile. (Funded by uniQure and CSL Behring; HOPE-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03569891.).

The IgG-degrading enzyme, Imlifidase, restores the therapeutic activity of FVIII in inhibitor-positive hemophilia A mice.

Neutralizing anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies, known as FVIII inhibitors, represent a major drawback of replacement therapy in persons with congenital hemophilia A (PwHA), rendering further infusions of FVIII ineffective. FVIII inhibitors can also appear in non-hemophilic individuals causing acquired hemophilia A (AHA). The use of non-FVIII bypassing agents in cases of bleeds or surgery in inhibitor-positive patients is complicated by the lack of reliable biological monitoring and increased thrombotic risk. Imlifidase (IdeS) is an endopeptidase that degrades human immunoglobulin G (IgG); it was recently approved for hyperimmune patients undergoing renal transplants. Here we investigated the ability of IdeS to eliminate FVIII inhibitors in vitro and in a model of inhibitor-positive HA mice. IdeS cleaved anti-FVIII plasma IgG from PwHA and AHA patients, and hydrolyzed recombinant human anti-FVIII IgG independently from their subclass or specificity for the A2, A3, C1 or C2 domains of FVIII. In HA mice passively immunized with recombinant human anti-FVIII IgG, IdeS restored the hemostatic efficacy of FVIII, as evidenced by the correction of the bleeding tendency. Our results provide the proof of concept for the transient removal of FVIII inhibitors by IdeS, thereby opening a therapeutic window for efficient FVIII replacement therapy in inhibitor-positive patients.

Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes to older people with haemophilia A - A modified Delphi consensus by the ADVANCE Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population. AIM: To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS. METHODS: As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors. RESULTS: Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.