The timing of recurrence after endoscopic papillectomy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) offers a safe and effective method for resection of ampullary adenomas. Data regarding the long-term resolution of adenoma following EP are limited. The aim of this study therefore was to examine the timing of recurrence after EP of ampullary adenomas. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study including patients who received EP for ampullary adenomas from 8/2000 to 1/2018. Patients with confirmed complete eradication of adenoma were included in the recurrence analysis with recurrence defined as finding adenomatous histology after 1 negative surveillance endoscopy. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated to determine recurrence rates. RESULTS: Of the 165 patients who underwent EP, 136 patients (mean age 61.9, 51.5% female) had adenomatous histology with a mean lesion size of 21.2 mm. A total of 124 (91.2%) achieved complete eradication with a follow-up of 345.8 person-years. Recurrence occurred in 20 (16.1%) patients at a mean of 3.2 (± 3) years (range 0.5-9.75 years) for a recurrence rate of 5.8 (95% CI 3.6-8.8) per 100 person-years. Nine (45%) recurrences occurred after the 1st 2 years of surveillance. Recurrence rate did not differ by baseline pathology [low-grade dysplasia: 5.2 (95% CI 3.0-9.0), high-grade dysplasia: 6.9 (95% CI 2.3-15.5), adenocarcinoma: 7.7 (95% CI 0.9-25.1)]. CONCLUSION: Recurrence remains a significant concern after EP. Given the timing of recurrence, long surveillance periods may be necessary. Larger multicenter studies are needed, however, to determine appropriate surveillance intervals.

Endoscopic iatrogenic esophageal perforation and management: a retrospective outcome analysis in the modern era.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) is a severe adverse event (AE) of upper endoscopy procedures (UEPs) associated with morbidity. Management has shifted from surgery to endotherapy with clip closure (CC), self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), and vacuum therapy (VT). Limited analyses measure outcomes during contemporary interventional endoscopy periods. METHODS: IEPs associated with EGD, upper EUS, small bowel enteroscopy (SBE), and ERCP at a 3-hospital academic center from January 2011 to December 2023 were identified retrospectively from a centralized AE database. Additional information was obtained from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and STATA. RESULTS: Thirty-two IEPs from 26 EGDs, 4 EUS, 1 SBE, and 1 ERCP were identified. IEPs occurred mostly after dilation (bougie N = 7; balloon, N = 5) or foreign body removal (N = 6). Most IEPs occurred in the lower esophagus (N = 10) or gastroesophageal junction (N = 8). Diagnosis was made at a median 2 h after the injury by endoscopy (N = 14), CT scan (N = 12), esophagram (N = 5), or x-ray (N = 1). Initial treatment included conservative therapy alone (N = 7), CC (N = 3), SEMS (N = 14), SEMS plus CC (N = 3), or surgery (N = 3). Eleven patients required additional treatment including repeat SEMS or adjustment (N = 4) or VT (N = 1). No surgical interventions were required after 2013. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Disposition included discharge to home (N = 25), long-term care facility (N = 2), 4 deaths (12.5% of IEPs), and 1 unknown. CONCLUSIONS: IEPs are rare and occur throughout the esophagus after any UEP. The majority are recognized immediately and managed with endotherapy, or rarely, surgery today. These characteristics likely explain the low mortality in this study.

Endoscopic Management of Necrotic Pancreatic Fluid Collections in the Setting of Disrupted Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Out Like a LAMS?

In this commentary, the recent study "Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Transmural Plastic Stent Placement After Removal of Lumen Apposing Metal Stent In Resolved Pancreatic Fluid Collections With Duct Disconnection at Head/Neck of Pancreas" is addressed. Some background information regarding endoscopic management of walled off necrosis is mentioned, then the study is summarized, followed by a critique about the strengths and limitations of the study. Further areas of research are also mentioned.

Adverse Event Fatalities Related to GI Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Death after endoscopy is rare, under-reported, and has variable causes. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and causes of fatal endoscopic adverse events (AEs) across two academic medical centers and to identify patient-, procedure-, and sedation-related risk factors. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of fatal adverse events causally related to endoscopy at Denver Health Medical Center and the University of Colorado Hospital from 2011 to 2020. Fatal AEs were retrieved from the physician-reported database. Electronic medical records were then reviewed to determine medical history, procedure details, subsequent treatments, and time and cause of death. RESULTS: From January 2011 to January 2020, 146,010 GI endoscopy procedures were performed. Median patient age was 70 [51-78] and 57% were male. Thirty-one deaths were identified, 28 of which were attributed to endoscopy, yielding a procedure-related fatality rate of 0.018%. Procedures included 11 EGDs, one colonoscopy, two flexible sigmoidoscopies, six ERCPs, seven upper EUS, and one PEG-J tube placement. Specific causes of death included aspiration in four patients (14%); cardiac arrest or myocardial infarction in seven patients (25%); perforation in nine patients (32%); bleeding in four patients (14%); cholangitis or sepsis without perforation in three patients (11%); and acute pancreatitis in one patient (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Fatal endoscopic AEs were rare but tended to occur in older patients with major comorbidities. Most deaths occurred from aspiration pneumonia, cardiac arrest, or perforation-related sepsis within 1 week of the procedure.

Proximal Biliary Stent Migration Causing Cardiac Tamponade.

Plastic biliary stents are commonly placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for various indications, and stent-related complications are uncommon. We describe a case in which a plastic biliary stent migrated proximally through the liver capsule and diaphragm after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, leading to pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. It is important for clinicians managing patients with biliary stents to be aware of this significant adverse event.

Adverse Events Associated With Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography.

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding the safety of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) are limited compared with biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study was to determine adverse events (AEs) associated with therapeutic ERP. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined consecutive therapeutic ERPs with the primary intention of cannulating the pancreatic duct. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for AEs. RESULTS: A total of 3023 ERPs were performed in 1288 patients (mean age, 50.3 years; 57.8% female) from January 2000 to January 2017. Overall AE rate was 18.9% with abdominal pain requiring admission (9.8%) and post-ERP pancreatitis (5.7%) being most common. On multivariate analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.9), acute recurrent pancreatitis (aOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.7-15.3), chronic pancreatitis (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6), and pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3) were associated with an increased risk of overall AEs. Pancreatic sphincterotomy (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.4) and therapeutic stenting (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) also increased the risk of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 5 patients who undergo therapeutic ERP will experience an AE; however, the rates of major AEs, including post-ERP pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation, are low.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and liver biopsy in the evaluation of elevated liver function tests after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) in post-liver transplant (LT) patients pose a challenge in the timing and selection of diagnostic modalities. There are little data regarding the accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and liver biopsy (LB) in diagnosing post-transplant complications. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ERCP and LB in patients with non-vascular post-LT complications. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients undergoing both ERCP and LB for evaluation of elevated LFTs within 6 mo of LT from 2000 to 2017. Diagnostic operating characteristics including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for various diagnoses were calculated for ERCP and LB. The R factor (ratio of alkaline phosphatase to alanine aminotransferase) was also calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Of the 1284 patients who underwent LT, 91 patients (74.7% males, mean age of 51) were analyzed. Anastomotic strictures (AS, 24.2%), acute cellular rejection (ACR, 11%) and concurrent AS/ACR (14.3%) were the most common diagnoses. ERCP carried an accuracy of 79.1% (95%CI: 69.3-86.9), LB had an accuracy of 93.4% (95%CI: 86.2-97.5), and the combination of the two had an accuracy of 100% (95%CI: 96-100). There was no difference between patients with AS and ACR in mean R factor (AS: 1.9 vs ACR: 1.1, P = 0.24). Adverse events did not differ between the two tests (ERCP: 3.1% vs LB: 1.1%, P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: In patients with abnormal LFTs after LT without vascular complications, the combination of LB and ERCP carries low risk and improves diagnostic accuracy over either test alone.

Combination of ERCP-Based Modalities Increases Diagnostic Yield for Biliary Strictures.

BACKGROUND: Biliary stricture evaluation with brush cytology and intraductal forceps biopsy carries a low sensitivity, but the combination of newer modalities may improve sensitivity. AIM: To determine whether the addition of advanced modalities increases diagnostic yield of ERCP-based sampling. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluates patients with biliary strictures sampled using brush cytology. Operating characteristics were calculated for individual and combinations of modalities including cholangioscopy, fluoroscopy- and cholangioscopy-directed intraductal biopsy, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and confocal laser endomicroscopy. Analyses under Standard Criteria (SC) included malignant results as "positive" and Expanded Criteria (EC) included "suspicious" and "high-grade dysplasia" results as "positive." RESULTS: A total of 614 patients were included, and 354 (57.8%) received brush cytology alone, which had a sensitivity of 38.5% (SC) to 40.3% (EC) and a specificity of 97.8% (EC) to 99.3% (SC). Combining brush cytology with fluoroscopy-guided biopsy (n = 259, 42.2%) had a sensitivity of 62.5% (SC) to 67.9% (EC) and specificity of 90.2% (EC) to 96.7% (SC). Adding FISH to brush cytology had a sensitivity of 84.2% (SC) to 87.5% (EC) and specificity of 54.1% (SC and EC), while cholangioscopy visualization addition resulted in a sensitivity of 80.4% (SC) to 92.2% (EC) and specificity of 67.3% (EC) to 89.1% (SC). There were no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity using SC and EC. CONCLUSIONS: Brush cytology has a low sensitivity, but the addition of other modalities increases sensitivity. There was no difference in specificity between the SC and the EC, supporting the inclusion of "suspicious" impressions with malignant results at our center.

A Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography With or Without Pancreatoscopy for Removal of Pancreatic Duct Stones.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic duct stones contribute to pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis, and per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) allows visualization, fragmentation, and removal of these stones. This study compared the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) with and without POP. METHODS: This single-center retrospective review compared ERP with and without POP for treatment of main-duct pancreatic duct stones. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as partial or complete stone removal, which was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In all, 223 patients underwent 549 ERPs with a technical success rate of 92.4% and complete stone clearance rate of 74.9%. Patients undergoing ERP with POP (n = 94) had higher technical success than patients undergoing ERP without POP (n = 129, 98.9% vs 87.6%, P < 0.001), but required more ERPs (3.1 vs 1.9, P = 0.02). Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with POP was associated with larger stone size (8.9 vs 6.1 mm, P = 0.001), more stones per case (5+ stones: 33.8% vs 21.1%, P = 0.002), and more impacted stones (48.8% vs 10.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy permits effective stone removal in cases not amenable to standard ERP techniques, including those with larger or more numerous stones.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Placement of Preloaded Fiducial Markers Shortens Procedure Time Compared to Back-Loaded Markers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fiducial markers are inert radiopaque gold or carbon markers implanted in or near pancreatic tumor to demarcate areas for image-guided radiation therapy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) pre-loaded fiducial needles (PLNs) have been developed to circumvent technical issues associated with traditional back-loaded fiducials (BLNs). We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare procedure times in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing EUS-guided placement of BLNs vs PLNs. METHODS: In a prospective study, 44 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma referred for fiducial marker placement at 2 tertiary care centers were assigned to groups that received PLNs (n = 22) or BLNs (n = 22); each group had the same proportion of patients with tumors of different locations (head or neck vs body or tail).The procedure was standardized among all endoscopists and placement of a minimum of 3 markers inside the tumor was defined as technical success. The times for procedure and fiducial placement were recorded, total number of fiducial markers used documented, and grade of procedure difficulty ranked by passing the needle or deploying the fiducials. Other recorded variables included tumor characteristics, fluoroscopy use, and the number of fiducials clearly seen by EUS and fluoroscopy. The primary aim was to compare the duration of EUS-guided fiducial insertion of BLNs vs PLNs. RESULTS: The median placement time was significantly shorter in the PLN group (9 min) than the BLN group (16 min) (P < .001). However, the 44% reduction in time did not reach pre-specified levels (≥60%). Similar results were found after stratifying by tumor location. Deployment of BLNs was easier than deployment of PLNs (P = .03). There was no significant difference between groups in technical success, number of fiducials placed, EUS or fluoroscopic visualization, or adverse events. During simulation computed tomography and image-guided radiation therapy, there was no difference between groups in visualization of fiducials, migration rate, or accuracy of placement. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial of 44 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we found EUS-guided placement of PLNs to require less time and produce similar results compared with BLNs. Further refinements in PLN delivery system are needed to increase the ease of deployment. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02332863.

Advanced ERCP techniques for the extraction of complex biliary stones: a single referral center's 12-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced ERCP techniques (AETs) for difficult biliary stones include peroral cholangioscopy (POC) with electrohydraulic/laser lithotripsy (EHL/LL), endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) and mechanical lithotripsy (ML). We assess the efficacy of AETs. METHODS: A retrospective query for AETs. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Complete duct clearance. Secondary outcome: Complete duct clearance by technique. Statistical Analysis version 9.3 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC). RESULTS: From 1/00 to 10/12, 349 patients were identified of which 222 (80% had prior ERCPs) had AETs. 211 with sufficient follow-up underwent 295 ERCPs; 280 of which were AET's. Index AETs: POC with EHL/LL (n = 46/211, 22%), ML (n = 84/211, 40%), EPLBD with mean balloon size of 11.5 ± 1.7 mm (n = 39/211, 18%) and combination AETs (n = 42/211, 20%). Stone characteristics: 76% had ≥1 stone, 81% extrahepatic and 32% had strictures. Number of stones (mean 2.5 and range 1-20) did not differ among groups. EPLBD had higher percentage (95%) of extrahepatic stones (p = .0003). The 'Combination' and 'POC' groups had larger stones (mean 17.7 mm ±6.4 and 16.8 mm ±6.1, respectively; p < .001). Complete clearance: 209/211 (99%) at index AET 167/211 (79%) or after mean of 2.5 ± 0.7 AETs in 42/211 (20%). Partial clearance: 2/211 (1%). Clearance at index AETs was higher with EPLBD (90%, p = .014). Adverse Events: 7/280 (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: AETs achieved clearance in 99%. EPLBD had higher clearance at index AET likely owing to higher extrahepatic stones. Larger stones, but not number, were associated with increased combination AETs and total ERCPs.

Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There have been few studies that compared the effects of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections from pancreatitis. We aimed to compare technical and clinical success and adverse events in patients who received LAMS vs DPS for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-mediated drainage in 149 patients (65% male; mean age, 47 y) with pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis (97 received LAMS and 152 received DPS), from January 2011 through September 2016 at a single center. We collected data on patient characteristics, outcomes, hospitalizations, and imaging findings. Technical success was defined as LAMS insertion or a minimum of 2 DPS. Clinical success was defined as resolution of pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis based on imaging results. The primary outcome was resolution of peripancreatic fluid collection with reduced abdominal pain or obstructive signs or symptoms. Secondary outcomes included the identification and management of adverse events, number of additional procedures required to resolve fluid collection, and the recurrence of fluid collection. RESULTS: Patients who received LAMS had larger peripancreatic fluid collections than patients who received DPS prior to intervention (P = .001), and underwent an average 1.7 interventions vs 1.9 interventions for patients who received DPS (P = .93). Technical success was achieved for 90 patients with LAMS (92.8%) vs 137 patients with DPS (90.1%) (odds ratio [OR] for success with DPS, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.33-2.0; P = .67). Despite larger fluid collections in the LAMS group, there was no significant difference in proportions of patients with clinical success following placement of LAMS (82 of 84 patients, 97.6%) vs DPS (118 of 122 patients, 96.7%) (OR for clinical success with DPS, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.13-4.0; P = .71). Adverse events developed in 24 patients who received LAMS (24.7%) vs 27 patients who received DPS (17.8%) (OR for an adverse event in a patient receiving a DPS, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.33-2.0; P = .67). However, patients with LAMS had a higher risk of pseudoaneurysm bleeding than patients with DPS (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 1.19-84.6; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients undergoing drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis, we found LAMS and DPS to have comparable rates of technical and clinical success and adverse events. Drainage of walled-off necrosis or pancreatic pseudocysts using DPS was associated with fewer bleeding events overall, including pseudoaneurysm bleeding, but bleeding risk with LAMS should be weighed against the trend of higher actionable perforation and infection rates with DPS.

Technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety of microforceps biopsies during EUS evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Through-the-needle microforceps are a recent addition to the EUS armamentarium for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). The main aim of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety of EUS-guided microforceps biopsy for PCLs. METHODS: Our electronic endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of PCLs and microforceps biopsies during the same procedure. A biopsy was done on the wall of the cyst with the microforceps through the 19-gauge needle, and cyst fluid was collected for cytology and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Adverse events were recorded per published American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent EUS-FNA and microforceps biopsy of PCLs from February 2016 to July 2017. Fourteen cysts were located in the pancreatic head and/or uncinate, and 13 were located in the body and/or tail region. Microforceps biopsies were technically successful in all cases and provided a pathology diagnosis in 24 of 27 cases (yield 88.9%). Microforceps biopsies diagnosed mucinous cyst in 9 patients (33.3%), serous cystadenoma in 4 (14.8%), neuroendocrine tumor in 1 (3.7%), and benign and/or inflammatory cyst in 10 (37.1%). In 7 patients (26%), microforceps biopsy results drastically changed the diagnosis, providing diagnoses otherwise not suggested by cytology or cyst fluid CEA levels. However, cytology provided a diagnosis of mucinous cyst in 4 cases (14.8%) not detected by microforceps biopsies. No adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION: Microforceps biopsies were associated with high technical success, and an excellent safety profile and may be a useful adjunctive tool, complementing existing EUS-FNA sampling protocols for PCLs.

Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy is effective in removal of difficult biliary stones. We investigated the safety and efficacy of D-SOC with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy in an international, multicenter study of patients with difficult biliary stones. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 407 patients (60.4% female; mean age, 64.2 years) who underwent D-SOC for difficult biliary stones at 22 tertiary centers in the United States, United Kingdom, or Korea from February 2015 through December 2016; 306 patients underwent electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 101 (24.8%) underwent laser lithotripsy. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with technical failure and the need for more than 1 D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy session to clear the bile duct. RESULTS: The mean procedure time was longer in the electrohydraulic lithotripsy group (73.9 minutes) than in the laser lithotripsy group (49.9 minutes; P < .001). Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients (96.7% of patients with electrohydraulic lithotripsy vs 99% patients with laser lithotripsy; P = .31). Ducts were cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients (74.5% by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 86.1% by laser lithotripsy; P = .20). Electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy failed in 11 patients (2.7%); 8 patients were treated by surgery. Adverse events occurred in 3.7% patients and the stone was incompletely removed from 6.6% of patients. On multivariable analysis, difficult anatomy or cannulation (duodenal diverticula or altered anatomy) correlated with technical failure (odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-21.2; P = .02). Procedure time increased odds of more than 1 session of D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter, international, retrospective analysis, we found D-SOC with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy to be effective and safe in more than 95% of patients with difficult biliary stones. Fewer than 5% of patients require additional treatment with surgery and/or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to clear the duct.

Role of per-oral pancreatoscopy in the evaluation of suspected pancreatic duct neoplasia: a 13-year U.S. single-center experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) in the evaluation of occult pancreatic duct (PD) lesions remains limited to case series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of POP to differentiate malignant from benign diseases of the PD. METHODS: Patients who underwent POP between 2000 and 2013 for the evaluation of indeterminate PD strictures, dilatations, or with suspected or known main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm were identified. Main outcome measurements were visual impression accuracy, POP tissue sampling, efficacy, and safety of POP. RESULTS: During the study period, 79 patients who underwent POP for the evaluation of pancreatic stricture or dilatation were identified. Technical success was achieved in 78 (97%). In the PD neoplasia group (n = 33), the final diagnosis was based on index confirmatory POP-guided tissue sampling in 29 (88%). For the detection of PD neoplasia, POP visual impression had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 87%, 86%, 83%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. When combined with POP-guided tissue sampling, the values were 91%, 95%, 94%, 93%, and 94%, respectively. Of 102 POPs performed, adverse events were noted in 12 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a high technical success rate, visual impression accuracy, and tissue sampling capability of POP. Examinations were performed by endoscopists with expertise in pancreatoscopy interpretation, and the results may not be generalizable.