Centralization reduces meniscal extrusion, improves joint mechanics and functional outcomes in patients undergoing meniscus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on meniscal centralisation procedures, analysing its impact on meniscal extrusion, joint biomechanics and clinical and radiological outcome measures. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Biomechanical studies on healthy animal or human cadaveric knee joints that assessed meniscal extrusion or tibiofemoral contact mechanics (contact area and pressure) following centralization for meniscal pathologies were included. For clinical studies, those that prospectively or retrospectively assessed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postoperative knee motion, complications and radiological extrusion following centralization for meniscal pathologies were included. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis, comprising eight biomechanical, six clinical and one both. There were 92 knee specimens for biomechanical testing, of which 40 were human cadaveric and 52 porcine models. Biomechanical data revealed centralization to be commonly performed for posterior meniscal root tears and significantly reduced extrusion and contact pressure whilst improving contact area following a tear (p < 0.00001). Centralization restored extrusion to that of the native knee at all flexion angles described (0-90°, p = 0.25) and, compared to the torn state, brought tibiofemoral contact mechanics 3.2-5.0 times closer to the native state. Clinical data showed that 158 patients underwent centralization for extrusion. It improved postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) (p = 0.006) and Lysholm scores (p < 0.00001) at 25.0 months, maintained extrusion reduction at 17.1 months (p < 0.00001) and preserved knee motion. CONCLUSION: Centralisation for various meniscal injuries associated with extrusion can reduce meniscal extrusion and improve joint biomechanics, along with clinical and radiological outcomes. Existing evidence is still scarce and exhibits a notable amount of methodological heterogeneity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of Level IV evidence.

Patients undergoing multiligament knee reconstruction injured during pivoting sports demonstrate similar clinical, functional and return to sport outcomes by 2 years compared with those undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the clinical and activity-based outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR) following a pivoting sports injury. METHODS: Fifty MLKR patients were included, of which 20 (40%) were injured during pivoting sports. A further 50 patients undergoing ACLR following an injury during pivoting sports were consecutively recruited for comparison. Patients were assessed before the surgery and at 6-, 12- and 24 months with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Tegner activity scale (TAS) and anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score. Knee movement, the single (SHD) and triple (THD) hop tests for distance, and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength were assessed, with Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) calculated. Outcomes were compared across groups: (1) ACLR (n = 50), (2) MLKR (n = 50) and (3) MLKR due to pivoting sport injury (n = 20). RESULTS: IKDC, TAS and ACL-RSI scores remained lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR versus ACLR cohort at all timepoints. Comparing the ACLR and MLKR cohort that had injuries specifically during pivoting sports, the IKDC (p < 0.001) and TAS (p = 0.009) were higher in the ACLR group at 6 months, and the ACL-RSI was higher at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.007) months, there were no further differences. Hop and knee extensor strength LSIs were lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR (versus ACLR) cohort at all timepoints (apart from the 24-month SHD LSI). However, the ACLR group only demonstrated greater LSIs than the pivoting sport MLKR for the SHD at 6 months (p < 0.001), and knee extensor strength at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p < 0.001) months. CONCLUSIONS: While the recovery of patients undergoing MLKR due to a pivoting sports injury is delayed compared with their ACLR counterparts, the clinical outcome and activity profile are similar by 24 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Modern multiligament knee injury surgical reconstruction techniques can achieve excellent knee function and patient satisfaction, with low complication rates.

PURPOSE: To report on the recovery of strength and functional capacity symmetry following multiligament knee surgical reconstruction (MLKR), as well as the capacity of athletes to return to sport. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited 47 patients undergoing MLKR between February 2018 and July 2021. Forty patients had full outcome assessment postoperatively at 6, 12 and 24 months and were included in the analysis, 75% were knee dislocation one injuries and 60% were injured playing sport. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, the Knee Outcome Survey, the Lysholm Knee Score and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Objective assessment included assessment of active knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), the single (single horizontal hop for distance [SHD]) and triple (triple horizontal hop for distance [THD]) hop tests for distance and peak isokinetic knee flexor/extensor torque. RESULTS: All PROMs significantly improved (p < 0.001) from presurgery to 24 months postsurgery. At 24 months, 70% of patients were satisfied with their sports participation. Active knee flexion (p < 0.0001) and extension (p < 0.0001) ROM significantly improved over time, as did the limb symmetry indices (LSIs) for the SHD (p < 0.0001), THD (p < 0.0001), peak knee extensor (p < 0.0001) and flexor (p = 0.012) torque. While LSIs for the SHD, THD and knee flexor strength tended to plateau by 12 months, knee extensor strength continued to improve from 12 to 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing modern MLKR surgical techniques and rehabilitation can achieve excellent knee function, with low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

No increased complication rate with the use of soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The autograft of choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains debateable. Recently there has been increased popularity of soft tissue quadriceps tendon (s-QT) autograft due to less donor site morbidity, reduced anterior knee pain and comparable re-operation and complication rates. The aim of this review was to analyse functional outcomes of primary ACLR using s-QT in adult population without the bone plug and to report its complication profile against other autografts. PATIENT AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a review of literature was conducted on four online databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar). Clinical studies reporting on patients undergoing primary ACLR with s-QT autograft or in comparison to BPTB or HS autografts with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. The studies were inclusive of only all soft tissue QT autograft regardless of the implants or fixation method used. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were eligible. There were three randomised control studies (RCT) and 11 non-randomised comparative studies with 1543 patients who underwent ACLR. 682 underwent s-QT, 498 had hamstring tendon (HT) and 174 had bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). 60% (n = 930) were males and mean follow up was 23.6 months (6-65). Eight studies reported post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 91.5 ± 15.1 whereas mean Lysholm score was 90 ± 3.9. Five studies reported on laxity with mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) of 1.28 ± 1.09 mm. Overall complication rate of s-QT ACLR was 6% with 3% graft failure, 0.52% arthrofibrosis, 0.2% infection, 0.75% revision ACLR. There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores, knee stability and range of motion (ROM) between s-QT, HT and BPTB. CONCLUSION: s-QT for ACLR has a comparable functional outcome, laxity, failure and with overall graft failure rate of 3%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Modified Mason-Allen vs Two Simple Stitch Fixation for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various suture configurations are available for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair. The modified Mason-Allen (MMA) technique has been proposed as a refixation technique for MMPRT instead of the conventional 2 simple stitches (TSS). This is in view of its superior biomechanical characteristics. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare MMA and TSS configuration techniques for MMPRT repair and identify any differences between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes, medial meniscal extrusion (MME), and postoperative healing. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: ("meniscus" OR "meniscal injuries") AND ("Mason-Allen" OR "simple stitch" OR "suture techniques"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, MME, postoperative healing, cartilage degeneration, and progression of knee osteoarthritis were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed using random- and fixed-effects models. RESULTS: After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 291 patients; 160 underwent MMA fixation, and 131 underwent the TSS technique. The majority of studies had similar surgical techniques regarding repair technique, suture material, tibial fixation, and number and position of tibial tunnels. There were no differences between the groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at 14.2 months. Both techniques were also similar in the degree of postoperative MME and meniscal healing. CONCLUSION: Both suture configurations were equivalent in terms of clinical outcomes, the extent of meniscal extrusion, and postoperative healing. The TSS technique may offer advantages in terms of faster learning curve and shorter operative time. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes, longer follow-up and assessment of chondral degeneration, and presence of knee osteoarthritis are required to assess whether a true difference exists, as the majority of included studies were limited by their retrospective design.

The Role of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND: After its success in restoring rotational stability and reducing failure rates in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) has been endorsed for use in revision ACLR surgery, where failure rates are historically higher. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether the addition of a LET or ALLR results in superior clinical outcomes and stability compared with isolated revision ACLR (iACLR). STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: ("extra-articular" OR "tenodesis" OR "anterolateral ligament" OR "iliotibial") AND ("anterior cruciate ligament") AND ("revision" OR "re-operation"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rotational stability, and postoperative complications were extracted from each study. RESULTS: After abstract and full-text screening, 10 clinical comparative studies were included. There were 793 patients, of whom 390 had an iACLR while 403 had an ACLR augmented with a LET or an ALLR (augmented ACLR [aACLR]). The mean time for assessment of PROMs was 35 months. The aACLR group had superior International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.54; P = .04), rotational stability (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.91 to 4.01; P < .00001), and lower side-to-side difference (OR, -0.53; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.24; P = .0003) than those without the augmentation. Furthermore, they were less likely to fail (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.80; P = .007). Subgroup analysis in the higher-grade laxity cohort (grade ≥2) revealed an even greater IKDC score (SMD, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.86; P = .005) and an improved Lysholm score (SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.67; P < .0001) in the aACLR group. CONCLUSION: Revision aACLR with a LET or an ALLR can improve subjective IKDC scores, restore rotational stability, and reduce failure rates compared with iACLR. Although controversy remains on the necessity of augmenting all revision ACLRs, the present meta-analysis advocates adding a lateral procedure, particularly in those with a higher-grade pivot shift.

Surgical treatment of high-grade acute intramuscular hamstring tendon injuries in athletes leads to predictable return to sports and no re-injuries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the post-operative return to sport and re-injury rates following surgical repair of acute, first-time, high-grade intramuscular hamstring tendon injuries in high level athletes. METHODS: Patients were identified using the databases of two sports surgeons. Once patients were identified their clinical notes and imaging were reviewed to confirm that all patients had injuries to the intramuscular portion of the distal aspect of the proximal biceps femoris tendon. All imaging was reviewed by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist to confirm diagnosis. Surgery for such injuries was indicated in high-level athletes presenting with acute hamstring injuries. All patients were operated on within 4 weeks. Outcomes included Tegner scores, return to sport, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), current hamstring symptoms and complications including re-injury. RESULTS: Eleven injuries (10 patients) were included in the study. All patients were male and Australian Rules Football players. Six patients were professional athletes and 4 semi-professional athletes. Median age was 24.5 (range 21-29) and median follow-up period was 33.7 months (range; 16-65). 91% were British Athletic Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) 3c and 9% were BAMIC 4c. 91% were classed as MR2 and 9% as MR3 on the simplified four-grade injury classification. Athletes achieved return to play (RTP) at an average of 3.1 months (SD 1.0) post repair. All but one patient achieved a Tegner score equal to pre-injury levels. Maximum LEFS was achieved by all patients. Minor pain scores (all with VAS < 1/10) on sciatic and functional stretch were recorded in 36% and 27% of patients respectively, with subtle neural symptoms (9%) and subjective tightness (36%) also noted. There were no surgical complications in our patient cohort. No patients had a re-injury or re-operation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of high-grade intramuscular tendon injuries of the biceps femoris hamstring muscle in athletes resulted in high levels of return to pre-injury sporting levels and no re-injuries. The intra-muscular tendon should be scrutinized when assessing hamstring injuries in elite sport and offer surgery in high-grade cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Combined quadriceps medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and osteochondral fixation offers good patient-reported outcomes and low rates of recurrent instability for osteochondral defects secondary to acute patella dislocation.

PURPOSE: Chondral injuries secondary to traumatic patella dislocation are common, and a subgroup of these are significant defects with fragments amenable to fixation. There is a paucity of published evidence assessing patients managed with combined acute patellofemoral stabilisation and osteochondral fixation. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of patients with osteochondral injuries secondary to acute traumatic patella dislocation treated with combined early fragment fixation and MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon turndown technique which has distinct advantages for this cohort, including preventing chondral overloading and non-violation of the patella bone. METHODS: Patients who underwent combined quadriceps tendon MPFL reconstruction and osteochondral fixation were included. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, complications and reoperations were evaluated. Patients were assessed with Lysholm, Kujala, KOOS-PF scores and satisfaction scale at follow up. Pre-operative MRI was assessed for presence of radiological risk factors for patella dislocation and post-operative MRI was used to assess cartilage quality with MOCART 2.0 score. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (63.2% female) were included. The mean age was 17.4 ± 4.8 years and patients were followed up at a mean 15.8 ± 5.1 months post-surgery. The mean defect size was 2.4 cm2 ± 1.3 cm2, with the most common defect location being the patella (13/19; 68.4%) followed by the lateral femoral condyle (5/19; 26.3%). At final follow up, the overall mean Lysholm, Kujala, and KOOS-PF scores were 84.9 ± 11.1, 89.7 ± 5.8 and 80.6 ± 13.6, respectively. Seventeen patients (89.5%) were satisfied with their outcome. The mean MOCART 2.0 score at final follow-up was 72.5. One patient required medial capsular plication with removal of a loose chondral body and microfracture and 3 knees required minor reoperations. CONCLUSION: Combined acute osteochondral fragment fixation and MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft offers good radiological and patient-reported outcomes with high satisfaction and low rates of recurrent patella dislocation. To our knowledge, this is currently the largest series of its kind in the literature and the results of this study provide a rationale for a combined approach using a quadriceps tendon graft for this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The relationship between exposure to noise and hearing loss in orthopaedics.

Aims: In the UK, the agricultural, military, and construction sectors have stringent rules about the use of hearing protection due to the risk of noise-induced hearing loss. Orthopaedic staff may also be at risk due to the use of power tools. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have clear standards as to what are deemed acceptable occupational levels of noise on A-weighted and C-weighted scales. The aims of this review were to assess the current evidence on the testing of exposure to noise in orthopaedic operating theatres to see if it exceeds these regulations. Methods: A search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in PROSPERO. Studies which assessed the exposure to noise for orthopaedic staff in operating theatres were included. Data about the exposure to noise were extracted from these studies and compared with the A-weighted and C-weighted acceptable levels described in the HSE regulations. Results: A total of 15 studies were deemed eligible. These included a total of 386 orthopaedic operations and the use of 64 orthopaedic instruments. A total of 294 operations (76%) and 45 instruments (70%) exceeded the regulations on an A-weighted scale, and 22% (10 of 46) of operations exceeded the maximum C-weighted peak acceptable level of noise. Noise-induced hearing loss was reported in 28 of 55 orthopaedic staff members (50.9%). Conclusion: Safe levels of noise can be exceeded in orthopaedic operations, and when using orthopaedic instruments. Employers have clear policies about exposure to noise in the workplace but have yet to identify orthopaedic theatres as a potential at-risk area. Orthopaedic staff need education, monitoring, and protection, while employers should consider regular assessments of staff in orthopaedic theatres and offer methods to prevent noise-induced hearing loss.

The Effect of a Formal Nonoperative Management Program Combining a Hip Injection With Structured Adjunctive Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although the initial treatment recommendations for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may include nonsurgical therapies such as injections and rehabilitation, many patients undergo isolated injections or a rudimentary exercise regimen. PURPOSE: To investigate the benefit of an intra-articular hip injection and concomitant structured exercise rehabilitation program in patients with symptomatic FAIS ≥6 months. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: For this study we recruited 49 patients with a mean age of 32.8 years (range, 16-56 years) and symptoms ≥6 months (range, 6-250 months) associated with FAIS, as confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging and radiography. After a guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid and local anesthetic, patients underwent a structured 12-week rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed before and after injection (8 weeks and 4, 6, 12, and 24 months) with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Hip Outcome Score, modified Harris Hip Score, the Tegner Activity Score, a visual analog scale assessing the frequency and severity of hip pain, and a Global Rating of Change scale. Range of motion, peak isometric hip strength, and hop tests were assessed. Absolute scores and limb symmetry indices were calculated. The percentage of patients transitioning toward surgery over the period was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients who underwent the injection and completed the initial 8-week rehabilitation component, 14 (31.8%) progressed toward surgical intervention over the 24-month postinjection period owing to dissatisfaction and/or symptom recurrence. Patients who progressed toward surgery, as compared with those who did not, reported significantly worse (P < .05) PROMs presurgery and more pain within the first 4 weeks after injection. In the nonoperative cohort, a significant improvement (P < .05) in all PROMs was observed, with 93% of these patients satisfied overall. The Global Rating of Change did not improve, although this was measured only after the injection, reflecting no further significant perceived global change from 8 weeks to 24 months. A significant increase (P < .05) in all hip range of motion and most isometric strength measures was observed at 8 weeks after injection, with these improvements largely sustained until 24 months. Bilateral improvements in hop capacity were observed, with hop test LSIs significantly improving for the single (p = 0.009), triple (p = 0.029) and triple crossover (p = 0.005) hop tests for distance. CONCLUSION: Although 32% of patients progressed toward surgery, significant improvement in hip pain, symptoms, and physical function was observed in the majority of patients with symptomatic FAIS as a result of a targeted nonoperative management pathway consisting of an intra-articular injection and a structured exercise program.

Fibular- Versus Tibiofibular-Based Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions are the gold standard treatment for posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee. Despite comparable outcomes in biomechanical studies, clinical results comparing these constructs remain elusive with no consensus reached regarding the best treatment option. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare fibular- and tibiofibular-based techniques for posterolateral corner reconstruction. We aimed to identify whether any differences existed between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes and rotational and varus stability. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms ("posterolateral corner" OR "fibular collateral ligament" OR "lateral collateral ligament" OR "popliteus tendon" OR "popliteofibular ligament") AND ("reconstruction" OR "LaPrade" OR "Larson" OR "Arciero"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postoperative complications, and valgus and rotational stability were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed by random- and fixed-effects models. RESULTS: After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 183 patients, of which 90 received fibular-based and 93 tibiofibular-based reconstruction. The majority of studies used similar surgical techniques regarding tunnel orientation, attachment sites, and graft fixation sequence. There were no differences between the groups in terms of PROMs and subjective knee scores at a mean of 20.3 months. The techniques were equally effective in restoring varus and rotational stability. Subgroup analysis revealed that the stability of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction postoperatively was not affected by either construct. CONCLUSION: Both constructs had comparable clinical outcomes and were equally effective in restoring varus and rotational stability for PLC knee injuries. The fibular-based technique may offer advantages in view of being less technically demanding and invasive and requiring fewer grafts with a quicker operative time. However, higher quality studies are required to reinforce or refute such conclusions, as the majority of studies in this review were poor to fair quality.

A systematic review on management and outcome of irreducible knee dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Irreducible knee dislocations (IKD) are rare and can often be missed or misdiagnosed. The incidence of knee dislocation is quoted between 0.01% and 0.2% of all orthopaedic injuries, with up to 4% of these dislocations sub-classified as irreducible. The primary aim of this systematic review was to analyse cases of IKD described in the literature, with a secondary aim of producing a streamlined approach for managing these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1st September 2021 in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using the online databases Medline and EMBASE. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Case reports or clinical studies or reporting on IKD were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 60 studies eligible for inclusion, giving a total of 114 cases of IKD. Posterolateral dislocation was most common, seen in 85% of cases. The dimple sign was present in 70%. All cases required surgical intervention to achieve joint reduction. The most commonly involved structure blocking reduction was the medial collateral ligament (MCL)±medial structures, seen in 52.4%. MCL reconstruction or repair was carried out in 32.3% cases. The overall incidence of neurovascular injury was 9% and the overall complication rate was 14.4%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this SR we conclude that: the most common type of IKDs are PL dislocations, and the MCL, medial retinaculum and capsule and vastus medialis oblique form the most common structures involved in block to reduction and often will require open reduction and repair in acute setting if arthroscopic reduction fails. The most common pattern of injury to ligament is likely to be ACL, PCL, MCL±other structures but the MCL will be the most commonly repaired ligament. The dimple sign is often present and is highly pathognomonic of IKD. The incidence of neurovascular injury is uncommon. The most common post-operative complications likely to be encountered is medial skin necrosis and postoperative knee stiffness. Therefore, patients should be mobilised as early as possible with ROM in hinge brace. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcomes of Unconstrained Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Background: Unconstrained pyrocarbon and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to silicone implants and arthrodesis. This systematic review appraises their outcomes. Methods: Thirty studies comprising 1,324 joints (813 pyrocarbon, 511 MoP) were included. Mean patient age was 59 years (38-78) and mean follow-up period was 54 months (12-118). Results: There were mean improvements of 4.5 points (2-6.9) in pain visual analogue score, 10.5° (-26 to 58) in range of motion (ROM), 3.1 kg (-4 to 7) in grip strength, 0.6 kg (-1.5 to 2) in pinch strength and 18 points (-3 to 29) in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score, with no significant differences between implant types. ROM gains deteriorated over time. Clinical complications were frequent (23%) and significantly more common with pyrocarbon, as were radiographic complications. However, most were mild-moderate and did not necessarily correlate with negative outcomes or dissatisfaction. Overall re-operation rate was 21%, and revision rate 11%, both more frequent with pyrocarbon. Most revisions were within 24 months, beyond which survival was maintained up to 10 years. Conclusions: Unconstrained PIP joint arthroplasty is effective in improving pain scores, active ROM, grip/pinch strength and patient-reported outcome measures, particularly in patients with osteoarthritis. Results are generally maintained at least to the medium term, although gains diminish in the longer term. Complication and early revision rates are high, particularly with pyrocarbon implants. Most patients express positive attitudes to arthroplasty, with significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures for both pyrocarbon and MoP implants. Patients with post-traumatic and inflammatory arthropathy are generally less satisfied. There is currently insufficient data to recommend one implant type over another, although the early-to-medium term results of MoP implants are promising. Prospective surveillance via small joint registries is recommended. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the addition of computer navigation achieves good clinical outcomes and implant survival at 10 years.

PURPOSE: To report 10-year outcomes and survivorship in patients undergoing bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BCKA) using the Journey-Deuce prosthesis in a consecutive prospective case series. METHODS: Between November 2006 and November 2009, 41 patients with a mean age of 69.6 years (range 51-86) underwent 51 bicompartmental knee arthroplasties with the Journey-Deuce knee prosthesis. All patients presented with symptomatic medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis, with intact cruciate ligaments and a preserved lateral compartment on plain radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clinical assessment was undertaken pre-surgery and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-surgery using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol Group 5-Dimension self-reported questionnaire (EQ-5D) and maximal active range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: 30 patients (37 knees) were followed-up at a mean time of 11.4 years (SD 1.1; range 10.5-14.0). Eight patients (ten knees) were deceased and three could not be contacted at final review. No major component revision was performed. Pre-operative OKS 25.4 (SD 5.2; range 15-40), knee flexion 116.4° (SD 10.3°; range 100°-140°) and EQ-5D 70.5 (SD 19.9; range 25-95). 10-year OKS 43.5 (SD 4.1; range 32-48), knee flexion 127.3° (SD 11.1°; range 105°-144°) and EQ-5D 77.4 (SD 9.3; range 60-100). The OKS (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D (p = 0.024) and active knee flexion ROM (p < 0.0001) all significantly improved from pre-surgery to 1-year post-surgery, with no further significant changes in these scores between any post-operative time period up until 10 years. 32% (7/22) of tibial and 45% (10/22) of femoral components showed progressive radiolucencies between 2 and 5-year and 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort of patients having undergone BCKA (with the Journey-Deuce prosthesis) with longest follow-up described in the literature. At 10 years, patients presented with significantly improved clinical outcomes, comparable to other surgical arthroplasty options. No major component revision was performed. Progressive radiolucencies were noted in 32% of tibial and 45% of femoral components without corresponding clinical signs of loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes of Unconstrained Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Background: Unconstrained pyrocarbon and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to silicone implants and arthrodesis. This systematic review appraises their outcomes. Methods: 30 studies comprising 1,324 joints (813 pyrocarbon, 511 MoP) were included. Mean patient age was 59 years (38 to 78) and mean follow-up period was 54 months (1.2 to 380). Results: There were mean improvements of 4.5 points (2 to 6.9) in pain Visual Analogue Score, 10.5° (-26 to 58) in range of motion (ROM), 3.1 kg (-4 to 7) in grip strength, 0.6 kg (-1.5 to 2) in pinch strength, and 18 points (-3 to 29) in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, with no significant differences between implant types. ROM gains, in particular, deteriorated over time. Clinical complications were frequent (23%), and significantly more common with pyrocarbon, as were radiographic complications. However, most were mild-moderate and did not necessarily correlate with negative outcomes or dissatisfaction. Overall reoperation rate was 21%, and revision rate 11%, both more frequent with pyrocarbon. Most revisions were within 24 months, beyond which survival was maintained up to ten years. Conclusions: Unconstrained PIP joint arthroplasty is effective at improving pain scores, active ROM, grip/pinch strength, and patient reported outcome measures, particularly in patients with osteoarthritis. Results are generally maintained at least to the medium term, although gains diminish in the longer term. Complication and early revision rates are high, particularly with pyrocarbon implants. The majority of patients express positive attitudes to arthroplasty, with significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures for both pyrocarbon and MoP implants. Patients with post-traumatic and inflammatory arthropathy are generally less satisfied. There is currently insufficient data to recommend one implant type over another, although the early-to-medium term results of MoP implants are promising. Prospective surveillance via small joint registries is recommended.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented With the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Versus Hamstrings Alone: A Comparative Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the return-to-sports (RTS) rate in patients after augmentation of autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent ACLR with single-bundle 4-strand hamstring autograft either without augmentation (HA-ACLR group) or with LARS augmentation (AUG-ACLR group). It was hypothesized that clinical outcomes and RTS rates would be better in the AUG-ACLR group at the 1-year follow-up, with similar outcomes in both cohorts by 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR between April 2014 and December 2017 were included in the current comparative study if they were skeletally mature and had 1- and 2-year follow-up outcomes; patients with concomitant meniscal surgery were also included. Included were 66 patients with AUG-ACLR (mean age, 26.8 years; 67% male) and 130 patients with HA-ACLR (mean age, 27.5 years; 61% male). Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm scale, Tegner activity scale, and the Noyes sports activity rating scale. Objective measures included knee laxity, maximal isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength, and the results of 4 functional hop tests. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study groups in age, sex distribution, body mass index, time to surgery, or number of concurrent meniscal surgeries. At the 1-year follow-up, the AUG-ACLR group had a significantly higher Tegner score (P = .001) and rates of RTS (P = .029) and return to preinjury level of sport (P = .003) compared with the HA-ACLR group. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no differences in these measures between groups. There were no between-group differences in other subjective outcomes, knee laxity, or strength and hop test results at either postoperative time point. There were also no differences in rerupture rates or other complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with AUG-ACLR had higher 1-year postoperative Tegner scores and rates of RTS and preoperative sport level compared with the HA-ACLR group. The 2-year rerupture rate for the AUG-ACLR group was low, and no intra-articular inflammatory complications were noted.

Vitamin D and the athlete-patient: state of the art.

Vitamin D deficiency is common in athletes. The conventional measurement of vitamin D levels provides a general indicator of body stores. However, there are nuances in its interpretation as values of 25(OH)D do not correlate absolutely with the amount of 'bioavailable' vitamin to the cells. Vitamin D should be regarded as a hormone and influences between 5% and 10% of our total genome. Determining the precise effect of the vitamin, isolated from the actions of other cofactors, is not straightforward and restricts our complete understanding of all of its actions. Deficiency has harmful effects on not only bone and muscle but also wider areas, including immunity and respiratory and neurological activities. More caution should be applied regarding the ability of supranormal vitamin D levels to elevate athletic performance. Hopefully, future research will shed more light on optimal levels of vitamin D and supplementation regimes, and improved understanding of its intracellular control of our genetic mechanisms and how extrinsic influences modify its activity.