RESUMO
Aim of the Study: Through the promotion of smoking cessation premature mortality can be prevented. Therefore it is necessary to provide effective and cost-effective smoking cessation interventions. In Germany the cost of pharmacological smoking cessation measures are not yet reimbursed by the statutory health insurance. The aim of this study is to present the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of already approved pharmacological smoking cessation therapies and to evaluate their quality. Method: A systematic literature research was conducted in the databases by DIMDI (Medline, Embase, etc.) in April 2013 (update April 2014). The study research was focused on studies for cost effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline and bupropion. The assessment of study quality was performed using the "Quality of Health Economic Studies" (QHES) instrument. Results: 33 Of the original 10 340 identified studies were finally included. The majority of the studies show that an additional prescription of NRT or bupropion to a medical consultation is a cost-effective strategy. In addition, in most studies varenicline is a dominant strategy compared to bupropion. Overall, the study quality was found to be very heterogeneous between 45 and 80 points (Ø 63.7 points). Conclusion: The studies show that treatment with varenicline is the most cost effective strategy followed by bupropion and the NRT. However, the studies can only be compared inadequately due to different levels of age and country-specific intervention costs.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/economia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a major risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For current smokers who are diagnosed with COPD, their first treatment option is to stop smoking. Motivation is necessary for long-term smoking cessation; therefore, when designing smoking cessation programs, the patients' needs and preferences should be considered. We focused on COPD patients' experiences with existing smoking cessation programs and evaluated their preferences for the improvement of these programs. METHODS: We conducted 18 guideline-based interviews with COPD patients between April and June 2014 in Germany. Each patient with COPD, who was a current or past smoker and had made at least one attempt to quit smoking in the past 5 years, was included in the study. We audiotaped, verbatim transcribed, and evaluated the interviews, using content analysis. RESULTS: The patients had broad and different experiences with pharmaceutical, behavioral, and alternative approaches that supported or negatively influenced the smoking cessation process. Pharmaceuticals were viewed as an expensive alternative with many side effects although they helped to stop cravings for a few moments. Furthermore, the bad structure and impersonal content of the seminars for smoking cessation negatively influenced group cohesion, and therefore degrading the patients' motivation to stop smoking. Alternative methods, such as acupuncture and hypnosis were mostly ineffective in smoking cessation, but in some cases, served as motivational strategies. CONCLUSION: Negative experiences with smoking cessation were explained by the patients' lack of motivation or resolution. Other negative experiences, such as the structure of seminars for smoking cessation and the high price of pharmaceuticals should be addressed through policy changes to increase the patients' motivation to quit smoking.
RESUMO
With the shift towards patient-centered healthcare, patient- and person-reports of health-related factors, including outcomes, are seen as important determinants for evaluating and improving healthcare. However, a comprehensive, systematic categorization of patient- and person-reports is currently lacking in the literature. This study aims at developing a new classification system with well-defined constructs for patients' and persons' self-reports on health and healthcare. A literature research and evaluation by the Reported Health Outcomes (RHO) Group were used to develop this classification system. The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes. Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories - preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction - have been described in this article. Even though the value of patients' and persons' perspectives on healthcare is increasingly being recognized, its measurement and implementation presents a lasting challenge to researchers, clinicians, patients, and the general population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation is a challenging task with a high risk of relapse. Depending on the choice of medication and duration of therapy, the costs of using a smoking cessation aid can be high. Additionally, these costs are not covered by health insurance in Germany. Information on willingness to use (WTU) and willingness to pay (WTP) for smoking cessation aids is valuable for developing different smoking cessation strategies. OBJECTIVES: The study analyses WTU and WTP for three pharmacological smoking cessation aids (nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion and varenicline) among young and middle-aged adults in Germany and attempts to determine their major driving factors. METHODS: Two cross-sectional internet-based surveys of smokers over 18 years of age were conducted in 2014 and 2015 in Germany. Respondents were asked about smoking-related issues and WTU and WTP for each therapy. The contingent valuation method with payment cards was used to measure WTP. Descriptive statistics, logistical regression and accelerated failure-time regression models were performed. RESULTS: The total sample size is 505. Half of the respondents are willing to use NRT and one-third are willing to use bupropion and/or varenicline. WTU induces positive WTP; however, the magnitude of WTP is beneath the market price. WTU significantly increases with a higher addiction level and if smokers have previously heard about the therapy. CONCLUSION: This study indicates different points to be considered for policy development. Promotion information and improving awareness about medication aids might increase WTU, and development of monetary incentives for young smokers could create a better chance for successful smoking cessation.
Assuntos
Bupropiona/economia , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Vareniclina/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Inibidores da Captação de Dopamina/economia , Inibidores da Captação de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agonistas Nicotínicos/economia , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapêutico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 4 million patients with a rare disease live in Germany. The medical care of these patients is problematic because of the rarity and heterogeneity of different clinical pictures. The Federal Ministry of Health has therefore published a research report on "Measures to improve the health situation of people with rare diseases in Germany" in 2009. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to present the main recommendations of this research report and relate it to current developments in the field of medical care for people with rare diseases. METHODOLOGY: The care situation of patients with rare diseases was determined using questionnaires, expert interviews and focus group discussions with representatives of patients, service providers and stakeholders from the health institutions. RESULTS: The main range of actions that have been identified in the research report were centre and network formation, specialized forms of medical care, diagnosis and treatment, information and experience exchange, performance fees and reimbursement of the costs, guidelines and patient pathways, the research, the implementation of a National Action Alliance and the development of a National Action Plan. DISCUSSION: In March 2010 a National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) was founded. The NAMSE created a national plan of action for people with rare diseases for improving medical care in the field of rare diseases which was approved by the Federal Government in August 2013. Thus, two important areas of the research report have already been implemented. In a comparison of the areas of activity of the research report with those of the National Action Plan it becomes clear that priorities will be in the context of health services research in rare diseases, for example the introduction of centres of reference for rare diseases, measures to accelerate the diagnostic process and the promotion of research and information management in the future.
Assuntos
Prioridades em Saúde/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Objetivos Organizacionais , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Doenças Raras/terapia , Alemanha , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence and incidence as well as the health care costs of asthma specifically in the German setting. METHODS: Two systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed in December 2012 (updated in March 2014). All publications in German and English were included. RESULTS: After review of title, abstracts and full publications, 17 relevant studies included information on the prevalence and incidence of asthma. The 12-month prevalence for adults ranges between 4.6â% and 6.34â% (children: 3.8â%â-â11.8â%). At younger ages, asthma is more prevalent in boys. In adulthood, more women are affected. We identified seven cost-of-illness studies. The direct costs range between â690.4âm and 1.36âbn. The reported health care costs depend on the perspective, the severity of disease and the database, so that a comparison of results is difficult. CONCLUSION: All in all, this review underlines the epidemiological and health economic importance of asthma in Germany. Several studies on the prevalence of asthma are available, but there is little information on the current incidence of this disease. Further research is necessary for obtaining a comprehensive picture of the current health care costs.