Displacing the Burden: A Review of Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin Clearance Strategies in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Uremic toxins (UTs), particularly protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs), accumulate in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, causing significant health complications like uremic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and immune dysfunction. The binding of PBUTs to plasma proteins such as albumin presents a formidable challenge for clearance, as conventional dialysis is often insufficient. With advancements in the classification and understanding of UTs, spearheaded by the European Uremic Toxins (EUTox) working group, over 120 molecules have been identified, prompting the development of alternative therapeutic strategies. Innovations such as online hemodiafiltration aim to enhance the removal process, while novel adsorptive therapies offer a means to address the high affinity of PBUTs to plasma proteins. Furthermore, the exploration of molecular displacers, designed to increase the free fraction of PBUTs, represents a cutting-edge approach to facilitate their dialytic clearance. Despite these advancements, the clinical application of displacers requires more research to confirm their efficacy and safety. The pursuit of such innovative treatments is crucial for improving the management of uremic toxicity and the overall prognosis of CKD patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and clinical trials.

Urine MMP7 as a kidney injury biomarker.

Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7) is a secreted endopeptidase involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix components and the activation of cytokines and growth factors. The regulation of MMP-7 can be transcriptionally regulated by AP-1 or Wnt/ß-catenin or post-translationally by proteolytic activation. MMP-7 expression is low or absent in the healthy kidney, but is significantly upregulated in kidney injury, including AKI and CKD. The function of MMP-7 in kidney disease may differ for CKD and AKI; it may have a profibrotic role in CKD and an anti-apoptotic and regenerative function in AKI. Additionally, the potential of MMP-7 as a biomarker has been studied in different kidney diseases, and the results are promising. Recently, combined unbiased kidney proteomics and transcriptomics approaches identified kidney MMP-7 as the protein having the strongest association with both fibrosis and eGFR and confirmed the predictive role of plasma MMP-7 levels for kidney function decline in over 11 000 individuals. Additionally, urinary MMP-7, combined with urinary cystatin C (CysC) and retinol binding protein (RBP) was reported to provide information on tubular injury in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease. We now present an overview of research on MMP-7 expression and function in kidney diseases and discuss its potential as a biomarker of kidney diseases.

NephroCheck at 10: addressing unmet needs in AKI diagnosis and risk stratification.

Despite its name, the current diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) still depends on markers of decreased kidney function and not on markers of injury. This results in a delayed diagnosis: AKI is diagnosed based on serum creatinine criteria only when the severity of injury is enough to decrease glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, by the time AKI is diagnosed, the insult may have already ceased, and even appropriate therapy targeted at the specific insult and its associated pathogenic pathways may no longer be effective. Biomarkers of injury are needed that allow the diagnosis of AKI based on injury criteria. At least three commercially available immunoassays assessing urinary or plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 × insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 ([TIMP2]*[IGFBP7]) (NephroCheck®) have generated promising data regarding prediction and early diagnosis of AKI, although their relative performance may depend on clinical context. Recently, a urinary peptidomics classifier (PeptAKI) was reported to predict AKI better than current biomarkers. Focusing on [TIMP2]*[IGFBP7], the cellular origin of urinary TIMP2 and IGFBP7 remains unclear, especially under the most common predisposing condition for AKI, i.e. chronic kidney disease. We now discuss novel data on the kidney cell expression of TIMP2 and IGFBP7 and its clinical implications.

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and metabolic acidosis: Potential mechanisms and clinical consequences.

Metabolic acidosis is frequent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with accelerated progression of CKD, hypercatabolism, bone disease, hyperkalemia, and mortality. Clinical guidelines recommend a target serum bicarbonate ≥ 22 mmol/L, but metabolic acidosis frequently remains undiagnosed and untreated. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) binds potassium in the gut and is approved to treat hyperkalemia. In clinical trials with a primary endpoint of serum potassium, SZC increased serum bicarbonate, thus treating CKD-associated metabolic acidosis. The increase in serum bicarbonate was larger in patients with more severe pre-existent metabolic acidosis, was associated to decreased serum urea and was maintained for over a year of SZC therapy. SZC also decreased serum urea and increased serum bicarbonate after switching from a potassium-binding resin in normokalemic individuals. Mechanistically, these findings are consistent with SZC binding the ammonium ion (NH4+) generated from urea by gut microbial urease, preventing its absorption and, thus, preventing the liver regeneration of urea and promoting the fecal excretion of H+. This mechanism of action may potentially result in benefits dependent on corrected metabolic acidosis (e.g., improved well-being, decreased catabolism, improved CKD mineral bone disorder, better control of serum phosphate, slower progression of CKD) and dependent on lower urea levels, such as decreased protein carbamylation. A roadmap is provided to guide research into the mechanisms and clinical consequences of the impact of SZC on serum bicarbonate and urate.

COVID-19 in Patients with Glomerular Disease: Follow-Up Results from the IRoc-GN International Registry.

Background: The acute and long-term effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in individuals with GN are still unclear. To address this relevant issue, we created the International Registry of COVID-19 infection in GN. Methods: We collected serial information on kidney-related and -unrelated outcomes from 125 GN patients (63 hospitalized and 62 outpatients) and 83 non-GN hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and a median follow-up period of 6.4 (interquartile range 2.3-9.6) months after diagnosis. We used logistic regression for the analyses of clinical outcomes and linear mixed models for the longitudinal analyses of eGFR. All multiple regression models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use. Results: After adjustment for pre-COVID-19 eGFR and other confounders, mortality and AKI did not differ between GN patients and controls (adjusted odds ratio for AKI=1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 3.60; P=0.64). The main predictor of AKI was pre-COVID-19 eGFR (adjusted odds ratio per 1 SD unit decrease in eGFR=3.04; 95% CI, 1.76 to 5.28; P<0.001). GN patients developing AKI were less likely to recover pre-COVID-19 eGFR compared with controls (adjusted 6-month post-COVID-19 eGFR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.56; times pre-COVID-19 eGFR). Shorter duration of GN diagnosis, higher pre-COVID-19 proteinuria, and diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or minimal change disease were associated with a lower post-COVID-19 eGFR. Conclusions: Pre-COVID-19 eGFR is the main risk factor for AKI regardless of GN diagnosis. However, GN patients are at higher risk of impaired eGFR recovery after COVID-19-associated AKI. These patients (especially those with high baseline proteinuria or a diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or minimal change disease) should be closely monitored not only during the acute phases of COVID-19 but also after its resolution.

Increased 1-year mortality in haemodialysis patients with COVID-19: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis confers the highest risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) death among comorbidities predisposing to severe COVID-19. However, reports of COVID-19-associated mortality frequently refer to mortality during the initial hospitalization or first month after diagnosis. METHODS: In a prospective, observational study, we analysed the long-term (1-year follow-up) serological and clinical outcomes of 56 haemodialysis (HD) patients who were infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the first pandemic wave. COVID-19 was diagnosed by a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test (n = 37) or by the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (n = 19). RESULTS: After >1 year of follow-up, 35.7% of HD patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave had died, 6 (11%) during the initial admission and 14 (25%) in the following months, mainly within the first 3 months after diagnosis. Overall, 30% of patients died from vascular causes and 40% from respiratory causes. In adjusted analysis, a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test for diagnosis {hazard ratio [HR] 5.18 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.30-20.65], P = 0.020}, higher baseline C-reactive protein levels [HR 1.10 (IQR 1.03-1.16), P = 0.002] and lower haemoglobin levels [HR 0.62 (IQR 0.45-0.86), P = 0.005] were associated with higher 1-year mortality. Mortality in the 144 patients who did not have COVID-19 was 21 (14.6%) over 12 months [HR of death for COVID-19 patients 3.00 (IQR 1.62-5.53), log-rank P = 0.00023]. Over the first year, the percentage of patients having anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) decreased from 36/49 (73.4%) initially to 27/44 (61.3%) at 6 months and 14/36 (38.8%) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The high mortality of HD patients with COVID-19 is not limited to the initial hospitalization. Defining COVID-19 deaths as those occurring within 3 months of a COVID-19 diagnosis may better represent the burden of COVID-19. In HD patients, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG response was suboptimal and short-lived.

Slo-Mo anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated renal vasculitis.

Nephrologists are familiar with severe cases of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis (AAV) presenting as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. However, less is known about AAV with slowly progressive renal involvement. While its existence is acknowledged in textbooks, much remains unknown regarding its relative frequency versus more aggressive cases as well as about the optimal therapeutic approach and response to therapy. Moreover, this uncommon presentation may be underdiagnosed, given the scarce familiarity of physicians. In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Trivioli et al. report the largest series to date and first systematic assessment of patients with AAV and slowly progressive renal involvement, defined as a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-50% in the 6 months prior to diagnosis after excluding secondary causes. Key findings are that slowly progressive AAV may be less common than previously thought, although it still represents the second most common presentation of renal AAV, it usually has a microscopic polyangiitis, anti-myeloperoxidase, mainly renal phenotype in elderly individuals, diagnosis may be late (over one-third of patients had end-stage kidney disease at diagnosis), clearly identifying an unmet need for physician awareness about this presentation, but those not needing renal replacement therapy at diagnosis still responded to immunosuppression.

Clinical Features of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: CKD is a risk factor for severe COVID-19. However, the clinical spectrum of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients is still poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical spectrum of COVID-19 on hemodialysis patients. METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 66 hemodialysis patients. Nasopharyngeal swab PCR and serology for SARS-CoV-2, blood analysis, chest radiography, treatment, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: COVID-19 was diagnosed in 50 patients: 38 (76%) were PCR-positive and 12 (24%) were PCR-negative but developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. By contrast, 17% of PCR-positive patients failed to develop detectable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Among PCR-positive patients, 5/38 (13%) were asymptomatic, while among PCR-negative patients 7/12 (58%) were asymptomatic (p = 0.005) for a total of 12/50 (24%) asymptomatic patients. No other differences were found between PCR-positive and PCR-negative patients. No differences in potential predisposing factors were found between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients except for a lower use of ACE inhibitors among asymptomatic patients. Asymptomatic patients had laboratory evidence of milder disease such as higher lymphocyte counts and oxygen saturation and lower troponin I and interleukin-6 levels than symptomatic patients. Overall mortality was 7/50 (14%) and occurred only in symptomatic PCR-positive patients in whom mortality was 7/33 (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is common in hemodialysis patients, especially among patients with initial negative PCR that later seroconvert. Thus COVID-19 mortality in hemodialysis patients may be lower than previously estimated based on PCR tests alone.

Ultrafiltration rate adjusted to body weight and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mortality among hemodialysis patients remains high. An elevated ultrafiltration rate adjusted by weight (UFR/W) has been associated with hypotension and higher risk of death and/or cardiovascular events. METHODS: We evaluated the association between UFR/W and mortality in 215 hemodialysis patients. The mean follow-up was 28 ±â€¯6.12 months. We collected patients' baseline characteristics and mean UFR/W throughout the follow-up. RESULTS: Mean UFR/W was 9.0 ±â€¯2,4 and tertiles 7.1 y 10.1 mL/kg/h. We divided our population according to the percentage of sessions with UFR/W above the limits described in the literature associated with increased mortality (10.0 ml/kg/h and 13.0 mL/kg/h). Patients with higher UFR/W were younger, with higher interdialytic weight gain and weight reduction percentage but lower dry, pre and post dialysis weight. Throughout the follow-up, 46 (21.4%) patients died, the majority over 70 years old, diabetic or with cardiovascular disease. There were neither differences regarding mortality between groups nor differences in UFR/W among patients who died and those who did not. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find an association between UFR/W and mortality, maybe due to a higher prevalence in the use of cardiovascular protection drugs and lower UFR/W. CONCLUSIONS: The highest UFR/W were observed in younger patients with lower weight and were not associated with an increased mortality.

The Spectrum of Clinical and Serological Features of COVID-19 in Urban Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The inherent immunosuppression of uremia increases the susceptibility of hemodialysis patients to infection. There is still limited evidence on hemodialysis patients and COVID-19. The clinical and analytical spectrum and treatment responses and mortality are poorly characterized. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical and analytical features, chest X-ray, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibodies for SARS-CoV-2, treatment and outcomes were analyzed in 48 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during March and April 2020 in two coordinated Spanish hemodialysis units. RESULTS: In 200 haemodialysis patients, COVID-19 was diagnosed in 48, of whom 22 were PCR positive, eight PCR negative but seroconverted and two were diagnosed on typical clinical grounds. Despite a mean age of 72.6 years, the overall mortality rate was 5/48 (10%). Among the PCR positive patients, 21 (55%) required admission and five (13%) died. PCR positive patients were more often symptomatic and hospitalized and had higher troponin I levels than PCR negative patients, but did not differ in lymphocyte counts, D-dimer or interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Among PCR negative COVID-19 patients, three out of 10 (30%) required admission, and none died. The most frequent symptom among the 48 patients was fever (31%), followed by asymptomatic patients (23%). A low number of lymphocytes was the only parameter significantly different between hospitalized and ambulatory COVID-19 patients, independently of PCR status. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 hemodialysis patients are frequently asymptomatic, and mortality may be lower than previously reported. Diagnosis may be retrospective, based on seroconversion, as PCR may be negative. This information should guide preventive and patient isolation strategies.