Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for T1 to T2 Glottic Larynx Cancer: Mature Results From the Phase 2 GLoTtic Larynx-SABR Trial.

PURPOSE: Traditional radiation therapy for early-stage larynx cancer irradiates the whole larynx over 5.5 to 6 weeks. Phase 1 data suggest that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a viable strategy to reduce the irradiated volume and compress treatment time. This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of gLoTtic larynx-SABR in 5 or 16 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligibility required stage 0 to II squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx. The arytenoid cartilage could not be involved beyond the vocal process, and patients smoking more than one pack per day were excluded. The treatment volume consisted of the gross tumor volume, with a 3 mm margin (5 mm craniocaudal) to create the planning target volume. Patients without active smoking and planning target volume <10 cc received 4250 cGy in 5 fractions, twice per week; other patients received 58.08 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of local failure. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were accrued to this study, with 21 and 4 treated with 5 and 16 fractions, respectively. The stage distribution was in situ (n = 1, 4%), T1a/b (n = 16/5, 64%/20%), and T2 (n = 3, 12%). The median age was 72 years, with a prior smoking history in 16 (64%) and active smoking in 1 (4%). At a median follow-up for surviving patients of 3.7 years (IQR, 3.1-4.4 years), there have been 2 in-field recurrences (1 in each dose cohort). The cumulative incidences of local failure were 4% (90% CI, 0.8%-20%) and 8% (90% CI, 3%-24%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There have been no acute or late grade 3+ toxicities in disease-free patients. The median baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months Voice Handicap Index scores were 57 (IQR, 32-69), 28.5 (8-48), 4 (0-12), 7.5 (0-12), and 5 (0-24), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Highly conformal stereotactic radiation therapy appears safe and efficacious for early-stage glottic larynx cancer, with encouraging patient-reported outcomes. These results need to be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and large noninferiority margin. Additional follow-up and ultimately comparative studies are necessary to validate this paradigm.

In silico evaluation and feasibility of near margin-less head and neck daily adaptive radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: We explore the potential dosimetric benefits of reducing treatment volumes through daily adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using the Ethos system/Intelligent Optimizer Engine (IOE). We hypothesize reducing treatment volumes afforded by daily adaption will significantly reduce the dose to adjacent organs at risk. We also explore the capability of the Ethos IOE to accommodate this highly conformal approach in HNC radiation therapy. METHODS: Ten HNC patients from a phase II trial were chosen, and their cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were uploaded to the adaptive RT (ART) emulator. A new initial reference plan was generated using both a 1 mm and 5 mm planning target volume (PTV) expansion. Daily adaptive ART plans (1 mm) were simulated from the clinical CBCT taken every fifth fraction. Additionally, using physician-modified ART contours the larger 5 mm plan was recalculated on this recontoured on daily anatomy. Changes in target and OAR contours were measured using Dice coefficients as a surrogate of clinician effort. PTV coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were statistically compared, and the robustness of each ART plan was evaluated at fractions 5 and 35 to observe if OAR doses were within 3 Gy of pre-plan. RESULTS: This study involved six patients with oropharynx and four with larynx cancer, totaling 70 adaptive fractions. The primary and nodal gross tumor volumes (GTV) required the most adjustments, with median Dice scores of 0.88 (range: 0.80-0.93) and 0.83 (range: 0.66-0.91), respectively. For the 5th and 35th fraction plans, 80 % of structures met robustness criteria (quartile 1-3: 67-100 % and 70-90 %). Adaptive planning improved median PTV V100% coverage for doses of 70 Gy (96 % vs. 95.6 %), 66.5 Gy (98.5 % vs. 76.5 %), and 63 Gy (98.9 % vs. 74.9 %) (p < 0.03). Implementing ART with total volume reduction yielded median dose reductions of 7-12 Gy to key organs-at-risk (OARs) like submandibular glands, parotids, oral cavity, and constrictors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The IOE enables feasible daily ART treatments with reduced margins while enhancing target coverage and reducing OAR doses for HNC patients. A phase II trial recently finished accrual and forthcoming analysis will determine if these dosimetric improvements correlate with improved patient-reported outcomes.

In Silico Analysis of Adjuvant Head and Neck Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Recently developed online adaptive radiation therapy (OnART) systems enable frequent treatment plan adaptation, but data supporting a dosimetric benefit in postoperative head and neck radiation therapy (RT) are sparse. We performed an in silico dosimetric study to assess the potential benefits of a single versus weekly OnART in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the adjuvant setting. Methods and Materials: Twelve patients receiving conventionally fractionated RT over 6 weeks and 12 patients receiving hypofractionated RT over 3 weeks on a clinical trial were analyzed. The OnART emulator was used to virtually adapt either once midtreatment or weekly based on the patient's routinely performed cone beam computed tomography. The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose heterogeneity, and cumulative dose to the organs at risk for these 2 adaptive approaches were compared with the nonadapted plan. Results: In total, 13, 8, and 3 patients had oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx primaries, respectively. In the conventionally fractionated RT cohort, weekly OnART led to a significant improvement in PTV V100% coverage (6.2%), hot spot (-1.2 Gy), and maximum cord dose (-3.1 Gy), whereas the mean ipsilateral parotid dose increased modestly (1.8 Gy) versus the nonadapted plan. When adapting once midtreatment, PTV coverage improved with a smaller magnitude (0.2%-2.5%), whereas dose increased to the ipsilateral parotid (1.0-1.1 Gy) and mandible (0.2-0.7 Gy). For the hypofractionated RT cohort, similar benefit was observed with weekly OnART, including significant improvement in PTV coverage, hot spot, and maximum cord dose, whereas no consistent dosimetric advantage was seen when adapting once midtreatment. Conclusions: For head and neck squamous cell carcinoma adjuvant RT, there was a limited benefit of single OnART, but weekly adaptations meaningfully improved the dosimetric criteria, predominantly PTV coverage and dose heterogeneity. A prospective study is ongoing to determine the clinical benefit of OnART in this setting.

HYPORT: Phase 1 Study of 3-Week Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Shortening the overall radiation therapy (RT) treatment time has advantages in cost and treatment burden, but data on hypofractionated RT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are limited. This study assessed the safety of moderately hypofractionated RT in the postoperative setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with completely resected stage I-IVB squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx with intermediate risk factor(s) including T3/4 disease, positive lymph node(s), close margin(s), perineural invasion, and/or lymphovascular invasion were enrolled on a rolling 6-design phase 1 study. Levels 0 and 1 consisted of 46.5 Gy in 15 fractions delivered 5 days a week and 44.4 Gy in 12 fractions delivered 4 days a week, respectively. The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose/fractionation of moderately hypofractionated postoperative RT. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled with 6 each on levels 0 and 1. No patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity or grade 4 to 5 toxicity. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 2 patients on level 0 (weight loss, neck abscess) and 3 patients on level 1 (all oral mucositis). One patient on level 0 experienced late grade 3 toxicity (persistent neck abscess). With a median follow-up of 18.6 months, 2 patients on level 1 had a recurrence: a regional recurrence in the undissected, unirradiated contralateral neck from a well-lateralized tonsil primary and an in-field local recurrence of oral tongue primary. The maximum tolerated dose/fractionation was determined to be 44.4 Gy in 12 fractions, but owing to more favorable tolerability in the setting of equivalent biologically effective dose, 46.5 Gy in 15 fractions was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose/fractionation. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately hypofractionated RT delivered over 3 weeks is well tolerated in the short term in this phase 1 cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following surgical resection. The follow-up phase 2 randomized trial will deliver 46.5 Gy in 15 fractions as the experimental arm.

Early Experience of Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Definitive Radiation of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Purpose: The advent of cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) has dramatically reduced the barriers of adaptation. We present the first prospective oART experience data in radiation of head and neck cancers (HNC). Methods and Materials: Patients with HNC receiving definitive standard fractionation (chemo)radiation who underwent at least 1 oART session were enrolled in a prospective registry study. The frequency of adaptations was at the discretion of the treating physician. Physicians were given the option of delivering 1 of 2 plans during adaptation: the original radiation plan transposed onto the cone beam computed tomography with adapted contours (scheduled), and a new adapted plan generated from the updated contours (adapted). A paired t test was used to compare the mean doses between scheduled and adapted plans. Results: Twenty-one patients (15 oropharynx, 4 larynx/hypopharynx, 2 other) underwent 43 adaptation sessions (median, 2). The median ART process time was 23 minutes, median physician time at the console was 27 minutes, and median patient time in the vault was 43.5 minutes. The adapted plan was chosen 93% of the time. The mean volume in each planned target volume (PTV) receiving 100% of the prescription dose for the scheduled versus adapted plan for high-risk PTVs was 87.8% versus 95% (P < .01), intermediate-risk PTVs was 87.3% versus 97.9% (P < .01), and low-risk PTVs was 94% versus 97.8% (P < .01), respectively. The mean hotspot was also lower with adaptation: 108.8% versus 106.4% (P < .01). All but 1 organ at risk (11/12) saw a decrease in their dose with the adapted plans, with the mean ipsilateral parotid (P = .013), mean larynx (P < .01), maximum point spinal cord (P < .01), and maximum point brain stem (P = .035) reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Online ART is feasible for HNC, with significant improvement in target coverage and homogeneity and a modest decrease in doses to several organs at risk.

Efficacy and Quality-of-Life Following Involved Nodal Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The INRT-AIR Phase II Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Elective neck irradiation (ENI) has long been considered mandatory when treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with definitive radiotherapy, but it is associated with significant dose to normal organs-at-risk (OAR). In this prospective phase II study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eliminating ENI and strictly treating involved and suspicious lymph nodes (LN) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx were eligible for enrollment. Each LN was characterized as involved or suspicious based on radiologic criteria and an in-house artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification model. Gross disease received 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions and suspicious LNs were treated with 66.5 Gy, without ENI. The primary endpoint was solitary elective volume recurrence, with secondary endpoints including patterns-of-failure and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, with 18 larynx/hypopharynx and 49 oropharynx cancer. With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the 2-year risk of solitary elective nodal recurrence was 0%. Gastrostomy tubes were placed in 14 (21%), with median removal after 2.9 months for disease-free patients; no disease-free patient is chronically dependent. Grade I/II dermatitis was seen in 90%/10%. There was no significant decline in composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Index scores after treatment, with means of 89.1 and 92.6 at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eliminating ENI is oncologically sound for HNSCC, with highly favorable quality-of-life outcomes. Additional prospective studies are needed to support this promising paradigm before implementation in any nontrial setting.

Evaluating machine learning enhanced intelligent-optimization-engine (IOE) performance for ethos head-and-neck (HN) plan generation.

PURPOSE: Varian Ethos utilizes novel intelligent-optimization-engine (IOE) designed to automate the planning. However, this introduced a black box approach to plan optimization and challenge for planners to improve plan quality. This study aims to evaluate machine-learning-guided initial reference plan generation approaches for head & neck (H&N) adaptive radiotherapy (ART). METHODS: Twenty previously treated patients treated on C-arm/Ring-mounted were retroactively re-planned in the Ethos planning system using a fixed 18-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) template. Clinical goals for IOE input were generated using (1) in-house deep-learning 3D-dose predictor (AI-Guided) (2) commercial knowledge-based planning (KBP) model with universal RTOG-based population criteria (KBP-RTOG) and (3) an RTOG-based constraint template only (RTOG) for in-depth analysis of IOE sensitivity. Similar training data was utilized for both models. Plans were optimized until their respective criteria were achieved or DVH-estimation band was satisfied. Plans were normalized such that the highest PTV dose level received 95% coverage. Target coverage, high-impact organs-at-risk (OAR) and plan deliverability was assessed in comparison to clinical (benchmark) plans. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired two-tailed student t-test. RESULTS: AI-guided plans were superior to both KBP-RTOG and RTOG-only plans with respect to clinical benchmark cases. Overall, OAR doses were comparable or improved with AI-guided plans versus benchmark, while they increased with KBP-RTOG and RTOG plans. However, all plans generally satisfied the RTOG criteria. Heterogeneity Index (HI) was on average <1.07 for all plans. Average modulation factor was 12.2 ± 1.9 (p = n.s), 13.1 ± 1.4 (p = <0.001), 11.5 ± 1.3 (p = n.s.) and 12.2 ± 1.9 for KBP-RTOG, AI-Guided, RTOG and benchmark plans, respectively. CONCLUSION: AI-guided plans were the highest quality. Both KBP-enabled and RTOG-only plans are feasible approaches as clinics adopt ART workflows. Similar to constrained optimization, the IOE is sensitive to clinical input goals and we recommend comparable input to an institution's planning directive dosimetric criteria.

Long-term opioid use in patients treated with head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Acute and chronic pain during and after radiotherapy is an important driver of poor quality of life. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with increased chronic opioid use in head and neck squamous cell cancer survivors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on head and neck squamous cell cancer patients treated with definitive or adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy. We tracked their oncologic opioid prescription profile from initial presentation to the last follow-up date. We determined the incidences of 1- and 2-year opioid use and performed multivariate logistic regression for both outcomes. RESULTS: Our analytic cohort consisted of 403 head and neck squamous cell cancer survivors. The numbers of patients requiring opioids at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment were 316 (78%), 203 (50%), and 102 (25%), respectively. On multivariate logistic regression, positive smoking history (95% CI 1.86 [1.03, 3.43], p = 0.04), unemployment (95% CI 2.33 [1.16, 4.67], p = 0.02), prior psychiatric illness (95% CI 2.15 [1.05, 4.40], p = 0.03), and opiate use before radiotherapy (95% CI 2.75 [1.49, 5.20], p = 0.01) were independently associated with significantly greater odds of opioid use at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our institutional analysis has shown that a substantial amount of head and neck cancer survivors are chronically dependent on opioids following radiotherapy. We have identified a cohort at highest risk for long-term use, for whom early interventions should be targeted.

Registration-guided deep learning image segmentation for cone beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART), especially online ART, effectively accounts for positioning errors and anatomical changes. One key component of online ART process is accurately and efficiently delineating organs at risk (OARs) and targets on online images, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Direct application of deep learning (DL)-based segmentation to CBCT images suffered from issues such as low image quality and limited available contour labels for training. To overcome these obstacles to online CBCT segmentation, we propose a registration-guided DL (RgDL) segmentation framework that integrates image registration algorithms and DL segmentation models. METHODS: The RgDL framework is composed of two components: image registration and RgDL segmentation. The image registration algorithm transforms/deforms planning contours that were subsequently used as guidance by the DL model to obtain accurate final segmentations. We had two implementations of the proposed framework-Rig-RgDL (Rig for rigid body) and Def-RgDL (Def for deformable)-with rigid body (RB) registration or deformable image registration (DIR) as the registration algorithm, respectively, and U-Net as the DL model architecture. The two implementations of RgDL framework were trained and evaluated on seven OARs in an institutional clinical head-and-neck dataset. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline approaches using the registration or the DL alone, RgDLs achieved more accurate segmentation, as measured by higher mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and other distance-based metrics. Rig-RgDL achieved a DSC of 84.5% on seven OARs on average, higher than RB or DL alone by 4.5% and 4.7%. The average DSC of Def-RgDL was 86.5%, higher than DIR or DL alone by 2.4% and 6.7%. The inference time required by the DL model component to generate final segmentations of seven OARs was less than 1 s in RgDL. By examining the contours from RgDLs and DL case by case, we found that RgDL was less susceptible to image artifacts. We also studied how the performances of RgDL and DL vary with the size of the training dataset. The DSC of DL dropped by 12.1% as the number of training data decreased from 22 to 5, whereas RgDL only dropped by 3.4%. CONCLUSION: By incorporating the patient-specific registration guidance to a population-based DL segmentation model, RgDL framework overcame the obstacles associated with online CBCT segmentation, including low image quality and insufficient training data, and achieved better segmentation accuracy than baseline methods. The resulting segmentation accuracy and efficiency show promise for applying this RgDL framework for online ART.

Survival and disease progression following solitary locoregional recurrence after head and neck radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The management of solitary locoregional recurrence (sLRR) of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) previously treated with radiotherapy (RT) is challenging. We aimed to identify characteristics associated with improved outcome. METHODS: We identified patients treated with non-sinus, mucosal HNSCC who initially received IMRT. We characterized overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC). Multivariable analysis (MVA) on survival and patterns-of-failure were performed using Cox and Fine-Gray competing risks analysis. RESULTS: We identified 90 patients with available follow-up. In total, 67 (74%) patients received curative-intent salvage, while 23 (26%) received palliative care. On MVA, significantly improved OS and LRC were associated with lower initial N-classification and use of salvage total laryngectomy (TL) or neck dissection (ND). CONCLUSION: A nontrivial number of patients with sLRR cannot undergo salvage. Among patients treated with curative intent, TL or ND were clearly associated with improved OS and LRC.

Prognostic impact of matted lymphadenopathy in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cervical matted lymphadenopathy (ML) is associated with outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: OPSCC patients treated at our institution with CRT were included (n = 417). ML was defined by three adjacent nodes without an intervening fat plane. Patients were stratified into favorable OPSCC (p16 + with ≤ 10 pack-years smoking history) or unfavorable OPSCC (p16- and/or > 10 pack years). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidences of regional recurrence (RR) and distant metastasis (DM). RESULTS: The median follow-up time for the surviving cohort was 49.9 months. In favorable OPSCC (n = 220), there were no significant associations between ML and any outcome. In unfavorable OPSCC (n = 197), ML had a significant negative impact on OS and PFS, with 3-year OS for patients without and with matted nodes at 74% and 56% (HR, 1.61, 95% CI 1.01-2.58). On multivariable Cox regression, patients with ML experienced significantly worsened OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.65) and PFS (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.28-2.93). The cumulative incidence of DM was also higher with ML (31% vs. 9%, adjusted HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.71-6.48). CONCLUSION: ML carries no prognostic importance in patients with favorable OPSCC. However, ML portends significantly worse outcomes in individuals with HPV-negative disease or a significant smoking history. Thus, ML may help risk-stratify this latter population for treatment intensification, but does not seem to be a contraindication for treatment de-escalation in the former.

High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Clinical Review.

BACKGROUND: Given the rapidly evolving nature of the field, the current state of "high-risk" head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) is poorly characterized. METHODS: Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, workup, risk stratification, staging and treatment of high-risk HNcSCC. RESULTS: Clinical and pathologic risk factors for adverse HNcSCC outcomes are nuanced (e.g., immunosuppression and perineural invasion). Frequent changes in adverse prognosticators have outpaced population-based registries and the variables they track, restricting our understanding of the epidemiology of HNcSCC and inhibiting control of the disease. Current heterogeneous staging and risk stratification systems are largely derived from institutional data, compromising their external validity. In the absence of staging system consensus, tumor designations such as "high risk" and "advanced" are variably used and insufficiently precise to guide management. Evidence guiding treatment of high-risk HNcSCC with curative intent is also suboptimal. For patients with incurable disease, an array of trials are evaluating the impact of immunotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and other novel agents. CONCLUSION: Population-based registries that broadly track updated, nuanced, adverse clinicopathologic risk factors, and outcomes are needed to guide development of improved staging systems. Design and development of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced-stage HNcSCC populations are needed to evaluate (1) observation, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or elective neck dissection for management of the cN0 neck, (2) indications for surgery plus adjuvant radiation versus adjuvant chemoradiation, and (3) the role of immunotherapy in treatment with curative intent. Considering these knowledge gaps, the authors explore a potential high-risk HNcSCC treatment framework.

Rapid recurrence in head and neck cancer: Underappreciated problem with poor outcome.

BACKGROUND: Rapid recurrence, defined as gross tumor recurrence after primary operation but prior to initiating postoperative radiation therapy (PORT), is underappreciated in head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: CT simulation images in patients with HNC managed surgically with adjuvant therapy at a single center between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients with HNC were included. Rapid recurrence occurred in 39 patients (20%) with a median time from operation to CT simulation of 37 days. On multivariable analysis (MVA), extranodal extension (ENE) was the only predictor of rapid recurrence (P = .03). While rapid recurrence, ENE, and perineural invasion were all associated with poor overall survival (OS) on MVA, rapid recurrence was the strongest predictor (hazard ratio [HR] 5.47). CONCLUSION: Rapid recurrence occurs at an underappreciated rate and is associated with poor survival outcomes. Patients with ENE are at highest risk and may benefit from diagnostic imaging evaluations immediately prior to PORT.

Ten-Year Update of a Randomized, Prospective Trial of Conventional Fractionated Versus Moderate Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: The previously published single institution randomized prospective trial failed to show superiority in the 5-year biochemical and/or clinical disease failure (BCDF) rate with moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (H-IMRT) versus conventionally fractionated IMRT (C-IMRT). We now present 10-year disease outcomes using updated risk groups and definitions of biochemical failure. METHODS: Men with protocol-defined intermediate- and high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive C-IMRT (76 Gy in 38 fractions) or H-IMRT (70.2 Gy in 26 fractions). Men with high-risk disease were all prescribed 24 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and had lymph node irradiation. Men with intermediate risk were prescribed 4 months of ADT at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of BCDF. We compared disease outcomes and overall mortality by treatment arm, with sensitivity analyses for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group adjustment. RESULTS: Overall, 303 assessable men were randomly assigned to C-IMRT or H-IMRT. The median follow-up was 122.9 months. Per updated NCCN risk classification, there were 28 patients (9.2%) with low-risk, 189 (62.4%) with intermediate-risk, and 86 (28.4%) with high-risk prostate cancer. The arms were equally balanced for clinicopathologic factors, except that there were more black patients in the C-IMRT arm (17.8% v 7.3%; P = .02). There was no difference in ADT use (P = .56). The 10-year cumulative incidence of BCDF was 25.9% in the C-IMRT arm and was 30.6% in the H-IMRT arm (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.82 to 2.11). The two arms also had similar cumulative 10-year rates of biochemical failure, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality; however, the 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases was higher in the H-IMRT arm (rate difference, 7.8%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 15.1%). CONCLUSION: H-IMRT failed to demonstrate superiority compared with C-IMRT in long-term disease outcomes.

Examining adjuvant radiation dose in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Compare adjuvant radiation dose trends and outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Nonmetastatic HNSCCs treated between 2004 and 2014 with primary site surgery, lymph node dissection, and adjuvant radiation were identified in the National Cancer Database. Standard dose radiation (SD-RT) was defined as an equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) ≥56.64 and ≤60 Gy and high-dose radiation (HD-RT) as an EQD2 >60 and <70 Gy. RESULTS: HD-RT was given to 46% of the 15 836 HNSCC patients managed with adjuvant radiation. When adjusted for poor prognostic factors, HD-RT was associated with increased mortality (HR1.09; 95%CI 1.02-1.16). In nonoropharynx or human papillomavirus-negative oropharynx primary that had positive margins, ≥5 positive lymph nodes, and/or extranodal extension, HD-RT was still not associated with improved survival (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: There was no survival benefit from postoperative dose escalation above EQD2 60 Gy even in a high-risk cohort.

A comparison of robotic arm versus gantry linear accelerator stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer diagnosed in men in the United States besides skin cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT; 6-15 Gy per fraction, up to 45 minutes per fraction, delivered in five fractions or less, over the course of approximately 2 weeks) is emerging as a popular treatment option for prostate cancer. The American Society for Radiation Oncology now recognizes SBRT for select low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. SBRT grew from the notion that high doses of radiation typical of brachytherapy could be delivered noninvasively using modern external-beam radiation therapy planning and delivery methods. SBRT is most commonly delivered using either a traditional gantry-mounted linear accelerator or a robotic arm-mounted linear accelerator. In this systematic review article, we compare and contrast the current clinical evidence supporting a gantry vs robotic arm SBRT for prostate cancer. The data for SBRT show encouraging and comparable results in terms of freedom from biochemical failure (>90% for low and intermediate risk at 5-7 years) and acute and late toxicity (<6% grade 3-4 late toxicities). Other outcomes (eg, overall and cancer-specific mortality) cannot be compared, given the indolent course of low-risk prostate cancer. At this time, neither SBRT device is recommended over the other for all patients; however, gantry-based SBRT machines have the abilities of treating larger volumes with conventional fractionation, shorter treatment time per fraction (~15 minutes for gantry vs ~45 minutes for robotic arm), and the ability to achieve better plans among obese patients (since they are able to use energies >6 MV). Finally, SBRT (particularly on a gantry) may also be more cost-effective than conventionally fractionated external-beam radiation therapy. Randomized controlled trials of SBRT using both technologies are underway.

Surgical Resection of Brain Metastases and the Risk of Leptomeningeal Recurrence in Patients Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Recent prospective data have shown that patients with solitary or oligometastatic disease to the brain may be treated with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with deferral of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). This has been extrapolated to the treatment of patients with resected lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) in patients treated with SRS to the postsurgical resection cavity for brain metastases compared with patients treated with SRS to intact metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred sixty-five patients treated with SRS without upfront WBRT at a single institution were identified; 330 of these with at least 3 months' follow-up were included in this analysis. One hundred twelve patients had undergone surgical resection of at least 1 lesion before SRS compared with 218 treated for intact metastases. Time to LMD and overall survival (OS) time were estimated from date of radiosurgery, and LMD was analyzed by the use of cumulative incidence method with death as a competing risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with competing risk regression to determine whether various clinical factors predicted for LMD. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 9.0 months, 39 patients (12%) experienced LMD at a median of 6.0 months after SRS. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of LMD, with death as a competing risk, was 5.2% for the patients without surgical resection versus 16.9% for those treated with surgery (Gray test, P<.01). On multivariate analysis, prior surgical resection (P<.01) and breast cancer primary (P=.03) were significant predictors of LMD development. The median OS times for patients undergoing surgery compared with SRS alone were 12.9 and 10.6 months, respectively (log-rank P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing SRS with deferral of upfront WBRT for intracranial metastatic disease, prior surgical resection and breast cancer primary are associated with an increased risk for the development of LMD.

What Are Medical Students in the United States Learning About Radiation Oncology? Results of a Multi-Institutional Survey.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess the exposure that medical students (MSs) have to radiation oncology (RO) during the course of their medical school career, as evidenced by 2 time points in current medical training (ie, first vs fourth year; MS1s and MS4s, respectively) and to assess the knowledge of MS1s, MS4s, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about the appropriateness of RT in cancer management in comparison with RO attendings. METHODS: We developed and beta tested an electronic survey divided into 3 parts: RO job descriptions, appropriateness of RT, and toxicities of RT. The surveys were distributed to 7 medical schools in the United States. A concordance of >90% (either yes or no) among RO attendings in an answer was necessary to determine the correct answer and to compare with other subgroups using a χ(2) test (P<.05 was significant). RESULTS: The overall response rate for ROs, MS1s, MS4s, and PCPs was 26%; n (22 + 315 + 404 + 43)/3004. RT misconceptions decreased with increasing level of training. More than 1 of 10 MSs did not believe that RT alone could cure cancer. Emergent oncologic conditions for RT (eg, spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome) could not be identified by >1 of 5 respondents. Multiple nontoxicities of RT (eg, emitting low-level radiation from the treatment site) were incorrectly identified as toxicities by >1 of 5 respondents. MS4s/PCPs with an RO rotation in medical school had improved scores in all prompts. CONCLUSIONS: Although MS knowledge of general RT principles improves from the first to the fourth year, a large knowledge gap still exists between MSs, current PCPs, and ROs. Some basic misconceptions of RT persist among a minority of MSs and PCPs. We recommend implementing formal education in RO fundamentals during the core curriculum of medical school.