Comparison of perioperative stress in patients undergoing thyroid surgery with and without neuromonitoring-a pilot study.

PURPOSE: A comprehensive psychological comparison of preoperative stress in patients scheduled for thyroidectomy with versus without intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) has never been reported. The aim of this study was to assess whether a planned utilization of IONM had any effect on the reduction of stress and anxiety level before and after thyroid surgery. METHODS: The outcomes of 32 patients scheduled for thyroidectomy with IONM were compared to the outcomes of a carefully matched control group of 39 patients operated on without IONM. All the patients were tested before the surgery and at 1-7 days postoperatively employing psychological self-report instruments: the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Scale (FACT H&N), and the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The examined groups were homogenous and carefully matched in terms of mental health (GHQ), the quality of life (FACT H&N), and the intensity of depression level (DASS). The IONM group showed a significantly lower level of "the state anxiety"(STAI) 1 day before the operation (p < 0.05), greater trust in the doctor (VAS) (p < 0.05), and greater confidence in the treatment method (VAS) as compared to the patients in the control group (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found when the remaining items were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The planned use of IONM during thyroidectomy may reduce patient anxiety before surgery. However, further research in this area is necessary to confirm this preliminary finding in a larger population of patients.

Evaluation of selected cognitive functions before and after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cognitive functions have been reported to be impaired in patient with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). The aim of this psychological study was to evaluate cognitive disturbances in pHPT in relation to serum calcium levels before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, case-control study with 1-year follow-up of 35 pHPT patients versus 35 matched controls was undertaken. All patients were tested before surgery and at 12-18 months following surgery with a battery of selected cognitive function psychological tools: Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Memory Verbal Learning Test (DCS), The Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Trail Making Test A & B, Verbal Fluency Test, and Beck Depression Inventory. In addition to psychological testing, serum calcium, parathyroid hormone and phosphate levels were evaluated. RESULTS: The following cognitive functions of pHPT patients versus controls were deteriorated before surgery: impaired concentration, decreased nonverbal learning process, difficulties in using direct memory, verbal fluency and visual constructive abilities. However, no correlation was found between serum calcium levels and the results of neuropsychological tests. In longitudinal comparison of pHPT patients before and 1 year after surgery, there was a significant improvement in visual memory, visual-constructive abilities and direct memory. CONCLUSIONS: pHPT patients have significantly decreased concentration level, nonverbal learning process, access to verbal resources and constructional and visual memory ability. Thus, neuropsychological testing may be useful in the decision making for early surgery in patients with mild asymptomatic disease in order to avoid further deterioration of cognitive functions.

Impact of menthal representation of disease and wound-related subjective perception of disease on convalescence after surgical treatment.

UNLABELLED: Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic treatment has been shown to have several advantages, including lower levels of postoperative pain, faster recovery, and better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, the advantages of laparoscopy are being debated as possibly not being merely related to biomedical factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consisted of two sub-studies. In the first study, 150 healthy, previously unoperated volunteers, not employed in the health services, were included. Healthy volunteers, from the latter study, were given questionnaires that presented different sizes of post-operative wounds and examined their perception of the severity of the illnesses that were treated by surgery leading to these wounds. In the second study, data was collected from 65 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and 35 patients treated by the open approach cholecystectomy. Patients from the second study were examined prior to operation and 1 month after surgery with a questionnaire evaluating their subjective perception of the disease. RESULTS: Subjective perception of the severity of disease (SPSD) was similar between the laparoscopy and the open approach cholecystectomy patients before the operation (respectively, 6.25±1.7 and 6.06±2.2; ns). At the follow-up, a significant decrease of SPSD among laparoscopy patients was observed (post-op score = 3.28±0.8, p<0.05 in paired t-Student test), but not in the open approach patients (6.42±1.7, ns in paired t-Student test). The volunteers perceived that the disease of the laparoscopically treated patients was less serious than the disease of those treated with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors would like to emphasize that the study presents a new approach to the explanation of the so called "laparoscopy phenomenon", i.e. much faster and smoother recovery after relatively larger and more serious surgical procedures. We believe that the benefits observed among the videoscopy patients might be, apart from immunological and pain-related factors, attributed to the psychological influence of cognitive representations of the disease severity on pain, analgetics use, and recovery.