How I do it:- Endoscopic Reverse Denker's Approach.

Introduction: Endoscopic Denker's approach involves complete exposure of the anterior, inferior and lateral walls of the maxillary sinus providing access to both infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossa. Open approaches to maxillary sinus may lead to a high chance of cranial nerve dysfunction, trismus and wound healing issues. Surgical methods differ based on pathology, exposure, visualization and extent of clearance of the pathology. Method: The technique and surgical steps of Endoscopic Reverse Denker's approach are presented. Results: Critical steps include inferior turbinectomy, uncinectomy, followed by mega middle meatal antrostomy. For exposure drilling is started from the anterior margin of middle meatal antrostomy up to the pyriform aperture anteriorly till the anterior wall of the maxilla is visualized and the nasolacrimal duct can be visualized and transected. This method preserves the pyriform aperture and anterior wall similar to inside-out mastoidectomy tracing the pathology with less bone removal, faster and less morbidity. Conclusion: Endoscopic Reverse Denker's is a 2-handed or 4-handed endoscopic technique for proper exposure, visualization and clearance of the maxillary pathology of the anterolateral and anterior wall. Olfaction is preserved and crusting is less as there is less bone removal with no atrophic nasal changes. It preserves the pyriform aperture thereby preventing alar collapse.

A Comparative Study between Endoscopic Prelacrimal Approach and Middle Meatal Antrostomy for Maxillary Sinus Pathologies.

Aim, To evaluate the treatment outcomes of endoscopic prelacrimal approach in managing various maxillary sinus pathologies, analyzing the associated adverse events and post treatment quality of life and also to compare surgical outcomes of prelacrimal approach with middle meatal antrostomy approach to remove various maxillary sinus pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from January 2019 to April 2020. We took 60 patients with maxillary sinus pathologies and divided into two groups and done sinus surgery through middle meatal antrostomy approach (group A) and prelacrimal approach (group B). Post operative follow up done for one year and analyzed complications and recurrence. RESULTS: We compared the recurrence rate of antrochoanal polyp in both groups. Out of 12 patients in group A, 6 patients (50%) got recurrence of polyp. In group B, only one patient (8%) got recurrence out of 12 patients of antrochoanal polyp. CONCLUSION: We conclude that prelacrimal recess approach is a better option than middle meatal antrostomy for complete removal of pathologies in maxillary sinus.