Personalized screening before subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Usefulness and outcomes in clinical practice-the S-ICD screening SIS prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is unsuccessful in around 10% of cases. A personalized screening method, by slightly moving the electrodes, to obtain a better R/T ratio has been described to overcome traditional screening failure. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the SIS study were to assess to what extent a personalized screening method improves eligibility for S-ICD implantation and to evaluate the inappropriate shock rate after such screening success. METHODS: All consecutive patients eligible for an S-ICD implantation were prospectively recruited across 20 French centers between December 2019 and January 2022. In case of traditional screening failure, patients received a second personalized screening. If at least 1 vector was positive, the personalized screening was considered successful, and the patient was eligible for implantation. RESULTS: The study included 474 patients (mean age, 50.4 ± 14.1 years; 77.4% men). Traditional screening was successful in 456 (96.2%) cases. This figure rose to 98.3% (n = 466; P = .002) when personalized screening was performed. All patients implanted after successful personalized screening had correct signal detection on initial device interrogation. Nevertheless, after 1-year follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients (43%) implanted with personalized screening experienced inappropriate shock vs 18 of the 427 patients (4.2%) with traditional screening and S-ICD implantation (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Traditional S-ICD screening was successful in our study in a high proportion of patients. Considering the small improvement in success of screening and a higher rate of inappropriate shock, a strategy of personalized screening cannot be routinely recommended. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04101253.

ATE Score Diagnostic Accuracy for Predicting the Absence of Intra-Atrial Thrombi Before AF Ablation.

BACKGROUND: In a preliminary study in patients hospitalized for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), the atrial thrombus exclusion (ATE) score (stroke, hypertension, heart failure, and D-dimers >270 ng/mL) was developed to rule out the diagnosis of intra-atrial thrombus, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, and to avoid performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to prospectively confirm the NPV of the ATE score in an independent population. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized for catheter ablation of AF or left atrial tachycardia (LAT) were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study. D-dimer levels were measured within 48 hours before ablation. An ATE score of 0 was considered predictive of no thrombus. TEE was routinely performed at the beginning or just before the ablation procedure. The primary endpoint was the presence of atrial thrombus diagnosed by TEE. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,072 patients (53.3% paroxysmal AF, 36.7% persistent AF, and 10% LAT). A thrombus was detected in 29 patients (0.94%; 95% CI: 0.63%-1.35%), all on appropriate anticoagulant therapy. An ATE score of 0 was observed in 818 patients (26.6%), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV were 93.1%, 26.8%, 1.2%, and 99.8%, respectively. Follow-up of the 2 false negative patients revealed the persistence of chronic organized thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized for catheter ablation of AF or LAT, the ATE score identifies a population at very low risk for atrial thrombus. In consultation with the patient, the cardiologist may consider not performing a preoperative TEE in case of an ATE score of 0.

Exclusion of Intra-Atrial Thrombus Diagnosis Using D-Dimer Assay Before Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that the association of D-dimer blood level and several clinical items in a new risk score could predict the absence of atrial thrombus. BACKGROUND: Symptomatic and drug resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) can be treated by catheter ablation. The procedure-related risk of thromboembolism is limited by the pre-operative use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to detect atrial thrombi. METHODS: Patients admitted for catheter ablation of AF (n = 2,494) were prospectively included in a multicenter study. TEE was systematically performed before the procedure to search for atrial thrombus (primary endpoint). D-dimer level, CHADS2 score, left ventricular ejection fraction, pre-operative anticoagulation regimen, and medical history were collected. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with the presence of atrial thrombus (hypertension, history of stroke, heart failure, D-dimer level >270 ng/ml). These factors were aggregated in a new score called atrial thrombus exclusion (ATE). RESULTS: The incidence of atrial thrombus was 1.92%. CHADS2 score and D-dimer level were significantly associated with atrial thrombus (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). A zero CHADS2 score failed to exclude all atrial thrombi (5 false negatives; sensitivity: 89.58%, specificity: 52.2%). No false negative was found with a zero ATE score, which had a specificity of 37% and a higher sensitivity (100%) than the CHADS2 score (p < 0.031) to predict the absence of intra-atrial thrombi on TEE. Conversely, the positive predictive value was poor, and the ATE score should not be used to conclude a positive diagnosis of thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: An ATE score of zero was strongly associated with the absence of atrial thrombus. This new score could be useful to rule out a diagnosis of atrial thrombus before catheter ablation of AF.

Importance of anterograde visualization of the coronary venous network by selective left coronary angiography prior to resynchronization.

BACKGROUND: Understanding of coronary anatomy is essential to the advancement of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) techniques. We determined whether the difficulties associated with catheterization of the coronary sinus (CS) and its lateral branches could be overcome by a preliminary angiographical study of the coronary venous system carried out during a pre-operative coronary angiography with examination of venous return. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients were scheduled for an exploratory angiography procedure and indicated for CRT. Group A patients were implanted with a CRT device after a right arterial angiographical procedure while group B patients had a selective left angiogram including examination of venous return. Data analyzed in group B were: position of CS ostium, number and distribution of lateral branches, and ability to preselect a marginal vein suitable for catheterization. Subsequent device implantation was guided by these parameters. A total of 96 and 89 patients were included in groups A and B, respectively. Implantation success rates were not different (98% and 100%, respectively), but CS catheterization time was reduced in group B (6 minutes vs 4 minutes; P < 10(-6)) as well as total time required to position the left ventricular lead (25 minutes vs 15 minutes; P < 10(-6)), fluoroscopy exposure (7 minutes vs 5 minutes; P < 10(-6)), and volume of contrast medium required (45 mL vs 15 mL; P < 10(-6)). CONCLUSION: A coronary angiographical study, including examination of the coronary venous return prior to implantation of a CRT device, can simplify the device implant and allows patient-specific preselection of appropriate tools for the procedure.

Intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony. A new independent predictor of severe cardiac events in heart failure patients.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the electromechanical parameters, using tissue Doppler echocardiography, as potential independent predictors of heart failure (HF) worsening. BACKGROUND: Ventricular conduction disorders worsen the prognosis for HF patients. However, the relationships between the QRS width and morphology, hemodynamic parameters, and presence and magnitude of intra-left ventricular (LV) and inter-ventricular (V) asynchrony have not been well clarified. METHOD: A total of 104 patients with an LV ejection fraction (EF)