Observed-to-expected lung-area-to-head-circumference ratio on ultrasound examination vs total fetal lung volume on magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of survival in fetuses with left-sided diaphragmatic hernia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the value of antenatally determined observed-to-expected (O/E) lung-area-to-head-circumference ratio (LHR) on ultrasound examination vs O/E total fetal lung volume (TFLV) on MRI examination to predict postnatal survival of fetuses with isolated, expectantly managed left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study including all consecutive fetuses with isolated CDH that were managed expectantly in Mannheim, Germany, and in five other European centers, that underwent at least one ultrasound examination for measurement of O/E-LHR and one MRI scan for measurement of O/E-TFLV during pregnancy. All MRI data were centralized, and lung volumes were measured by two experienced operators blinded to the pre- and postnatal data. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the effect on survival at hospital discharge of various perinatal variables, including the center of management. In left-sided CDH with intrathoracic herniation of the liver, receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed separately for cases from Mannheim and the other five European centers and were used to compare O/E-TFLV and O/E-LHR in the prediction of postnatal survival. RESULTS: From Mannheim, 309 patients were included with a median gestational age (GA) at ultrasound examination of 29.6 (range, 19.7-39.1) weeks and median GA at MRI examination of 31.1 (range, 18.0-39.9) weeks. From the other five European centers, 116 patients were included with a median GA at ultrasound examination of 26.7 (range, 20.6-37.6) weeks and median GA at MRI examination of 27.7 (range, 21.3-37.9) weeks. Regression analysis demonstrated that the survival rates at discharge were lower in left-sided CDH (odds ratio (OR), 0.349 (95% CI, 0.133-0.918), P = 0.033) and those with intrathoracic liver (OR, 0.297 (95% CI, 0.141-0.628), P = 0.001), and higher with increasing O/E-TFLV (OR, 1.123 (95% CI, 1.079-1.170), P < 0.001), advanced GA at birth (OR, 1.294 (95% CI, 1.055-1.588), P = 0.013) and when birth occurred in Mannheim (OR, 7.560 (95% CI, 3.368-16.967), P < 0.001). Given the difference in survival rate between Mannheim and the five other European centers, ROC curve comparisons between the two imaging modalities were presented separately. For cases of left-sided CDH with intrathoracic herniation of the liver, pairwise comparison showed no significant difference between the area under the ROC curves for the prediction of postnatal survival between O/E-TFLV and O/E-LHR in Mannheim (mean difference = 0.025, P = 0.610, standard error = 0.050), whereas there was a significant difference in the other European centers studied (mean difference = 0.056, P = 0.033, standard error = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: In fetuses with left-sided CDH and intrathoracic herniation of the liver, the predictive value for postnatal survival of O/E-TFLV on MRI examination and O/E-LHR on ultrasound examination was similar in one center (Mannheim), but O/E-TFLV had better predictive value compared to O/E-LHR in the five other European centers. Hence, in these five European centers, MRI should be included in the diagnostic process for left-sided CDH. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) is associated with several adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although many studies have found that early induction of labor (eIOL) in LGA reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia (SD), no current guidelines recommend this particular strategy, due to concerns about increased rates of cesarean delivery (CD) and neonatal complications. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the timing of IOL in LGA fetuses affects maternal and neonatal outcomes in a single center; and to combine these results with the evidence reported in the literature. METHODS: This study comprised two parts. The first was a retrospective cohort study that included: consecutive patients with singleton pregnancy, an estimated fetal weight (EFW) ≥90th percentile on ultrasound (US) between 35+0 and 39+0 weeks of gestation (WG), who were eligible for normal vaginal delivery. The second part was a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis that included the results of the first part as well as all previously reported studies that have compared IOL to expectant management in patients with LGA. The perinatal outcomes were CD, operative vaginal delivery (OVD), SD, brachial plexus palsy, anal sphincter injury, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), APGAR score, umbilical arterial pH, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), phototherapy, and bone fracture. RESULTS: Retrospective cohort: of the 547 patients, 329 (60.1%) were induced and 218 (39.9%) entered spontaneous labor. Following covariate balancing, CD was significantly higher in the IOL group in comparison to the spontaneous labor group. This difference only became apparent beyond 40WG (hazard ratio: 1.9, p=0.030). The difference between both groups for shoulder dystocia was not statistically significant. Systematic review and metanalysis: 17 studies were included in addition to our own results giving a total sample size of 111,300 participants. When IOL was performed <40+0WG, the risk for SD was significantly lower in the IOL group (OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.42-0.98, I2 =19%). There was no significant difference in CD rate between IOL and expectant management after pooling the results of these 17 studies. However, when removing the studies in which IOL was done exclusively before 40+0WG, the risk for CD in the remaining studies (IOL not exclusively <40+0WG) was significantly higher in the IOL group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.02-2.09, I2 =56%). There were no statistically significant differences between IOL and expectant management for the remaining perinatal outcomes. Nulliparity, history of CD, and low Bishop score but not methods of induction were independent risk factors for intrapartum CD in patients who were induced for LGA. CONCLUSION: Timing of IOL in patients with suspected macrosomia significantly impacts perinatal adverse outcomes. IOL has no impact on rates of SD but does increase CD when considered irrespective of gestational age, but it may decrease the risk of SD without increasing the risk of other adverse maternal outcomes, in particular cesarean section when performed before 40+0 WG. (GRADE: Low/Very low). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.