[Stopping antidepressants: withdrawal symptoms and rebound effects : Review and practical recommendations]. / Absetzen von Antidepressiva ­ Absetzsymptome und Rebound-Effekte : Übersicht und praktische Empfehlungen.

Stopping antidepressants can cause withdrawal (discontinuation) symptoms, the return of the original illness, and rebound. The latter means that the disease will return stronger, faster, or with greater likelihood than if it had not been treated with medication. The Psychiatry Working Group of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association (AkdÄ) presents the scientific findings and provides practical recommendations for action. Withdrawal symptoms are multiform; unspecific physical symptoms are predominant. Distinguishing them from the recurrence of depressive symptoms can be difficult. Most of them are mild and self-limiting. There is insufficient evidence on the extent and frequency of rebound depression. The rebound risk implies that when establishing the medication, the short-term benefit must be weighed against the possible long-term risk of chronic depression or the possible need for long-term medication. Patients should be informed about the risk of withdrawal both as early as the joint decision-making process about treatment initiation and regularly during the course of treatment. Withdrawal should take place gradually, except in emergency situations, whereby small steps should be taken, especially in the low-dose range.

In search of a dose-response relationship in SSRIs-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Recent meta-analyses on dose-response relationships of SSRIs are largely based on indirect evidence. We analyzed RCTs directly comparing different SSRI doses. METHOD: Systematic literature search for RCTs. Two raters independently screened articles and extracted data. Across SSRIs, doses defined as low, medium, and high doses, based on drug manufacturers' product monographs, were analyzed in pairwise random-effects meta-analyses and in a sensitivity network meta-analysis with regard to differences in antidepressive efficacy (primary outcome). We also analyzed all direct comparisons of different dosages of specific SSRIs. (Prospero CRD42018081031). RESULTS: Out of 5333 articles screened, we included 33. Comparisons of dosage groups (low, medium, and high) resulted in only small and clinically non-significant differences for SSRIs as a group, the strongest relating to medium vs low doses (SMD: -0.15 [95%-CI: -0.28; -0.01) and not sustained in a sensitivity analysis. Among different doses of specific SSRIs, no statistically significant trend emerged for efficacy at higher doses, but 60 mg/day fluoxetine are statistically significantly inferior to 20 mg/day. Paroxetine results are inconclusive: 10 mg/day are inferior to higher doses, but 30 and 40 mg/day are inferior to 20 mg/day. Meaningful effects cannot be ruled out for certain drugs and dosages, often investigated in only one trial. Dropout rates increase with dose-particularly due to side effects. Network meta-analyses supported our findings. CONCLUSIONS: There is no conclusive level I or level II evidence of a clinically meaningful dose-response relationship of SSRIs as a group or of single substances. High SSRI doses are not recommended as routine treatment.

[German S3 guidelines on bipolar disorders-first update 2019 : What is new in pharmacotherapy?] / S3-Leitlinie Bipolare Störungen ­ 1. Update 2019 : Was ist neu in der Pharmakotherapie?

BACKGROUND: German S3 guidelines are subject to the highest methodological standards. This includes that they are only valid for a certain time period. Following the first edition in 2012 the first update of the S3 guidelines on bipolar disorder has now been published (2019). OBJECTIVE: What has changed in the field of pharmacological recommendations comparing the first edition with the update in 2019? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison of the 1st edition from 2012 with the update from 2019 of the S3 guidelines for the diagnostics and treatment of bipolar disorders. RESULTS: The three principle treatment targets of acute treatment of bipolar depression, acute treatment of mania and phase prophylaxis (maintenance treatment) can be distinguished. For acute treatment of bipolar depression, for the first time a medication has received a level A recommendation: quetiapine. For the acute treatment of mania, several drugs are still recommended with the same level of recommendation (B). Asenapine has been added as the tenth substance. Lithium is still the only drug with a level A recommendation for maintenance and prophylactic treatment and is also the only drug approved for this indication without restrictions. A new recommendation is that in the absence of contraindications, phase prophylaxis with a serum level of at least 0.6 mmol/l should be carried out. With a B recommendation, quetiapine has been added to the drugs for phase prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSION: The S3 guidelines make recommendations at the highest scientific level. In view of these findings, lithium is clearly underutilized for maintenance therapy. In the absence of clear contraindications (advanced renal insufficiency), every patient with bipolar disease should be given the chance of lithium prophylaxis for an adequately long period.

Baclofen for alcohol use disorder-a systematic meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of baclofen vs. placebo for long-term treatment of alcohol use disorder. METHOD: Systematic review and meta-analysis following methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017073663). Primary outcome was the random-effects summary estimate of all standardized mean differences (SMDs), as calculated from the primary outcomes of each study. RESULTS: Fourteen double-blind RCTs (1522 patients) were included. Heterogeneity was substantial for most analyses (I2 about 75%). Baclofen showed a small, but not statistically significant superiority over placebo: SMD = 0.22 ([95% CI: -0.03; 0.47], P = 0.09). This result was supported by a leave-one-out-analysis, and Orwin's fail-safe N, by predefined secondary analyses (on abstinence rates and amount of drinking), and by a post hoc-analysis of high-dose studies (>80 mg/day). An analysis of low risk of bias studies (SMD = 0.10 [-0.20; 0.41], P = 0.51, I2  = 43.3%) found no effect. Exclusion of four studies focusing on patients with comorbidity yielded a small positive effect. Drop-out rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Our results question baclofen's utility in the long-term treatment of alcohol use disorder at both normal and high doses. While the confidence intervals indicate that marginally harmful or moderately beneficial effects of baclofen remain a possibility, the most likely effect size is slightly above placebo effects.

Solar insolation in springtime influences age of onset of bipolar I disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm prior findings that the larger the maximum monthly increase in solar insolation in springtime, the younger the age of onset of bipolar disorder. METHOD: Data were collected from 5536 patients at 50 sites in 32 countries on six continents. Onset occurred at 456 locations in 57 countries. Variables included solar insolation, birth-cohort, family history, polarity of first episode and country physician density. RESULTS: There was a significant, inverse association between the maximum monthly increase in solar insolation at the onset location, and the age of onset. This effect was reduced in those without a family history of mood disorders and with a first episode of mania rather than depression. The maximum monthly increase occurred in springtime. The youngest birth-cohort had the youngest age of onset. All prior relationships were confirmed using both the entire sample, and only the youngest birth-cohort (all estimated coefficients P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A large increase in springtime solar insolation may impact the onset of bipolar disorder, especially with a family history of mood disorders. Recent societal changes that affect light exposure (LED lighting, mobile devices backlit with LEDs) may influence adaptability to a springtime circadian challenge.

[Genetic tests for controlling treatment with antidepressants]. / Genetische Tests zur Steuerung der Behandlung mit Antidepressiva.

In clinical practice, there is a need for a more individualized selection of antidepressants and adequate dosage. The investigation of pharmacokinetically relevant genes is a promising approach to assist this selection. In the past 2 years, two commercially available tests have been subject of advertisement, a test from Stada, which analyses variants of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 and a test from HMNC Brain Health, which analyses variants of the ABCB1 gene. The costs for both kits are not covered by the statutory health insurance and it is therefore proposed that the patients are invoiced directly in the form of individual healthcare payment. The companies claim that by applying the tests antidepressant treatment failure can be avoided and that patients will respond faster to the antidepressant used. These claims are not based on appropriate clinical trials, which are either lacking or reveal conflicting results. Hence, the routine use of these tests is not recommended. In accordance with the German S3 Guideline for unipolar depression, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of serum levels should be carried out in cases of non-response to an antidepressant with adequate dosage and duration. As a rule the costs for TDM are covered by the statutory health insurance. Cytochrome P450 genotyping is only indicated when the serum level is not within the expected range and other reasons to explain this discrepancy are excluded. Many laboratories provide these analyses and in individual cases the costs are reimbursed by the statutory health insurance. Further research should be carried out to investigate the importance of the ABCB1 gene for the treatment with antidepressants.

Comparison of psychotic bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia: an international, multisite study.

OBJECTIVE: Nosological distinctions among schizoaffective disorder (SA), bipolar I disorder with psychotic features (BDp), and schizophrenia (SZ) remain unresolved. METHOD: We compared 2269 subjects with psychotic features in DSM-IV-TR diagnoses (1435 BDp, 463 SZ, 371 SA) from 8 collaborating international sites, by 12 sociodemographic and clinical measures, all between diagnostic pairs. RESULTS: In bivariate comparisons, SA was consistently intermediate between BDp and SZ for 11/12 features (except onset stressors), and SZ vs. BDp differed in all 12 factors. SA differed from both BDp and SZ in 9/12 factors: SA and BDp were similar in education and suicidal ideation or acts; SA and SZ were similar in education, onset stressors, and substance abuse. Meta-analytic comparisons of diagnostic pairs for 10 categorical factors indicated similar differences of SA from both SZ and BDp. Multivariate modeling indicated significantly independent differences between BDp and SZ (8 factors), SA vs. SZ (5), and BDp vs. SA (3). Measurement variance was similar for all diagnoses. CONCLUSION: SA was consistently intermediate between BDp and SZ. The three diagnostic groups ranked: BDp > SA > SZ related to lesser morbidity or disability. The findings are not consistent with a dyadic Kraepelinian categorization, although the considerable overlap among the three DSM-IV diagnostic groups indicates uncertain boundaries if they represent distinct disorders.

Influence of birth cohort on age of onset cluster analysis in bipolar I disorder.

PURPOSE: Two common approaches to identify subgroups of patients with bipolar disorder are clustering methodology (mixture analysis) based on the age of onset, and a birth cohort analysis. This study investigates if a birth cohort effect will influence the results of clustering on the age of onset, using a large, international database. METHODS: The database includes 4037 patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, previously collected at 36 collection sites in 23 countries. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to adjust the data for country median age, and in some models, birth cohort. Model-based clustering (mixture analysis) was then performed on the age of onset data using the residuals. Clinical variables in subgroups were compared. RESULTS: There was a strong birth cohort effect. Without adjusting for the birth cohort, three subgroups were found by clustering. After adjusting for the birth cohort or when considering only those born after 1959, two subgroups were found. With results of either two or three subgroups, the youngest subgroup was more likely to have a family history of mood disorders and a first episode with depressed polarity. However, without adjusting for birth cohort (three subgroups), family history and polarity of the first episode could not be distinguished between the middle and oldest subgroups. CONCLUSION: These results using international data confirm prior findings using single country data, that there are subgroups of bipolar I disorder based on the age of onset, and that there is a birth cohort effect. Including the birth cohort adjustment altered the number and characteristics of subgroups detected when clustering by age of onset. Further investigation is needed to determine if combining both approaches will identify subgroups that are more useful for research.

Regularity in daily mood stabilizer dosage taken by patients with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate regularity in the daily mood stabilizer dosage taken by patients with bipolar disorder, and identify factors associated with irregularity. METHODS: Self-reported daily mood and medication data were available from 206 patients who took the same mood stabilizer for ≥100 days. Approximate entropy (ApEn) was used to measure serial regularity in daily mood stabilizer dosage. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate if demographic or clinical variables were associated with ApEn. RESULTS: There was a wide range of regularity in the daily mood stabilizer dosage. The mean percent of days of missing doses was 13.6%. The number of psychotropic medications (p=0.007), pill burden (p=0.004) and percent of days with depressed mood (p=0.013) were associated with more irregularity, while the percent of days euthymic (p=0.014) was associated with less irregularity. The percent of days missing doses was not associated with the number of medications, pill burden or mood ratings. DISCUSSION: Patients may have irregularity in daily dosage in spite of a low percent of days missing doses. Psychotropic medication regimen complexity and depression are associated with increased dosage irregularity. Research is needed on how irregularity in daily dosage impacts the continuity of drug action of mood stabilizers.

Heterogeneity of schizoaffective disorder compared with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Low diagnostic reliability, the need to meet criteria of two disorders, and its status as residual diagnosis in clinical practice led us to hypothesize that schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is characterized by considerable heterogeneity, particularly in comparison with schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD). As this has not been investigated the aim of this study is to test whether heterogeneity is larger in SAD than in SZ and BD. METHOD: Systematic search for studies simultaneously comparing all three diagnoses regarding demographic, clinical, psychometric (clinical rating scales and IQ tests), and biological parameters; comparison of heterogeneity as measured by standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Standard deviation of SAD samples (N = 47) was smaller than in both differential diagnoses. SDs were 7% higher in BD than in SAD (SZ: 2% higher); in studies employing DSM-IIIR/-IV pooled SD was 4% higher in BD (8% lower in SZ). Differences between diagnoses were limited to the comparison of SAD and BD, and became smaller when only psychotic BD was considered. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity of SZ and BD is not smaller than that of SAD. SAD seems not to be more diverse than other functional psychoses. Results are preliminary because of the novelty of the approach and to the small number of studies.

[Antipsychotics for treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in dementia]. / Antipsychotika zur Behandlung neuropsychiatrischer Störungen bei Demenz.

Antipsychotics, when used to treat neuropsychological symptoms associated with dementia, are associated with low effectiveness but a high risk of side effects. Some of these unwanted effects are severe and include an increased rate of cerebrovascular events and increased mortality. Although neuropsychiatric symptoms are frequently associated with dementia, it appears that antipsychotics are often used without clear indications and for too long time periods. Antipsychotics should be used only when all non-pharmacological strategies have failed. A clear definition of the treatment target in advance and a continuous monitoring of the therapy are mandatory.

No evidence for switching the antidepressant: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of a common therapeutic strategy.

OBJECTIVE: Switching antidepressants is a common strategy for managing treatment-resistant depressed patients. However, no systematic reviews have been conducted to date. METHOD: We systematically searched MEDLINE/EMBASE/Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and additional sources. We included double-blind studies of patients with depressive symptomatology who were not responding to initial antidepressant monotherapy and were subsequently randomized to another antidepressant or to continue the same antidepressant. Results were pooled for meta-analysis of response + remission rates using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: A total of three studies were included. Switching to another antidepressant was not superior to continuing the initial antidepressant in any of these studies. Our meta-analysis showed no significant advantages to either strategy and no significant heterogeneity of results [OR for response rates: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.55-1.30) favoring continuing]. CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between the published evidence and the frequent decision to switch antidepressants, indicating an urgent need for more controlled studies. Pending such studies we recommend that physicians rely on more thoroughly evaluated strategies.

An analysis of quality of life in 130 families having small children with cleft lip/palate using the impact on family scale.

Most parents are emotionally traumatized when confronted by the birth of a baby with an orofacial cleft (OFC). Affected families may have to compensate for increased financial, social and personal impacts before primary treatment is completed. This study was conducted to identify factors influencing the quality of life (QoL) of families having young children with OFC. A self-administered questionnaire containing the impact on family scale was applied in 130 consecutive families having children with OFC aged between 6 and 24 months. The results were related to the type of cleft and the time of initial diagnosis using non-parametric tests and multivariate correlation analysis (P<0.05). In families having children with isolated cleft lip, financial and social impacts were reduced, but problems in coping were increased when compared to families with children having cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate. Total impact was highest in families having children with isolated cleft palate, probably due to later surgery for reconstruction. Prenatal diagnosis of OFC did not reduce the general impact on affected families, but increased the social impact. The relation of certain impacts to distinct types of cleft might allow more tailored support of affected families and improve their QoL.

Do antidepressants influence mood patterns? A naturalistic study in bipolar disorder.

This prospective, longitudinal study compared the frequency and pattern of mood changes between outpatients receiving usual care for bipolar disorder who were either taking or not taking antidepressants. One hundred and eighty-two patients with bipolar disorder self-reported mood and psychiatric medications for 4 months using a computerized system (ChronoRecord) and returned 22,626 days of data. One hundred and four patients took antidepressants, 78 did not. Of the antidepressants taken, 95% were selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or second-generation antidepressants. Of the patients taking an antidepressant, 91.3% were concurrently taking a mood stabilizer. The use of antidepressants did not influence the daily rate of switching from depression to mania or the rate of rapid cycling, independent of diagnosis of bipolar I or II. The primary difference in mood pattern was the time spent normal or depressed. Patients taking antidepressants frequently remained in a subsyndromal depression. In this naturalistic study using self-reported data, patients with bipolar disorder who were taking antidepressants--overwhelmingly not tricyclics and with a concurrent mood stabilizer--did not experience an increase in the rate of switches to mania or rapid cycling compared to those not taking antidepressants. Antidepressants had little impact on the mood patterns of bipolar patients taking mood stabilizers.

Dental implants in patients with orofacial clefts: a long-term follow-up study.

Aim of this study was to determine the success of implants that were inserted in patients with cleft of the lip, alveolus and palate (CLAP) and to identify prognosis-relevant factors. In a prospective evaluation, 75 implants inserted in combination with bone grafting at cleft sites of 45 patients were examined. The observation period extended 5.5 years in average (minimum 1.5, maximum 11.3 years). Implant success was evaluated clinically and radiographically and was compared to age- and gender-matched control groups. Statistic assessment included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Log rank tests and Cox regression analysis. In total, 10 implants were lost in 8 patients, resulting in an implant survival rate of 82.2% at the end of the observation period. Patient-related parameters of age, gender or type of cleft had no significant influence. The length of an implant was significantly related to an improved survival rate (P<0.01). Implant survival was less in CLAP patients when compared to implant insertions in a non-cleft control group, but improved when compared to patients with bone grafting for other indications. It is concluded that implants combined with bone grafting can offer a reliable alternative in patients with CLAP.

Time experience and time judgment in major depression, mania and healthy subjects. A controlled study of 93 subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Studies on the time sense of depressed patients have revealed inconsistent results. Manic patients have been almost neglected. METHOD: Patients with a major depressive episode (n = 32), or a manic episode (n = 30) (both Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV, Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-confirmed), and 31 healthy controls were included. The subjective time experience was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), the objectively measurable time judgment abilities by the Chronotest, a computer program developed for this study, consisting of time estimation and time production tasks. RESULTS: Controls reported a balanced, manic patients an enhanced, and depressive patients a slowed experience of time flow in the VAS (P < 0.001). In the time judgment tasks, however, both depressed and manic patients showed time overestimation for the longer time spans (P < 0.008). CONCLUSION: This largest study on time sense in manic patients confirmed results of a divergent alteration of time experience in depressive and in manic patients but revealed an uniform time overestimation by both patient groups in time judgment tasks.

Long-term treatment of schizoaffective disorder: review and recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of long-term treatment studies in schizoaffective disorder (SAD) and to draw conclusions for clinical decision-making. METHOD: Literature was identified by searches in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register as well as a hand-search of handbook and journal articles. Studies were considered relevant if they reported on trials of at least 6 months duration and if they presented data for the SAD patients in particular. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies met the criteria and 18 used modern diagnostic criteria, i. e., RDC, DSM-III-R, -IV, or ICD-10. The studies focused on lithium, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics. The scientific evidence for prophylactic efficacy of the different substances is poor. Nevertheless, the data encourage the use of lithium and carbamazepine in primarily affective patients and clozapine in primarily schizophrenic patients and possibly in mainly affective patients as well. CONCLUSIONS: There is a considerable need for prospective and controlled studies on the long-term treatment of SAD. However, it seems to be useful to subtype the disorder of the patients into primarily affective vs. schizophrenic schizoaffective disorder and schizodepressive vs. schizobipolar and to treat accordingly.

Does prophylaxis-delay in bipolar disorder influence outcome? Results from a long-term study of 147 patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of latency (the time between illness onset and initiation of prophylactic treatment) on the outcome of prophylaxis in bipolar disorders. METHOD: The effect of prophylaxis delay (latency) on the course of illness was assessed in 147 patients. Dependent variables were: reduction of days spent in the hospital (prior to vs. during prophylaxis), time to first recurrence, and Morbidity-Index during prophylaxis (lithium or carbamazepine). Latency and other independent variables were tested using a multivariate approach. RESULTS: Latency (9.3 years on average) had no significant effect on the subsequent response. Illness severity prior to prophylaxis, however, did predict the relative response. The course of illness during treatment could not be predicted by any one factor. CONCLUSION: The delay in initiating prophylaxis appears to have no influence on prophylaxis outcome. Instead, those whose illness was more severe were treated earlier and these patients subsequently showed a relatively greater response. If severity is not controlled for as part of the analysis, latency may be mistaken as an important predictor for response.