RESUMO
Introduction The post-discharge all-cause mortality of COVID-19 disease is known, but predictors for the same have not been studied as much. The objective of this study was to develop an understanding of predictors of mortality to guide in prioritizing patient care and preventive approaches. Methods This current research is a single-center unmatched case-control study conducted at a tertiary care center in northern India, between April and September 2022. The data were extracted retrospectively from the hospital's electronic medical records of patients with the assistance of trained physicians using a standardized data extraction sheet. Results A total of 184 patients were enrolled and were segregated into two groups, cases and control, with 92 in each. The mean age of patients was 49.3 ± 17.53 years. The mortality group had a higher mean age (53.24 ± 18.53 yrs) as compared to the control group (45.37 ± 15.58 yrs, p=0.002). Bivariate analysis revealed a significant difference in the two groups with respect to O2 saturation at the time of admission (case - 91.12 ± 12.49 %, control - 95.46 ± 5.01 %, p=0.003); maximum O2 flow rate (L/min) (case - 11.01 ± 22.2, control - 6.41 ± 13.31, p=0.04); ICU need (p=0.005), cancer (p=0.001), O2 requirement at discharge (p=0.001) and acute kidney injury (AKI; p=0.007). On multiple regression analysis, cancer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) - 2.469; 95% CI 1.183-5.150, p=0.016), ICU admission (aOR - 2.446; 95% CI 1.212-4.938, p=0.013), oxygen at discharge (aOR - 2.340; 95% CI 0.971-5.640, p=0.0586) and AKI (aOR - 5.6; 95% CI 2.351- 13.370, p=0.00) only found to be significant. Conclusion Among the patients released from the hospital post-COVID-19 treatment, the following aspects oxygen requirement (2.3 times), malignancy (2.4 times), ICU admission (2.4 times), and AKI (5.6 times) are risk factors of mortality. The presence of these variables would warrant a close follow-up for these patients in order to decrease post-COVID mortality.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To estimate prevalence of common ocular morbidities including color blindness among school-attending children of an urban foothill town of Uttarakhand State in Northern India. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among school-going children of age group 6-16 years of standard I-XII. Schools were selected using population proportionate to the size sampling technique. Detailed ocular examination including color vision and unaided or aided visual acuity for various ocular morbidities was done. Data was entered into MS excel with statistical analysis using SPSS version 23 with significant P value <0.05. RESULTS: In total, 13,492 students (mean age 10.9 ± 2.7 years) with almost equal male to female ratio were screened. Overall prevalence of ocular morbidity was 23.2%, with refractive error (18.5%) on top, followed by color blindness (2.2%). The later was observed more among males (3.0%) as compared to females (1.4%) with significantly higher odds, OR = 2.3 (1.7-2.9) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Refractive error has been the most common ocular morbidity, followed by color blindness. Earliest detection can prevent permanent disability and disappointment among youngsters when rejected from entering certain professions due to color vision defect.
Assuntos
Defeitos da Visão Cromática , Erros de Refração , Adolescente , Cegueira , Criança , Defeitos da Visão Cromática/diagnóstico , Defeitos da Visão Cromática/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Morbidade , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Instituições AcadêmicasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to determine pooled estimates of out-of-pocket (OOPE) and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE), correlates of CHE, and most common modes of distress financing on the treatment of selected non-communicable disease (cancer) among adults in India. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus and Embase were searched for eligible studies using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was extracted and pooled estimates using random effects model of meta-analysis were determined for different types of costs. Forest plots were created and heterogeneity among studies was checked. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of direct OOPE on inpatient and outpatient cancer care were 83396.07 INR (4405.96 USD) (95% CI = 44591.05-122202.0) and 2653.12 (140.17 USD) INR (95% CI = -251.28-5557.53), respectively, total direct OOPE was 47138.95 INR (2490.43 USD) (95% CI = 37589.43-56690.74), indirect OOPE was 11908.50 INR (629.15 USD) (95% CI=-5909.33-29726.31) and proportion of individuals facing CHE was 62.7%. However, high heterogeneity was observed among the studies. Savings, income, borrowing money and sale of assets were the most common modes of distress financing for cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Income- and treatment-related cancer policies are needed to address the evidently high and unaffordable cancer treatment cost. Economic studies are needed for estimating all types of costs using standardised definitions and tools for precise estimates. Robust cancer database/registries and programs focusing on affordable cancer care can reduce the economic burden and prevent impoverishment.
Assuntos
Doença Catastrófica/economia , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Renda , Índia , Neoplasias/terapia , Doenças não Transmissíveis/economia , Doenças não Transmissíveis/terapiaRESUMO
CONTEXT: India has adopted active case finding (ACF) as an additional strategy to find its missing tuberculosis (TB) cases since 2017. Treatment outcomes of patients identified through ACF may be similar or different from those detected through routine passive case finding (PCF); currently, there are limited studies on this in India. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess differences in treatment outcomes of patients detected through ACF and PCF under the national TB program. STUDY DESIGN: A study was conducted in six TB units of Haridwar district where ACF campaigns were conducted in 2017-2018. METHODS: Data from patients detected by ACF (n = 72) and PCF (n = 184) were extracted from program records. RESULTS: Of 72 patients detected by ACF, only 54 (75%) were initiated on treatment. A high proportion of initial loss to follow-up (25% vs. 0%) and delay in treatment initiation (4 days vs. 0 days) was observed in ACF patients as compared to PCF. The proportion of unsuccessful treatment outcome was 33% (n = 18) among ACF patients compared to 14% (n = 25) among PCF patients (adjusted relative risk: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-4.0). CONCLUSION: High initial loss to follow-up, delay in treatment initiation, and poor treatment outcome among ACF patients are a major concern. The study results call for active follow-up after diagnosis and close monitoring during treatment for patients detected by ACF.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Developing and using the software version of existing validated paper version of patient-related outcome can go a long way in saving cost, time and effort. However, the equivalence of paper version and software versions cannot be assumed. The aim of the study is to test the equivalence between paper version and software version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and its acceptability among patients. METHODS: This is a within-subject cross over equivalence study. Fifty-five patients with back pain were asked to complete the paper and software version of RMDQ in random order. Patients were included from the Neuro Spinal surgery outpatient department of Lilavati Hospital and Research Center. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of 52 patients who completed the study showed high agreement between the paper and software version of the questionnaire (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.994, 95% confidence interval (0.989-0.996)). High sensitivity and specificity of 84 and 88% of the software version was noted. About 69.2% patients preferred software version over paper version. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that software version is comparable to the paper version. It may prove to be a useful tool for epidemiological studies and patient follow-up over longer period.