Percutaneous common femoral artery interventions using angioplasty, atherectomy, and stenting.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of endovascular interventions for common femoral artery (CFA) occlusive disease. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained multicenter database, we analyzed outcomes in 167 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous CFA interventions for Rutherford class 3 to class 6 (R3-R6) disease. The standardized treatment approach included primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) only, atherectomy + PTA, and provisional stenting. Outcomes included technical failure rate, recurrence, complications, and major or minor amputation rate. Data were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: During a 7-year period, 167 patients with R3 (n = 91 [54.5%]) and R4 to R6 (n = 76 [45.5%]) disease underwent CFA interventions that included PTA only (n = 114 [68.2%]), atherectomy ± PTA (n = 38 [22.8%]), and provisional stenting (n = 15 [9.0%]) for failed atherectomy ± PTA. Procedure-related complications included pseudoaneurysm (n = 1 [0.6%]), thrombosis (n = 1 [0.6%]), distal embolization (n = 1 [0.6%]), and death (R6, n = 1 [0.06%]). CFA restenosis was observed in 34 (20.4%) patents; these underwent further percutaneous (n = 18 [10.8%]) or surgical (n = 17 [10.2%]) revascularization that included CFA endarterectomy ± femoral distal bypass. Major or minor amputations were observed in none of the R3 patients and in only three (3.9%) and five (6.5%) of the R4 to R6 patients, respectively. Compared with the atherectomy + PTA group, patients in the PTA-only group had a significantly lower patency. Furthermore, during long-term mean follow-up of 42.5 months, the CFA provisional stent group had a 100% primary patency, which was significantly better than the primary patency in the CFA nonstent groups combined (77.0%; P = .0424). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study to date would suggest that percutaneous CFA interventions in select patients are relatively safe and effective. In the long term, CFA stenting has significantly better primary patency than CFA atherectomy and PTA combined. CFA atherectomy + PTA has significantly better primary patency than CFA PTA-only at midterm, especially in patients with claudication. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Early and long term outcome of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI): experience from a tertiary care center in Pakistan: outcome of rescue angioplasty in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis is the standard of care for STEMI in Pakistan. Failed thrombolysis has a very high morbidity and mortality. Rescue PCI then remains the only option to salvage the myocardium. We sought to analyze the angiographic, immediate and long term clinical outcome of patients undergoing Rescue PCI at our institution in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: 58 consecutive patients who underwent rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis between 2002 and 2005 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, angiographic and procedural details with clinical outcomes including total mortality, recurrent angina, and repeat revascularization were studied. Sources included cardiac catheterization lab database, medical records and follow up at outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Rescue PCI was performed in 58 patients with a mean age 55 +/- 12 years with 47 (79%) male and 11 (21%) females. CAD risk factors were hypertension (53%), dyslipidemia (48%), smoking (34%) and diabetes (34%). 53% had anterior MI, 39% inferior and 8% had a lateral wall MI. The median time frames were: onset of chest pain to ER = 99 min, door to needle time = 35 min, ER to procedure start time = 250 min. The culprit vessels were: Left Anterior Descending (LAD) (53%), Right Coronary Artery (RCA) (32%) and Circumflex (CX) (15%). TIMI flow grades pre-procedural were 0/I = 52%, II = 34%, III = 14% and post procedure 0/I = 8%, II = 6%, III = 86%. The mean follow-up duration was 16.15 months at which 50 (86%) were alive and 43 (74.13%) had event free survival. CONCLUSION: Procedural success, event free survival and mortality in our series of Rescue PCI from Pakistan are comparable to recent international trials and registries. It should be considered as a reasonable option for patients with failed thrombolysis.