Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergy ; 72(4): 590-597, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27638292

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple allergic sensitizations are common in persistent childhood asthma, and thorough assessment of allergy is crucial for optimal care of these children. Microarray testing offers opportunities for improved sIgE characterization, which has been projected to be useful in the management of multisensitized patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and information obtained by two microarray platforms applied on a well-characterized pediatric asthma cohort. METHODS: Seventy-one children were recruited from a nationwide Swedish study on severe childhood asthma. Severe (n = 40) and controlled (n = 31) asthmatics were assessed for allergic sensitization by two microarray systems (Microtest and ISAC) and by two standard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test). Data on clinical history, physical examination, spirometry, asthma control test, and doctor's diagnosis were collected. Results from the four diagnostic methods were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A high prevalence of allergic sensitization was observed in this cohort. The pairwise concordance between two methods was 90-92% independently of methods compared. The sensitivity of the four methods against doctor's diagnosis was 0.77-0.88, and the specificity was 0.97-0.99. Microarray methods provided new information in 47% of the sensitized children in comparison with results obtained by standard diagnostic methods. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of food and respiratory sensitization supports the clinical guideline recommendation that allergies should be evaluated in all children with suspected asthma. The microarray platforms studied here demonstrated acceptable accuracy and provided refined IgE characterization in 47% of the patients compared to standard extract-based methods.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Análise Serial de Proteínas/métodos , Adolescente , Asma/complicações , Criança , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Imunoensaio/métodos , Imunoensaio/normas , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Masculino , Análise Serial de Proteínas/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Testes Cutâneos/métodos
2.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 184(1): 1-10, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26437695

RESUMO

Microarray platforms, enabling simultaneous measurement of many allergens with a small serum sample, are potentially powerful tools in allergy diagnostics. We report here the first study comparing a fully automated microarray system, the Microtest allergy system, with a manual microarray platform, Immuno-Solid phase Allergen Chip (ISAC), and two well-established singleplex allergy tests, skin prick test (SPT) and ImmunoCAP, all tested on the same patients. One hundred and three adult allergic patients attending the allergy clinic were included into the study. All patients were tested with four allergy test methods (SPT, ImmunoCAP, Microtest and ISAC 112) and a total of 3485 pairwise test results were analysed and compared. The four methods showed comparable results with a positive/negative agreement of 81-88% for any pair of test methods compared, which is in line with data in the literature. The most prevalent allergens (cat, dog, mite, timothy, birch and peanut) and their individual allergen components revealed an agreement between methods with correlation coefficients between 0·73 and 0·95. All four methods revealed deviating individual patient results for a minority of patients. These results indicate that microarray platforms are efficient and useful tools to characterize the specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E profile of allergic patients using a small volume of serum sample. The results produced by the Microtest system were in agreement with diagnostic tests in current use. Further data collection and evaluation are needed for other populations, geographical regions and allergens.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/sangue , Hipersensibilidade/sangue , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Análise Serial de Proteínas/métodos , Adulto , Animais , Arachis/química , Arachis/imunologia , Betula/química , Betula/imunologia , Gatos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/instrumentação , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Cães , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácaros/química , Ácaros/imunologia , Phleum/química , Phleum/imunologia , Análise Serial de Proteínas/instrumentação , Análise Serial de Proteínas/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA