Screening for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection status in university freshmen: acceptability of a gingival swab method.

Prophylactic vaccines against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are under development. EBV-naïve college freshmen are ideal candidates for an efficacy trial, because their incidence of infectious mononucleosis (mono) during freshman year is as high as 20%. To assess perceptions about mono and a mono vaccine, and to learn if EBV immune status could be determined using a gingival swab rather than phlebotomy, we performed a cross-sectional study of 235 healthy students at the beginning of their freshman year. Subjects completed questionnaires and donated oral washes, gingival swabs and venous blood. Overall, 90% of students found the swab easy to use and 80% preferred the swab over venepuncture. Of the 193 students with sufficient samples, 108 (56%) had EBV antibodies in blood vs. 87 (45.1%) in the gingival swab. The sensitivity and specificity of the swab compared with blood for detecting EBV antibodies was 75.9% and 94.1%, respectively, with an accuracy of 89.3%. EBV DNA was detected in the oral wash and swab of 39.2% and 30.4% of blood-antibody-positive individuals, respectively. In conclusion, 44% of our freshmen were EBV-naïve and thus vaccine candidates, the gingival swab was an acceptable alternative to phlebotomy for detecting EBV antibody but needs improved sensitivity, and the perceived value of EBV vaccine was high (72% believed they would benefit).

The impact of recipient BKV shedding before transplant on BKV viruria, DNAemia, and nephropathy post-transplant: A prospective study.

We previously demonstrated that detectable BKV replication in donor urine pretransplant was significantly associated with post-transplant recipient BKV viremia. In this 4-year prospective study, we assessed whether recipient BKV replication pretransplant was associated with post-transplant viremia/BKV nephropathy. We studied 220 primary adult and pediatric organ transplant recipients for 490 person-years and 2100 clinical visits. BKV viruria was detectable in 28 (16%), 26 adults and two children; and viremia in none pretransplant. Post-transplant viruria occurred in all recipients with pretransplant BKV viruria, significantly more than in recipients without pretransplant viruria on univariate (P<.005) and multivariate analysis including type of organ transplanted and immunosuppression type (P .008). Time to post-transplant viruria was significantly shorter in recipients with pretransplant viruria (P .01). By univariate and multivariate analysis, BKV viruria in recipients pretransplant did not impact post-transplant BKV viremia (P=.97 and .97, respectively) even when stratified by type of organ transplant (kidney P=.6; liver P=.5). The peak serum and urine BKV PCR post-transplant were not significantly different in patients with pretransplant BKV viruria and no one developed BK nephropathy. In conclusion, recipient BKV viruria prior to transplant predicts post-transplant viruria but not viremia or BKV nephropathy.

Emergence of antiviral resistance during oral valganciclovir treatment of an infant with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.

Congenital infection with human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity, including sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), in newborns. Antiviral therapy with ganciclovir (GCV) and its oral prodrug, valganciclovir (VAL-GCV) are increasingly being administered to infected infants, toward the goal of improving neurodevelopmental and auditory outcomes. In this case report, we describe a symptomatic congenitally infected infant treated with VAL-GCV in whom GCV resistance was suspected, based on a 50-fold increase in viral load after 6 weeks of oral therapy. Analyses of CMV sequences from both blood and urine demonstrated populations of viruses with M460V and L595F mutations in the UL97 phosphotransferase gene. In contrast, analysis of viral DNA retrieved from the newborn dried blood spot demonstrated wild-type UL97 sequences. DNAemia resolved after the discontinuation of VAL-GCV. Long-term VAL-GCV therapy in congenitally infected infants can select for resistant viral variants, and anticipatory virological monitoring may be warranted.

Multicenter comparison of different real-time PCR assays for quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus.

Quantification of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in peripheral blood is important for the diagnosis and management of serious EBV diseases, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. A variety of PCR-based methods are currently in use; however, there is little information on their comparability. This study assessed the relative performance of different quantitative assays. A multicenter comparative study was performed at eight sites using three panels consisting of serial dilutions of quantified EBV DNA and extracts from a total of 19 whole-blood specimens. Samples were distributed and tested blindly. Instrumentation, probe chemistries, amplification targets, and other test-related aspects varied considerably between laboratories. Each laboratory's calibration curve indicated strong evidence of a consistent log-linear relationship between viral load and cycle threshold, suggesting that intralaboratory tracking of a given patient would yield similar relative quantitative trends among the participating test sites. There was strong concordance among laboratories with respect to qualitative test results; however, marked quantitative discordance was seen. For most samples, the across-laboratory interquartile range of the reported viral load (in copies/microl) was roughly 0.6 log-units, and for one sample the overall range was approximately 4.2 log-units. While intralaboratory tracking of patients may yield similar results, these data indicate a need for caution when attempting to compare clinical results obtained at different institutions and suggest the potential value to be gained by more standardized testing methodology.

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus encephalitis in a bone marrow transplant recipient.

A 20-year-old patient, who received a bone marrow transplant in order to treat metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD), succumbed to cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis. After CMV viremia developed, the patient received ganciclovir, but he was switched to foscarnet when ganciclovir resistance was suspected. Foscarnet was discontinued because of concern about its potential central nervous system toxicity. Autopsy samples of brain and cerebrospinal fluid contained CMV DNA with a UL97 mutation (M460V) known to confer ganciclovir resistance. No foscarnet resistance mutations were found.

Controlled trial of acyclovir for chickenpox evaluating time of initiation and duration of therapy and viral resistance.

BACKGROUND: Chickenpox is prevalent in the US despite the availability of an effective vaccine. Acyclovir treatment is limited by concerns about efficacy if given after the first day of rash and by concerns about induction of viral resistance. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate initiation and duration of acyclovir treatment of chickenpox and its effect on viral resistance. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial in immunocompetent patients who were stratified by age at enrollment (children, 2 to 11 years; adolescents, > or = 12 to 18 years; adults, > or = 19 years) and duration of rash (< or = 24 h vs. >24 to 48 h). Lesions were staged, counted and cultured; temperatures and symptoms were recorded daily. INTERVENTION: Subjects presenting within 24 h of rash onset (Group A) were randomly assigned to 5 or 7 days of oral acyclovir treatment, 80 mg/kg/day up to a maximum of 3,200 mg/day in four divided doses. Subjects whose rash was >24 to 48 h old were randomized to receive 5 days of acyclovir treatment beginning on the first (Group B1) or second study day (Group B2). Matching placebos were used to ensure that subjects uniformly received 28 doses of study compound. RESULTS: Of the 177 subjects recruited Group A patients who were treated on the first day of rash had the greatest number of significantly shortened event times with 5 days of therapy being equivalent to 7 days. There also were some shorter times to events for Group B1 patients who began therapy on the second day of rash vs. Group B2 patients who started acyclovir on the third. These included: time to maximum lesion formation (adolescents, P = 0.007; children, P = 0.03); 50% healing in adolescents (P = 0.005); and residual facial lesions in adults (P = 0.047). The probability of viral shedding was significantly reduced for Group A subjects vs. Group B1 subjects (P = 0.006). Viruses shed during therapy remained susceptible to acyclovir and retained normal thymidine kinase function. CONCLUSIONS: Immunocompetent children, adolescents and adults with chickenpox displayed a gradation in their clinical responses to acyclovir that correlated with the time from onset of rash to initiation of therapy. Five days of therapy is sufficient because a 7-day course provided no additional benefit. The susceptibility to acyclovir of viruses shed during treatment did not change; however, the effect of therapy on resistance of latent virus was not assessed.

Acyclovir for treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: efficacy and pharmacokinetics.

Postherpetic neuralgia is the most common complication of herpes zoster (shingles) in the immunocompetent host. Its mechanism is incompletely understood, but one postulate is that continuous replication of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in nerve tissues may be responsible for the pain. If this is so, antiviral treatment could be advantageous. To test this hypothesis, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous acyclovir (10 mg/kg every 8 h [q8h]) for 14 days, followed by oral acyclovir (800 mg q6h) for 42 days in 10 subjects (median age, 71 years) who had experienced at least 6 months of severe pain (median duration of postherpetic neuralgia before enrollment, 3.2 years). Intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic sampling occurred during both dosing phases of the study. One- and two-compartment models were fitted to the oral and intravenous concentration-time data, respectively. The four men and four women assigned to acyclovir during either or both dosing phases tolerated it well. Pharmacokinetic results were similar to those previously reported in younger individuals. The mean oral clearance and elimination half-life following oral dosing were 1.47 liters/h/kg and 2.78 h, respectively. Total clearance and terminal half-life following intravenous administration were 0.16 liters/h/kg and 3.67 h, respectively. Only 1 of 10 participants reported definite improvement in the severity of postherpetic pain, and treatment had no effect on titers of humoral antibody to VZV. We concluded that 56 days of intravenous and oral acyclovir therapy were well tolerated but had little or no effect on the clinical course of postherpetic neuralgia.

Effect of lamivudine in HIV-infected persons with prior exposure to zidovudine/didanosine or zidovudine/zalcitabine.

Nucleoside analog-based regimens remain an integral component of combination therapy for use in both antiretroviral treatment-naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. To further define treatment responses to new antiretroviral therapy in patients with long-term experience to dual nucleoside analog therapy (zidovudine [ZDV] plus didanosine [ddI] or ZDV plus zalcitabine [ddC]), 325 subjects derived from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 175 trial were randomized to three different combination regimens: (1) continuation of ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (continuation arm), (2) addition of 3TC to ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (addition arm), or (3) a switch to ZDV + 3TC therapy (switch arm). Both the addition and switch arms sustained significantly greater short-term (baseline to week 4) mean CD4+ cell count increases compared with the continuation arm (+36, +28 versus -4 cells/mm3; p = 0.012) and long-term CD4+ cell count responses (baseline to weeks 40/48: +32, +19 versus -9 cells/mm3; p = 0.003). Superior short-term (baseline to week 8) mean decreases in plasma HIV RNA (p < 0.001) were achieved by both the addition and switch arms (0.53 log10 and 0.54 log10 copies/ml, respectively) compared with the continuation arm (0.13 copies/ml) whereas no differences in long-term virologic suppression were observed (p = 0.30). At week 48, no differences were observed in the proportions of subjects who had HIV RNA levels below 500 copies/mL: 18% of subjects in each treatment arm (3-way p = 1.0). Overall, the treatments were well tolerated and only nine subjects (3%) died or developed one or more AIDS-defining events. While this study confirms the intrinsic antiretroviral activity of 3TC, only modest marker changes and limited short-term viral suppression are seen with incremental addition of the drug. The current approach of using 3TC in maximally suppressive regimens is preferred.

Semen and serum pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide in men with HIV-1 infection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the concentration-time profiles of zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide in semen and serum of men infected with the human immunodeficiency-1 virus (HIV-1). DESIGN: Open-label observational study. SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital and research center. PATIENTS: Four asymptomatic HIV-1-infected men. INTERVENTIONS: Zidovudine administration was followed by an 8-hour intensive pharmacokinetic study on day 1. Over the next 8 days, a dose administration and timed single-sample strategy was employed to determine serum and semen concentration time profiles simultaneously. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide concentrations were uniformly higher in semen than in serum except at 1 hour after the dose. The median area under the curve ratio (semen AUC0-48:serum AUC0-infinity) was 3.31 for zidovudine and 15.04 for zidovudine-glucuronide. CONCLUSION: Zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide reach high levels in seminal plasma relative to serum. The virologic, pharmacodynamic, and public health implications of distribution to this compartment require further study.

Phase II, randomized, open-label, community-based trial to compare the safety and activity of combination therapy with recombinant interferon-alpha2b and zidovudine versus zidovudine alone in patients with asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic HIV infection. HIV Protocol C91-253 Study Team.

OBJECTIVES: To compare, in a community-based therapeutic setting, the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of combination therapy with recombinant interferon-alpha2b (rIFN-alpha2b) and zidovudine (ZDV) to ZDV monotherapy. DESIGN: Open-label, two-armed, randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic HIV-infected adults without an AIDS-defining illness, a CD4 count of 200 to 500 cells/microl, and < or = 6 months of prior ZDV therapy received ZDV 100 mg orally five times daily. Patients randomized to rIFN-alpha2b received 3 million IU subcutaneously three times weekly for 2 weeks and 5 million IU three times weekly thereafter. The groups were compared with respect to adverse events (AEs), dosing modifications, treatment discontinuation, clinical endpoints and changes in CD4 count. A virology substudy compared the treatments with respect to HIV viral load and development of ZDV resistance. RESULTS: Between October, 1991 and January, 1993, 139 patients were randomized to combination therapy and 117 to ZDV alone. Of AEs reported at any grade, fatigue, myalgias, and sweating occurred significantly more often with combination therapy (p < .001). Study subjects receiving combination therapy showed modest but significantly greater weight loss (p = .0001), a significantly higher frequency of any abnormal laboratory test result (p = .002), neutropenia (p = .002), and leukopenia (p = .02), and also required dosage reduction for hematologic toxicity significantly more often (p < .05) than those in the ZDV monotherapy arm. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to development of specific AIDS-defining events, overall event rate, time to events, or change in performance status or CD4+ counts, or percentages or development of ZDV resistance. Viral burden, reflected by serum p24 antigen and quantitative peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) microcultures, was greater at baseline in the combination therapy group. Baseline SI phenotype predicted progression to AIDS (p = .004, chi2), whereas intermediate susceptibility to ZDV predicted development of ZDV resistance (p < .005, chi2). The annual rate of development of phenotypic resistance to ZDV was 16.8% and was not affected by administration of rIFN-alpha2b. CONCLUSIONS: At the doses and schedule used in this study, the combination of ZDV with rIFN-alpha2b was not therapeutically superior to ZDV alone and was less well tolerated. The addition of rIFN-alpha2b to ZDV did not prevent or delay the development of ZDV resistance.

Atovaquone compared with dapsone for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who cannot tolerate trimethoprim, sulfonamides, or both. Community Program for Clinical Research on AIDS and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the drug of choice for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, many patients cannot tolerate it and must switch to an alternative agent. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing daily atovaquone (1500-mg suspension) with daily dapsone (100 mg) for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus who could not tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The median follow-up period was 27 months. RESULTS: Of 1057 patients enrolled, 298 had a history of P. carinii pneumonia. P. carinii pneumonia developed in 122 of 536 patients assigned to atovaquone (15.7 cases per 100 person-years), as compared with 135 of 521 in the dapsone group (18.4 cases per 100 person-years; relative risk for atovaquone vs. dapsone, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.09; P=0.20). The relative risk of death was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.30; P=0.45), and the relative risk of discontinuation of the assigned medication because of adverse events was 0.94 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.19; P=0.59). Among the 546 patients who were receiving dapsone at base line, the relative risk of discontinuation because of adverse events was 3.78 for atovaquone as compared with dapsone (95 percent confidence interval, 2.37 to 6.01; P<0.001); among those not receiving dapsone at base line, it was 0.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.58; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, atovaquone and dapsone are similarly effective for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia. Our results support the continuation of dapsone prophylaxis among patients who are already receiving it. However, among those not receiving dapsone, atovaquone is better tolerated and may be the preferred choice for prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind study comparing the survival benefit of four different reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapies (three-drug, two-drug, and alternating drug) for the treatment of advanced AIDS. AIDS Clinical Trial Group 193A Study Team.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the effects of dual or triple combinations of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors with respect to survival. The time to new HIV disease progression or death, toxicities, the change in CD4 cells, and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations in a subset of study subjects were evaluated. DESIGN: This was a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: The study was conducted among 42 adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites and 7 National Hemophilia Foundation centers. PATIENTS: 1313 HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts < or = 50 cells/mm3 participated in this study, which was conducted from June 1993 to June 1996. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to one of four daily regimens containing 600 mg of zidovudine: zidovudine alternating monthly with 400 mg didanosine; zidovudine plus 2.25 mg of zalcitabine; zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine; or zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine plus 400 mg of nevirapine (triple therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was survival (i.e., time to death). RESULTS: A significant difference in survival time was found between the four treatment groups, favoring those assigned to triple therapy (p = .02). A significant difference was also found in the delay of disease progression or death among the four treatment arms favoring the group assigned to triple therapy (p = .002). Baseline CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations as well as changes of CD4 counts at week 8 predicted survival for subjects in the virology substudy. CONCLUSIONS: In the pre-protease inhibitor era, a combination of triple reverse transcriptase inhibitors prolonged life and delayed disease progression in AIDS patients with advanced immune suppression.

Concentration-controlled zidovudine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in the response to antiretroviral therapy has been attributed to pharmacologic, immunologic, and virologic differences between patients. Currently available antiretroviral agents used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in adults are administered in standard fixed doses. The active moiety of nucleoside anti-HIV drugs is the intracellular anabolite. Therefore the heterogeneity in response to nucleoside agents may arise as a result of pharmacologic variability at both the systemic and cellular level. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a novel concentration-controlled zidovudine regimen could improve anti-HIV response compared with the standard fixed-dose approach. DESIGN: At the Outpatient Clinic of the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Minnesota, 20 persons with HIV infection received an oral regimen of zidovudine designed to achieve a target concentration in plasma of 0.7 mumol/L and the 500 mg/day standard dose in a randomized, crossover 24-week study. RESULTS: The concentration-controlled regimen achieved overall higher systemic concentrations with reduced interpatient variability: steady-state average zidovudine plasma concentrations were 0.76 mumol/L (coefficient of variation, 12%) versus 0.62 mumol/L (coefficient of variation, 32%) for the standard regimen. There was no difference in safety and tolerance between regimens. Intracellular zidovudine triphosphate concentrations averaged 160 fmol/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with concentration-controlled versus 92 fmol/10(6) PBMCs for standard therapy. The percentage change from baseline in CD4 cells was a 22% increase for the concentration-controlled regimen versus a 7% decrease with standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that pharmacologic variability affects antiretroviral response. Furthermore, these findings provide a framework to characterize the pharmacologic determinants of effect and quantitate their contribution to the heterogeneity in clinical response to optimize therapeutic benefit.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex viruses from immunocompromised patients.

Phenotypic and genotypic analyses were done on 30 acyclovir-resistant and 5 acyclovir-susceptible herpes simplex virus (HSV) isolates (22 HSV type 1 and 13 HSV type 2) recovered from 24 subjects. All isolates were susceptible to foscarnet. The phenotypes of the acyclovir-resistant HSV isolates were as follows: 17 were thymidine kinase (TK) deficient, 12 had decreased TK activity (produced low amounts of viral TK) or TK with altered substrate specificity, and 1 was undetermined. Sequencing analysis of the HSV TK gene revealed that 14 (46.7%) of 30 acyclovir-resistant isolates had an insertion or deletion of 1 or 2 nucleotides, especially in homopolymer runs of Gs, Cs, and rarely in As. On the other hand, 16 (53.3%) of 30 acyclovir-resistant isolates had point mutations in conserved or nonconserved regions of the TK gene. In conclusion, HSV can develop multiple strategies to exhibit acyclovir resistance, including, in about half of the cases, frameshift mutations in homopolymer nucleotide stretches of the TK gene.

Ganciclovir susceptibilities and analysis of UL97 region in cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates from bone marrow recipients with CMV disease after antiviral prophylaxis.

Ganciclovir susceptibilities and UL97 sequences were analyzed in 20 cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates recovered from 15 bone marrow transplant recipients with active CMV infection after prophylaxis with acyclovir (group I; 12 isolates) or after acyclovir prophylaxis followed by ganciclovir therapy (group II; 8 isolates). All group I isolates were susceptible to ganciclovir. Five group II isolates were susceptible to ganciclovir, and 3 isolates (all from the same person) were resistant to ganciclovir (IC50 > 12 microM). Ganciclovir resistance UL97 mutations were found in 4 group II isolates, including a ganciclovir-susceptible isolate obtained from 1 patient after 41 days of therapy with ganciclovir and 3 ganciclovir-resistant isolates obtained from another patient after 73, 116, and 132 days of treatment with ganciclovir. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV isolates may emerge rapidly in bone marrow transplant recipients who are treated with ganciclovir after receiving prophylaxis with acyclovir.

A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of adding a protease inhibitor to two nucleoside analogues to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are not clear. We compared treatment with the protease inhibitor indinavir in addition to zidovudine and lamivudine with treatment with the two nucleosides alone in HIV-infected adults previously treated with zidovudine. METHODS: A total of 1156 patients not previously treated with lamivudine or protease inhibitors were stratified according to CD4 cell count (50 or fewer vs. 51 to 200 cells per cubic millimeter) and randomly assigned to one of two daily regimens: 600 mg of zidovudine (or stavudine) and 300 mg of lamivudine, or that regimen with 2400 mg of indinavir. The primary end point was the time to the development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death. RESULTS: The proportion of patients whose disease progressed to AIDS or death was lower with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine (6 percent) than with zidovudine and lamivudine alone (11 percent; estimated hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.76; P=0.001). Mortality in the two groups was 1.4 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively (estimated hazard ratio, 0.43; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.99; P=0.04). The effects of treatment were similar in both CD4 cell strata. The responses of CD4 cells and plasma HIV-1 RNA paralleled the clinical results. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine as compared with zidovudine and lamivudine alone significantly slows the progression of HIV-1 disease in patients with 200 CD4 cells or fewer per cubic millimeter and prior exposure to zidovudine.

Pharmacokinetics of hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoglobulin in persons with AIDS.

Hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoglobulin (HIVIG) is an intravenous immunoglobulin prepared from HIV-infected asymptomatic donors with a CD4 cell count greater than 400 cells/microl and a high titer of antibody to HIV-1 p24 protein. Twelve persons with AIDS received four doses of HMG (two at 50 mg/kg of body weight and then two at 200 mg/kg) every 28 days. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by measurement of anti-p24 antibody. HIVIG was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. Three subjects who were not receiving Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis developed PCP. The mean value for HIVIG clearance was 3.02 ml/kg/day at 50 mg/kg and 3.65 ml/kg/day at 200 mg/kg (P = 0.027); the mean trough antibody titers (reciprocal units) were 1,442 and 4,428, respectively. This study indicates that high titers of anti-p24 antibody can be maintained with a monthly administration schedule of HIVIG and that short-term safety is acceptable. Comparisons to evaluate the therapeutic potential of HIVIG are justified.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of concentration-controlled oral zidovudine therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and feasibility of concentration-controlled oral zidovudine therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, open-label study. SETTING: University-affiliated general clinical research center. PATIENTS: Eight individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus with CD4+ lymphocyte counts of 100 cells/microliter or greater. INTERVENTION: During the 24-week study, patients received oral zidovudine regimens that consisted of a standard fixed dose of 500 mg/day and a concentration-controlled regimen designed to maintain a steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of 0.187 +/- 0.04 mg/L (0.7 +/- 0.14 microM). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean Css during standard therapy was 0.170 +/- 0.024 mg/L versus 0.205 +/- 0.021 mg/L with the concentration-controlled regimen (p = 0.025). Respective mean changes in hemoglobin were -0.02 g/dl (range -0.9-0.9 g/dl) and -0.30 g/dl (range -1.5-0.4 g/dl, p = 0.67). The absolute neutrophil count decreased 0.90 x 10(9)/L during standard therapy and increased 0.40 x 10(9)/L during concentration-controlled therapy (p = 0.07). The regimens did not differ in toxicity. CONCLUSION: Concentration-controlled oral antiretroviral therapy with zidovudine is feasible and safe, and provides pharmacologic data to determine the regimen's virologic and immunologic benefits.

Antiviral susceptibilities and analysis of UL97 and DNA polymerase sequences of clinical cytomegalovirus isolates from immunocompromised patients.

Antiviral susceptibilities to ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir and sequencing of UL97 and DNA polymerase were done on 23 cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates from 10 immunocompromised persons with end-organ CMV disease who were treated with ganciclovir alone or ganciclovir followed by foscarnet. Screening of UL97 for ganciclovir resistance mutations was done by restriction digest analysis. Of 14 isolates resistant to ganciclovir, 11 (79%) contained one or more UL97 mutations at codons known to confer resistance to this compound, and 10 (91%) had a concordant mutant pattern by restriction digest analysis. Of 9 isolates containing mutations in conserved regions of the DNA polymerase, 8 were resistant to ganciclovir, and 4 were cross-resistant to cidofovir. All isolates were susceptible to foscarnet. It is concluded that ganciclovir-resistant clinical CMV isolates may contain UL97 mutations, DNA polymerase mutations, or mutations in both genes. Ganciclovir therapy may select for CMV isolates that are cross-resistant to cidofovir.