Transesophageal echocardiography in patients with cardiac arrest: from high-quality chest compression to effective resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Survival after cardiac arrest depends on prompt and effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be applied to evaluate the effectiveness of chest compression-decompression maneuvers in the setting of cardiac arrest undergoing CPR. The efficacy of chest compression can be continuously assessed by TEE that can improve the effectiveness of CPR guiding the rescuer to optimize or correct chest compression and decompression by directly examining the movements of the cardiac walls and valve leaflets. PURPOSE: The review describes how to perform TEE in the emergency setting of cardiopulmonary arrest, its advantages, and limitations, and ultimately propose an echo-guided approach to CPR.

Kinetics of manual and automated mechanical chest compressions.

AIM: Early onset of adequate chest compression is mandatory for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following cardiac arrest. Transmission of forces from chest strain to the heart may be variable between manual and mechanical chest compressions. Furthermore, automated mechanical chest devices can deliver an active decompression, thus improving the venous return to the heart. This pilot study investigated the kinetics of cardiac deformation during these two CPR methods. METHODS: Transesophageal echocardiographic analysis of the right ventricular wall behind the sternum during CPR was assessed during manual and mechanical chest compression in adult patients admitted to the emergency department for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. RESULTS: 9 patients had manual and 11 mechanical chest compression. Mechanical chest compression was characterized by greater right ventricular lateral wall displacement [with a median (IQR) of 3.7 (3.12-4.27) vs. 2.53 (2.27-2.6) cm, p < 0.0001], and lower rising time [123 (102-169) vs. 187 (164-215) ms, p = 0.002], relaxing time [109 (102-127) vs. 211 (133-252) ms, p = 0.0003], compression rate [100.6 (99.6-102.2) vs. 131.9 (125.4-151.4) bpm, p < 0.0001], with compression-decompression time ratio of [1.04 (0.86-1.1) vs. 0.86 (0.78-0.96), p = 0.046]. CONCLUSION: Mechanical compared to manual chest compression delivered a more rapid compression and decompression of the cardiac structures at an adequate rate, with broader inward-outward movement of the ventricular walls suggesting greater emptying and filling of the ventricles. Transesophageal echocardiography may be a useful tool to assess the adequacy of chest compression without CPR interruption.

Association between left ventricular outflow tract opening and successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Survival after cardiac arrest depends on adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Manual or mechanical external chest compression may be ineffective to restore circulation: structures subjected to external chest compression may differ in forces transfer to intrathoracic structures due to anatomic characteristics and physiological changes. This clinical study aims to assess the association of trans-oesophageal findings during CPR and successful resuscitation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Trans-oesophageal assessment of right ventricular fractional area change, right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening, left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and aortic diameters were performed in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to emergency department for extracorporeal CPR. RESULTS: 19 patients were analyzed. 15 of 19 patients (79%) received venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Resuscitation was successful with return of spontaneous circulation or electromechanical activity in 7 patients (group-SUXX) and failed in 12 patients (group-FAIL). 6 patients (32%) were alive at 24 h from the cardiac arrest, one patient (5%) survived to hospital discharge. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) was open during CPR in all patients in group-SUXX and in 1 patient in group-FAIL (p 0.0002). None of the patients with closed LVOT had successful resuscitation. Patients in group-SUXX had a higher ejection fraction (p 0.03), ascending aortic diameter (p 0.04), and survival rate than those in group-FAIL (p 0.015). In a multiple variable Cox's proportional model LVOT opening was the only variable associated with successful resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-oesophageal echocardiography can be useful in the emergency setting of cardiopulmonary arrest for discriminating between successful and failing resuscitation.