A Phase 1, Double-blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of HEV-239 (Hecolin®) Vaccine in Healthy US Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Establishing the safety and immunogenicity of a hepatitis E virus vaccine in multiple populations could facilitate broader access and prevent maternal and infant mortality. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (4:1 vaccine: placebo) trial of 30 µg HEV-239 (Hecolin®, Xiamen Innovax Biotech Company Limited, China) administered intramuscularly in healthy US adults aged 18-45 years. Participants were vaccinated on days 1, 29, and 180. Participants reported solicited local and systemic reactions for 7 days following vaccination and were followed through 12 months after enrollment for safety and immunogenicity (IgG, IgM). RESULTS: Solicited local and systemic reactions between treatment and placebo group were similar and overall mild. No participants experienced serious adverse events related to HEV-239. All participants receiving HEV-239 seroconverted at one month following the first dose and remained seropositive throughout the study. HEV-239 elicited a robust hepatitis E IgG response that peaked one month following the second dose (Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) 6.16; 95% CI 4.40-8.63), was boosted with the third dose (GMC 11.50; 95% CI 7.90-16.75) and persisted through 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: HEV-239 is safe and elicits a durable immune response through at least 6 months after the third dose in healthy US adults. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03827395. Safety Study of Hepatitis E Vaccine (HEV239) - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov.

Matching for HLA-DR excluding diabetogenic HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR4 predicts insulin independence after pancreatic islet transplantation.

Introduction: In pancreatic islet transplantation, the exact contribution of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to graft survival remains unclear. Islets may be exposed to allogenic rejection but also the recurrence of type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated the HLA-DR matching, including the impact of diabetogenic HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 matches. Methods: We retrospectively examined the HLA profile in 965 transplant recipients and 2327 islet donors. The study population was obtained from patients enrolled in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry. We then identified 87 recipients who received a single-islet infusion. Islet-kidney recipients, 2nd islet infusion, and patients with missing data were excluded from the analysis (n=878). Results: HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR4 were present in 29.7% and 32.6% of T1D recipients and 11.6% and 15.8% of the donors, respectively. We identified 52 T1D islet recipients mismatched for HLA-DR (group A), 11 with 1 or 2 HLA-DR-matches but excluding HLA-DR3 and HLA- DR4 (group B), and 24 matched for HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 (group C). Insulin-independence was maintained in a significantly higher percentage of group B recipients from year one through five post-transplantation (p<0.01). At five-year post-transplantation, 78% of group B was insulin-independent compared to 24% (group A) and 35% (group C). Insulin-independence correlated with significantly better glycemic control (HbA1c <7%), fasting blood glucose, and reduced severe hypoglycemic events. Matching HLA-A-B-DR (≥3) independently of HLA- DR3 or HLA-DR4 matching did not improve graft survival. Conclusion: This study suggests that matching HLA-DR but excluding the diabetogenic HLA-DR3 and/or 4 is a significant predictor for long-term islet survival.

Association between primary graft function and 5-year outcomes of islet allogeneic transplantation in type 1 diabetes: a retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study in 1210 patients from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic islet transplantation is a validated therapy in type 1 diabetes; however, there is decline of transplanted islet graft function over time and the mechanisms underlying this decline are unclear. We evaluated the distinct association between primary graft function (PGF) and 5-year islet transplantation outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study, we enrolled all patients from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry who received islet transplantation alone (ITA recipients) or islet-after-kidney transplantation (IAK recipients) between Jan 19, 1999, and July 17, 2020, with a calculable PGF (exposure of interest), measured 28 days after last islet infusion with a validated composite index of islet graft function (BETA-2 score). The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of unsuccessful islet transplantation, defined as an HbA1c of 7·0% (53 mmol/mol) or higher, or severe hypoglycaemia (ie, requiring third-party intervention to correct), or a fasting C-peptide concentration of less than 0·2 ng/mL. Secondary outcomes were graft exhaustion (fasting C-peptide <0·3 ng/mL); inadequate glucose control (HbA1c ≥7·0% [53 mmol/mol] or severe hypoglycaemia); and requirement for exogenous insulin therapy (≥14 consecutive days). Associations between PGF and islet transplantation outcomes were explored with a competing risk analysis adjusted for all covariates suspected or known to affect outcomes. A predictive model based on PGF was built and internally validated by using bootstraps resampling method. FINDINGS: In 39 centres worldwide, we enrolled 1210 patients with a calculable PGF (of those without missing data, mean age 47 years [SD 10], 712 [59·5%] were female, and 865 (97·9%) were White), who received a median of 10·8 thousand islet-equivalents per kg of bodyweight (IQR 7·4-13·5). 986 (82·4%) were ITA recipients and 211 (17·6%) were IAK recipients. Of 1210 patients, 452 (37·4%) received a single islet infusion and 758 (62·6%) received multiple islet infusions. Mean PGF was 14·3 (SD 8·8). The 5-year cumulative incidence of unsuccessful islet transplantation was 70·7% (95% CI 67·2-73·9), and was inversely and linearly related to PGF, with an adjusted subhazard ratio (sHR) of 0·77 (95% CI 0·72-0·82) per 5-unit increase of BETA-2 score (p<0·0001). Secondary endpoints were similarly related to PGF. The model-adjusted median C-statistic values of PGF for predicting 5-year cumulative incidences of unsuccessful islet transplantation, graft exhaustion, inadequate glucose control, and exogenous insulin therapy were 0·70 (range 0·69-0·71), 0·76 (0·74-0·77), 0·65 (0·64-0·66), and 0·72 (0·71-0·73), respectively. INTERPRETATION: This global multicentre study reports a linear and independent association between PGF and 5-year clinical outcomes of islet transplantation. The main study limitations are its retrospective design and the absence of analysis of complications. FUNDING: Public Health Service Research, National Institutes of Health, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, Agence National de la Recherche, Fondation de l'Avenir, and Fonds de Dotation Line Renaud-Loulou Gasté.

Predictive Value of C-Peptide Measures for Clinical Outcomes of ß-Cell Replacement Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes: Report From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR).

OBJECTIVE: To determine C-peptide measures and levels associated with positive glycemic control outcomes following islet transplant (ITx) in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) islet-alone recipients with pretransplant C-peptide <0.1 nmol/L and mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.1 years (n = 677). Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive value of fasting and stimulated glucose and C-peptide measures for seven primary outcomes: 1) absence of severe hypoglycemic events (ASHEs); 2) HbA1c <7.0%; 3) HbA1c <7.0% and ASHEs; 4) HbA1c ≤6.5%; 5) HbA1c ≤6.5% and ASHEs; 6) insulin independence; and 7) ASHEs, HbA1c ≤6.5%, and insulin independence (the optimal outcome). Measures with the highest ROC-AUC were selected for determination of optimal cut points. RESULTS: Fasting C-peptide was highly predictive for ASHE (ROC-AUC 0.906; optimal cut point 0.070 nmol/L) and the optimal outcome (ROC-AUC 0.845; optimal cut point 0.33 nmol/L). Mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT)-stimulated C-peptide-to-glucose ratio (CPGR) outperformed both fasting and stimulated C-peptide for all outcomes except ASHE. The optimal cut point for the optimal outcome was 0.12 nmol/mmol for MMTT-stimulated CPGR and 0.97 nmol/L for MMTT-stimulated C-peptide. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting C-peptide reliably predicts ITx primary outcomes. MMTT-stimulated CPGR provides marginally better prediction for composite ITx outcomes, including insulin independence. In the absence of an MMTT, a fasting C-peptide ≥0.33 nmol/L is a reassuring measure of optimal islet graft function. C-peptide targets represent excellent and easily determinable means to predict glycemic control outcomes after ITx and should be considered as potential goals of ß-cell replacement.

Factors associated with favourable 5 year outcomes in islet transplant alone recipients with type 1 diabetes complicated by severe hypoglycaemia in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Islet transplantation has been studied in small cohorts of recipients with type 1 diabetes complicated by severe hypoglycaemic events (SHEs). We determined factors associated with favourable outcomes in a large cohort of recipients reported to the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR). METHODS: In 398 non-uraemic islet transplant alone (ITA) recipients with type 1 diabetes and SHEs, transplanted between 1999 and 2015 and with at least 1 year follow-up, we analysed specified favourable outcomes against each of all available characteristics of pancreas donors, islet grafts, recipients and immunosuppressive regimens, as well as immunosuppression and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: Four factors were associated with the highest rates of favourable outcomes: recipient age ≥35 years; total infused islets ≥325,000 islet equivalents; induction immunosuppression with T cell depletion and/or TNF-α inhibition; and maintenance with both mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and calcineurin inhibitors. At 5 years after the last islet infusion, of the recipients meeting these four common favourable factors (4CFF; N=126), 95% were free of SHEs, 76% had HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%), 73% had HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) and absence of SHEs, and 53% were insulin independent, significantly higher rates than in the remaining recipients (<4CFF; N=272). The incidence of procedural and immunosuppression-related SAEs per recipient that resulted in sequelae, disability or death was low in both the 4CFF (0.056 per person) and <4CFF (0.074 per person) groups. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In recipients with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs, islet transplantation meeting 4CFF protected 95% from SHEs at 5 years after the last islet infusion and exerted a large and significant benefit on glycaemic control, with an acceptable safety profile for this subgroup of type 1 diabetes.

Antibody in Lymphocyte Supernatant (ALS) responses after oral vaccination with live Shigella sonnei vaccine candidates WRSs2 and WRSs3 and correlation with serum antibodies, ASCs, fecal IgA and shedding.

The levels of antigen-specific Antibodies in Lymphocyte Supernatant (ALS) using an ELISA are being used to evaluate mucosal immune responses as an alternate to measuring the number of Antibody Secreting Cells (ASCs) using an ELISpot assay. A recently completed trial of two novel S. sonnei live oral vaccine candidates WRSs2 and WRSs3 established that both candidates were safe, well tolerated and immunogenic in a vaccine dose-dependent manner. Previously, mucosal immune responses were measured by assaying IgA- and IgG-ASC in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In this report, the magnitude of the S. sonnei antigen-specific IgA- and IgG-ALS responses was measured and correlated with previously described ASCs, serum antibodies, fecal IgA and vaccine shedding. Overall, the magnitude of S. sonnei anti-Invaplex50 ALS was higher than that of LPS or IpaB, and both vaccines demonstrated a more robust IgA-ALS response than IgG; however, compared to WRSs3, the magnitude and percentage of responders were higher among WRSs2 recipients for IgA- or IgG-ALS. All WRSs2 vaccinees at the two highest doses responded for LPS and Invaplex50-specific IgA-ALS and 63-100% for WRSs3 vaccinees responded. Regardless of the vaccine candidate, vaccine dose or detecting antigen, the kinetics of ALS responses were similar peaking on days 7 to 9 and returning to baseline by day 14. The ALS responses were vaccine-specific since no responses were detected among placebo recipients at any time. A strong correlation and agreement between responders/non-responders were noted between ALS and other mucosal (ASC and fecal IgA) and systemic (serum antibody) immune responses. These data indicate that the ALS assay can be a useful tool to evaluate mucosal responses to oral vaccination, an observation noted with trials of other bacterial diarrheal pathogens. Furthermore, this data will guide the list of immunological assays to be conducted for efficacy trials in different populations. It is hoped that an antigen-specific-ALS titer may be a key mucosal correlate of protection, a feature not currently available for any Shigella vaccines candidates. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01336699.