Orthognathic model surgery by using of a passive Robot Arm.

PURPOSE: The possibility of using a passive Robot Arm (3D method) in model surgery and comparing with manual technique model surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients undergoing orthognathic surgery gave consent for this study. Model surgery was performed by using a manual technique and using the Robot Arm. The model surgery that was performed by using the manual technique named group A and the one performed by the Robot Arm named group B. Patients' maxillary casts were measured before and after model surgery, and results were compared with those for the original treatment plan in the horizontal (X-axis), vertical (Y-axis), and transverse (Z-axis) planes. RESULTS: Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test for X- and Y-axis and independent sample t test for Z-axis have shown significant differences between both groups in X-axis (P = .026) and Y-axis (P = .021) but not in Z-axis (P = .762). CONCLUSIONS: Model surgery performed with a Robot Arm is more accurate in all dimensions X, Y, and Z than the manual model surgery.

A novel approach to bite force measurements in a porcine model in vivo.

A novel device for a bite force measurement system in a porcine model is described. A single polyethylene layer was vacuum-formed into a splint, and a force sensor was fitted on to the splint occlusal surface and seated with a silicone layer. This design enabled the measurement of bite forces on selected teeth in a large animal model with either natural dentition or single implant crowns and could be used in assessing information on biomechanical adaptation of the bone-implant interface to masticatory loads. Preliminary recordings of force values obtained during mastication in the premolar region (200-560 N) and various limiting factors of the technical design are discussed.

A validation of two orthognathic model surgery techniques.

In order to create an evidence-based orthognathic surgery planning protocol, an investigation of two popular model surgery techniques, the Lockwood keyspacer and the Eastman anatomically-orientated system was carried. This determined (a) the accuracy of positioning of the maxillary cast according to the prescribed treatment plan and (b) the relocation of the maxilla after a simulated Le Fort I down fracture osteotomy using the intermediate wafer as a guide. Fifteen patients-five Class II division 1, five Class II division 2, and five Class III-were included in the study. All the measurements were taken with Erickson's vertically mounted electronic caliper and variations from the treatment plan were analysed. The mean model surgery positioning errors +/- SD (mm) were: (i) vertical plane-Lockwood -0*8 +/- 1*6 and Eastman 0*00 +/- 1*0 (P = 0*0001); (ii) anteroposterior plane-Lockwood 1*2 +/- 1*8 and Eastman -0*1 +/- 1*4 (P = 0*05); and (iii) transverse plane-Lockwood 0*9 +/- 0*9 and Eastman 1*0 +/- 0*9 (P = 0*34). After the simulated osteotomy, the mean errors +/- SD were: (i) vertical plane-Lockwood -0*5 +/- 1*5 and Eastman 0*3 +/- 1*1 (P = 0*001); (ii) in anteroposterior plane-Lockwood 0*8 +/- 2*0 and Eastman 0*7 +/- 1*0 (P = 0*89); and (iii) transverse plane-Lockwood 0*8 +/- 0*6 and Eastman 0*7 +/- 0*5 (P = 0*83). The Eastman technique was relatively better especially in the vertical plane. The variations from the treatment plan were on the whole anatomically small, but in some cases could be clinically significant.

The reproducibility of the head position for a laser scan using a novel morphometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the head position for a three-dimensional soft tissue laser scan (lasergraph) using thin-plate splines, for orthognathic surgery planning and follow-up. 60 laser scans of five subjects (12 scans per subject) were obtained at specified intervals. The head was positioned in the lateral view using a spirit level, an engineering device for setting horizontal surfaces, to adjust the Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the ground. The projection of a narrow beam of longitudinal laser light was used to adjust the axial plane for the frontal view. These scanned images (lasergraphs) were digitised and the co-ordinates of the landmarks recorded. The digitised laser scans were compared using thin-plate splines analysis. The mean difference between the scans due to variations in head position was 0.0135 +/- 0.0109 g x cm2/ sec2 in the lateral view and 0.0090 +/- 0.0054 g x cm2/sec2 in the frontal view. This represents an overall distortion error of less than 2% when following up the surgical change of a typical bimaxillary osteotomy case with 6 mm maxillary advancement and 3 mm mandibular set-back. It is concluded that facial laser scans (lasergraphs) with the Frankfort horizontal plane set using a head rest and spirit level, and the axial plane set using projection of a vertical laser light on the facial midline, are highly reproducible.

The effect of posture and anesthesia on the occlusal relationship in orthognathic surgery.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the differences in centric occlusion (intercuspal-CO) and centric relation contact position (CR) in patients in an upright and supine posture when conscious and when supine under general anesthesia to rationalize planning for complex bimaxillary osteotomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four men and 37 women, with a mean age of 24.7 +/- 4.5 years were included in this study. Occlusal records on each patient included 1 in CO and 3 in CR in each of the following postures: conscious upright, conscious supine, and anesthetized supine. Casts were mounted in the Denar Mark II articulator and transferred to the Denar Vericheck (Denar Corp, Anaheim, CA) recording tool for measurements. The centric relation displacement vectors (CO-CR) were projected in various axes by 3D graphics. RESULTS: The upright conscious CO-CR (mm) vectors were significantly different from both the supine conscious and anesthetized positions in the anteroposterior plane. The difference in the vertical plane was only significant in Class II division 1 patients. CONCLUSION: The posterior change in centric relation explains the apparent occlusal discrepancies created by rigid fixation of the mandible applied in the supine anesthetized position. By taking the CR records in the supine conscious position, the "loss" of maxillary advancement can be avoided.

The optical surface scan as an alternative to the cephalograph for soft tissue analysis for orthognathic surgery.

The aim of this study was to compare cephalographs and optical surface scanner images (lasergraphs) by measuring the lipincisor relationship, the nasolabial angle, nasal tip projection, the nasofacial angle, the nasomental angle, and the labiomental angle in pre- and postoperative orthognathic surgery patients. The results showed that the methods were comparable, but the optical surface scan (lasergraph) could be used to greater advantage for pre- and postoperative assessment of soft tissue changes with orthognathic surgery, because of its clarity and 3-dimensional potential.

A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning.

The relative reproducibility of two widely used arbitrary face-bow transfer systems, the Denar Slidematic and the Dentatus type AEB, was assessed for use in orthognathic surgery planning. A novel method was also developed to determine any variation in three-dimensional spatial position and orientation of the maxillary cast. This envelope of movement enabled realistic comparisons to be made for each face-bow system, operator, and skeletal type. The overall face-bow/articulator procedure showed poor reproducibility. However, the Denar Slidematic face-bow was better (P < 0.001) than the Dentatus type AEB standard face-bow, and the errors were higher in the anteroposterior and lateral directions than the vertical direction. There was no significant difference between operators for each system.

The role of the occlusal wafer in orthognathic surgery; a comparison of thick and thin intermediate osteotomy wafers.

The aim of this study was to compare two types of osteotomy wafers, derived from model surgery on a semi-adjustable anatomical articulator. The thick wafer was fabricated before autorotation of the mandibular cast and the thin after the autorotation. Twenty-five patients, 19 female and 6 male, who had osteotomies with a maxillary impaction as part of a bimaxillary correction were included in this study. Thick and thin wafers were fabricated and the surgeons were requested to compare both wafers, intra-operatively. Valid results were received for 19 cases, in 14 (74%) the surgeons concluded that both wafers located the maxilla in the same position. In 5 cases (26%) there was up to 2 mm difference in the maxillary position. These were cases when the impaction was > 6 mm, however, chi 2 and Fisher's exact test showed that the difference in impaction between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.06).