Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry: cut-off values for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation in children.

OBJECTIVE: Dyssynergic defecation (DD) may be one of the most important causes of constipation, but its diagnostic criteria have not been formally validated in children. This study aims to evaluate constipated children with 3DHRAM (three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry) and determine a new pediatric cut-off for DD variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 205 patients diagnosed with functional constipation (FC) based on Rome III criteria were prospectively enrolled. Data were compared to a historical control group (C). Initially, the diagnosis of DD was based on adult criteria and divided into 4 types. A new cut-off value for percent anal relaxation was determined based on ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The FC group presented significantly lower values of percent anal relaxation during straining compared to the C group (9.5% vs. 20%, respectively, p=0.03). Based on adult criteria, DD was found in 53% of the FC group and 46% of the C group (p=0.3), with type II occurring most frequently (35.8%). New cut-off value of 31% for percent anal relaxation in children was derived based on the ROC curve analysis. Based on this new cut-off value, DD was diagnosed in 69.3% of constipated children, with type IV occurring most frequently (28.9%). The analysis of segmental pressure showed significant influence of segments at the locations of the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter. CONCLUSIONS: We found that during bear down maneuver the percent anal relaxation variable significantly differed between patients and controls. The higher cut-off value should be used when 3DHRAM and the standard four-type classification are used to diagnose DD in children.

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in children after surgery for anorectal disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) is the most precise tool for assessing the function of the anal canal. Our aim was to evaluate children after surgery for anorectal disorders using 3DHRAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 43 children (30 males; mean age: 7 years) after surgery for Hirschsprung's disease, anal atresia, or after proctocolectomy. Manometric data were compared to raw data obtained from previously studied children without symptoms arising from the lower gastrointestinal tract. Correlations between manometry and symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: The lowest values of the resting pressure, squeeze pressure, and pressure of the puborectalis muscle were observed in the anal atresia group (55.6 mmHg, 121.7 mmHg, and 44.17 mmHg, respectively). Compared to asymptomatic children, the lowest mean resting pressures were observed in those with non-retentive fecal incontinence (61.3 mmHg, p<0.000). The receiver operating curve cut-off value for the mean resting pressure between asymptomatic children and incontinent patients was 68.5 mmHg. The thresholds of urge were significantly higher in constipated patients compared to asymptomatic patients (87.5 cm³ and 30 cm³, respectively; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: 3DHRAM may be a useful tool for assessing the function of the anorectum of children after surgery (NCT02296008).

Immunization Coverage in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are at increased risk of infections, mainly due to immunosuppressive treatment. Moreover, infections may cause flares of IBD. Vaccination is the most effective way of preventing many infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vaccination status of Polish children with IBD. Individual immunization cards of children with IBD and healthy controls were reviewed. Demographic data such as age, sex, and IBD history, including therapy type, were collected. We enrolled 267 children into the study, including 214 children with IBD and 53 controls. None of the children had completed the full up-to-date routine childhood immunization schedule recommended in Poland. Controls were more than 4 times more likely to be vaccinated than the IBD patients, with the vaccines that enjoy the insurance reimbursed (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.2-7.9). In conclusion, the study demonstrates a poor vaccination status in children suffering from IBD.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in adult patients with interstitial lung disease. However, no data currently exist regarding the prevalence and characteristics of the disease in pediatric patients with interstitial lung disease. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and characterize its features in children with interstitial lung disease. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was established based on 24 h pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH). Gastroesophageal reflux episodes (GERs) were classified according to widely recognized criteria as acid, weakly acid, weakly alkaline, or proximal. Eighteen consecutive patients (15 boys, aged 0.2-11.6 years) were enrolled in the study. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed in a half (9/18) of children. A thousand GERs were detected by MII-pH (median 53.5; IQR 39.0-75.5). Of these, 585 (58.5 %) episodes were acidic, 407 (40.7 %) were weakly acidic, and eight (0.8 %) were weakly alkaline. There were 637 (63.7 %) proximal GERs. The patients in whom gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed had a significantly higher number of proximal and total GERs. We conclude that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with interstitial lung disease is high; thus, the disease should be considered regardless of presenting clinical symptoms. A high frequency of non-acid and proximal GERs makes the MII-pH method a preferable choice for the detection of reflux episodes in this patient population.

Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is a recent development used in the evaluation of esophageal function. Our aim was to assess the inter-observer agreement for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders using this technology. Practitioners registered on the HRM Working Group website were invited to review and classify (i) 147 individual water swallows and (ii) 40 diagnostic studies comprising 10 swallows using a drop-down menu that followed the Chicago Classification system. Data were presented using a standardized format with pressure contours without a summary of HRM metrics. The sequence of swallows was fixed for each user but randomized between users to avoid sequence bias. Participants were blinded to other entries. (i) Individual swallows were assessed by 18 practitioners (13 institutions). Consensus agreement (≤ 2/18 dissenters) was present for most cases of normal peristalsis and achalasia but not for cases of peristaltic dysmotility. (ii) Diagnostic studies were assessed by 36 practitioners (28 institutions). Overall inter-observer agreement was 'moderate' (kappa 0.51) being 'substantial' (kappa > 0.7) for achalasia type I/II and no lower than 'fair-moderate' (kappa >0.34) for any diagnosis. Overall agreement was somewhat higher among those that had performed >400 studies (n = 9; kappa 0.55) and 'substantial' among experts involved in development of the Chicago Classification system (n = 4; kappa 0.66). This prospective, randomized, and blinded study reports an acceptable level of inter-observer agreement for HRM diagnoses across the full spectrum of esophageal motility disorders for a large group of clinicians working in a range of medical institutions. Suboptimal agreement for diagnosis of peristaltic motility disorders highlights contribution of objective HRM metrics.