RESUMO
A variety of thoracic imaging modalities and techniques have been used to evaluate diseases of the trachea and central bronchi. This document evaluates evidence for the use of thoracic imaging in the evaluation of tracheobronchial disease, including clinically suspected tracheal or bronchial stenosis, tracheomalacia or bronchomalacia, and bronchiectasis. Appropriateness guidelines for initial imaging evaluation of tracheobronchial disease and for pretreatment planning or posttreatment evaluation are included. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Assuntos
Broncopatias , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Sociedades Médicas , Doenças da Traqueia , Humanos , Broncopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados Unidos , Doenças da Traqueia/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Torácica/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/normasRESUMO
Plain language summary (for Research Letters only): Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis has many clinical manifestations and pulmonary complications such as pulmonary fibrosis. We hypothesized that patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis would have radiographic evidence of a wide range of pulmonary abnormalities on CT and that ANCA titer would be associated with these pulmonary abnormalities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects roughly 1% of the population and commonly involves the lungs. Of lung involvement in RA, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is well known; however, airways disease in RA is relatively understudied. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the baseline airways abnormalities in a prospective cohort of patients with RA based on pulmonary function testing (PFT) results, high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans, and computational imaging analysis and are there associations between these abnormalities and respiratory symptoms? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center study, 188 patients with RA without a clinical diagnosis of ILD underwent HRCT imaging and PFT. Radiologists assessed HRCT scans for airway abnormalities. Computational imaging via VIDA Vision software and in-house quantitative CT imaging analysis was applied to 147 HRCT scans to quantify airway abnormalities. RESULTS: Airways obstruction (FEV1 to FVC ratio < 0.7) was present in 20.7% of patients and was associated with older age, male sex, and higher smoking rate. Radiologists identified airway abnormalities in 61% of patients: 55% had bronchial wall thickening, 12% had bronchiectasis, and 5% had mosaic attenuation. These airways findings were associated with older age; male sex; lower FEV1, FVC, and FEV1 to FVC ratio; and higher rates of rheumatoid factor positivity. Prespecified quantitative CT scan metrics (wall thickening percentage and emphysema percentage) correlated with obstruction in PFT results and more severe respiratory symptoms, including shortness of breath and cough. INTERPRETATION: High rates of airways abnormalities were found in this prospective RA cohort based on 3 methods of detection. Significant associations were identified between quantitative CT scan measures and respiratory symptoms. Airways disease may be an underrecognized extra-articular manifestation of RA and quantitative CT imaging may be a sensitive method to detect the clinical impact on respiratory symptoms.
RESUMO
Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a lymphoproliferative and granulomatous pulmonary manifestation of primary immune deficiency diseases, notably common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and is an important contributor of excess morbidity. As with all forms of ILD, the significance of utilizing a multidisciplinary team discussion to enhance diagnostic and treatment confidence of GLILD cannot be overstated. In this review, key clinical, radiological, and pathological features are integrated into a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate a consensus diagnosis. As the evidence for diagnosing and managing patients with GLILD is limited, the viewpoints discussed here are not meant to resolve current controversies. Instead, this review aims to provide a practical framework for diagnosing and evaluating suspected cases and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach when caring for GLILD patients.
RESUMO
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. A search for the underlying cause of infection typically includes radiological imaging as part of this investigation. This document focuses on thoracic and abdominopelvic causes of sepsis. In 2017, the global incidence of sepsis was estimated to be 48.9 million cases, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths (accounting for nearly 20% of all global deaths); therefore, understanding which imaging modalities and types of studies are acceptable or not acceptable is imperative. The 5 variants provided include the most commonly encountered scenarios in the setting of sepsis along with recommendations and data for each imaging study. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Sepse , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Sepse/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados Unidos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/normasRESUMO
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. A search for the underlying cause of infection typically includes radiological imaging as part of this investigation. This document focuses on thoracic and abdominopelvic causes of sepsis. In 2017, the global incidence of sepsis was estimated to be 48.9 million cases, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths (accounting for nearly 20% of all global deaths); therefore, understanding which imaging modalities and types of studies are acceptable or not acceptable is imperative. The 5 variants provided include the most commonly encountered scenarios in the setting of sepsis along with recommendations and data for each imaging study. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Assuntos
Humanos , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/diagnóstico por imagem , RadiografiaRESUMO
Routine chest imaging has been used to identify unknown or subclinical cardiothoracic abnormalities in the absence of symptoms. Various imaging modalities have been suggested for routine chest imaging. We review the evidence for or against the use of routine chest imaging in different clinical scenarios. This document aims to determine guidelines for the use of routine chest imaging as initial imaging for hospital admission, initial imaging prior to noncardiothoracic surgery, and surveillance imaging for chronic cardiopulmonary disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Open and robotic-assisted transthoracic approaches for diaphragm plication are accepted surgical interventions for diaphragm paralysis and eventration. However, long-term patient-reported symptom improvement and quality of life (QOL) remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: A telephone-based survey was developed focusing on postoperative symptom improvement and QOL. Patients who underwent open or robotic-assisted transthoracic diaphragm plication (2008-2020) across three institutions were invited to participate. Patients who responded and provided consent were surveyed. Likert responses on symptom severity were dichotomized and rates before and after surgery were compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of patients participated (43 of 105 responded, mean age 61.0 years, 67.4% male, 37.2% robotic-assisted surgery), with an average time between surgery and survey of 4.1 ± 3.2 years. Patients reported significant improvement in dyspnea while lying flat (67.4% pre- vs 27.9% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea at rest (55.8% pre- vs 11.6% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea with activity (90.7% pre- vs 55.8% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea while bending over (79.1% pre- vs 34.9% postoperative, p < 0.001), and fatigue (67.4% pre- vs 41.9% postoperative, p = 0.008). There was no statistical improvement in chronic cough. 86% of patients reported improved overall QOL, 79% had increased exercise capacity, and 86% would recommend surgery to a friend with a similar problem. Analysis comparing open and robotic-assisted approaches found no statistically significant differences in symptom improvement or QOL responses between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients report significantly improved dyspneic and fatigue symptoms after transthoracic diaphragm plication, regardless of open or robotic-assisted approach. The majority of patients report improved QOL and exercise capacity.
Assuntos
Diafragma , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Diafragma/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/cirurgia , Fadiga , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo PacienteRESUMO
Rationale: Relatives of patients with familial interstitial pneumonia (FIP) are at increased risk for pulmonary fibrosis and develop preclinical pulmonary fibrosis (PrePF). Objectives: We defined the incidence and progression of new-onset PrePF and its relationship to survival among first-degree relatives of families with FIP. Methods: This is a cohort study of family members with FIP who were initially screened with a health questionnaire and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan, and approximately 4 years later, the evaluation was repeated. A total of 493 asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with FIP were evaluated at baseline, and 296 (60%) of the original subjects participated in the subsequent evaluation. Measurements and Main Results: The median interval between HRCTs was 3.9 years (interquartile range, 3.5-4.4 yr). A total of 252 subjects who agreed to repeat evaluation were originally determined not to have PrePF at baseline; 16 developed PrePF. A conservative estimate of the annual incidence of PrePF is 1,023 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 511-1,831 per 100,000 person-years). Of 44 subjects with PrePF at baseline, 38.4% subjects had worsening dyspnea compared with 15.4% of those without PrePF (P = 0.002). Usual interstitial pneumonia by HRCT (P < 0.0002) and baseline quantitative fibrosis score (P < 0.001) are also associated with worsening dyspnea. PrePF at the initial screen is associated with decreased survival (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of PrePF in this at-risk population is at least 100-fold higher than that reported for sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although PrePF and IPF represent distinct entities, our study demonstrates that PrePF, like IPF, is progressive and associated with decreased survival.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Dispneia , Pulmão , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Different subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with different patterns of metastatic spread. Anatomic location of lesions in the chest may influence patterns of cancer growth and the shrinkage to therapy. Consequently, lesion location could affect apparent response rates per RECIST. We sought to explore this and develop, as needed, treatment response assessments less affected by the location. METHODS: Cases of advanced oncogene-addicted NSCLC (EGFR, ALK, and ROS1) with pre- and on-therapy imaging during initial targeted therapy were identified. Lesions located in the lung parenchyma, pleural space or intra-thoracic lymph nodes were identified and analyzed separately from each other by RECIST 1.1 (unidimensional measurements) and by a novel MAX methodology (bidimensional measurements) which takes the axis with the greatest absolute percentage change on therapy in each location as the representative measurement. RESULTS: Three hundred three patients with 446 unidimensional measured lesions were included for RECIST analysis. Two hundred forty nine patients with 386 bidimensional measured lesions were included for MAX analysis, as well as the analysis comparing RECIST and MAX. Intrathoracic location significantly impacted percentage shrinkage and the response rate per RECIST. The response rates for pleural, intra-parenchymal and nodal lesions were 34.1%, 49.6%, and 68.3%, respectively (P = .0002). The MAX methodology both increased the apparent treatment effect and made it consistent between intrathoracic locations. For pleural, parenchymal and nodal lesions, the MAX calculated response rate were 83.7%, 72.2%, and 75.4%, respectively (P-value = .24). CONCLUSION: Intrathoracic lesion location affects RECIST-based treatment effectiveness estimations. The MAX methodology neutralizes location effect when examining impact of treatment and should be explored further.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Oncogenes , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas , Critérios de Avaliação de Resposta em Tumores Sólidos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosAssuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/genética , Mucina-5B/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/genética , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Prevalência , Estudos ProspectivosAssuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Síndrome de Marfan , Aorta/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Humanos , Síndrome de Marfan/complicações , Síndrome de Marfan/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Marfan/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
When discussing cystic lung diseases, a certain group of diseases tends to receive the majority of attention. Other less frequently discussed cystic lung diseases are also important causes of morbidity in patients. Etiologies include genetic syndromes, lymphoproliferative diseases, infections, exogenous exposures, and a developmental abnormality. This review article focuses on the clinical and imaging features of these other cystic lung diseases.
Assuntos
Pneumopatias , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumopatias/etiologiaRESUMO
Diffuse lung disease, frequently referred to as interstitial lung disease, encompasses numerous disorders affecting the lung parenchyma. The potential etiologies of diffuse lung disease are broad with several hundred established clinical syndromes and pathologies currently identified. Imaging plays a critical role in diagnosis and follow-up of many of these diseases, although multidisciplinary discussion is the current standard for diagnosis of several DLDs. This document aims to establish guidelines for evaluation of diffuse lung diseases for 1) initial imaging of suspected diffuse lung disease, 2) initial imaging of suspected acute exacerbation or acute deterioration in cases of confirmed diffuse lung disease, and 3) clinically indicated routine follow-up of confirmed diffuse lung disease without acute deterioration. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Assuntos
Pneumopatias , Sociedades Médicas , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Chest pain is a common reason that patients may present for evaluation in both ambulatory and emergency department settings, and is often of musculoskeletal origin in the former. Chest wall syndrome collectively describes the various entities that can contribute to chest wall pain of musculoskeletal origin and may affect any chest wall structure. Various imaging modalities may be employed for the diagnosis of nontraumatic chest wall conditions, each with variable utility depending on the clinical scenario. We review the evidence for or against use of various imaging modalities for the diagnosis of nontraumatic chest wall pain. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Assuntos
Parede Torácica , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Parede Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/terapia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/terapia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/complicações , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangiopancreatografia por Ressonância Magnética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/complicações , Resistência VascularRESUMO
Primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs), which are humoral, combined, and innate defects of the immune system, are relatively uncommon and may go undiagnosed in patients experiencing recurrent infections, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. PIDs are clinically characterized by a broad spectrum of disorders, including repeated infections, autoimmune disorders, lymphoproliferative diseases, congenital anomalies, and increased risk of malignancy. Cardiothoracic imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of PIDs owing to the high rates of repeated respiratory infections leading to bronchiectasis and other forms of chronic lung disease. Although PIDs as a group may seem similar in terms of radiologic features and clinical manifestations, there are specific entities that are pertinent to each PID on an individual level. For example, patients with common variable immunodeficiency may develop a unique granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease, and Good syndrome is associated with thymoma. Familiarity with the imaging characteristics of these disorders may expedite diagnosis and prognostication, and better direct therapy. Reviewing the thoracic manifestations of all PIDs is beyond the scope of this article; thus, the focus herein is on discussing the thoracic manifestations of the most common PIDs and their imaging features. © RSNA, 2021An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on March 25, 2021.
RESUMO
Mediastinal masses can present with symptoms, signs, and syndromes or incidentally. Selecting the appropriate diagnostic imaging study for mediastinal mass evaluation requires awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of the various imaging modalities with regard to tissue characterization, soft tissue contrast, and surveillance. This publication expounds on the differences between chest radiography, CT, PET/CT, ultrasound, and MRI in terms of their ability to decipher and surveil mediastinal masses. Making the optimal imaging choice can yield diagnostic specificity, avert unnecessary biopsy and surgery, guide the interventionist when necessary, and serve as a means of surveillance for probably benign, but indeterminate mediastinal masses. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Assuntos
Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Ultrassonografia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs when a patient presents with positive cardiac enzymes in the absence of obstructive atherosclerosis on coronary angiography. Several hypotheses for the pathogenesis of MINOCA have been suggested and multiple potential underlying etiologies have been reported. This review will outline the reported causes of MINOCA and associated major imaging features. In doing so, it will increase awareness of this entity and equip cardiac imagers with the knowledge to appropriately tailor imaging to make a prompt and accurate diagnosis.