Communicating the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: The patient perspective.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are a common cause of refractory seizures. Video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring has allowed PNES to be effectively distinguished from epileptic seizures. Once the diagnosis of PNES is established, neurologists face the challenge of explaining it to patients. Patients may not always receive the diagnosis well. The aim of this study is to evaluate how effectively patients receive and perceive the diagnosis of PNES. This prospective study was conducted in an eight-bed epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). Adult patients with newly confirmed PNES were included. After receiving written consent, a self-administered questionnaire was given to patients after the attending physician had communicated the diagnosis of PNES. A total of 75 patients were recruited. All patients had their typical seizures recorded on video-EEG (range 1-12, mean 2.18). Seventy patients were satisfied with the diagnosis of PNES. Nine patients did not agree that PNES has a psychological cause. Nineteen patients thought that the EMU doctors had no clue as to the cause of their seizures and 20 thought that there was no hope for a cure of their seizures. A significant number of patients with PNES feel that there is no hope for cure of their seizures. Thorough education about PNES, properly preparing patients before discussing the diagnosis of PNES, and preferably earlier diagnosis may prevent this miscommunication and result in better outcomes. A comprehensive approach including psychological counseling and psychiatric input, evaluation and treatment, in order to bring the illness from the subconscious to the conscious level, and effective follow-up may be helpful.

Tiagabine-induced stupor in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: nonconvulsive status epilepticus or encephalopathy?

BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus has been rarely reported with tiagabine (TGB) use. METHODS: We report findings from continuous video-EEG monitoring and serial neurological examinations during prolonged episodes of stupor associated with TGB use in three patients who did not have epilepsy. RESULTS: All three patients had emergence of new type of events after starting TGB treatment. All three patients had gradual decline in responsiveness to verbal stimuli, intermittent twitching of the upper extremities, and urinary incontinence. The corresponding EEG showed gradual build-up of generalized bisynchronous delta-wave activity with subsequent intermingled sharp transients. Two patients did not respond to IV lorazepam, one of whom also did not respond to IV phenytoin. The EEG slowly normalized in conjunction with associated clinical improvement. Habitual seizures were found to be psychogenic, with no interictal evidence for epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Tiagabine-related stupor may represent a form of toxic encephalopathy in some cases rather than nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Long term video/EEG prevents unnecessary vagus nerve stimulator implantation in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are common paroxysmal events that mimic and can often be misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures. PNES account for 10 to 40% of patients referred to epilepsy centers. Patients with uncontrolled PNES are at times subjected to vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) implantation. We report a series of such referred patients studied with video/EEG monitoring at our institution. METHODS: We evaluated patients who were implanted with a VNS by their primary neurologist for refractory seizures and who were referred to the Vanderbilt University epilepsy monitoring unit for a second opinion. The presumed diagnosis of epilepsy was based on abnormal routine EEG studies obtained by their primary neurologist. We evaluated these patients and recorded their typical spells between 2005 and 2009. We describe the results of 13 patients with VNS who were found to have PNES. The total number of patients with a VNS studied during this time was 60. RESULTS: None of the patients had undergone prior long-term video/EEG monitoring to document the nature of their events. A total of 13 patients with an implanted VNS had exclusive PNES, 9 women and 4 men with a mean age of 38.2±10.4 years. Mean age at seizure onset was 28.5±15.4 years. Patients were taking two to four antiepileptic medications in addition to VNS at the time of video/EEG monitoring. The average latency from the time of VNS implantation to the confirmatory diagnosis was 2.8 years. One to ten (median=3) of these patients' typical seizures were recorded during video/EEG monitoring. All patients were subsequently discharged off antiepileptic medications, and five of these patients were discharged home with the VNS turned off. CONCLUSION: A VNS may be implanted inappropriately in patients with PNES. As video/EEG monitoring may help in excluding the diagnosis of PNES and preventing unnecessary VNS implants, it should be a requirement before VNS implantation.