A multicentre, randomized, naturalistic, open-label study between aripiprazole and standard of care in the management of community-treated schizophrenic patients Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole: (STAR) study.

BACKGROUND: Naturalistic effectiveness trials of atypical antipsychotics are needed to provide broader information on efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia treated in a community practice setting. METHOD: In this 26-week, open-label, multicentre study, patients with schizophrenia requiring a switch in antipsychotic medication because current medication was not well tolerated and/or clinical symptoms were not well controlled were randomized to receive aripiprazole or an atypical antipsychotic standard of care (SOC) treatment (i.e., olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone based on the investigator's judgment of the optimal treatment for the individual patient and the patient's prior response to antipsychotic medication). The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of a 26-week treatment of aripiprazole versus SOC, as measured by the Investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) total score at Week 26 last observation carried forward (LOCF) (primary endpoint), a validated measure that monitors relief or worsening of 10 key symptoms associated with the psychopathology of schizophrenia and side effects of antipsychotic treatment. Secondary objectives were to further assess effectiveness using the Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale, to assess time to treatment discontinuation, patient preference of medication, quality of life, and the tolerability of aripiprazole compared with SOC. RESULTS: Aripiprazole treatment (n=268) resulted in significantly better effectiveness than SOC treatment (n=254; P<0.001; Week 26 LOCF) as evidenced by the IAQ total score beginning at Week 4 (the first assessment point) and sustained through Week 26. A similar relationship was demonstrated among patients who completed the study (observed cases analysis); aripiprazole was associated with significantly better effectiveness at all time points with a greater differential effect from SOC over time. Patients treated with aripiprazole also demonstrated significantly greater improvements on the CGI-I scale (responder rate, P=0.009 at Week 26 LOCF), as well as on quality of life (Quality of Life scale total score; P<0.001 at Week 26). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving aripiprazole rated their study medication as "much better" on the Preference of Medication Questionnaire (POM) scale than their pre-study medication compared with SOC patients (P<0.001; Week 26). Time to treatment discontinuation and rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. The incidence of patients with one or more extrapyramidal symptom (e.g., akathisia, dystonia, parkinsonian events, and residual events) was higher in patients receiving aripiprazole compared with patients treated with SOC (13.5% vs. 5.6%); however, a higher proportion of patients in the SOC-treated group had clinically significant weight gain (21.2% vs. 7.3% for aripiprazole) and potentially clinically relevant elevated fasting levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum prolactin compared with patients receiving aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole is an effective atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, demonstrating better effectiveness than SOC agents used in this study in patients for whom a switch in antipsychotic medication was warranted.

[Olanzapine: a second generation antipsychotic drug and an "atypical" mood stabilizer?]. / Olanzapin: második generációs antipsszichotikum és "atípusos" hangulatstabilizátor?

The term "mood stabilizer" has been widely used since the early 1990's but it still does not have a uniform and generally accepted definition. Usually, agents that are effective in ameliorating acute manic or depressive episodes and have some prophylactic efficacy against the recurrence of new phases are considered as mood stabilizers. Lithium is unquestionably the prototype drug of this class; others, like some anticonvulsants, have been subsequently added to the list. Recent clinical research indicates that some of the newer second-generation antipsychotics may have very similar properties. In controlled clinical studies of acute manic and mixed episodes, olanzapine has proved to be at least as effective as lithium, divalproex, or haloperidol - often with additional benefits, such as faster onset of action, or wider spectrum of target symptoms. Added to mood stabilizers, olanzapine significantly enhances their antimanic efficacy. It also has intrinsic antidepressant properties; and in combination with fluoxetine, this has resulted in convincing efficacy in bipolar depressive episodes. Long-term maintenance treatment with olanzapine has extended the periods of remission and shown prophylactic efficacy against the recurrence of both manic and depressive episodes that is comparable or, in the case of preventing manic relapses, even superior to lithium. While none of the current agents meet the most stringent criteria for an "ideal" mood stabilizer, there is strong evidence that olanzapine, just like lithium, is effective across all phases of bipolar disorder without provoking either manic or depressive symptomatology. Regardless of formal definition criteria, this is exactly what clinicians expect of a dependable mood stabilizer.

Olanzapine versus clozapine in treatment-resistant or treatment-intolerant schizophrenia.

Clozapine has been the gold standard for treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia but is associated with serious safety liabilities. This has prompted the search for therapeutic alternatives for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus clozapine in schizophrenic patients who failed to respond adequately to antipsychotic medication or who experienced intolerable adverse effects associated with the medication. This 18-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study compared treatment with either olanzapine (5-25 mg/day, n=75) or clozapine (100-500 mg/day, n=72) in patients with schizophrenia who were nonresponsive to, or intolerant of, standard acceptable antipsychotic therapy. At the 18-week endpoint, no statistically significant differences were found between olanzapine and clozapine in any efficacy measure used: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, positive, negative, or general psychopathology or Clinical Global Impression severity (CGI-S). Response rates based on the criteria of Kane et al. [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 45 (1988) 789] were also not significantly different between olanzapine-treated (57.9%) and clozapine-treated patients (60.8%). There were no significant differences in measurements of extrapyramidal symptoms or electrocardiography, and no clinically and statistically significant changes were seen in vital signs or laboratory measures in either group. Both treatments were well tolerated. Olanzapine demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in patients who had failed previous treatment because of lack of efficacy (treatment resistance) or intolerable side effects (treatment intolerance). Olanzapine therefore presents a safe alternative in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia.