Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock.

PURPOSE: To assess long-term outcomes of restrictive versus standard intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock included in the European Conservative versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy in Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. METHODS: We conducted the pre-planned analyses of mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L index values and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS), and cognitive function using Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini MoCA) test at 1 year. Deceased patients were assigned numerical zero for HRQoL as a state equal to death and zero for cognitive function outcomes as worst possible score, and we used multiple imputation for missing data on HRQoL and cognitive function. RESULTS: Among 1554 randomized patients, we obtained 1-year data on mortality in 97.9% of patients, HRQoL in 91.3%, and cognitive function in 86.3%. One-year mortality was 385/746 (51.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group versus 383/767 (49.9%) in the standard-fluid group, absolute risk difference 1.5%-points [99% confidence interval (CI) - 4.8 to 7.8]. Mean differences were 0.00 (99% CI - 0.06 to 0.05) for EQ-5D-5L index values, - 0.65 for EQ VAS (- 5.40 to 4.08), and - 0.14 for Mini MoCA (- 1.59 to 1.14) for the restrictive-fluid group versus the standard-fluid group. The results for survivors only were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adult ICU patients with septic shock, restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy resulted in similar survival, HRQoL, and cognitive function at 1 year, but clinically important differences could not be ruled out.

Pericapsular nerve group block: an overview.

INTRODUCTION: The PENG block is a recently described ultrasound-guided technique for the blockade of the sensory nerve branches to the anterior hip joint capsule. It was described as an analgesic block for the acute pain management after hip fracture, while subsequent studies expanded the original indication. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the existing knowledge about the PENG block from the anatomical bases and to provide an up-to-date description of the technique, applications and effects. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reviewed the following medical literature databases for publications on PENG block: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Web of science until August 31st, 2020. Data regarding anatomy, indications, drugs and technique were also collected, reported and discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: From our search result we selected 57 relevant publications. Among them, 36 were case reports or case series and 12 publication were letters or correspondence; no RCT was identified. The main indication is the hip-related analgesia. The most commonly injected drug is a 20ml long-acting local anesthetic. There are some cases of femoral and obturator nerve block, but no major complication such as hematoma/bleeding or needle-related organ injury has been reported yet. CONCLUSIONS: The PENG block is a promising technique. Randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality are required to further elaborate the role of this block.

Predicting difficult spinal anesthesia: development of a neuraxial block assessment score.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is a commonly performed procedure with unpredictable difficulty. The objective of this study was to predict a difficult lumbar spinal anesthesia with clinical elements that are easy to collect. METHODS: A questionnaire-based, observational study named NBA, conducted from February 2018 to June 2018. The questions regarded clinical elements and the eventual spinal anesthesia difficulty encountered. A total of 427 questionnaires were filled by the operators. The clinical elements were selected upon literature search and have been integrated with new ones. All the answers were recorded from the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. RESULTS: The NBA Score was derived from a total number of 427 questionnaires. Among them, 26 patients had "previous history of difficult spinal anesthesia;" 277 had "spinous processes not visible;" 83 had "spinous processes not palpable;" 77 had "spinal deformities" and 28 had "previous spinal surgery" in the puncture area; 138 patients received lumbar spinal anesthesia in lateral position. There were 328 (76.8%) single puncture successes. Seventy-nine (18.5%) patients required more than one skin puncture to obtain a successful spinal anesthesia. 20 (4.7%) required an alternative anesthesia technique (general anesthesia). Multivariate analysis indicated that each element is a risk factors for difficult spinal anesthesia, except for previous spinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of more than one element increased the chance of a second skin puncture of more than 50%. This work proposes a simple clinical scoring system predicting the probability of a difficult spinal anesthesia.

Continuous PENG block for hip fracture: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional technique indicated for analgesia for hip joint pain. We administered PENG blocks and performed catheter insertion for continuous infusions in patients with femur fractures on hospital admission. In this case series, we describe our initial experience of pain management in 10 patients with continuous infusion and its associated adverse events. CASE SERIES: The PENG block was administered with an introducer needle. The catheter was then inserted 3 cm beyond the needle tip. In three patients, blood aspiration through the catheter occurred. In each patient, the catheter was repositioned 0.5-1.0 cm more medially. No blood aspiration or visible hematoma occurred subsequently. The presence of any vascular structure deep to the iliopsoas muscle was excluded postoperatively based on a Doppler color flow scan. DISCUSSION: Overall, eight patients had femoral neck fractures, and two patients had intertrochanteric fractures. All 10 patients reported good pain relief. The median (IQR) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score decreased from 7 (6-7) before the block to 2 (2-2.75) 20 min after PENG catheter placement. The median (IQR) NRS score after 12, 24 and 48 hours were 2 (2-3), 2 (2-3), and 2 (0.25-2), respectively. Patients underwent surgery 24-48 hours following catheter placement. Catheters were removed by an Acute Pain Service nurse 72 hours postinsertion. We want to highlight the potential for intravascular catheter placement in this anatomical region. Further studies are required to confirm if this is a technical error or an associated complication of continuous PENG blocks.