The TPA score (total psoas muscle area) is the best marker for preoperative measurement of pre-sarcopenia in pancreatic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-sarcopenia, defined by the loss of muscle mass, is significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications in digestive surgery, particularly pancreatic resection. The five predominant markers of sarcopenia are: psoas muscle area (TPA), intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), Average Hounsfield Unit Calculation (HUAC), Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (MMI), and the ratio between visceral adipose tissue area and muscle surface area (VFA/TAMA). No standard reference marker has been determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort included patients who underwent pancreatic resection at the University Hospital of Angers between January 2008 and June 2017. The goal was to determine the marker that was most significantly associated with morbidity and mortality in pancreatic surgery. The secondary objective was to determine the characteristics of pre-sarcopenic patients. RESULTS: The TPA score is the most sensitive marker for identifying patients at highest risk for immediate complications (P=0.008), proving far more sensitive than MMI (P=0.02), HUAC (P=0.34), IMAC (P=1), or VFA/TAMA (P=0.42). Postoperative mortality was 3.3% (n=5), morbidity was 63.8% (n=97). Pre-sarcopenic patients, as identified by the TPA index had significantly more immediate complications (71.2% versus 49.5%, P=0.008), in particular, more gastroparesis (P=0.02) and pancreatic fistula (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring pancreatic surgery, the prevalence of pre-sarcopenia is high and seems to be associated with a greater risk of immediate postoperative complications. The TPA score seems to be the most sensitive marker for detecting pre-sarcopenia. Evaluation of TPA preoperatively would make it possible to identify priority patients a priori who might benefit from pre-habilitation programs.

[Diaphragmatic rupture and right ipsilateral intercostal hernia in chronic cough]. / Rupture diaphragmatique et hernie intercostale droites homolatérales sur toux aiguë.

INTRODUCTION: We are reporting the case of a 64-year-old patient with chronic cough who has been diagnosed with an intercostal hernia with pleural and hepatic content associated with a diaphragmatic hernia of non-traumatic origin. CASE REPORT: The patient was treated for an acutely febrile cough with signs of respiratory distress. Thoracic scan showed an intercostal hernia containing an encysted hematoma and a right anterior diaphragmatic hernia with epiploic content. The COVID PCR was negative. This is one of the rare reported cases of intercostal hernia associated with a homolateral diaphragmatic rupture. Visceral and thoracic surgery enabled treatment of the two hernial orifices by raphy as well as omentectomy of the necrotic omentum ascending to the right pulmonary hilum. CONCLUSION: These two parietal complications of chronic cough should be considered in case of intercostal flap or acute respiratory distress. Surgery must then be carried out as a matter of urgency to reduce the content of the hernias and treat the musculoaponeurotic dehiscent orifices.

Trans-anal total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancers: Preliminary oncological results of a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The management of lower rectal cancers is a therapeutic challenge both from the oncological and functional viewpoints. The aim of this study is to assess the oncological results and postoperative morbidity after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for low rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study, we compared the quality of carcinologic resection and the morbidity-mortality between a group of 20 patients undergoing TaTME and 21 patients treated by abdomino-perineal resection (APR) between 2016 to 2019. RESULTS: More patients had a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (≤1mm) in the APR group (47.6% vs. 5%; P<0.0036). The difference in the rates of grades I-II and III-IV complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) between the two groups was not statistically significant (50% vs. 57.1% and 5% vs. 9.5% in TaTME and APR, respectively; P=0.7579, P=1.00). The median follow-up was longer in the TaTME group (20 months vs. 11 months; P=0.58). The local recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups (5% vs. 4.8%; P=1.00) CONCLUSION: TaTME provides a reliable total mesorectal resection with an acceptable CRM. However, like any new technique, it requires experience and the learning curve is long.

Gastrointestinal motility has more of an impact on postoperative recovery than you might expect.

PURPOSE: While patient's reported autonomy (PRA) may help the physician to adapt the day of discharge, the link between postoperative ileus and length of stay and PRA is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of the PRA score during the postoperative period and to determine the factors possibly influencing such an evolution. METHODS: This retrospective study on a prospective database took place in a single centre over 14 months. PRA was defined by the by using part I of the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale known as activity of daily life [from 9 (best) to 45 (worst)]. RESULTS: Among the 101 patients operated on for elective or emergent colorectal surgery, 80% of the patients had recovered their preoperative PRA (±5 points) before discharge and maintained their PRA during the 2 days preceding discharge. While PRA was significantly decreased by surgery (P<0.0001), each postoperative day allowed for its progressive recovery. Interestingly, the day of recovery of GI transit was associated with a significant increase of PRA (-6.96 points, P<0.0001). Despite high variability of baseline autonomy level, patients presented very similar recovery processes, which were represented by very low slope variability in the linear mixed model. Laparoscopy reduced the decrease of postoperative PRA (P=0.03) while ASA score>2 increased PRA (P=0.03). Age, emergency surgery and the occurrence of postoperative morbidity did not affect postoperative autonomy. Finally, enhanced recovery programs (ERP) tended to improve postoperative autonomy recovery (P=0.09). CONCLUSION: PRA may be used as a means of optimising a patient's day of discharge following colorectal surgery.

Urine drainage management in colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) is aimed at reducing a patient's surgical stress response, specifically by reducing the duration of catheterization. In cases of colorectal surgery, there is pronounced heterogeneity in urinary catheterization, which is largely explained by fear of acute urinary retention (AUR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the work is to report on the current literature on postoperative urinary catheterization following colorectal surgery, particularly with regard to the risk of AUR, and thereby contribute to the standardization of perioperative practices. RESULTS: In colon surgery without preoperative urinary disorders, catheterization must not exceed 24h. In rectal surgery, catheter removal starting on postoperative D2 seems reasonable in the absence of AUR risk factor (RF). Male sex, past history of lower urinary tract obstruction, abdomino-perineal amputation (APA) and low rectal anastomosis are AUR risk factors that must be taken into account when deciding to withdraw the urinary catheter. While the role of a suprapubic catheter is not clearly defined, it may be of use following APA. The epidural catheter is another AUR risk factor, but it seems possible to withdraw the urinary catheter on postoperative D1, before the epidural catheter, provided that the other risk factors have been taken into full account. Lastly, up until now no satisfactorily conducted study has assessed the prophylactic value of systematic perioperative alpha-blocker treatment in colorectal surgery.

Long-term functional outcomes of perineal gangrene: worse than expected?-an observational retrospective study.

PURPOSE: For survivors of perineal gangrene (PG), quality of life and functional prognosis of pelvic functions are probably overestimated. The aim of this study was to report long-term anal and urinary sphincter dysfunctions, sexual sequelae, and patients' quality of life after treatment of perineal gangrene. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted in one university hospital over 16 years. Seventy-three patients experienced PG; 22 were subject to long-term follow-up. Three questionnaires were sent to patients to assess pelvic dysfunction and quality of life: the GIQLI, the Cleveland Incontinence Score, and the USP score for urinary dysfunction. Sexual sequelae were considered if orchiectomy or penile resection for male patients and vulvar resection for female patients were performed. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients included, seven died before discharge (9.7%) and at least 14 died during follow-up (19.4%), despite a mean age of 62 years (± 13). Among the surviving patients, seven experienced an alteration of their quality of life (44%) (GIQLI < 96). Six patients still had a colostomy, and among the remaining patients, 11 experienced minimal to mild incontinence (68.7%), while one experienced constipation (6.2%). One patient suffered from urinary incontinence (4.5%), and six suffered from dysuria (27.3%). Three male patients (14%) underwent an orchiectomy, and one female patient (100%) underwent a vulvar resection. CONCLUSION: PG leads to a high rate of anal and urinary dysfunctions. Urinary dysfunctions are taken into account and treated; however, anal incontinence is not investigated even though it could lead to decreased quality of life.

Short-Term Outcomes of Colorectal Resection for Cancer in Elderly in the Era of Enhanced Recovery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early rehabilitation protocols should be assessed in elderly. We aimed to study the outcomes of colorectal surgery and the observance of the modalities of an early rehabilitation protocol in patients over 80 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer in our center over a 19-month period were included. All of these patients were managed using the same early rehabilitation protocol. Patients older than 80 were compared to younger patients. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included and 36 were ≥80 years (20.8%). Patients aged ≥80 years had a significantly higher ASA score and were operated on in emergency. In the peroperative period, patients aged ≥80 years were more likely to undergo laparotomy than patients <80 years in univariate analysis (p = 0.048), but in multivariate analysis, the choice for a laparoscopy was influenced by ASA score ≤2 (odds ratio = 3.55, 95% confidence interval = 1.67-7.58) and emergency surgery (odds ratio = 0.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.06-0.50). In the postoperative period, peristalsis stimulation and vascular catheter ablation were significantly better followed in Group 1 (p = 0.012 and 0.031). However, in multivariate analysis, age was not significantly associated with these parameters. Peristalsis stimulation was influenced by ASA score ≥2 (odds ratio = 4.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.18-15.37) and vascular catheter ablation was also influenced by ASA score ≤2 (odds ratio = 2.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-5.21). Emergency surgery had a strong trend to influence these parameters (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Although age or comorbidities may affect observance for certain modalities such as chewing gum use and vascular catheter ablation, an early rehabilitation protocol can be used after colorectal cancer surgery in patients ≥80 years old, where it would improve functional results and postoperative outcomes.

Primary Surgery for Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: Postoperative Nasogastric Tube Reinsertion is Not Mandatory.

BACKGROUND: Malignant large bowel obstructions frequently require emergency surgery. Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery programmes is significantly reduced due to non-removal of the nasogastric tube in the postoperative period. The first aim of the present study was to research factors associated with the failure of immediate nasogastric tube removal in patients who had undergone emergency surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction. The second aim was to assess the morbidity linked to nasogastric tube reinsertion. METHODS: This retrospective and monocentric study included all consecutive patients admitted for acute malignant large bowel obstruction who underwent emergency surgery. Patients who were not primarily operated on were excluded (n = 178; 69.3%). The group of patients requiring nasogastric tube (NGT) reinsertion was compared with the group that did not require NGT reinsertion. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent emergency surgery, of which 18 (22.8%) required nasogastric tube reinsertion. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to (a) immediate nasogastric tube removal (p = 0.87) and (b) inclusion in an enhanced recovery programme (p = 0.75). However, preoperative small bowel dilatation was associated with a reduction in the need for NGT reinsertion (p = 0.04). A left-sided tumour was also associated with the need for NGT reinsertion in uni- (p = 0.034) and multivariate analysis (OR = 8; p < 0.05). Surgical access and procedure were not significantly associated with NGT reinsertion. The postoperative course influenced NGT reinsertion, which was significantly associated with postoperative ileus (OR = 4; p < 0.05) and postoperative morbidity (OR = 4; p < 0.05). Morbidity was not linked to nasogastric tube removal. CONCLUSION: Nasogastric tube reinsertion was not affected by immediate removal of the tube. Left-sided tumours and patients at risk of postoperative ileus should be managed with caution. Immediate nasogastric tube removal is not contraindicated in the case of large bowel obstruction because it is not associated with a higher risk of NGT reinsertion.

CT findings of complications after abdominal wall repair with prosthetic mesh.

Postoperative complications following prosthetic mesh repair are relatively rare and depend on the type and location of prosthetic mesh. They include abscess, hematoma, seroma, fistula, bowel obstruction, mesh retraction, granuloma and recurrent hernia. Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging examination of choice for the diagnosis of such complications. This pictorial review illustrates the CT presentation of the most and less common postoperative complications following prosthetic mesh repair of the abdominal wall.

Does enhanced recovery reduce postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery?

INTRODUCTION: While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been proven to improve results in colorectal operations with regard to morbidity and duration of hospital stay, its impact on recovery of bowel motility is poorly documented. The aims of this study were to assess the impact of ERAS on bowel motility recovery, and to assess the consequences of the definition of postoperative ileus on its reported incidence in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-center prospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis over a period of 17 months. Global resumption of intestinal transit (GROT) was defined as passage of stool combined with alimentary tolerance of solid food. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one patients were included. A median of 14 items (range: 13-16) was complied out of 19 observable items in the protocol. Median time to passage of flatus (MTPF) was 2 days and the GROT was 3 days. The time interval to MTPF as well as to GROT decreased as adherence to the ERAS protocol increased (respectively P<0.001, r2=0.11 and P=0.04, r2=0.06). The incidence of postoperative "ileus" varied from 1.5% to 61.8% depending on the interval chosen to define ileus (cut-off from 1 to 7 days). Adherence to≥85% of the items in the ERAS protocol protected patients from "prolonged ileus", i.e., lasting≥4 days (OR=0.35; 95% CI=0.15 to 0.83). CONCLUSION: The implementation of and compliance with an ERAS protocol allowed a reduction in the time to GROT. There is a need for a consensual definition of postoperative ileus.

Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a major focus of concern for surgeons because it increases duration of hospitalization, cost of care, and postoperative morbidity. The definition of POI is relatively consensual albeit with a variable definition of interval to resolution ranging from 2 to 7 days for different authors. This variation, however, leads to non-reproducibility of studies and difficulties in interpreting the results. Certain risk factors for POI, such as male gender, advanced age and major blood loss, have been repeatedly described in the literature. Understanding of the pathophysiology of POI has helped combat and prevent its occurrence. But despite preventive and therapeutic efforts arising from such knowledge, 10 to 30% of patients still develop POI after abdominal surgery. In France, pharmacological prevention is limited by the unavailability of effective drugs. Perioperative nutrition is very important, as well as limitation of preoperative fasting to 6 hours for solid food and 2 hours for liquids, and virtually no fasting in the postoperative period. Coffee and chewing gum also play a preventive role for POI. The advent of laparoscopy has led to a significant improvement in the recovery of gastrointestinal function. Enhanced recovery programs, grouping together all measures for prevention or cure of POI by addressing the mechanisms of POI, has reduced the duration of hospitalization, morbidity and interval to resumption of transit.

Current indications for the Hartmann procedure.

The Hartmann procedure is used in the case of left-sided colonic disease, especially in the setting of emergency where intraoperative conditions contraindicate completion of an anastomosis. This procedure has been initially described for the management of colorectal cancer and is based on a sigmoïdectomy without restoration of intestinal continuity, including a left-sided iliac terminal stoma and closure of the rectal stump. Both procedure and underlying risk factors explain high rates of mortality and morbidity, around 15 and 50% respectively, and a low overall rate of subsequent restoration of internal continuity, less than 50%. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the value of the Hartmann procedure and its equivalents in colonic surgery, according to its indications: colorectal cancer, peritonitis from diverticular disease, anastomotic complications, ischemic colitis, left-sided colonic volvulus and abdominal trauma.

Sigmoid stricture associated with diverticular disease should be an indication for elective surgery with lymph node clearance.

BACKGROUND: The literature concerning stricture secondary to diverticulitis is poor. Stricture in this setting should be an indication for surgery because (a) of the potential risk of cancer and (b) morbidity is not increased compared to other indications for colectomy. The goal of this report is to study the post-surgical morbidity and the quality of life in patients after sigmoidectomy for sigmoid stricture associated with diverticular disease. METHOD: This is a monocenter retrospective observational study including patients with a preoperative diagnosis of sigmoid stricture associated with diverticular disease undergoing operation between Jan 1, 2007 and Dec 31, 2013. The GastroIntestinal Quality of Life Index was used to assess patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included of which nine were female. Median age was 69.5 (46-84) and the median body mass index was 23.55kg/m(2) (17.2-28.4). Elective sigmoidectomy was performed in all 16 patients. Overall, complications occurred in five patients (31.2%) (4 minor complications and 1 major complication according to the Dindo and Clavien Classification); none resulted in death. Pathology identified two adenocarcinomas (12.5%). The mean GastroIntestinal Quality of Life Index was 122 (67-144) and 10/11 patients were satisfied with their surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Sigmoid stricture prevents endoscopic exploration of the entire colon and thus it may prove difficult to rule out a malignancy. Surgery does not impair the quality of life since morbidity is similar to other indications for sigmoidectomy. For these reasons, we recommend that stricture associated with diverticular disease should be an indication for sigmoidectomy including lymph node clearance.

Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience.

OBJECTIVE: Since the first paper published by Matzel et al., in 1995, on the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in patients with faecal incontinence, the indications, the contraindications, the stimulation technique and follow up of implanted patients have changed. The aim of this article was to provide a consensus opinion on the management of patients with faecal incontinence treated with SNS. METHOD: Recommendations were based on a critical review of the literature when available and on expert opinions in areas with insufficient evidence. RESULTS: We have reviewed the indications and contraindications, proposed an algorithm for patient management showing the place of SNS. The temporary test technique, the implantation technique, the patient follow up and the approach in case of treatment failure were discussed. CONCLUSION: We hope not only to provide a guide on patient management to clinical practitioners interested in SNS but also to harmonize our practices.

Management of acute malignant large-bowel obstruction with self-expanding metal stent.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal stents are being used for palliation and as a "bridge to surgery" in obstructing colorectal carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as the initial interventional approach in the management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction. METHODS: Between February 2002 and May 2006, 67 patients underwent the insertion of a SEMS for an obstructing malignant lesion of the left-sided colon or rectum. RESULTS: In 55 patients, the stents were placed for palliation, whereas in 12 they were placed as a bridge to surgery. Stent placement was technically successful in 92.5% (n = 62), with a clinical success rate of 88% (n = 59). Two perforations that occurred during stent placement we retreated by an emergency Hartmann operation. In intention-to-treat by stent, the peri-interventional mortality was 6% (4/67). Stent migration was reported in 3 cases (5%), and stent obstruction occurred in 8 cases (13.5%). Of the nine patients with stents successfully placed as a bridge to surgery, all underwent elective single-stage operations with no death or anastomotic complication. CONCLUSIONS: Stent insertion provided an effective outcome in patients with malignant colonic obstruction as a palliative and preoperative therapy.

Risk factors for immediate complications after progressive pneumatic dilation for achalasia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the risk factors of early complications after progressive pneumatic dilation for achalasia. METHODS: Five hundred four dilations were performed in 237 consecutive achalasic patients between 1980 and 1994 with the same technique: low-pressure pneumatic dilation every other day with balloons of increasing diameter until success criteria were obtained (depending on manometric examination and esophageal x-ray transit performed 24 h after each dilation). Clinical, radiographical, endoscopical, and manometrical data as technical procedure characteristics for patients with perforations or other early complications were compared with those without complications. RESULTS: We observed 15 complications (6% of patients): 7 perforations (3%), 3 asymptomatic esophageal mucosal tears, 4 esophageal hematomas, and 1 fever. Perforations occurred in 6 of 7 patients during the first dilation. The mean age was 68.5 yr in the group with complications versus 56.4 yr for the remainder (p < 0.05). Two deaths occurred in patients older than 90 yr. Instability of the balloon during dilations was noted in 8 of 15 cases of complications versus 57 of 222 patients (p < 0.05). No other data differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a low prevalence of early complications using this progressive technique. Patients with hiatal hernia, esophageal diverticulum, or vigorous achalasia may safely undergo progressive pneumatic dilation. Only patients older than 90 yr should be referred for progressive pneumatic dilation with caution. Most of perforations arose during the first dilation, but there was no predictive pretherapeutic factor of perforation.