Incidental carcinoma of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens - is it always a toothless lion?

Incidental prostate carcinoma (iPC) is a subject of debate concerning its definition, incidence, biology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment. The present study aimed to assess the incidence and main clinical-morphological characteristics of iPC identified in radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP) specimens over a 5-year period. Using the database of the Urology and Pathology Departments, we identified all patients with bladder carcinomas (BCs) who underwent RCP within a 5-year frame time. We selected only those patients with synchronous BC and prostate carcinoma (PC). The following parameters were analyzed for these patients: age, type of bladder and prostate tumor, degree of differentiation, pathological stage, and other prognostic parameters. We identified 91 men with bladder tumors treated by RCP among whom 43, aged between 53 and 84 years (mean age: 69.2 years), presented synchronous PC. iPC was more prevalent in older individuals (>65 years: 30 patients, 69.8%), with only six out of the 43 (12.8%) patients with iPC being aged ≤60 years. All iPC cases were conventional adenocarcinoma. Well-differentiated prostate adenocarcinomas (grade group 1) predominated (65.1%). Among the 43 iPCs, 16 (37.2%) were clinically significant PCs. iPC is frequently identified in patients with BC when inclusion and evaluation of all or most of the prostate tissue are performed. Although more than half of iPCs were well-differentiated tumors confined to the prostate, a significant number of cases met the criteria of clinically significant PC. All men over the age of 50 who are candidates for RCP, should undergo evaluation through serum prostate specific antigen determination.

Prostate carcinomas mimicking a digestive malignancy.

AIM: To report our experience with specific cases of prostate cancer (PC) in which patients presented digestive symptoms, cases that represent a challenge and a source of error regarding the clinical and morphological diagnosis. METHODS: The most important clinical and pathological data were collected from three patients with PC which presented symptoms and/or investigations that initially suggested a digestive malignant tumor. RESULTS: We identified three patients with PC where the prostate tumor was not suspected based on the clinical-imagistic data, the correct diagnosis being the prerogative of the morphological investigation: in the first case, PC was detected during the microscopic examination of the lymph nodes (LN) in the intestinal resection specimen performed for suspected rectal cancer (RC), in the second case, in which the PC was synchronous with a RC, the dominant symptomatology was gastrointestinal, and in the third case, initially, the patient presented a widely disseminated PC, with pleural and bone metastases, as well as LN metastases, and apparent peritoneal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Unusual forms of PC presentation are not as rare as expected and should be acknowledged by all those involved in diagnosing this neoplasm. PC should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of a rectal tumor. The immunohistochemical (IHC) investigation is essential for establishing the diagnosis in difficult cases. An integrated approach of the interpretation of clinical manifestations, imagistic and serological changes would shorten the diagnostic time and help reduce diagnostic errors.

Xyloglucan + Gelose Combination versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy to First-Line Antimicrobials for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults.

BACKGROUND: A medical device containing xyloglucan-gelose-hibiscus-propolis (referred to hereafter as xyloglucan + gelose) acts as a mucosal barrier protector and urinary acidifier. The safety and efficacy of this device were investigated as adjuvant therapy to first-line antimicrobials for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, parallel group, double-blind, phase IV study, xyloglucan + gelose (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) were administered orally in combination with an antimicrobial agent (e.g., ciprofloxacin) for 5 days, then alone for 5 days, then beginning on Day 30 of the study for 15 days per month for 2 months. RESULTS: Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was 5 and 45% in the xyloglucan + gelose and placebo groups respectively. All AEs were unrelated to study products. Xyloglucan + gelose reduced uroculture positivity (defined as a bacterial count ≥103 CFU/mL) from 100% of patients at baseline to 0% at Day 11, with recurrence in 3 patients (15%) by Day 76. Corresponding results with placebo were 100% uroculture positive patients at baseline reduced to 45% at Day 11, with recurrence in 14 patients (70%) by Day 76. Xyloglucan + gelose significantly reduced the frequency of urinary incontinence and urgency of micturition compared with placebo (both p < 0.05), with symptom resolution in all patients by Day 90. CONCLUSIONS: The xyloglucan + gelose medical device was safe, well tolerated, and it reduced bacteriological and symptomatic parameters in adults with uncomplicated UTI.