Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(7): 1085-1097, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33890544

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Favipiravir is a repurposed drug to treat coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Due to a lack of available real-world data, we assessed its effectiveness and safety in moderately to critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in two public/specialty hospitals in Saudi Arabia. We included patients ≥18 years) admitted April-August 2020 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal swab. Patients received either favipiravir (1800 mg or 1600 mg twice daily loading dose, followed by 800 mg or 600 mg twice daily) or supportive-care treatment. Patients were excluded if they were outside the study period, classified as having a mild form of the disease per WHO criteria, or had an incomplete patient file. Kaplan-Meier (KM) models were used to estimate median time to discharge. Discharge ratios, progression to mechanical ventilation, and mortality outcomes were estimated across the severity spectrum using Cox proportional-hazards models. As a sensitivity analysis, we performed propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: Overall, median time to discharge was 10 days (95%CI = 9-10) in the favipiravir arm versus 15 days (95%CI = 14-16) in the supportive-care arm. The accelerated discharge benefit was seen across the COVID-19 spectrum of severity. The adjusted discharge ratio was 1.96 (95%CI = 1.56-2.46). Progression to mechanical ventilation was slower with favipiravir (HRadj = 0.10, 95%CI = 0.04-0.29). There was no significant effect on mortality (HRadj = 1.56, 95%CI = 0.73-3.36). There was a statistically non-significant trend toward worse outcomes in the critical category (HRadj = 2.80, 95%CI = 0.99-7.89). Age was an independent risk factor for mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. PSM analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Favipiravir was associated with clinical benefits, including accelerated discharge rate and less progression to mechanical ventilation; however, no overall mortality benefits were seen across the severity spectrum.


Assuntos
Amidas , Antivirais , COVID-19 , Pirazinas , Amidas/efeitos adversos , Amidas/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Pirazinas/efeitos adversos , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Arábia Saudita , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Saudi Med J ; 35(8): 821-6, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25129180

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review the epidemiology of invasive Candida infections in a single center in Saudi Arabia over a subsequent 10-year period. METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in a single center in Saudi Arabia over a 10-year period. Records of all patients with invasive Candida infections (ICI) over the period from January 2003 to December 2012 were reviewed. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of Candida albicans (C. albicans) versus non-albicans Candida species, and fluconazole resistance versus fluconazole susceptible in relation to crude mortality at 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS: Eight hundred positive sterile site cultures, associated with 652 ICI were identified. Median age was 52 years and 53% of patients were males. Candida albicans were the most common species (38.7%), followed by Candida tropicalis (18.9%), and Candida glabrata (C. glabrata) (16.3%). The proportion of ICI caused by C. albicans remained stable over time (p=0.07), but C. glabrata increased significantly (p<0.001). The median rate of ICI per 1,000 hospital discharges per year was 1.65, with a significant trend towards higher rates over time (p=0.01). Most isolates were susceptible to fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B. Only 66.7% of Candida krusei were susceptible to caspofungin. Overall 30-day crude mortality was 40.6%. There was no significant difference in crude mortality in association with C. albicans compared with non-albicans species, nor in association with fluconazole resistance. CONCLUSION: The rate of ICI increased significantly in the proportion of ICI caused by C. glabrata. Most isolates remain susceptible to caspofungin, voriconazole, and amphotericin B. The crude mortality remains high.


Assuntos
Candidíase/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Candidíase/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA