Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30‒50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3‒4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90‒100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO's MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.

Management of the N0 neck in early stage oral squamous cell cancer: a modeling study of the cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for diagnosing and treating cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov decision analytic model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of (1) elective neck dissection (END), (2) watchful waiting (WW), (3) gene expression profiling (GEP) followed by neck dissection (ND) or WW, (4) sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure followed by ND or WW, and (5) GEP and SLN (for positive GEP) followed by ND or WW. Uncertainty was addressed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that SLN procedure followed by ND or WW was the most effective and most cost effective strategy. Compared with direct END the incremental cost effectiveness ratio was €3356 per QALY gained. Uncertainty analysis showed that the model was sensitive to changes in assumed occult metastases incidence and utility values. SLN was found to have the highest probability (66%) of being cost-effective of the five strategies, at a willingness to pay of €80,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Given the current evidence and costs the SLN procedure followed by ND or WW appears to be the most cost effective strategy for diagnosing and treating oral squamous cell cancer patients. Our model provides the foundation for future diagnostic and therapeutic research in this field and shows that further information on quality of life in this population is highly valuable.