American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of the Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors Guidelines: Assessing Their Impact on Brain Tumor Clinical Practice.

Clinical guidelines direct healthcare professionals toward evidence-based practices. Evaluating guideline impact can elucidate information penetration, relevance, effectiveness, and alignment with evolving medical knowledge and technological advancements. As the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors marks its 40th anniversary in 2024, this article reflects on the tumor guidelines established by the Section over the past decade and explores their impact on other publications, patents, and information dissemination. Six tumor guideline categories were reviewed: low-grade glioma, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, progressive glioblastoma, metastatic brain tumors, vestibular schwannoma, and pituitary adenomas. Citation data were collected from Google Scholar and PubMed. Further online statistics, such as social media reach, and features in policy, news, and patents were sourced from Altmetric. Online engagement was assessed through website and CNS+ mobile application visits. Data were normalized to time since publication. Metastatic Tumor guidelines (2019) had the highest PubMed citation rate at 26.1 per year and webpage visits (29 100 page views 1/1/2019-9/30/2023). Notably, this guideline had two endorsement publications by partner societies, the Society of Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, concerning antiepileptic prophylaxis and steroid use, and the greatest reach on X (19.7 mentions/y). Citation rates on Google Scholar were led by Vestibular Schwannoma (2018). Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma led Mendeley reads. News, patent, or policy publications were led by low-grade glioma at 1.5/year. Our study shows that the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors guidelines go beyond citations in peer-reviewed publications to include patents, online engagement, and information dissemination to the public.

Comparative Analysis of Endoscope Obscuration With Utilization of an Endonasal Access Guide for Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for skull base pathologies, endoscope view obscuration remains a persistent, time-consuming, and distracting issue for surgeons and may result in increased operative time. The endonasal access guide (EAG) has been demonstrated as a possible adjunct to minimize these events. However, to date, there have been no comparative studies performed and the potential time savings by using EAGs have yet to be quantified. This cohort study aimed to determine the operative efficiency benefits of the EAG in EEA operations. METHODS: Analysis of EEA operative videos from an EAG cohort (n = 20) and a control cohort (n = 20) was performed, assessing 12-minute segments in the first, middle, and last third of each operation. The first segment in each cohort was selected before EAG placement, serving as an internal control. Every endoscope lens soiling instance was counted (measured as cleaning actions per minute), timed (obscuration time %), and identified as a withdrawal, irrigation, or other cleaning action. Perioperative variables including skull base repair and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage were assessed. RESULTS: Within the EAG cohort, obscuration time was reduced in the middle and last third compared with the first third (3.73% [CI: 2.39-5.07] vs 12.97% [CI: 10.24-15.70], P < .001; 4.19% [CI: 2.83-5.55] vs 12.97% [CI: 10.24-15.70], P < .001) and cleaning actions were also significantly reduced by EAG (0.69/min [CI: 0.39-0.99] vs 1.67/min [CI: 1.34-2.00], P = .001; 0.66/min [CI: 0.35-0.97] vs 1.67/min [CI: 1.34-2.00], P < .001). Between the control and EAG cohorts, there was no significant difference between obscuration time and cleaning actions in the first third (9.33% vs 12.97%, P = .086; 1.34/min vs 1.67/min, P = .151) or in the middle third (6.24% vs 3.73%, P = .140; 0.80/min vs 0.69/min, P = .335), but there was a significant difference in the last third (9.25% [CI: 6.95-11.55] vs 4.19% [CI: 2.83-5.55], P < .001; 0.95/min [CI: 0.73-1.17] vs 0.66/min [CI: 0.35-0.97], P = .018). CONCLUSION: EAG significantly reduces lens obscurations and cleaning events, particularly during the intradural portion of operations. This technology may offer a greater time-saving impact with patients undergoing long EEA operations.

Predictors of Durable Remission After Successful Surgery for Cushing Disease: Results From the Multicenter RAPID Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cushing disease (CD) affects mortality and quality of life along with limited long-term remission, underscoring the need to better identify recurrence risk. The identification of surgical or imaging predictors for CD remission after transsphenoidal surgery has yielded some inconsistent results and has been limited by single-center, single-surgeon, or meta-analyses studies. We sought to evaluate the multicenter Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database of academic US pituitary centers to assess whether robust nonhormonal recurrence predictors could be elucidated. METHODS: Patients with treated CD from 2011 to 2023 were included. The perioperative and long-term characteristics of CD patients with and without recurrence were assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 383 patients with CD from 26 surgeons achieving postoperative remission, 288 (75.2%) maintained remission at last follow-up while 95 (24.8%) showed recurrence (median time to recurrence 9.99 ± 1.34 years). Patients with recurrence required longer postoperative hospital stays (5 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2 days, P = .002), had larger average tumor volumes (1.76 ± 2.53 cm3 vs 0.49 ± 1.17 cm3, P = .0001), and more often previously failed prior treatment (31.1% vs 14.9%, P = .001) mostly being prior surgery. Multivariable hazard prediction models for tumor recurrence found younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, P = .002) and Knosp grade of 0 (OR = 0.09, reference Knosp grade 4, P = .03) to be protective against recurrence. Comparison of Knosp grade 0 to 2 vs 3 to 4 showed that lower grades had reduced risk of recurrence (OR = 0.27, P = .04). Other factors such as length of stay, surgeon experience, prior tumor treatment, and Knosp grades 1, 2, or 3 failed to reach levels of statistical significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study centers suggests that the strongest predictors of recurrence include tumor size/invasion and age. This insight can help with patient counseling and prognostication. Long-term follow-up is necessary for patients, and early treatment of small tumors may improve outcomes.

A phase I dose-escalation study of pulsatile afatinib in patients with recurrent or progressive brain cancer.

Background: Afatinib (BIBW2992; Gilotrif®) is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB; EGFR) family. It inhibits EGFR, HER2, and HER4 phosphorylation, resulting in tumor growth inhibition and regression. This phase I dose-escalation trial of pulsatile afatinib examined the safety, drug penetration into the central nervous system, preliminary antitumor activity, and recommended phase II dose in patients with progressive or recurrent brain cancers. Methods: Afatinib was taken orally once every 4 days or once every 7 days depending on dose cohort, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: A total of 24 patients received the investigational agent and were evaluable for safety analyses, and 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Dosing was administered at 80 mg every 4 days, 120 mg every 4 days, 180 mg every 4 days, or 280 mg every 7 days. A recommended phase II dose of pulsatile afatinib was established at 280 mg every 7 days as there were no dose-limiting toxicities in any of the dosing cohorts and all toxicities were deemed manageable. The most common drug-related toxicities were diarrhea, rash, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, stomatitis, pruritus, and limb edema. Out of the 21 patients evaluable for efficacy, 2 patients (9.5%) exhibited partial response based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria and disease stabilization was seen in 3 patients (14.3%). Conclusions: Afatinib taken orally was safe and well-tolerated up to 280 mg every 7 days in brain cancer patients.

The RAPID Consortium: A Platform for Clinical and Translational Pituitary Tumor Research.

Objectives Pituitary tumor treatment is hampered by the relative rarity of the disease, absence of a multicenter collaborative platform, and limited translational-clinical research partnerships. Prior studies offer limited insight into the formation of a multicenter consortium. Design The authors describe the establishment of a multicenter research initiative, Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID), to encourage quality improvement and research, promote scholarship, and apply innovative solutions in outcomes research. Methods The challenges encountered during the formation of other research registries were reviewed with those lessons applied to the development of RAPID. Setting/Participants RAPID was formed by 11 academic U.S. pituitary centers. Results A Steering Committee, bylaws, data coordination center, and leadership team have been established. Clinical modules with standardized data fields for nonfunctioning adenoma, prolactinoma, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke's cleft cyst were created using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based platform. Currently, RAPID has received institutional review board approval at all centers, compiled retrospective data and agreements from most centers, and begun prospective data collection at one site. Existing institutional databases are being mapped to one central repository. Conclusion The RAPID consortium has laid the foundation for a multicenter collaboration to facilitate pituitary tumor and surgical research. We sought to share our experiences so that other groups also contemplating this approach may benefit. Future studies may include outcomes benchmarking, clinically annotated biobank tissue, multicenter outcomes studies, prospective intervention studies, translational research, and health economics studies focused on value-based care questions.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive Approaches to the Sella and Parasellar Region

Introduction: Given advancements in endoscopic image quality, instrumentation, surgical navigation, skull base closure techniques, and anatomical understanding, the endonasal endoscopic approach has rapidly evolved into a widely utilized technique for removal of sellar and parasellar tumors. Although pituitary adenomas and Rathke cleft cysts constitute the majority of lesions removed via this route, craniopharyngiomas, clival chordomas, parasellar meningiomas, and other lesions are increasingly removed using this approach. Paralleling the evolution of the endonasal route to the parasellar region, the supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy has also been increasingly used as an alternative minimally invasive approach to reach this skull base region. Similar to the endonasal route, the supraorbital route has been greatly facilitated by advances in endoscopy, along with development of more refined, low-profile instrumentation and surgical navigation technology. Objectives: This review, encompassing both transcranial and transsphenoidal routes, will recount the high points and advances that have made minimally invasive approaches to the sellar region possible, the evolution of these approaches, and their relative indications and technical nuances. Data Synthesis: The literature is reviewed regarding the evolution of surgical approaches to the sellar region beginning with the earliest attempts and emphasizing technological advances, which have allowed the evolution of the modern technique. The surgical techniques for both endoscopic transsphenoidal and supraorbital approaches are described in detail. The relative indications for each approach are highlighted using case illustrations. Conclusions: Although tremendous advances have been made in transitioning toward minimally invasive transcranial and transsphenoidal approaches to the sella, furtherwork remains to be done. Together, the endonasal endoscopic and the supraorbital endoscope-assisted approaches are...

As variações na anatomia do seio esfenoidal e assoalho selar para realização de endoscopia transesfenoidal em adultos: revisão de literatura / The variations in anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and sellar floor to perform transsphenoidal endoscopy in adult age: a literature review

A cirurgia transesfenoidal depende da habilidade de visualizar e identificar referências anatômicas chaves durante cada fase da operação. Um grau notável de variação anatômica existe no seio esfenoidal, sela túrcica e estruturas ao redor da base do crânio. Nosso objetivo é revisar as variações anatômicas no seio esfenoidal e assoalho selar que são importantes para realizar uma cirurgia endoscópica transesfenoidal de modo efetivo e seguro em pacientes adultos. Uma detalhada informação em relação a anatomia é o meio mais confiável e efetivo de evitar complicações de todos os tipos na cirurgia transesfenoidal.