Frequency of irritable bowel syndrome in spondyloarthritis: a multicentric cross-sectional study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of symptoms and factors associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). METHODS: In a cross-sectional multicentric study, consecutive patients with ax-SpA treated with biologics in five rheumatology departments were asked for IBS Rome IV criteria. Demographic data, lifestyle behaviours and disease characteristics were recorded. Second, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 500 patients with ax-SpA included, 124 reported IBS symptoms (25%). Female gender, unemployment, higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and worse Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index scores, multiple lines of biologics, fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression and lower physical activity were associated with IBS symptoms. In multivariate model, the risk of IBS was associated with anxiety and physical inactivity. From the literature review, the prevalence of IBS in patients with SpA was 15.4% (8.8% to 23.3%). Meta-analysis of the five studies comparing the presence of IBS in patients with SpA (323/7292) and healthy controls (484/35587) showed a significant increase of IBS in patients with SpA (OR=1.59 (1.05 to 2.40)). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of IBS symptoms was high in the ax-SpA population and should therefore be considered in the presence of gastrointestinal disorders. The presence of IBS symptoms was associated with anxiety and low physical activity in multivariate analysis. Patients with IBS symptoms tended to have more difficult to manage disease characterised by higher activity, worse functional score and multiple lines of treatment in univariate analysis.

Evaluation of Facial Vitiligo Severity with a Mixed Clinical and Artificial Intelligence Approach.

Vitiligo is the most common depigmenting skin disorder. Given the ongoing development of new targeted therapies, it has become important to evaluate adequately the surface area involved. Assessment of vitiligo scores can be time consuming, with variations between investigators. Therefore, the aim of this study was to build an artificial intelligence system capable of assessing facial vitiligo severity. One hundred pictures of faces of patients with vitiligo were used to train and validate the artificial intelligence model. Sixty-nine additional pictures of facial vitiligo were then used as a final dataset. Three expert physicians scored the facial vitiligo on the same 69 pictures. Inter and intrarater performances were evaluated by comparing the scores between raters and artificial intelligence. Algorithm assessment achieved an accuracy of 93%. Overall, the scores reached a good agreement between vitiligo raters and the artificial intelligence model. Results demonstrate the potential of the model. It provides an objective evaluation of facial vitiligo and could become a complementary/alternative tool to human assessment in clinical practice and/or clinical research.

Occupational quantitative exposure to crystalline silica, solvents, pesticides, and risk of clinical forms of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association between SSc clinical phenotypes and quantitative occupational exposure to crystalline silica, chlorinated solvents, trichloroethylene, and pesticides using job-exposure matrices. METHODS: In the VISS-EXPOSITION transversal study, data on declarative occupational exposure to crystalline silica, solvents, and pesticides were retrieved. In parallel, the Lifetime Occupational History was evaluated using a questionnaire and cursus laboris for SSc patients followed at Bordeaux University Hospital (France). Using job-exposure matrices, we assessed patients' occupational exposure in relation to relevant clinical phenotypic forms of the disease. RESULTS: Toxic exposure to crystalline silica and pesticides is underestimated by patients. Non-biased job-exposure matrices retrieved more exposed patients than the declarative assessment (10.1% of patients by job-exposure matrices versus 6.3% by declaration for crystalline silica and 25.9% versus 12.2% for pesticides). Patients overestimate their solvent exposure (7.9% for chlorinated solvents and 4.8% for trichlorethylene assessed by job-exposure matrices and 24.4% declarative exposure to solvents at large). Clinical form evaluation revealed a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of crystalline silica occupational exposure in the pulmonary fibrotic group of SSc patients (OR 3.12 CI 95% [0.80-12.15]). We also observed a nonsignificant trend toward elevated OR (OR 2.89 CI 95% [0.93-8.95]) for chlorinated solvent occupational exposure and the vascular phenotype of SSc. Of note, pesticide occupational exposure evaluation represents one of the largest to date in SSc patients. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes that many exposed SSc patients are unaware of their occupational exposure. Job-exposure matrices allow better exposure screening for SSc secondary prevention and occupational exposure compensation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03543956.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients who previously experienced immune-related inflammatory arthritis: a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status. CONCLUSION: In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge.

Relevance of circulating Semaphorin 4A for rheumatoid arthritis response to treatment.

The lack of validated tools to predict rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease course warrants the development of new reliable biomarkers. Our aim was to evaluate the merit of circulating SEMA4A for the prediction of outcomes in patients with RA. In a first cohort of 101 consecutive RA patients followed up for 41 ± 15 months, increased baseline SEMA4A levels were identified as an independent predictor of treatment failure (hazard ratio, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.14-6.43), defined by the occurrence of patient-reported flares and initiation or change of targeted therapy. The highest predictive value of treatment failure was obtained with the combination of increased circulating SEMA4A and/or Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP > 3.2 and/or active synovitis on doppler ultrasound (HR 10.42, 95% CI 1.41-76.94). In a second independent cohort of 40 consecutive RA patients who initiated new therapy because of insufficient disease control, baseline SEMA4A levels were significantly higher in patients who further experienced none or moderate response, and SEMA4A concentrations were markedly decreased in the group of patients with good clinical response as compared to non-responders. Circulating SEMA4A appears as an appealing biomarker in RA with ability to predict treatment failure, and with association with response to therapy.

Impact of anterior cruciate ligament surgery on the development of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis comparing non-surgical and surgical treatments.

Introduction: Context: The development of knee osteoarthritis (OA) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is now widely recognized. The impact of surgical or non-surgical management on the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis is still debated in the medical community.Here, we present a meta-analysis comparing the impact of surgical or non-surgical management of ACL injuries on the development of knee OA. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted using data from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane libraries from February to May 2019. Only randomized clinical trials published between 2005 and 2019 with a non-surgical group and a surgical group were included to explore the onset or progression of knee OA after ACL injury. Trials had to have at least one radiographic endpoint (Kellgren-Lawrence scoring system). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane's Q and I2 statistical methods. Results: Only three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were selected for meta-analysis. Of the 343 injured knees included in the studies, 180 underwent ACL reconstruction and 163 underwent non-surgical treatment. The relative risk of knee osteoarthritis was higher after surgery than after non-surgical treatment (RR 1.72, CI 95% [1.18-2.53], I2 â€‹= â€‹0%). Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest a predisposition to knee osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction surgery compared with non-surgical management. Due to the small number of good quality studies available, further well-conducted randomised studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Antagonists for Folliculitis Decalvans: A Retrospective Case-series Pilot Study.

Folliculitis decalvans is a chronic inflammatory skin disease leading to scarring alopecia. Management of this disabling disease is difficult and no treatment is currently approved. Current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of folliculitis decalvans suggests the benefit of using anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α for management of folliculitis decalvans. A single-centre retrospective pilot study included patients with refractory folliculitis decalvans treated by tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. An Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score was designed and validated to assess the efficacy of the therapy. Response to treatment was considered good to excellent when an IGA ≤ 2 was obtained at month 12. Eleven patients were included, with a mean time from diagnosis of folliculitis decalvans to the introduction of infliximab (n = 9) or adalimumab (n = 2) of 8.55 ± 1.26 years. Nine patients had failed on at least 2 lines of systemic therapies before starting anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. The median IGA score at baseline was 3. At the end of follow-up, 5 patients were considered responders. Overall, the safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α was good. The results suggest that the clinical benefit of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α is obtained after at least 6 months of treatment. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Clinical and immunological features of patients with cancer-associated systemic sclerosis: An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical and immunological features of patients with cancer-associated systemic sclerosis: an observational study. OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported an increased incidence of cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The presence of RNA polymerase III antibodies (anti-RNA Pol 3) associates with an increased risk of cancer, but other risk factors need yet to be identified. We aimed to assess clinical and immunological predictive factors of cancer-associated SSc to guide clinicians when setting up selective cancer screening. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational study of SSc patients with and without associated malignancy. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data were collected, as well as SSc treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of cancer and the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 464 SSc patients, 74 (16%) had cancer, with breast (n=26) and lung cancer (n=13) being the most frequent. Diagnosis of cancer was made less than 3 years before or after SSc diagnosis for 23 patients (31%). In a multivariate analysis, anti-RNA Pol 3 and anti-SSA antibodies were significantly associated with an increased overall risk of cancer with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.12 (95% CI [1.6-10.7]; P<0.01) and 2.43 (95% CI [1.1-5.4]; P<0.05), respectively. Age at diagnosis of SSc and delay from the SSc diagnosis were also independent risk factors of cancer. Interstitial lung disease and anti-topoisomerase antibodies were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and cancer occuring more than three years after SSc diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In addition to anti-RNA Pol 3 antibodies, anti-SSA antibodies associated with an increased risk of cancer in SSc patients. Interstitial lung disease was a risk factor specifically for lung cancer and cancers diagnosed more than 3 years after SSc diagnosis. For these patients, a systematic and regular cancer screening should be considered.

Risk of Cancer After Initiation of Targeted Therapies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Prior Cancer: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of recurrent or new malignancy with exposure to targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a history of cancer. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature for articles published up to June 2019 that investigated adults with RA, axial SpA, or PsA who had a history of cancer and received biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARDs or tsDMARDs). We compared the risk of relapse or occurrence of new cancer between patients with and without bDMARDs. Rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated by the Cochran Q test and the I2 statistic. RESULTS: We included 24 observational studies of chronic inflammatory arthritis; of those, 12 were included in the meta-analysis of RA patients receiving bDMARDs. As compared with RA patients with a history of cancer and not receiving bDMARDs, for those receiving any bDMARD, the overall RR for risk of neoplasia was 1.09 (95% CI 0.92-1.32; P = 0.31, I2  = 8%); with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, it was 1.11 (95% CI 0.85-1.46; P = 0.45, I2  = 48%); and with rituximab, it was 0.79 (95% CI 0.41-1.53; P = 0.49, I2  = 0%). The RR for risk of recurrence for skin cancer was 1.32 (95% CI 1.02-1.72; P = 0.04, I2  = 0%) and for breast neoplasia 1.21 (95% CI 0.84-1.72; P = 0.31, I2  = 0%). CONCLUSION: Apart from skin cancers including melanoma, the risk of recurrent or new cancer is not increased with the initiation of bDMARDs for RA as compared with no bDMARDs.

Outcome of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic and inflammatory diseases treated with mycophenolic acid: data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMD) receiving mycophenolic acid (MPA) may have a less favourable outcome from COVID-19 infection. Our aim was to investigate whether MPA treatment is associated with severe infection and/or death. METHODS: IRMD patients with and without MPA treatment with highly suspected/confirmed COVID-19 were included in this observational multicentre study. The primary outcome was death rate from COVID-19 with secondary objectives to determine the severity of infection and length of hospital stay. Outcome comparisons were made using regression models with and without adjustment on prespecified confounding factors. ORs, sub-HR (sHR) and 95% CIs were calculated using patients not treated with MPA as a reference group. RESULTS: Of the 1977 patients, 1928 were not treated with MPA (393 were MPA eligible), and 49 patients were treated with MPA. MPA-treated patients had more severe disease, longer hospital stays and higher death rate from COVID-19 than non-MPA patients (OR 8.02 (95% CI 3.35 to 19.20), p<0.001; sHR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.98), p=0.040; OR 11.58 (95% CI 4.10 to 32.69), p<0.001). In adjusted analyses, however, no outcome was independently associated with MPA treatment. Death rate, severity and length of hospital stay of MPA-treated patients were not significantly different from those of not treated but MPA-eligible patients. CONCLUSION: MPA therapy is not associated with a more severe COVID-19 infection. However, due to increased vulnerability of developing a severe form of COVID-19, careful consideration should be taken with iRMD patients likely to be treated with MPA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04353609.

Development of a Prediction Model for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: Results From the Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Some patients with rheumatic diseases might be at higher risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to develop a prediction model for COVID-19 ARDS in this population and to create a simple risk score calculator for use in clinical settings. METHODS: Data were derived from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry from March 24, 2020, to May 12, 2021. Seven machine learning classifiers were trained on ARDS outcomes using 83 variables obtained at COVID-19 diagnosis. Predictive performance was assessed in a US test set and was validated in patients from four countries with independent registries using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A simple risk score calculator was developed using a regression model incorporating the most influential predictors from the best performing classifier. RESULTS: The study included 8633 patients from 74 countries, of whom 523 (6%) had ARDS. Gradient boosting had the highest mean AUC (0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.88) and was considered the top performing classifier. Ten predictors were identified as key risk factors and were included in a regression model. The regression model that predicted ARDS with 71% (95% CI: 61%-83%) sensitivity in the test set, and with sensitivities ranging from 61% to 80% in countries with independent registries, was used to develop the risk score calculator. CONCLUSION: We were able to predict ARDS with good sensitivity using information readily available at COVID-19 diagnosis. The proposed risk score calculator has the potential to guide risk stratification for treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies, that have potential to reduce COVID-19 disease progression.

Efficacy of Probiotics in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of probiotics supplementation on symptoms and disease activity in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis). METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis from RA and SpA randomized controlled trials were conducted searching for articles in MEDLINE/PubMed and abstracts from recent international rheumatology meetings. The control group was a placebo or another dietary intervention. The risk of bias of the selected studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Jadad scale. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 173 articles. Of these, 13 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, 8 concerning a total of 344 RA patients and 2 concerning a total of 197 SpA patients. Three meta-analyses were also analyzed. Probiotic strains and quantities used were different among trials (5 studies using Lactobacillus sp., 1 trial Bacillus coagulans and the others a mix of different probiotic strains). Time to assess response ranged from 8 weeks to one year. Two studies associated probiotic supplementation with a dietary intervention. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease of C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (mean difference (MD)) -3.04 (95% CI -4.47, -1.62) mg/L, p < 0.001; I2 = 20%, n patients = 209) with probiotics in RA. However, after excluding high-risk-of-bias trials of meta-analysis, there was no difference between probiotics and placebo on DAS28 (standard MD -0.54; 95% CI -1.94 to 0.85, p = 0.45, I2 93%, n patients = 143). The two studies on SpA patients showed no efficacy of probiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation might decrease RA activity with a moderate decrease effect on CRP, but lack of evidence and studies' heterogeneity do not allow us to propose them to patients with inflammatory arthritis to control their disease. Further RCTs are required in the future to determinate the efficacy of probiotics and the optimal administration design.

Efficacy of Treatments for Cholestatic Pruritus: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Cholestatic itch is a disabling symptom that may be secondary to liver or biliary diseases. Management of cholestatic pruritus is complex. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of treatments for cholestatic pruritus were performed. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched using the algorithm "(hepatitis OR cholestatic OR liver) AND (pruritus OR itch) AND (management OR treatment OR treatments)" for 1975-2019. Of the 2,264 articles identified, 93 were included in a systematic review and 15 in a meta-analysis (studies evaluating pruritus with a visual analogue scale). Some treatments act by reducing levels of pruritogens in the enterohepatic cycle, others modify the metabolism or secretion of these pruritogens, or act on pruritus pathways. A further possible treatment is albumin dialysis. However, due to many heterogeneities in the reviewed studies it is difficult to identify and recommend an optimum treatment. Only 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis, due to the small number of randomized studies using a visual analogue scale.

MRI and spondyloarthropathy: diagnostic performance compared to long-term clinical follow-up with evaluation of gadolinium chelates injection.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MRI performance on both initial and long-term rheumatologic diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA), taking into account clinical evolution and treatment response, and the impact of gadolinium injection. METHODS: In this single-center study, patients who underwent both spinal and sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI were prospectively recruited between May 2013 and January 2014 and followed for 7 years until 2020. Clinical, biological, and radiologic parameters were collected. At 7-year follow-up (2020), two independent readers reevaluated the initial MRI datasets for specific radiological features of SpA with a 5-point Likert scale to record the estimation of confidence. The centralized MRI interpretations were compared to the established rheumatologic diagnoses in 2013 and 2020. RESULTS: In total, 145 patients (52 men and 93 women) were included. During the 7-year follow-up, the number of patients with positive SpA diagnosis decreased from 93 to 58. Mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast MRI were 18, 97, and 49% and 27, 97, and 69% considering 2013 and 2020 rheumatologic diagnoses, respectively. Mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of gadolinium-enhanced MRI were 26, 97, and 54% and 38, 97, and 73% considering 2013 and 2020 diagnoses, respectively. Post-contrast MRI enabled identification of a subgroup of enthesis-only lesions, without any bone lesions, corresponding to 14% of the pathological cohort. It confirmed uncertain diagnoses in an additional 8.5% of pathological cases. CONCLUSIONS: MRI performance for SpA diagnosis is higher when long-term clinical follow-up is considered than when compared to initial diagnosis. Gadolinium injection increases MRI diagnostic performance and may demonstrate a pure enthesic form of the disease, without bone abnormality. KEY POINTS: • Compared to the rheumatologist's diagnosis over long-term clinical follow-up, MRI performance for SpA is higher than usually estimated. • Gadolinium injection increases diagnostic performance of MRI as it may identify a purely enthesis form of the disease. • Gadolinium injection should be discussed in patients for whom the diagnostic suspicion is strong and whose initial non-injected examination is normal or doubtful.

The response to TNF blockers depending on their comparator in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: the lessebo effect, a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of the biological reference agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) in RA in pivotal superiority placebo-controlled trials (reference agent vs placebo) vs their effect in equivalence active comparator-controlled trials (reference agent vs biosimilar). METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, controlled trials up to March 2020 comparing a biological reference agent vs placebo or biosimilar. The study assessed the ACR 20/50/70 responses of the reference agent in these groups (Reference-pbo and Reference-bs, respectively). The effect of the reference agent in both groups was estimated with 95% CI, pooled using random-effects models and then compared using a meta-regression model. RESULTS: We included 31 trials. The main characteristics of the population (disease duration and activity, % seropositivity and methotrexate dose) of the population in both groups were similar. The meta-analysis found a better ACR20 response to the biological originator in the Reference-bs group with a global rate of 70% (95% CI, 66, 74) compared with 59% (95% CI, 55, 62) in the reference-pbo group (P =0.001). A significant difference was also found for ACR 50 [44% (95% CI, 39, 50) vs 35% (95% CI, 31, 39), respectively, P <0.01]. CONCLUSION: The effect of the reference biologic agent was better when compared with an active drug to a placebo. This could be linked to an increased placebo effect in active comparator-controlled studies or a nocebo effect in placebo-controlled studies. This effect can be called the lessebo effect.

Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events.

PURPOSE: As gut microbiota composition is an important determinant of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we examined the effect of various co-medications known for their interaction with microbiota, when given at ICI initiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI between May 2015 and September 2017 in our institution. Co-medications given within 1 month before or 1 month after the first administration of ICI were reviewed from medical records. Survival data were analysed with univariable Cox regression, and the combined effect of multiple factors was assessed with factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurrence was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 635 patients were included. Psychotropic drugs (41%), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 38%), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs; 32%), glucocorticoids (26%), antibiotics (24%), statins (21%) and morphine (20%) were the most prescribed co-medications. Baseline use of antibiotics, glucocorticoids >10 mg/day, PPIs, psychotropic drugs, morphine and insulin was associated with significantly shortened overall survival and decreased tumour response, whereas coadministration of statins, ACEs and/or ARBs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and oral antidiabetic drugs did not impact patient outcomes. Treatments that altered the response to ICI were also associated with a decreased incidence of irAEs. FAMD revealed the respective weight of each factor or co-medication on the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Co-medications must be carefully assessed at the time of ICI initiation and clinicians aware of their possible deleterious effect, notably for PPIs, glucocorticoids, antibiotics and psychotropic drugs.