Phase I non-randomized clinical trial of allogeneic natural killer cells infusion in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

INTRODUCTION: A new type of immune cell transplantation called allogeneic NK cell infusion is proposed as a potential universal off-the-shelf cell product for adoptive immune cell therapy in hematologic malignancies. DESIGN: A multicentral phase I non-randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of adoptively infused NK cells in patients with refractory/relapsed AML. We evaluated the feasibility of the trial by considering cell production, patient selection, and treatment protocol. METHOD: Allogeneic NK cells were produced from random healthy unrelated donors; 10 patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and were included in two groups in case of NK cell dose escalation. Two cell infusions were given, spaced 7 days apart, following a lymphodepletion conditioning regimen of fludarabin-endoxan administered 7 days before the first infusion. The intervention safety was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) based on variations in vital signs due to cell infusion. NK cell chimerism, tumor burden, and duration of relapse were considered to be components of efficacy. The pilot feasibility evaluation was checked using the CONSORT platform. RESULTS: The NK cell infusion procedure was well tolerated, and no grade 2-5 toxicities related (possible or probable) to PB-NK cell infusion were observed. Four patients developed grade 1 transient chills, headaches, vomiting, and bone pain following each PB-NK cell infusion that were not required hospitalization. One of these patients (p01) died because of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Of 9 evaluable patients, 6 (66.6%) showed stable disease (SD) and 3 (33.3%) presented progressive disease (PD). Of 6 SD patients, 2 (p08 and p09) remained alive in SD and 3 patients (p04, p05 and p07) converted to PD at 9 months after infusion of NK cells, and 1 (p03) was not evaluable due to follow-up loss. No patient achieved complete remission. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of adoptive transfer of random healthy unrelated donor PB-NK cells in refractory/relapsed AML patients and supports continued study in phase II clinical trials in relapsed/refractory AML patients.

Safety and feasibility study of ex vivo expanded allogeneic-NK cells infusion in patients with acute pneumonia caused by COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: NK cells are the most active innate immune cells in antiviral immunity, which are impaired by SARS-COV2 infection. Infusion of allogeneic NK cells might be a complementary treatment to boost immune system function in COVID-19 patients. In this project, we focused on COVID-19 patients with low inspiratory capacity (LIC). This project aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of allogeneic NK cell infusion as an intervention for respiratory viral disease. METHODS: A non-blind two arms pilot study was designed and conducted after signing the consent form. Ten matched patients, in terms of vital signs and clinical features, were enrolled in the control and intervention groups. Approximately 2 × 10^6 cells/kg of NK cells were prepared under GCP (good clinical practice) conditions for each patient in the intervention group. The control group was under the same conditions and drug regimen except for the treatment with the prepared cells. Then, infused intravenously during 20 min in the ICU ward of Masih Daneshvari Hospital. The clinical signs, serological parameters, and CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were recorded for safety evaluation and the feasibility of project management were evaluated via designed checklist based on CONSORT. RESULTS: There were no symptoms of anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity, significant changes in blood pressure, cardiovascular complications, and fever from injection time up to 48 h after cell infusion. The mean hospitalization period in the control and intervention groups was 10 and 8 days, respectively. The blood O2 saturation level was raised after cell infusion, and a significantly lower mean level of inflammatory enzymes was observed in the intervention group following discharge compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The inflammatory parameters differences at the discharge date in cell therapy group were highly negative. CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusion of ex vivo-expanded allogeneic NK cells was safe and feasible. However, the efficacy of this approach to reducing the severity of disease in COVID-19 patients with LIC could not be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: NKCTC. IRCT20200621047859N2. December 29, 2020. URL of trial registry record: https://www.irct.ir/trial/49382.

Looking for biomarkers in interferon response pathway to predict response to oncolytic HSV-1 in breast cancer: An ex vivo study.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Administration of oncolytic viruses is one of the novel promising cancer therapy approaches. Replication of these viruses is usually limited to cancer cells that have interferon (IFN) signaling defects. However, Interferon signaling is not completely impaired in all cancer cells which may limit the benefits of virotherapy.    Identification of realistic IFN-mediated biomarkers to identify patients who most likely respond to virotherapy would be helpful. In this study, eight patients-derived primary tumor cultures were infected with an ICP34.5 deleted oHSV, then the rate of infectivity, cell survival, and expression of the gene involved in IFN pathway were analyzed.Data showed that mRNA expressions of Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (Myd88) is significantly higher in tumors whose primary cultures showed less cell death and resistance to oHSV infectivity (P-value < 0.05). The differentiating cut off of Myd88 expression, inferred from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, predicted that only 13 out of 16 other patients could be sensitive to this oHSV. Identifying such biomarker improves our ability to select the patients who do not exhibit resistance to virotherapy.

Novel delivery of sorafenib by natural killer cell-derived exosomes-enhanced apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer.

Aim: We investigated the delivery of sorafenib (SFB) to breast cancer spheroids by natural killer cell-derived exosomes (NK-Exos). Methods: SFB-NK-Exos were constructed by electroporation. Their antitumor effects were evaluated by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium, acridine orange/ethidium bromide, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, annexin/propidium iodide, scratch and migration assay, colony formation, RT-PCR, western blot and lipophagy tests. Result: The loading efficacy was 46.66%. SFB-NK-Exos-treated spheroids showed higher cytotoxic effects (33%) and apoptotic population (44.9%). Despite the reduction of SFB concentration in the SFB-NK-Exos formulation, similar cytotoxic effects to those of free SFB were observed. Increased intracellular trafficking, sustained release of the drug and selective inhibitory effects demonstrated efficient navigation. Conclusion: This is the first report for SFB loading into NK-Exos, which led to significant cytotoxic intensification against cancer cells.

What is this summary about? This study describes the delivery of an anticancer drug called sorafenib (SFB) to laboratory-grown spherical masses of cancer cells called spheroids. Saucer-like cellular structures called exosomes were used as drug-delivery tools. These exosomes were produced by a subgroup of immune cells called natural killer (NK) cells. NK cells are responsible for killing cancer cells. So, these exosomes share similar anticancer properties with NK cells. We wanted to test whether exosomes loaded with SFB would have better anticancer effects. What were the results? Using different methods, SFB was loaded within the exosomes and delivered to the spheroids. The obtained results showed that a combination of exosomes and SFB could improve the targeting efficacy, reducing the side effects to the normal cells and allowing continuous release of the drug. The spheroids were killed with higher efficacy following this treatment. What do the results of the study mean? The combination of NK cell-derived exosomes and SFB could lead to better cytotoxicity against cancer cells. Therefore, this strategy could have better anticancer effects compared with SFB treatment alone.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for treatment of alopecia areata in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib, a potent JAK inhibitor, has gained increasing interest, in recent years, among dermatologists for the management of refractory alopecia areata. Despite a growing number of studies on its safety and efficacy, there is still a lack of clarity, especially in the pediatric population, in treatment considerations such as proper dosage, treatment duration, side-effect profile, and therapeutic strategies to guide clinicians. METHODS: Multiple databases were systematically searched. Following the PRISMA diagram, of a pool of 601 papers, seven met a checklist of inclusion criteria. These were observational studies including a total of 59 patients from four to 19 years of age. RESULTS: In the evaluated studies, tofacitinib was administered either orally at a 2.5 to 15 mg daily (mostly 5 mg twice a day) dosage for 2 to 38 months or in the form of a 2% topical solution for 3-17 months. Metanalysis showed that 49% (95% CI: 29%-69%, I2  = 59.94%) of patients experienced a reversal of alopecia after a minimum of 3 to 9 months of therapy. Fifty-five percent (95% CI: 23%-86%, I2  = 75.07%) and 41% (95% CI: 23%-59%, I2  = 0.00%) showed Good/complete and partial response rates, respectively. Oral administration was significantly more efficacious than topical application (73% vs 23%, p-Value = 0.04). Few side effects such as diarrhea and mild liver transaminases abnormalities were noted in several patients. CONCLUSION: Results of this review suggest that tofacitinib at 2.5-15 mg daily (especially 5 mg twice daily) oral formulation or 2% topical solution can be regarded as a viable alternative or adjunct to the conventional treatment options for moderate to severe forms of alopecia areata in children owing to its acceptable efficacy and side-effect profile. However, uncertainties continue to exist around treatment strategies including initial and maintenance dosages, route of administration, dose adjustments, the timing of tapering or discontinuation, and associated treatment modalities.

Recombinant nanobody against MUC1 tandem repeats inhibits growth, invasion, metastasis, and vascularization of spontaneous mouse mammary tumors.

Alteration in glycosylation pattern of MUC1 mucin tandem repeats during carcinomas has been shown to negatively affect adhesive properties of malignant cells and enhance tumor invasiveness and metastasis. In addition, MUC1 overexpression is closely interrelated with angiogenesis, making it a great target for immunotherapy. Alongside, easier interaction of nanobodies (single-domain antibodies) with their antigens, compared to conventional antibodies, is usually associated with superior desirable results. Herein, we evaluated the preclinical efficacy of a recombinant nanobody against MUC1 tandem repeats in suppressing tumor growth, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Expressed nanobody demonstrated specificity only toward MUC1-overexpressing cancer cells and could internalize in cancer cell lines. The IC50 values (the concentration at which the nanobody exerted half of its maximal inhibitory effect) of the anti-MUC1 nanobody against MUC1-positive human cancer cell lines ranged from 1.2 to 14.3 nm. Similar concentrations could also effectively induce apoptosis in MUC1-positive cancer cells but not in normal cells or MUC1-negative human cancer cells. Immunohistochemical staining of spontaneously developed mouse breast tumors prior to in vivo studies confirmed cross-reactivity of nanobody with mouse MUC1 despite large structural dissimilarities between mouse and human MUC1 tandem repeats. In vivo, a dose of 3 µg nanobody per gram of body weight in tumor-bearing mice could attenuate tumor progression and suppress excessive circulating levels of IL-1a, IL-2, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-17A pro-inflammatory cytokines. Also, a significant decline in expression of Ki-67, MMP9, and VEGFR2 biomarkers, as well as vasculogenesis, was evident in immunohistochemically stained tumor sections of anti-MUC1 nanobody-treated mice. In conclusion, the anti-MUC1 tandem repeat nanobody of the present study could effectively overcome tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis.

Bioengineered tissue models for the development of dynamic immuno-associated tumor models and high-throughput immunotherapy cytotoxicity assays.

Cancer immunotherapy is rapidly developing, with numerous therapies approved over the past decade and more therapies expected to gain approval in the future. However, immunotherapy of solid tumors has been less successful because immunosuppressive barriers limit immune cell trafficking and function against cancer cells. Interactions between suppressive immune cells, cytokines, and inhibitory factors are central to cancer immunotherapy approaches. In this review, we discuss recent advances in utilizing microfluidic platforms for understanding cancer-suppressive immune system interactions. Dendritic cell (DC)-mediated tumor models, infiltrated lymphocyte-mediated tumor models [e.g., natural killer (NK) cells, T cells, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and macrophages], monocyte-mediated tumor models, and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) tumor models are among the various bioengineered immune cell-cancer cell interactions that we reviewed herein.

Cimetidine effects on the immunosuppression induced by burn injury.

Although many studies on the immune response following burn injuries have been reported, more attention has been given to the immunosuppression mechanism and mediators that shape the process of immune suppression. Specifically, information is not available concerning the immunomodulatory effects of the drugs which are involved in the immune response restoration. In this study, we investigated the effects of Cimetidine on the modulation of immune response in patients with burn injury of 20-60%. Two groups of patients were involved in this study; the patients in one group were treated with 15 mg/kg per day of Cimetidine while the patients in the other group were treated with placebo. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) expressing CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD3/HLA-DR was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell proliferation assay using H3 thymidine was performed on PBMC samples. The proliferation assay showed a significant suppression of cell proliferation rate in post-burn patients (p = 0.001). We observed a significant reduction in the lymphocyte count (p = 0.001) and frequency of CD3 (p = 0.007) and CD4 (p = 0.001) T cells in post-burn patients. Also, the frequency of CD 19+ and HLA DR+ cells was increased compare to normal donors following burn injury. Treatment with Cimetidine increased the frequency of CD8+ T cells in the patient's peripheral blood. The PBMC proliferation rate was restored following the treatment with Cimetidine (p = 0.02). Our data indicates that Cimetidine may have beneficial effects on cell mediated immunity following burn injury.