Fetal Megacystis: Associated Structural Abnormalities and Obstetric Outcomes.

Purpose: We evaluated the obstetrical outcomes, ultrasonographic characteristics, and final diagnosis in pregnancies with fetal megacystis (FM). Methods: We evaluated the obstetrical outcomes and associated structural abnormalities of fetuses with FM detected between FM between 2000 and 2021. Results: 17 FM were diagnosed, 16 had follow up. 16 were early megacystis. 14/16 (87.5%) of pregnancies were terminated, 1/16 (6.25%) resulted in intrauterine death, and 1/16 (6.25%) survived. FM was associated with 13 other abnormal sonographic findings in 12/16 (75%) pregnancies. The most common associated ultrasound abnormality was umbilical cord cyst in 3/16 (18.75%). Recognized etiologies included posterior urethral valves (2), trisomy 18 (2), trisomy 13 (1), Prune Belly syndrome (1), and Megacystis-Microcolon-Hypoperistalsis syndrome (1). Conclusion: Most FM are detected in the 2nd trimester, most are electively terminated, are associated with other ultrasonic abnormalities in 75%, most commonly umbilical cord cyst, and have an identifiable cause in 44%.

Conservative Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy located in the lower uterine segment. The current increase in the percentage of cesarean sections is accompanied by significant growth in the incidence of CSP, while advances in ultrasound diagnostic techniques have led to a greater number of CSP diagnoses. A misdiagnosed CSP, or one that is diagnosed too late, is life-threatening to the pregnant patient and predisposes her to complications such as uterine bleeding or rupture, which often require hysterectomy and thus result in the irreversible loss of fertility. We present the case of a 50-year-old woman with a history of undiagnosed CSP after multiple consultations for intermittent bleeding and hemorrhage. She was diagnosed by ultrasound and the diagnosis was confirmed by hysteroscopy. She underwent conservative medical treatment that was successful.

Evolution of laparoscopic myomectomy and description of two hemostatic techniques in a large teaching gynecological center.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a description of laparoscopic myomectomy and the two hemostatic techniques performed over the last 11 years in a single reference center for gynecology and obstetrics and to evaluate the factors associated with favorable surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed 625 who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy from January 2009 to December 2019. RESULTS: Of 625 patients, 437 (69.8%) were symptomatic. The most common symptoms were heavy uterine bleeding (33.2%). 188 patients (30.1%) were asymptomatic but were operated in 77 cases (12.3%) for rapid fibroid growth, 32 (5.1%) for uterine cavity distortion and, in 45 cases (8.6%), the myomectomy was indicated during a surgery for other medical reason due to its accessibility. In 173 cases (27.9%) intramyometrial adrenaline was injected and in 246 cases (39.7%) a temporary blockage of the uterus blood supply was performed. Only 35 (5.6%) patients presented complications, of which, 14 (40%) were hemorrhagic. These hemorrhagic complications were more frequent when intramyometrial adrenaline was used (5,8%) than after the temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and infundibulopelvic ligaments (0,8%; p < 0,001). In the multivariate logistic regression model, the only factor statistically associated with favorable surgical outcome was the use of temporary clipping of the uterine arteries at their origin and infundibulopelvic ligaments as hemostatic technique during the surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myomectomy was generally safe with a high level of favorable outcomes. The temporary clipping of uterine arteries and infundibulopelvic ligaments presented fewer intraoperative bleedings compared with injecting intramyometrial adrenaline.

Clinical Features Associated with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Pilot Longitudinal Study.

(1) Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is associated with physical and psychological complications. However, there is scarce literature on how women with FGM/C respond to treatment interventions. (2) Methods: In the present pilot longitudinal study, we assessed changes in general psychopathology (Symptom Check List-90-R), sexual functioning and distress (Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) female sexual dysfunction criteria), body image (Body Shape Questionnaire), and sexual body image (Female Genital Self-Image Scale) in a sample of n = 15 women with FGM/C before and after reconstructive surgery. (3) Results: Sexual distress was significantly improved following surgery. We also observed an improvement in general psychopathology and genital self-image. However, sexual function was not improved. (4) Conclusions: These results provide evidence for the benefits of reconstructive surgery on sexual distress in women with FGM/C. The impact of surgery on sexual function cannot be conclusively evaluated.

COVID-19 and Laparoscopic Surgery: Scoping Review of Current Literature and Local Expertise.

BACKGROUND: The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is holding the world in its grip. Epidemiologists have shown that the mortality risks are higher when the health care system is subjected to pressure from COVID-19. It is therefore of great importance to maintain the health of health care providers and prevent contamination. An important group who will be required to treat patients with COVID-19 are health care providers during semiacute surgery. There are concerns that laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of contamination more than open surgery; therefore, balancing the safety of health care providers with the benefit of laparoscopic surgery for the patient is vital. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide an overview of potential contamination routes and possible risks for health care providers; we also aimed to propose research questions based on current literature and expert opinions about performing laparoscopic surgery on patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a scoping review, adding five additional questions concerning possible contaminating routes. A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases, adding results from gray literature as well. The search not only included COVID-19 but was extended to virus contamination in general. We excluded society and professional association statements about COVID-19 if they did not add new insights to the available literature. RESULTS: The initial search provided 2007 records, after which 267 full-text papers were considered. Finally, we used 84 papers, of which 14 discussed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Eight papers discussed the added value of performing intubation in a low-pressure operating room, mainly based on the SARS outbreak experience in 2003. Thirteen papers elaborated on the risks of intubation for health care providers and SARS-CoV-2, and 19 papers discussed this situation with other viruses. They conclude that there is significant evidence that intubation and extubation is a high-risk aerosol-producing procedure. No papers were found on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 and surgical smoke, although 25 papers did provide conflicting evidence on the infection risk of human papillomavirus, hepatitis B, polio, and rabies. No papers were found discussing tissue extraction or the deflation risk of the pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be consensus in the literature that intubation and extubation are high-risk procedures for health care providers and that maximum protective equipment is needed. On the other hand, minimal evidence is available of the actual risk of contamination of health care providers during laparoscopy itself, nor of operating room pressure, surgical smoke, tissue extraction, or CO2 deflation. However, new studies are being published daily from current experiences, and society statements are continuously updated. There seems to be no reason to abandon laparoscopic surgery in favor of open surgery. However, the risks should not be underestimated, surgery should be performed on patients with COVID-19 only when necessary, and health care providers should use logic and common sense to protect themselves and others by performing surgery in a safe and protected environment.

Clinical, Sexual and Psychopathological Changes after Clitoral Reconstruction in a Type II Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Case Report.

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a health issue associated with serious negative psychological and health consequences. However, there is little literature on the impact of FGM/C on female sexuality, mental health and genital self- image after clitoral reconstructive surgery. Our aim was to assess sexual function, psychopathology and genital self-image in a type II FGM/C patient. The patient was assessed prior to FGM/C reconstructive surgery and at a 6-month follow-up. At follow- up, she reported an improvement in sexual function and a clear improvement of the psychopathological state. However, a worsening in genital self-image was also endorsed after the surgery. Our findings uphold that FGM/C reconstructive surgery can lessen psychopathological and sexual distress, although more research is needed in order to increase awareness of the potential benefits of genital reconstruction and to perfect the surgery procedures. These results have repercussions for health practitioners and psychologists alike in terms of developing prevention strategies and treatment protocols for FGM/C women.

[Current role of conservative surgery]. / Papel actual de la cirugía conservadora.

It is not easy to establish the true impact of fibroids on fertility. Fibroidectomy in sterile patients with subserosal fibroids does not offer the best results for patients with in situ fibroids. Women with intramural fibroids appear to present reduced fertility and increased miscarriage rates, compared with women without fibroids. However, fibroidectomy does not always reverse this effect (does not increase the clinical pregnancy or "take-home baby" rates), but the quality of the studies is still poor. Fibroids with a submucosal component significantly decrease implantation and pregnancy rates with regard to sterile controls. Fibroid exeresis clearly improves fertility results. There is a need for better quality studies aimed at assessing the impact of intramural fibroids, with a special focus on factors such as size, number and proximity to the endometrium. The majority of cases can be treated endoscopically. This procedure needs properly trained teams who monitor their results and who are able to offer the same guarantees that laparotomy affords, both in terms of the surgical technique and the patients' obstetric future. Laparoscopic fibroidectomy offers results comparable to laparotomy and minimizes the formation of adhesions, blood loss, hospital stay and the time to return to work. For sterile patients, laparoscopic fibroidectomy may be the first choice therapy.