Detection of recurrent brain tumors in children: No significant difference in sensitivity between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium injection is currently used in the follow-up of children in remission of cerebral tumors (CTs). Intracerebral gadolinium deposition has been recently reported with unknown risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of unenhanced brain MRI (U-MRI) in detection of tumor recurrence. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A set of 58 U-MRIs of children in remission was retrospectively evaluated by three seniors (a neuroradiologist, a pediatric and a general radiologist) and one junior to look for any recurrence. Clinical, tumoral and imaging data were collected. The final diagnosis was anatomopathological when available, or the clinicoradiological evolution. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and interobserver agreement were calculated. A Fisher test and Fleiss kappa coefficient were performed. RESULTS: For the seniors, the U-MRI had a sensitivity of 81% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.90), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82% (95% CI: 0.63-0.94). The U-MRI sensitivity, regardless of the observer, was not significantly different from the contrast-enhanced MRI sensitivity (86%) according to a Fisher test (p > 0.05). No significant difference in sensitivity within the subgroups was found. The interobserver agreement of seniors was good (κ = 0.68). CONCLUSION: U-MRI brain was suboptimal for 80% of patients. Three-dimensional millimetric, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion would constitute helpful sequences in follow-up. Further specific studies depending on each tumor type are still required to determine whether a potential abstention of gadolinium intravenous injection should be discussed for children.

Sonography of suspected acute appendicitis in children: Evaluation of the progress in performance of senior residents.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the progress in performance of senior residents in diagnosing acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Results were collected and compared of ultrasound examinations performed for suspected acute appendicitis by three senior residents and two faculty members over a six-month period in a university hospital setting. A grid with the sonographic findings was completed separately by the residents and the faculty members immediately after each examination. The duration of each examination was reported. The final ultrasound diagnosis was compared to the surgical and pathological results and to the clinical follow-up. RESULTS: The residents and faculty members performed 171 consecutive ultrasound examinations including 49 children with acute appendicitis and 122 with normal appendices. The accuracy of the diagnosis by the residents was 96%, and was similar to that of the faculty members (kappa=0.90) over the six months. The duration of the resident ultrasound examinations was significantly shorter during the second three-month period (p=0.01). No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were demonstrated by the residents between the first and second three-month periods (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The residents performed well when using sonography to diagnose acute appendicitis in children, and were faster during the second three-month period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.