Complex Liver Resection Using Standard Total Vascular Exclusion, Venovenous Bypass, and In Situ Hypothermic Portal Perfusion: An Audit of 77 Consecutive Cases.

OBJECTIVE: To identify independent predictors of 90-day mortality after liver resection for patients undergoing standard total vascular exclusion (TVE) with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the long-term outcomes. BACKGROUND: Tumors invading the vena cava and/or the hepatocaval confluence are indications for standard TVE. The inclusion of liver hypothermic perfusion permits safe TVE. There are a limited number of reports focusing on this complex technique and no relevant analysis of short-term and long-term results. METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive liver resections performed using standard TVE with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass between 1998 and 2010 were analyzed. The independent predictors and rates of 90-day mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate was 19.5% (15 cases). Three independent predictors of mortality were identified: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index 3 or more (P = 0.0231; odds ratio = 47.565; 95% confidence interval = 1.701-1330.414), tumor size 10 cm or more (P = 0.0442; odds ratio = 6.374; 95% confidence interval = 1.049-38.734), and the presence of 50/50 criteria (P = 0.0407; odds ratio = 6.217; 95% confidence interval = 1.080-35.782). The overall 5-year survival rate was 30.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection using standard TVE with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass is associated with a high mortality rate. The identification of preoperative predictors of mortality should improve the selection of patients for this aggressive surgery. Compared with nonsurgical management, the long-term results are acceptable and justify this aggressive surgery in selected patients.

Plasma transfusion in liver transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical comparison of three virally secured plasmas.

BACKGROUND: The clinical equivalence of plasma treated to reduce pathogen transmission and untreated plasma has not been extensively studied. A clinical trial was conducted in liver transplant recipients to compare the efficacy of three plasmas. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, equivalence, blinded trial was performed in four French liver transplantation centers. The three studied (fresh-frozen) plasmas were quarantine (Q-FFP), methylene blue (MB-FFP), and solvent/detergent (S/D-FFP) plasmas. The primary outcome was the volume of plasma transfused during transplantation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, hemostasis variables corrections, and adverse events. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were randomly assigned in the MB-FFP, 96 in the S/D-FFP, and 97 in the Q-FFP groups, respectively. The median volumes of plasma transfused were 2254, 1905, and 1798 mL with MB-FFP, S/D-FFP, and Q-FFP, respectively. The three plasmas were not equivalent. MB-FFP was not equivalent to the two other plasmas, but S/D-FFP and Q-FFP were equivalent. The median numbers of transfused plasma units were 10, 10, and 8 units with MB-FFP, S/D-FFP, and Q-FFP, respectively. Adjustment on bleeding risk factors diminished the difference between groups: the excess plasma volume transfused with MB-FFP compared to Q-FFP was reduced from 24% to 14%. Blood loss and coagulation factors corrections were not significantly different between the three arms. CONCLUSION: Compared to both Q-FFP and S/D-FFP, use of MB-FFP was associated with a moderate increase in volume transfused, partly explained by a difference in unit volume and bleeding risk factors. Q-FFP was associated with fewer units transfused than either S/D-FFP or MB-FFP.

Delayed pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax complicating laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

A 53-year-old healthy man underwent elective laparoscopic, extraperitoneal, right-sided herniorrhaphy. Postoperatively, he complained of chest pain on inspiration. Chest x-ray and computed tomographic scan revealed a pneumomediastinum and a right-sided pneumothorax. Previous case reports and possible etiologies are reviewed.

A combination of alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol in the absence of muscle relaxants.

PURPOSE: To compare the ease of tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants following an alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol sequence vs a fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol sequence. CLINICAL FEATURES: In 80 ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, we compared the intubating conditions following alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1), lidocaine 1.5 mg x kg(-1), propofol 3 mg x kg(-1) (Group I; n = 40) vs fentanyl 2 microg x kg(-1), lidocaine 1.5 mg x kg(-1), propofol 3 mg x kg(-1) (Group II; n = 40). The intubating conditions were scored by jaw relaxation, vocal cord position and response to intubation, as well as by blood pressure and heart rate changes. The intubating conditions were good or excellent in 95% of patients in Group I vs 62.5% of patients in Group II (P < 0.05). Blood pressure decreased from a preinduction value of 86 +/- 13 mmHg to 72 +/- 28 mmHg and 74 +/- 19 mmHg in Group I, and from 85 +/- 12 mmHg to 78 +/- 15 mmHg and 78 +/- 12 mmHg in Group II, one and five minutes following intubation (P < 0.05). This drop in blood pressure was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: An alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol sequence offers significantly better intubating conditions than a fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol sequence in healthy adult patients.

Complicated negative pressure pulmonary oedema in a child with cerebral palsy.

A 3-year-old child with cerebral palsy developed postextubation upper airway obstruction secondary to laryngospasm and/or masseteric spasm,which may have been triggered by the muscular spasticity and the slow recovery from inhalational anaesthesia associated with cerebral palsy. This upper airway obstruction was followed by negative pressure pulmonary oedema. The patient improved on mechanical ventilation; however, his condition was complicated with the occurrence of bilateral pneumothoraces. After release of the pneumothoraces and reexpansion of the lungs, the child developed reexpansion pulmonary oedema, culminating in acute lung injury.