Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 81
Filtrar
1.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 40(2): 201-205, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995148

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study investigates how Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects the outcomes of ptosis repair. We hypothesized that patients with OSA have an increased rate of reoperation after ptosis repair. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients age >18 from the Mayo Clinic who underwent ptosis repair by levator advancement or Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection between 2018 and 2021. Outcomes were measured at 1 to 3 months of follow-up with surgical failure defined as asymmetry or unsatisfactory eyelid height requiring revision surgery within 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 577 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in surgical failure between patients with OSA and those without (20.5% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.02). Patients with OSA showed a statistically significant difference in risk of revision by a factor of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.06-2.07). Revisions were attributed to unsatisfactory eyelid height in 72.6% of patients and eyelid asymmetry in 21.1%. All patients who had revision surgery had satisfactory outcomes. On logistic regression analysis, when adjusting for age and sex, OSA was significantly associated with ptosis revision ( p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: OSA increases risk of surgical failure and need for revision surgery in patients undergoing blepharoptosis repair but is not a sole risk factor.


Assuntos
Blefaroplastia , Blefaroptose , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pálpebras/cirurgia , Blefaroptose/cirurgia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia
2.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(10): 982-988, 2023 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707837

RESUMO

Importance: Women remain underrepresented in ophthalmology and gender-based disparities exist in salary, grant receipt, publication rates, and surgical volume throughout training and in practice. Although studies in emergency medicine and general surgery showed mixed findings regarding gender differences in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones ratings, limited data exist examining such differences within ophthalmology. Objective: To examine gender differences in ophthalmology ACGME Milestones. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of postgraduate year 4 (PGY-4) residents from 120 ophthalmology programs graduating in 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: PGY-4 midyear and year-end medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) ratings and Written Qualifying Examination (WQE) scaled scores for residents graduating in 2019 were included. Differential prediction techniques using Generalized Estimating Equations models were performed to identify differences by gender. Results: Of 452 residents (median [IQR] age, 30.0 [29.0-32.0] years), 275 (61%) identified as men and 177 (39%) as women. There were no differences in PC domain average between women and men for both midyear (-0.07; 95% CI, -0.11 to 0; P =.06) and year-end (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.03; P =.51) assessment periods. For the MK domain average in the midyear assessment period, women (mean [SD], 3.76 [0.50]) were rated lower than men (mean [SD], 3.88 [0.47]; P = .006) with a difference in mean of -0.12 (95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03). For the year-end assessment, however, the average MK ratings were not different for women (mean [SD], 4.10 [0.47]) compared with men (mean [SD], 4.18 [0.47]; P = .20) with a difference in mean of -0.08 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.03). Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that ACGME ophthalmology Milestones in 2 general competencies did not demonstrate major gender bias on a national level at the time of graduation. There were, however, differences in MK ratings at the midyear mark, and as low ratings on evaluations and examinations may adversely affect career opportunities for trainees, it is important to continue further work examining other competencies or performance measures for potential biases.

4.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 247: 1-8, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370838

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the likelihood of disciplinary actions against medical licenses of ophthalmologists who maintained board certification through successful completion of the American Board of Ophthalmology Maintenance of Certification program compared with ophthalmologists who did not maintain certification. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of ophthalmologists certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology from 1992 to 2012 with time-limited certificates. Rates and severity of disciplinary actions against medical licenses were analyzed among ophthalmologists who did and did not maintain certification. RESULTS: Of 9111 ophthalmologists who earned initial board certification between 1992 and 2012, 8073 (88.6%) maintained their certification and 1038 (11.4%) did not maintain their certification. A total of 234 license actions were identified in the study group. Among ophthalmologists who did not maintain board certification, the risk of a license action was more than 2 times that of those who maintained board certification (hazard ratio = 2.34, 95% CI=1.73-3.18). License actions were significantly higher in men than in women (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% CI=1.43-2.86). Ophthalmologists who had a lapse in their certification had a higher severity of disciplinary actions (χ2 = 9.21, p <.01) than ophthalmologists who maintained their certification. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports prior literature in other specialties demonstrating a higher risk of disciplinary licensure actions in physicians who did not maintain board certification as compared with those who did. Physicians who did not maintain certification were also more likely to have actions against their license reflecting a higher severity violation. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.


Assuntos
Oftalmologia , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Competência Clínica , Certificação
9.
Ophthalmol Sci ; 1(3): 100048, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36247815

RESUMO

Purpose: To better understand the history and epidemiology of Bartonella henselae infections of the eye and adnexa, and their relationship to cat scratch disease (CSD). We also assess B. henselae infection as a public health threat. Methods: We reviewed the available literature concerning B. henselae infections of the eye and CSD, and attempted calculation of the incidence and prevalence of both B. henselae eye infections and CSD from the database of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Results: It took nearly a century of determined effort to reveal that Henri Parinaud's oculoglandular syndrome (POGS) (1889) and Leber's stellate retinitis (1916) were the result of B. henselae infection and are subtypes of CSD. These ocular infections remain of clinical, epidemiologic, and public health concern to ophthalmologists with many unanswered questions. Their incidence and prevalence have yet to be accurately determined. Our attempt to achieve this through the Rochester Epidemiology Project database suggests a major obstacle is inconsistent with nonunanimous diagnostic terminology and coding. Conclusions: Modern serologic testing and molecular diagnostic techniques offer ophthalmologists the opportunity to make B. henselae infection of the eyes an area of "precision medicine." For this to happen, greater awareness and teaching about this disease, updated terminology, and a greater clinical and research effort are required.

10.
Ophthalmology ; 127(11): 1454-1459, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654758

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of implementing standardized opioid prescribing guidelines on prescription patterns for acute pain after ophthalmic surgery in opioid-naïve patients. DESIGN: Quality improvement study. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmic surgeons in an academic department of ophthalmology. METHODS: Postoperative opioid prescribing patterns were compared before and after the implementation of standardized opioid prescribing guidelines for ophthalmic surgery at an academic institution. Only prescriptions provided to opioid-naïve patients 18 years of age or older were included. Surgeons reached a consensus for standardized prescribing guidelines appropriate for the type of surgery within their subspecialty. Guidelines were disseminated in conjunction with postsurgical pain management education to all ophthalmologists in the department, including trainees. The frequency of opioid prescriptions, the quantity of opioid prescribed (converted to oral morphine equivalent [OME]), and opioid prescription refill rates were compared before and after intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescriptions with more than 80 OME, frequency of opioid prescriptions, mean OME, and refill rates. RESULTS: Of 5349 ophthalmic surgeries performed during the 2 assessment periods, 196 (3.7%) were associated with opioid prescriptions for acute postoperative pain. The frequency of opioid prescriptions decreased to 3.0% (81/2736) after intervention compared with 4.4% (115/2613) before intervention (P = 0.005). When opioids were prescribed, the mean OME decreased from 93 (range, 27-500) before intervention to 42 (range, 14-100) after intervention (P = 0.003). The number of prescriptions for more than 80 OME decreased from 56 (2.1%) before intervention to 4 (0.1%) after intervention (P < 0.001). Based on the standardized guidelines, 103 of the 115 (89.6%) preintervention opioid prescriptions would not have adhered to the guidelines, whereas 39 of the 81 (48.1%) postintervention prescriptions did not adhere to the guidelines (P < 0.001). The proportion of refill prescriptions did not differ before and after intervention (P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The process of discussing postsurgical pain management and developing standardized opioid prescribing guidelines reduces overprescribing of opioids after ophthalmic surgery without increasing refill rates. Continued education is required to improve adherence to the prescribing guidelines further.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Ophthalmology ; 127(4S): S160-S171, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200817

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although widely used for more than 85 years, the efficacy of radiotherapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) has not been established convincingly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy for GO. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, internally controlled, double-blind clinical trial in a tertiary care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The patients were ethnically diverse males and females over age 30 seen in a referral practice. The patients had moderate, symptomatic Graves' ophthalmopathy (mean clinical activity score, 6.2) but no optic neuropathy, diabetes, recent steroid treatment, previous decompression, or muscle surgery. Forty-two of 53 consecutive patients were enrolled after giving informed consent and fulfilling study entry criteria. Eleven eligible patients declined to participate because of inconvenience, desire for alternative therapy, or concern about radiation. INTERVENTION: One randomly selected orbit was treated with 20 Gy of external beam therapy; sham therapy was given to the other side. Six months later, the therapies were reversed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Every 3 months for 1 year, we measured the volume of extraocular muscle and fat, proptosis, range of extraocular muscle motion, area of diplopia fields, and lid fissure width. Effective treatment for GO will modify one or more of these parameters. RESULTS: No clinically or statistically significant difference between the treated and untreated orbit was observed in any of the main outcome measures at 6 months. At 12 months, muscle volume and proptosis improved slightly more in the orbit that was treated first. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients, representative of those for whom radiotherapy is frequently recommended, we were unable to demonstrate any beneficial therapeutic effect. The slight improvement noted in both orbits at 12 months may be the result of natural remission or of radiotherapy, but the changes are of marginal clinical significance.


Assuntos
Oftalmopatia de Graves/radioterapia , Órbita/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Diplopia/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Exoftalmia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Oftalmopatia de Graves/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos Oculomotores/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
15.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ; 14: 14-15, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30775613

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the possible connection between Stickler syndrome and floppy eyelid syndrome. OBSERVATIONS: A 36-year-old man with genetically confirmed Stickler syndrome presented with prominent bilateral eyelid laxity consistent with floppy eyelid syndrome. He had a high-arched palate and reported years of apneic episodes during sleep consistent with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there have been no prior reported cases of floppy eyelid syndrome in Stickler syndrome patients. However, many patients with Stickler syndrome have palate abnormalities, which are associated with a higher risk of OSA. Given the known association between floppy eyelid syndrome and OSA, this case highlights the potential role for the ophthalmologist in identifying these patients and referring them for a sleep study if floppy eyelid syndrome is identified.

16.
Ophthalmology ; 125(12): e88, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343940
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA