The relationship between disease activity with pan-immune-inflammatory value and systemic immune-inflammation index in rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. Immune system cells have an important role in RA. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between disease activity, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) levels in RA patients. We planned to investigate whether these 2 measurements have an advantage over each other. About 67 patients diagnosed with RA and 49 healthy controls included in this study. RA was diagnosed based on 2010 ACR classification criteria. In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood tests, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemogram, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels were noted after the physical examination of all participants. PIV was calculated with the formula: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count) / lymphocyte count. SII was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × monocytes count) / lymphocyte count. The disease activity score 28 (DAS28) were noted in patients with RA. CRP values of active RA group were significantly higher than remission RA and control groups (P < .001), control and remission RA groups were similar (P = .86). PIV and SII are significantly higher in active RA than remission RA and control (P < .001, P < .001) higher in remission RA than control (P < .001, P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in predicting remission compared to the control group, CRP was not significant, PIV and SII was significant and PIV has higher sensitivity and sensitivity, a PIV value of > 217.31 have sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 85.7%. CRP, PIV, and SII are statistically significant in predicting active RA compared to the remission RA and control group. Our findings show that PIV, and SII are easy, inexpensive and reliable markers predicting remission in RA patients. CRP was not significant compared to remission RA and control group, PIV and SII was significant and PIV has higher sensitivity and specificity than SII in the remission group in RA. Patients with high disease activity, PIV, SII, and CRP levels were effective in showing disease activity compared to RA remission group and healthy controls.

Blade expandable intramedullary nails for fixation of tibial shaft fractures.

This study is aimed to compare the clinical and radiological differences between classic locked intra- medullary nailing (LIN) and blade expandable intra- medullary nailing (BEIN) at tibia shaft fractures. Operation time, exposing of radiation time and fracture healing times were recorded. Pain visual anolog scale (VAS), shortening of tibia and angulation of fracture line were compared. All patients healed. In LIN group operation time, exposing of radiation time was longer (statistically significant). Because of shorter operation time and lower radiation exposure we recommend the BEIN technique as a preferable technique in tibia intramedullary nailing.

Clinimetric properties of the Duruoz hand index in patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI) in assessing activity limitation related to hand function in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Prospective validation study. A consecutive sample of stroke patients was evaluated on 3 occasions: 2 baseline measurements with a 24-hour interval in between, and again 1 month later immediately after a 4-week inpatient rehabilitation program. SETTING: Three different inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 56 patients with stroke (33 men, 23 women) with a mean age 62 years and a mean time since stroke 84 days. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brunnstrom stages, Modified Ashworth Scale, sensory status, FIM instrument, and DHI. Test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and internal consistency was tested using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Indexes of measurement error were calculated by standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change (MDC). Construct validity was assessed by association with the FIM instrument (Spearman rho correlation coefficient). Responsiveness was assessed by calculation of the effect size and paired t test. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the DHI were excellent, with an ICC of .99 (95% confidence interval, .93-.99) and alpha of .97. The MDC was 1.4 DHI points. The correlation between the DHI and the FIM self-care items was high (rho=-.73). The DHI significantly discriminated the patients with dominant side paresis versus nondominant side paresis (P<.01). The DHI score improved significantly after a 4-week inpatient rehabilitation program (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The DHI is a time and labor efficient, practical instrument that can be used to assess the hand-related activity level for clinical and research purposes in patients with stroke.