RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Conical tapered stems may be useful implants to manage the reconstruction of complex dysplastic anatomies. The aims of this paper were to assess: 1) the preoperative CT features of the dysplastic femurs; 2) survival rates, complications and reasons for revision; 3) the clinical outcomes; 4) the radiographic outcomes of single-taper conical stems in dysplasia (defined as center edge angle < 20°) at a long-term follow-up. HYPOTHESIS: Monoblock conical stem provides a 10-year survival rate of at least 95%, with excellent clinical outcomes and bony ingrowth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 100 THAs in 85 patients (15 bilateral cases) were enrolled. The average age of the patients at surgery was 50.9±11.5 years. Assessment of the native femoral morphology was performed using CT-scan, coronal (neck-shaft angle, offset, center of rotation position) and axial parameters (anteversion, mediolateral and anteroposterior femoral diameters). Clinical (HHS score) and radiological (osseointegration, subsidence and offset reconstruction) outcomes were evaluated at the last available follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 9.34±5.61 years. Severely distorted anatomies from Crowe I to Crowe IV were included, with a mean canal flare of 4.3 and a mean femoral antetorsion of 34°. The survival rates were stable at long-term (98.9% at 10 and 15 years): no aseptic loosening occurred. The mean postoperative HHS was 89.8±6.8 points. Ninety-nine percent of the stems showed bone ingrowth, from 6 months to the last available follow-up. Subsidence occurred in 18% of the cases (mean value: 2.5mm, range: 1-6mm) in the first month, with subsequent stabilization. A mild proximal stress shielding occurred in 28% of the THAs. Radiolucent lines were detected in the 8% of the cases. There was a postoperative loss of offset in 12% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Conical stems in dysplastic hips achieved bony ingrowth at long-term outcome, even in complex anatomies. Subsidence, proximal stress shielding and imperfect offset restoration may occur with this implant. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV; retrospective study.