RESUMO
Background: Acute decompensated heart failure accounts for more than 1 million hospitalizations in the United States every year. Beta-blockers are a first-line agent for patients experiencing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but beta-blocker use in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure remains low. We conducted an analysis of the existing evidence and guidelines to determine the conditions for prescribing beta-blockers to patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for studies from 2004 to 2024 that included the search terms "beta blockers" and "acute decompensated heart failure." We included studies in which beta-blockers were used in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and excluded studies that did not study beta-blockers directly. We compiled recommendations from professional societies regarding beta-blocker usage-both for outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Results: Studies consistently demonstrated lower rates of mortality and rehospitalization when beta-blocker therapy was maintained for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were already on beta-blocker therapy. Conversely, withdrawal of beta-blocker therapy was associated with increased in-hospital and short-term mortality. We summarized our findings in a guideline-based flowchart to help physicians make informed decisions regarding beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Based on the evidence, beta-blockers should be initiated at a low dose in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who have never been on beta-blockers, provided the patient is hemodynamically stable. Conclusion: Our research and our guideline-based flowchart promote guideline-directed use of beta-blockers to improve the outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can improve survival rates in individuals with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Two CPR approaches are commonly utilized, standard (S-CPR) with mouth-to-mouth breathing and compression-only (CO-CPR). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes associated with S-CPR versus CO-CPR in OHCA. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on adult OHCA patients receiving CO-CPR or S-CPR. Forest plots were generated for pooled data analysis using Review Manager version 5.4. Random-effect analyses were used, and statistical significance was set at p < .05. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis, encompassing a total sample size of 4987 patients (2482 in the CO-CPR group and 2505 in the S-CPR group). CO-CPR was associated with significantly improved 1-day survival compared with S-CPR (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.31; p = .03) and survival to hospital discharge (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01-1.55; p = .04). No heterogeneity was observed among the studies for either outcome. CONCLUSION: CO-CPR emerges as a promising strategy for improving outcomes in OHCA compared to S-CPR. However, further large-scale RCTs are required to generate more robust evidence.
RESUMO
Background: Antiplatelet therapy plays an important role in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, data regarding the effectiveness and safety of using aspirin plus clopidogrel in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to aspirin alone in mild ischemic stroke is limited. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DAPT to aspirin alone started within 72 hours in mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA. We used a random effects model to pool risk ratios (RRs) along with 95% CIs for clinical outcomes. Results: Four RCTs with 16,547 patients were included in this study. DAPT significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke by 26% (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.83; p < 0.00001), ischemic stroke by 28% (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.65-0.80; p < 0.00001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 24% (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68-0.84; p < 0.00001) compared to aspirin monotherapy. However, DAPT was associated with a significantly increased risk of moderate or severe bleeding (RR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.10-3.23; p = 0.02) compared to aspirin alone. No significant differences were observed for hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.77; 95% CI: 0.96-3.29; p = 0.07), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.87-1.80; p = 0.23), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.81-2.33; p = 0.23), and myocardial infarction (RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.77-3.46; p = 0.20). Conclusion: DAPT involving aspirin plus clopidogrel reduces stroke recurrence and MACE but can lead to an increased risk of moderate or severe bleeding compared to aspirin monotherapy. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024499310).
Assuntos
Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Hemorragia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório , AVC Isquêmico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/prevenção & controle , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/mortalidade , AVC Isquêmico/prevenção & controle , AVC Isquêmico/mortalidade , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , Razão de Chances , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) captures emboli during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). With recently published pivotal trials and multiple cohort studies reporting new data, there is a need to re-calibrate available statistical evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across databases from inception till February 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using Odds Ratio (OR), while continuous outcomes were pooled using Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) along with 95% corresponding intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Data was included from 17 studies (7 RCTs, 10 cohorts, n = 155,829). Use of CEPD was associated with significantly reduced odds of stroke (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in disabling stroke (p = 0.25), non-disabling stroke (p = 0.72), and 30-day mortality (p = 0.10) between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) findings, acute kidney injury, risk of pacemaker implantation life-threatening bleed, major bleed, minor bleed, worsening National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vascular complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CEPD during TAVR reduced the incidence of all-stroke (p = 0.003); however, there were no significant differences in any of the other pooled outcomes (p > 0.05). REGISTRATION: The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with the Open Science framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564] before data acquisition was started.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Dispositivos de Proteção Embólica , Embolia Intracraniana , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Embolia Intracraniana/epidemiologia , Embolia Intracraniana/etiologia , Embolia Intracraniana/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This systematic review will provide a comprehensive assessment of the evidence on PICSO in STEMI patients, and it will help to determine the role of this novel technique in the management of STEMI. The review searched for the relevant articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases regarding PC-ICSO. Four cohort studies were eligible to be included in the quantitative analysis. In the pooled analysis, the use of PICSO was associated with a significant reduction in infarct size (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.76,-0.13, p = 0.004). PICSO administration was associated with a reduced risk of developing microvascular resistance (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62,0.92, p = 0.0051). The post-procedural Index of Microvascular Occlusion (MVO) was lower in the PICSO treated compared to the control group and this result was homogenous and statistically significant (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.68-0.01, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). Compared to matched controls, the use of PICSO was associated with higher Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the longest follow-up (SMD = 0.328, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.06, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). This review suggested that PICSO can be used during PPCI in STEMI with improved outcomes of infarct size, LVEF, and microvascular perfusion.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Long-term follow-up results of various trials comparing Zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) with Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been published recently. Additionally, over the last decade, there have been new trials comparing the ZES with various commercially available EES. We aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis in light of new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide comprehensive evidence regarding the temporal trends in the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. RCTs comparing ZES with EES for short (<2 years), intermediate (2-3 years), and long-term follow-ups (3-5 years) were included. Relative risk was used to pool the dichotomous outcomes using the random effects model employing the inverse variance method. All statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies reporting data at different follow-ups for nine trials (n = 14319) were included. At short-term follow-up (<2 years), there were no significant differences between the two types of stents (all-cause death, cardiac death, Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis or safety outcomes (target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, target vessel failure, target lesion failure). At intermediate follow-up (2-3 years), EES was superior to ZES for reducing target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.58, p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (3-5 years), there were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the pooled outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ZES and EES have similar safety and efficacy at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-ups.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Stents Farmacológicos , Everolimo , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sirolimo , Humanos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Everolimo/administração & dosagem , Everolimo/farmacologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Sirolimo/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a high-resolution imaging modality, guides stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, OCT-guided PCI safety and efficacy data is limited. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCT-guided PCI to Angiography-guided PCI from inception to August 2023. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical endpoints. Results: Our analysis included 5,139 patients from 11 studies. OCT-guided PCI resulted in a higher minimum stent area (MD = 0.35 [95 % CI, 0.21-0.49]; p < 0.00001), significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, = 0.32-0.99]; p = 0.04), stent thrombosis (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, 0.32-0.96]; p = 0.04), stent malapposition RR = 0.79 [95 % CI, 0.71-0.88]; p = < 0.0001) and major edge dissection (RR = 0.47 [95 % CI, 0.34-0.65]; p = <0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71; p = 0.06), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [RR = 0.80; p = 0.10], myocardial infarction (MI) [RR = 0.84; p = 0.16], target lesion revascularization (TLR) [RR = 0.94; p = 0.68], and target vessel revascularization (TVR) [RR = 0.91; p = 0.52]. Conclusion: OCT-guided PCI led to an increased MSA and decreased cardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, stent malapposition, and major edge dissection. The incidence of all-cause mortality, MACE, MI, TLR, and TVR remained comparable across the two groups.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prescription writing is an important component of healthcare delivery and can directly influence patient safety and treatment outcomes. Prescription errors are common in developing countries because of the lack of national guidelines. This two-cycle clinical audit assessed the impact of educational interventions on improving prescription writing practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective clinical audit was conducted in the Out Patients Department (OPD) of the District Head Quarters (DHQ) Hospital in Bhimber, Azad Jammu, and Kashmir. A total of 100 randomly selected prescriptions were reviewed for each cycle from July to August 2023. We recorded compliance with WHO guidelines for prescription writing before and after the educational intervention. Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 25.0 were used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: An improvement in compliance was observed during the 2nd audit cycle, after the educational intervention. The greatest improvement was observed in documenting the allergic status of patients (62%) and the direction of drug administration (40%). We also observed improvements in the treatment duration (>10%), patient weight, physician registration number, diagnosis, and follow-up advice. The legibility of prescriptions also improved during the 2nd audit cycle. CONCLUSION: This study shows that integrating an educational intervention into a clinical audit can improve prescription writing practices and ultimately result in better quality of care for patients.
RESUMO
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma which may predispose individuals to development of secondary malignancies (SMs). The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is a comprehensive registry of cancer patients in the United States reporting on a wide set of demographic variables. Using the SEER-18 dataset, analyzing patients from 2000 to 2018, we aimed to assess the incidence of SMs in WM patients. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, race, and latency were identified, and respective standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) were calculated to compare to the general population. Of the 4,112 eligible WM patients identified, SMs were reported in 699 (17%) patients. The overall risk of developing SM, second primary malignancy, and secondary hematological malignancy was significantly higher in WM patients compared to the general population. Our findings show that WM patients had a 53% higher risk of SMs relative to the general population, and an AER of 102.69 per 10,000. Although the exact mechanism is unclear, the risk of SM development may be due to genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, or treatment-induced immune suppression.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anemia is associated with worse clinical outcomes in cardiac patients. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes and readmission rates in anemic patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). METHODS: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2015 to 2018 was queried using the ICD-10 codes to identify patients admitted for TEER. Patients were divided into anemic and non-anemic sub-groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed between cohorts at index admission and readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days. STATA v.17 was used for analysis (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA). RESULTS: Our final cohort included 28,995 patients who had undergone TEER in the United States between 2016 and 2019. About 1,434 (4.9%) had a diagnosis of anemia. The mean age of patients who had TEER with anemia and TEER without anemia was 76.9 ± 10.8 vs. 77.7 ± 10.2, respectively. In the adjusted model, anemic patients had higher odds of acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR 2.21; 95% [CI 1.81-2.6; p<0.001]), HF (aOR 1.75; 95% [CI 1.28-2.3; p<0.001]), myocardial infarction (MI) (aOR 1.54; 95% [CI 1.01-2.33; p<0.041]), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (aOR 1.72; 95% [CI 1.2-9-2.3; p<0.001]), and net adverse event (aOR 1.85; 95% [CI 1.32-2.59; p<0.001]). The anemic group's readmission rate was overall higher at 30, 90, and 180 days from 2016 to 2019. CONCLUSION: Anemia was associated with increased adverse clinical outcomes and more extended hospital stays in patients with anemia who had undergone TEER procedures compared to the non-anemic group.
RESUMO
Background: Recent guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care in the absence of long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) indications in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The superiority of one method over the other remains controversial. Materials and methods: Several databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, were electronically searched. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA, haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, systemic embolism, and valve thrombosis in post-TAVR patients receiving APT and oral anticoagulants (OACs). Forest plots were generated using Review Manager version 5.4, with a p value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies were selected. No significant differences were observed in APT and OAC group for ACM [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI:0.45-1.01; P=0.05], cardiovascular death [RR:0.91; 95% CI:0.73-1.14; P=0.42], MI [RR:1.69; 95% CI:0.43-6.72; P=0.46], Stroke/TIA [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.58-1.06; P=0.12], ischaemic stroke [RR:0.83; 95% CI:0.50-1.37; P=0.47], haemorrhagic stroke [RR:1.08; 95% CI: 0.23-5.15; P=0.92], major bleeding [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.51-1.21; P=0.28], minor bleeding [RR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.80-1.47; P=0.58], life-threatening bleeding [RR:0.85; 95% CI:0.55-1.30; P=0.45], any bleeding [RR:0.98; 95% CI:0.83-1.15; P=0.78], and systemic embolism [RR:0.87; 95% CI:0.44-1.70; P=0.68]. The risk of valve thrombosis was higher in patients receiving APT than in those receiving OAC [RR:2.61; 95% CI:1.56-4.36; P =0.0002]. Conclusions: Although the risk of valve thrombosis increased in patients receiving APT, the risk of other endpoints was comparable between the two groups.
RESUMO
Introduction: Monkeypox (mpox) is an evolving infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV). On July 23, 2022, the WHO declared the recent mpox outbreaks a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), which terminated on May 11, 2023. As of July 11, 2023, 88,288 confirmed cases and 149 deaths have been reported from 112 countries and territories. Currently, mpox is not a PHEIC, as the outbreak and its impacts are nearly over. Nurses played significant roles during the mpox 2022 outbreak as frontline workers. Purpose: In light of the impending mpox global outbreak in 2022, this brief report provides an update on the enormous difficulties faced by frontline nurses while playing a crucial role in handling the mpox outbreak and some potential solutions to these difficulties. The methodological framework employed in this narrative brief report involves conducting a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of relevant literature and hypothetical scenarios. The aim is to put forth practical strategies that can effectively tackle the difficulties encountered by frontline nurses in the context of the mpox outbreak. Additionally, the report seeks to envision a healthcare system that is more resilient in the face of future challenges. Conclusion: It is important to understand the challenges the nurses face from their perspective. As frontline health care workers, the various health issues of nurses and their concerns must be taken care of appropriately by adopting optimum health service practices, adequate safety measures, recommended precautionary measures, and boosting them mentally while handling mpox patients. Counseling and the arrangement of workshops are required. Appropriate care should be taken to address the various health issues concerning nurses by adopting health service practices at optimum levels. Side by side, recommended safety and precautionary measures should be followed.
RESUMO
AIMS: The once-weekly insulin icodec, a new basal insulin analog, may positively support a reduction in injection frequency and improve adherence to therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin icodec compared with those of once-daily glargine U100. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception till September 2023. Data about clinical outcomes in both groups were extracted. Forest plots were generated using the random-effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials and 2019 individuals with T2DM were included. In the pooled analysis, time in range was significantly higher (MD = 4.35; 95% CI: 1.65 to 7.05; p = 0.002) in the icodec group than in the once-daily glargine group. The HbA1c levels were significantly reduced (MD = -0.13; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.03; p = 0.02) in the weekly icodec group compared with those in the once-daily glargine group. The weight gain was significantly less in the glargine group than in the weekly icodec group (MD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.78; p = 0.03); however, in the subgroup analysis, this change became statistically insignificant in both insulin-naïve and previously insulin-treated individuals. The results were comparable across two groups for fasting plasma glucose levels, hypoglycaemia alert (Level 1), clinically significant (Level 2) or severe hypoglycaemia (Level 3), and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Insulin icodec was associated with a reduction in glycated haemoglobin levels and higher time in range, with a similar safety profile as compared to insulin glargine U100. However, further evidence is still needed to reach a definitive conclusion.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Esquema de Medicação , Hipoglicemiantes , Insulina Glargina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Insulina Glargina/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an underdiagnosed cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that usually presents in young female patients. Risk factors include female sex, physical and emotional stressors, and fibromuscular dysplasia, and diagnosis is usually made by coronary angiography aided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). While conservative treatment is usually preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery, medical management of SCAD has been under debate. This comprehensive review aims to summarize findings from recent studies exploring various medical treatment approaches for the management of SCAD. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin is generally safe and beneficial for SCAD patients, with dual antiplatelet (DAPT) being recommended for patients undergoing PCI. In the absence of intervention, DAPT may be given for a short period followed by a longer single-antiplatelet (SAPT) therapy with aspirin. Beta-blockers appear to be safe and effective for SCAD patients. On the other hand, fibrinolytics, anticoagulants, and glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitors are contraindicated. Cardiovascular medications such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and statins are not recommended in the absence of left ventricular dysfunction. Hormonal therapy is contraindicated for patients who develop SCAD during pregnancy and future pregnancy is discouraged in that patient population.
Assuntos
Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários , Doenças Vasculares , Doenças Vasculares/congênito , Humanos , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a prevalent and intricate health condition affecting a significant global population, characterized by a cluster of metabolic and hormonal disorders disrupting lipid and glucose metabolism pathways. Clinical manifestations encompass obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension, contributing to heightened risks of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Existing medications often fall short in addressing the syndrome's multifaceted nature, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and potential long-term health risks. This scenario underscores the pressing need for innovative therapeutic approaches in MetS management. RNA-based treatments, employing small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), emerge as promising strategies to target underlying biological abnormalities. However, a summary of research available on the role of RNA-based therapeutics in MetS and related co-morbidities is limited. Murine models and human studies have been separately interrogated to determine whether there have been recent advancements in RNA-based therapeutics to offer a comprehensive understanding of treatment available for MetS. In a narrative fashion, we searched for relevant articles pertaining to MetS co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease, fatty liver disease, dementia, colorectal cancer, and endocrine abnormalities. We emphasize the urgency of exploring novel therapeutic avenues to address the intricate pathophysiology of MetS and underscore the potential of RNA-based treatments, coupled with advanced delivery systems, as a transformative approach for achieving more comprehensive and efficacious outcomes in MetS patients.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hipertensão , Resistência à Insulina , Síndrome Metabólica , MicroRNAs , Humanos , Animais , Camundongos , Síndrome Metabólica/genética , Síndrome Metabólica/terapia , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , Hipertensão/complicações , Obesidade/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , MicroRNAs/uso terapêutico , RNA Interferente Pequeno/genética , RNA Interferente Pequeno/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection can cause extra-hepatic manifestations like myocarditis. An 8-year-old female with HAV infection presented with fever, abdominal pain, vomiting, and icterus. She developed viral myocarditis with complete AV dissociation on ECG and was treated with a temporary pacemaker, but her condition worsened, and she died. Hepatitis A viral infection can be associated with viral myocarditis and complete heart block that can lead to cardiogenic shock and death eventually.
RESUMO
The utilization of individualized anti-platelet therapy is of paramount significance in this era of cardiovascular advancement. This meta-analysis is also aiming to get more information relating to the effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A comprehensive literature search was done through various databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database Library from January 15, 2023, to February 23, 2023. After careful screening, eight articles with highly significant variables were involved in the synthesis of this meta-analysis. Data analysis was done through Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). In our study, ticagrelor and clopidogrel were evaluated in 10614 and 14662 patients, respectively. Ticagrelor was significantly superior to Clopidogrel in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001), risk of MI (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, p = 0.001), and stroke (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98, p = 0.04), but a higher risk of bleeding events was observed with Ticagrelor (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.79, p = 0.03). The two regimens were comparable in terms of stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor was found to be best in terms of reducing post-PCI myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all other mortality events in comparison to Clopidogrel. However, the bleeding events were of significant concern for the utilization of ticagrelor and required further investigations.
RESUMO
Objective: This study aimed to compare two protocols of deflation with increased intervals versus late deflation with smaller intervals for distal radial artery occlusion device (DROAD) removal to assess for radial artery occlusion (RAO). Methods: All patients who underwent PCI with distal radial access were enrolled in the study. The DROAD was applied using an occlusive hemostasis method. Patients were assigned to either protocol 1 or protocol 2 at the primary physician's discretion. Protocol 1 involved the removal of 2 ml of air starting 1 h after the sheath removal and then the removal of 2 ml every 30 min until the band came off. Protocol 2 involved the removal of 4 ml of air 2 h after the sheath removal and then a further 4 ml of air every 15 min until the band came off. Results: A total of 446 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age; 61 ± 6 (Group 1) and 60 ± 5 (Group 2); females 45.83% (Group 1) and 46.34% (Group 2)). The baseline characteristics were the same, including mean hemostasis time (256 ± 25 min (Group 1) and 254 ± 28 min (Group 2), P-value = 0.611). Primary and secondary endpoints did not reach significance in either group (RAO; 21 (8.71) Group 1 and 18 (8.78) Group 2 (P-value = 0.932)). Age (OR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.57-1.45); P-value = 0.031), female gender (OR (95%CI): 1.42 (0.93-1.74); P-value = 0.012), distal artery diameter (OR (95%CI): 0.57 (0.21-0.93); P-value = 0.005), procedure time (OR (95%CI): 2.64 (0.95-4.32); P-value = 0.001), and sheath size (OR (95%CI): 2.47 (1.43-3.76); P-value = 0.044) were predictors of RAO in our cohort. Conclusion: This investigation shows no difference in the incidence of RAO with the standard versus accelerated deflation protocol after PCI. However, local vascular complications, including hematoma were increased with the accelerated protocol.
RESUMO
Hepatitis is a major public health issue in Pakistan, with an estimated 11.55% prevalence of HCV infection in the adult population. The country ranks second globally in terms of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, with approximately one in every 20 Pakistanis already infected. The mortality rates due to HBV and HCV stand at 563,000 and 366,000 annually, respectively. However, the absence of a national registry or database system and the lack of coordination among provinces pose significant obstacles in combating this disease effectively. To address this issue, the establishment of a centralized national database registry is crucial, allowing comprehensive analysis, tracking of hepatitis prevalence, and identification of high-risk areas for targeted interventions. By fostering collaboration among provinces, the government, and non-governmental organizations, the registry would facilitate joint decision-making, minimize duplication of efforts, and address inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment. Collaborating with student-run organizations and leveraging enhanced laboratory capacities post-COVID era can strengthen the hepatitis control program. The centralized approach and unified efforts are necessary to achieve the goal of a hepatitis-free Pakistan, where a healthier future can be realized.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The increasing use of minimally invasive orthopedic procedures has led to a greater reliance on fluoroscopy, resulting in elevated radiation exposure for surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and daily practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding radiation safety in an academic hospital. Understanding radiation safety is crucial to minimize patient exposure and prevent adverse effects on surgeons. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics of different tertiary care hospitals in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Data were collected prospectively for two years, and a total of 505 participants, including residents, consultants, and operation theatre assistants, completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire was validated by experts and covered information on fluoroscopy usage, frequency of surgeries, awareness of radiation safety, and protective measures. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. RESULTS: The majority of participants were male (74.1%), and the sample included various ranks of orthopedic surgeons. Only 56.2% of participants were aware of the usage of fluoroscopy, and 40.2% had read some research on the topic. While 44.6% used lead aprons for radiation protection, the usage of other protective measures and dosimeters was limited. The mediation analysis showed an insignificant indirect association between the rank of orthopedic surgeons, number of surgeries performed, and fluoroscopy usage as a mediator. Awareness and reading research on fluoroscopy were significantly associated with radiation protection. CONCLUSION: The knowledge, awareness, and daily practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding radiation safety in fluoroscopy use need improvement. The findings emphasize the importance of implementing training programs, providing radiation protection devices, and ensuring compliance with safety guidelines.