Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Nat Rev Urol ; 20(4): 241-258, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653670

RESUMO

Approaches and techniques used for diagnostic prostate biopsy have undergone considerable evolution over the past few decades: from the original finger-guided techniques to the latest MRI-directed strategies, from aspiration cytology to tissue core sampling, and from transrectal to transperineal approaches. In particular, increased adoption of transperineal biopsy approaches have led to reduced infectious complications and improved antibiotic stewardship. Furthermore, as image fusion has become integral, these novel techniques could be incorporated into prostate biopsy methods in the future, enabling 3D-ultrasonography fusion reconstruction, molecular targeting based on PET imaging and autonomous robotic-assisted biopsy.


Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Biópsia , Ultrassonografia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
3.
BJU Int ; 131(4): 461-470, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36134435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes within the Rapid Assessment for Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis (RAPID) diagnostic pathway, introduced to reduce patient and healthcare burdens and standardize delivery of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2130 patients from three centres who completed the RAPID pathway (3 April 2017 to 31 March 2020) were consecutively entered as a prospective registry. These patients were also compared to a pre-RAPID cohort of 2435 patients. Patients on the RAPID pathway with an MRI score 4 or 5 and those with PSA density ≥0.12 and an MRI score 3 were advised to undergo a biopsy. Primary outcomes were rates of biopsy and cancer detection. Secondary outcomes included comparison of transperineal biopsy techniques, patient acceptability and changes in time to diagnosis before and after the introduction of RAPID. RESULTS: The median patient age and PSA level were 66 years and 6.6 ng/mL, respectively. Biopsy could be omitted in 43% of patients (920/2130). A further 7.9% of patients (168/2130) declined a recommendation for biopsy. The percentage of biopsies avoided among sites varied (45% vs 36% vs 51%; P < 0.001). In all, 30% (221/742) had a local anaesthetic (grid and stepper) transperineal biopsy. Clinically significant cancer detection (any Gleason score ≥3 + 4) was 26% (560/2130) and detection of Gleason score 3 + 3 alone constituted 5.8% (124/2130); detection of Gleason score 3 + 3 did not significantly vary among sites (P = 0.7). Among participants who received a transperineal targeted biopsy, there was no difference in cancer detection rates among local anaesthetic, sedation and general anaesthetic groups. In the 2435 patients from the pre-RAPID cohor, time to diagnosis was 32.1 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.3-34.9) compared to 15.9 days (95% CI 12.9-34.9) in the RAPID group. A total of 141 consecutive patient satisfaction surveys indicated a high satisfaction rate with the pathway; 50% indicated a preference for having all tests on a single day. CONCLUSIONS: The RAPID prostate cancer diagnostic pathway allows 43% of men to avoid a biopsy while preserving good detection of clinically significant cancers and low detection of insignificant cancers, although there were some centre-level variations.


Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Anestésicos Locais , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos
4.
Eur Urol ; 82(5): 559-568, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35963650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity, its lower specificity leads to a high prevalence of false-positive lesions requiring biopsy. OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate a scoring system for MRI-detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS)/Likert ≥3 lesions containing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The multicentre Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis (RAPID) pathway included 1189 patients referred to urology due to elevated age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE); April 27, 2017 to October 25, 2019. INTERVENTION: Visual-registration or image-fusion targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies for an MRI score of ≥4 or 3 + PSA density ≥0.12 ng/ml/ml. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Fourteen variables were used in multivariable logistic regression for Gleason ≥3 + 4 (primary) and Gleason ≥4 + 3, and PROMIS definition 1 (any ≥4 + 3 or ≥6 mm any grade; secondary). Nomograms were created and a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed. Models with varying complexity were externally validated in 2374 patients from six international cohorts. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The five-item Imperial RAPID risk score used age, PSA density, prior negative biopsy, prostate volume, and highest MRI score (corrected c-index for Gleason ≥3 + 4 of 0.82 and 0.80-0.86 externally). Incorporating family history, DRE, and Black ethnicity within the eight-item Imperial RAPID risk score provided similar outcomes. The DCA showed similar superiority of all models, with net benefit differences increasing in higher threshold probabilities. At 20%, 30%, and 40% of predicted Gleason ≥3 + 4 prostate cancer, the RAPID risk score was able to reduce, respectively, 11%, 21%, and 31% of biopsies against 1.8%, 6.2%, and 14% of missed csPCa (or 9.6%, 17%, and 26% of foregone biopsies, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Imperial RAPID risk score provides a standardised tool for the prediction of csPCa in patients with an MRI-detected PIRADS/Likert ≥3 lesion and can support the decision for prostate biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this multinational study, we developed a scoring system incorporating clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics to predict which patients have prostate cancer requiring treatment and which patients can safely forego an invasive prostate biopsy. This model was validated in several other countries.


Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
5.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 36: 9-18, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977691

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Advances in systemic agents have increased overall survival for men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. Additional cytoreductive prostate treatments and metastasis-directed therapies are under evaluation. These confer toxicity but may offer incremental survival benefits. Thus, an understanding of patients' values and treatment preferences is important for counselling, decision-making, and guideline development. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of patients' values, preferences, and expectations regarding treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for qualitative and preference elucidation studies reporting on patients' preferences for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) or GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO as CRD42020201420. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 1491 participants from 15 studies met the prespecified eligibility for inclusion. The study designs included were discrete choice experiments (n = 5), mixed methods (n = 3), and qualitative methods (n = 7). Disease states reported per study were: metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in nine studies (60.0%), metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in two studies (13.3%), and a mixed cohort in four studies (26.6%). In quantitative preference elicitation studies, patients consistently valued treatment effectiveness and delay in time to symptoms as the two top-ranked treatment attributes (low or very low certainty). Patients were willing to trade off treatment-related toxicity for potential oncological benefits (low certainty). In qualitative studies, thematic analysis revealed cancer progression and/or survival, pain, and fatigue as key components in treatment decisions (low or very low certainty). Patients continue to value oncological benefits in making decisions on treatments under qualitative assessment. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited understanding of how patients make treatment and trade-off decisions following a diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer. For appropriate investment in emerging cytoreductive local tumour and metastasis-directed therapies, we should seek to better understand how this cohort weighs the oncological benefits against the risks. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at how men with advanced (metastatic) prostate cancer make treatment decisions. We found that little is known about patients' preferences for current and proposed new treatments. Further studies are required to understand how patients make decisions to help guide the integration of new treatments into the standard of care.

6.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(5): 951-954, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33384271

RESUMO

Recent evidence from randomised trials supports the diagnostic superiority of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) over conventional imaging in the detection of distant occult metastasis in men with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer. This may result in a rise in the detection of de novo synchronous hormone-sensitive "oligometastatic" prostate cancer. We outline the evidence supporting PSMA PET/CT imaging in primary staging. We also discuss the translation of positive areas with a high probability of distant metastasis into clinical therapeutic targets for metastasis-directed interventions. Finally, we highlight the role of PSMA PET/CT as an imaging biomarker. This may have future utility in disease monitoring and prediction of response to systemic, local cytoreductive and metastasis-directed interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: A new whole-body scan can accurately detect cancer deposits in men in whom distant prostate cancer spread is suspected. This may be useful for monitoring and predicting response to drug therapy, treatments to the prostate, and cancer deposits.


Assuntos
Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Imagem Corporal Total
7.
J Urol ; 205(4): 1075-1081, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33207137

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We compared clinically significant prostate cancer detection by visual estimation and image fusion targeted transperineal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter study included patients with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions undergoing visual estimation or image fusion targeted transperineal biopsy (April 2017-March 2020). Propensity score matching was performed using demographics (age and ethnicity), clinical features (prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, prostate specific antigen density and digital rectal examination), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging variables (number of lesions, PI-RADS® score, index lesion diameter, whether the lesion was diffuse and radiological T stage) and biopsy factors (number of cores, operator experience and anesthetic type). Matched groups were compared overall and by operator grade, PI-RADS score, lesion multiplicity, prostate volume and anesthetic type using targeted-only and targeted plus systematic histology. Multiple clinically significant prostate cancer thresholds were evaluated (primary: Gleason ≥3+4). RESULTS: A total of 1,071 patients with a median age of 67.3 years (IQR 61.3-72.4), median prostate specific antigen of 7.5 ng/ml (IQR 5.3-11.2) and 1,430 total lesions underwent targeted-only biopsies (visual estimation: 372 patients, 494 lesions; image fusion: 699 patients, 936 lesions). A total of 770 patients with a median age of 67.4 years (IQR 61-72.1), median prostate specific antigen of 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 5.2-10.6) and 919 total lesions underwent targeted plus systematic biopsies (visual estimation: 271 patients, 322 lesions; image fusion: 499 patients, 597 lesions). Matched comparisons demonstrated no overall difference in clinically significant prostate cancer detection between visual estimation and image fusion (primary: targeted-only 54% vs 57.4%, p=0.302; targeted plus systematic 51.2% vs 58.2%, p=0.123). Senior urologists had significantly higher detection rates using image fusion (primary: targeted-only 45.4% vs 63.7%, p=0.001; targeted plus systematic 39.4% vs 64.5%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found no overall difference in clinically significant prostate cancer detection, although image fusion may be superior in experienced hands.


Assuntos
Biópsia/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue
8.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(5): 1027-1034, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now recommended prebiopsy in numerous healthcare regions based on the findings of high-quality studies from expert centres. Concern remains about reproducibility of mpMRI to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for csPCa in a real-world setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study, including men referred with raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or an abnormal digital rectal examination who had undergone mpMRI followed by transrectal or transperineal biopsy, was conducted. Patients could be biopsy naïve or have had previous negative biopsies. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary definition for csPCa was International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) ≥2 (any Gleason ≥7); the accuracy for other definitions was also evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Across ten sites, 2642 men were included (January 2011-November 2018). Mean age and PSA were 65.3yr (standard deviation [SD] 7.8yr) and 7.5ng/ml (SD 3.3ng/ml), respectively. Of the patients, 35.9% had "negative MRI" (scores 1-2); 51.9% underwent transrectal biopsy and 48.1% had transperineal biopsy, with 43.4% diagnosed with csPCa overall. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for ISUP GG≥2 were 87.3% and 87.5%, respectively. The NPVs were 87.4% and 88.1% for men undergoing transrectal and transperineal biopsy, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value of MRI were 49.8% and 49.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV increased to 96.6% and 90.6%, respectively, when a PSA density threshold of 0.15ng/ml/ml was used in MRI scores 1-2; these metrics increased to 97.5% and 91.2%, respectively, for PSA density 0.12ng/ml/ml. ISUP GG≥3 (Gleason ≥4+3) was found in 2.4% (15/617) of men with MRI scores 1-2. They key limitations of this study are the heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the data. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI when used in real-world settings is able to rule out csPCa accurately, suggesting that about one-third of men might avoid an immediate biopsy. Men should be counselled about the risk of missing some significant cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for ruling out prostate cancer, especially when combined with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Previous results published from specialist centres can be reproduced at smaller institutions. However, patients and their clinicians must be aware that an early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer could be missed in nearly 10% of patients by relying on MRI and PSAD alone.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Biópsia , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
BJU Int ; 124(4): 643-648, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31081983

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with Gleason 3 + 4 cancer on transrectal biopsy are upgraded after undergoing transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and whether this has implications for current clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis we examined 107 consecutive patients presenting at a single tertiary referral centre (July 2012 to July 2016) with prostate cancer of Gleason score 3 + 4 on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided systematic non-targeted biopsy who then underwent a multiparametric MRI followed by MRI-targeted transperineal prostate biopsy for accurate risk stratification and localization. RESULTS: The patients' mean (sd) age was 67.0 (8.0) years, and they had a median (interquartile range) PSA concentration of 6.2 (4.7-9.6) ng/mL. Of the 107 patients, 84 (78.5%) had Gleason 3 + 4 on both transrectal systematic biopsy and transperineal MRI-targeted biopsy. Nineteen patients (17.8%) were upgraded to Gleason 4 + 3, three patients (3.0%) to Gleason 4 + 4 and one patient (1.0%) to Gleason 4 + 5. These differences were significant (P = 0.0006). Likewise, 23/107 patients (22%) had higher-risk disease based on their targeted biopsies. CONCLUSION: The use of targeted biopsy in men with impalpable cancer, ultimately upgraded one in five patients from favourable-intermediate- to unfavourable-intermediate-risk disease or worse. This has significant clinical implications for men considering active surveillance or radical treatment. Our risk calculators must now be validated using these data from targeted biopsy as the technique becomes widely adopted.

10.
BMJ Open ; 8(10): e024941, 2018 10 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30361408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and cognitive fusion transperineal targeted biopsy (MRTB) led prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic service with regard to cancer detection and reducing time to diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN: Consecutive men being investigated for possible PCa under the UK 2-week wait guidelines. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre for PCa in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Men referred with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination between February 2015 and March 2016 under the UK 2-week rule guideline. INTERVENTIONS: An mpMRI was performed prior to patients attending clinic, on the same day. If required, MRTB was offered. Results were available within 48 hours and discussed at a specialist multidisciplinary team meeting. Patients returned for counselling within 7 days PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures in this regard included the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients referred with a suspicion of PCa. Quality control outcome measures included clinically significant and total cancer detection rates. RESULTS: 112 men were referred to the service. 111 (99.1%) underwent mpMRI. Median PSA was 9.4 ng/mL (IQR 5.6-21.0). 87 patients had a target on mpMRI with 25 scoring Likert 3/5 for likelihood of disease, 26 4/5 and 36 5/5.57 (51%) patients received a local anaesthetic, Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (MRTB). Cancer was detected in 45 (79%). 43 (96%) had University College London definition 2 disease or greater. The times to diagnosis and treatment were a median of 8 and 20 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This approach greatly reduces the time to diagnosis and treatment. Detection rates of significant cancer are high. Similar services may be valuable to patients with a potential diagnosis of PCa.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/economia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/normas , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Reino Unido
11.
BJU Int ; 121(2): 176-183, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28921833

RESUMO

The aim of the present study was to review major organizational guidelines on the evaluation and management of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria (AMH). We reviewed the haematuria guidelines from: the American Urological Association; the consensus statement by the Canadian Urological Association, Canadian Urologic Oncology Group and Bladder Cancer Canada; the American College of Physicians; the Joint Consensus Statement of the Renal Association and British Association of Urological Surgeons; and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. All guidelines reviewed recommend evaluation for AMH in the absence of potential benign aetiologies, with the evaluation including cystoscopy and upper urinary tract imaging. Existing guidelines vary in their definition of AMH (role of urine dipstick vs urine microscopy), the age threshold for recommending evaluation, and the optimal imaging method (computed tomography vs ultrasonography). Of the reviewed guidelines, none recommended the use of urine cytology or urine markers during the initial AMH evaluation. Patients should have ongoing follow-up after a negative initial AMH evaluation. Significant variation exists among current guidelines for AMH with respect to who should be evaluated and in what manner. Given the patient and health system implications of balancing appropriately focused and effective diagnostic evaluation, AMH represents a valuable future research opportunity.


Assuntos
Doenças Assintomáticas , Hematúria/diagnóstico , Hematúria/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores Etários , Cistoscopia , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Microscopia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Urina/citologia , Urografia
12.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 51: 27-34, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27846402

RESUMO

Radical treatments such as prostatectomy and radiotherapy have demonstrated success in terms of biochemical and disease-specific survival for localised prostate cancer. However, whilst the end goal of any cancer treatment is to control or cure disease it must also do so by minimising any side effects that may be experienced by the patient. Focal therapy as a concept aims to redress this established therapeutic ratio by treating areas of the prostate affected by significant disease as opposed to treating the entire gland. However, there are a number of common criticisms of focal therapy - we deem the seven sins - that require further interrogation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia
13.
Foot (Edinb) ; 25(4): 195-9, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26362237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is a common surgical procedure used to treat a variety of diseases and deformities of the forefoot. Fixation methods vary and typically fusion rates are good. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study are to demonstrate whether there is any advantage to using locking as opposed to non-locking plates for 1st MTPJ fusion. Additionally the study aims to determine whether there is any difference in non-union rates according to gender. METHODS: One hundred and seventy two consecutive 1st MTPJ fusions were performed for 153 patients. 40 patients (23%) were male and 132 (77%) female. Twenty patients received Hallu-fix™ plates, 76 Charlotte™ plates and 76 Anchorage™ plates. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for non-union. Failure rates were compared using Fisher's exact tests (p=0.05). RESULTS: Twelve (6.9%) non-unions were identified. The difference in failure rates between all systems was not statistically significant. However, the difference in fusion rates between males (17.5%) and females (3.8%) was significant. CONCLUSION: This study finds that 1st MTPJ fusion is an effective method to treat diseases of the 1st MTPJ. Locking plates may offer better fusion rates than their non-locking counterparts. This is especially evident in male patients.


Assuntos
Artrodese/instrumentação , Placas Ósseas , Parafusos Ósseos , Deformidades Adquiridas do Pé/cirurgia , Hallux/cirurgia , Articulação Metatarsofalângica/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Deformidades Adquiridas do Pé/diagnóstico por imagem , Deformidades Adquiridas do Pé/epidemiologia , Hallux/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Sexuais , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26734330

RESUMO

The point at which a patient is most vulnerable during their journey through the hospital as an acute or emergency admission is the point at which they are transferred to the designated oncoming responsible team. Unsurprisingly, inadequate and incomplete clinical handovers have the potential for latter catastrophic consequences and are utterly avoidable. Recognising these facts, good clinical handover is an essential part of clinical governance and patient safety. Perhaps secondarily, clinical handover - especially when conducted with senior surgical personnel - can be a valuable learning tool for the surgical trainee. An complete audit loop was performed to assess the rate of handover and urology registrar involvement in acute urology periods in 2 month long periods as well as the rate of inadequate investigations and treatment. The interventions introduced included foundation doctor induction training in acute urology cases, an explanation of the importance of handover and a reflective look at ourselves and our approachability. As a result there were significant improvements in the rate of early registrar involvement and successful handover for patients admitted under our take.

15.
Foot (Edinb) ; 24(2): 56-61, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24684777

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving connective tissue and joints. The most common rheumatoid forefoot deformities are hallux valgus and clawed lesser toes. There are a number of surgical procedures that have been described offering symptomatic relief and anatomical correction. OBJECTIVES: This prospective case series aims to assess outcome in patients with rheumatoid forefoot deformities who underwent a novel combination of 1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusions and Stainsby procedures. METHODS: Thirteen procedures were performed on 12 consecutive patients with an age range of 55-71 (mean=62) between 02/2009 and 05/2011. AOFAS scoring was performed preoperatively and again six and 12 months post-surgery. Hallux valgus (HVA) and intermetatarsal angles (IMA) were measured preoperatively and six weeks and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean AOFAS score increased from 46 to 72, 12 months postoperatively. The mean HVA reduced from 48° preoperatively to 14° six months postoperatively. The IMA decreased from 15° to 10° six months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel approach of 1st metatarsophalangeal fusion combined with lesser toe metatarsal head sparing is an effective procedure that reduces forefoot deformity and pain.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/cirurgia , Artrodese/métodos , Deformidades Adquiridas do Pé/cirurgia , Pé/cirurgia , Articulação Metatarsofalângica/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Dedos do Pé/cirurgia , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pé/fisiopatologia , Deformidades Adquiridas do Pé/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Articulação Metatarsofalângica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ; 6(1): e2014014, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24678391

RESUMO

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug mainly used to lower the risk of transplant rejection in individuals who are post solid organ or hematopoietic transplantation. It is a macrolide which reduces peptidyl-propyl isomerase activity and inhibits calcineurin, thus inhibiting T-lymphocyte signal transduction and interleukin-2 (IL-2) transcription. It has been associated with Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES), a disease of sudden onset that can present as a host of different symptoms, depending on the affected area of the brain. While infectious causes of encephalopathy must always be entertained, the differential diagnosis should also include PRES in the appropriate context. We report three cases of PRES in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) placed on tacrolimus after receiving a bone marrow transplant (BMT). The focus of this review is to enhance clinical recognition of PRES as it is related to an adverse effect of Tacrolimus in the setting of hematopoietic transplantation.

17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26734293

RESUMO

It was noted that a number of patients were having their procedures cancelled on the day of surgery because their antiplatelet or anticoagulative medications had not been stopped preoperatively. The team recognised that this problem was leading to an unnecessary waste of the department's labour and financial resources, and more importantly was becoming a source of disappointment and anxiety to patients. A retrospective analysis of all plastic surgery cases was performed for procedures listed for the previous 12 months. All cancellations and the reasons for them were recorded, which came to 23 cases. The sum of the financial tariffs for each cancelled procedure was calculated to assess the financial impact of the identified problem: £20,000. A root cause analysis was performed to assess where this problem was arising in the patient's preoperative journey. The common theme was the lack of information for the gatekeeper regarding the patients' anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications. A new gatekeeper form was introduced to practice with a subsection specifically highlighting antiplatelet and anticoagulative medications. In addition, this issue was highlighted to the relevant staff in the department. After four months, a second PDSA cycle was performed in the same manner. Seven cases were cancelled due to anticoagulants or antiplatelets not being stopped prior to surgery. This equated to a net loss of £11,865 to the department when projected over 12 months, improving on the performance prior to the newly introduced changes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA