Three-dimensional reconstruction technology in the preoperative workup of complex hepatic resections. Our experience on 11 consecutive cases.

Three-dimensional liver modeling can be a useful tool when planning the preoperative strategy in liver surgery. The present study aims to review our case series of patients requiring complex hepatic resections for primary and secondary liver tumors, and for whom 3D models were built, to add further evidence in this direction. All consecutive patients undergoing complex liver resection were enrolled. Cross-sectional triphasic CT images were obtained for each patient. DICOM images were processed, and full virtual 3D models were generated. The additional details provided by 3D models were employed to better understand the anatomy, to define the most adequate surgical pathway, and, in case, to switch to a different surgical procedure. From January 2020 to September 2022, 11 complex hepatic resections requiring 3D reconstruction technology were performed. Eight 3D models scored ≥ 15 points in the quality control system. A detailed analysis of each case was reported. In three cases (27%) 3DVT helped to understand the anatomy and/or to detect vascular abnormalities. In six cases (54.5%) 3DVT led to a variation of the surgical planning. 3DVT may be helpful in planning preoperatively the most appropriate surgical procedure. Further large-scale, well-designed studies are needed to prove its true effectiveness in HPB surgical oncology.

Dynamic surgical anatomy using 3D reconstruction technology in complex hepato-biliary surgery with vascular involvement. Results from an international multicentric survey.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional liver modeling can lead to substantial changes in choosing the type and extension of liver resection. This study aimed to explore whether 3D reconstruction helps to better understand the relationship between liver tumors and neighboring vascular structures compared to standard 2D CT scan images. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced CT scan images of 11 patients suffering from primary and secondary hepatic tumors were selected. Twenty-three experienced HBP surgeons participated to the survey. A standardized questionnaire outlining 16 different vascular structures (items) having a potential relationship with the tumor was provided. Intraoperative and histopathological findings were used as the reference standard. The proper hypothesis was that 3D accuracy is greater than 2D. As a secondary endpoint, inter-raters' agreement was explored. RESULTS: The mean difference between 3D and 2D, was 2.6 points (SE: 0.40; 95 % CI: 1.7-3.5; p < 0.0001). After sensitivity analysis, the results favored 3D visualization as well (mean difference 1.7 points; SE: 0.32; 95 % CI: 1.0-2.5; p = 0.0004). The inter-raters' agreement was moderate for both methods (2D: W = 0.45; 3D: W = 0.44). CONCLUSION: 3D reconstruction may give a significant contribution to better understanding liver vascular anatomy and the precise relationship between the tumor and the neighboring structures.