Outcomes of Heller Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Lessons From a 48-Year Prospective Experience With 4 Different Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To provide information on long-term outcomes of Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia with or without an antireflux fundoplication. BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of the Heller myotomy, surgeons have modified the original technique in order to balance the cure of dysphagia and the consequent cardial incontinence. METHODS: Totally, 470 patients underwent primary Heller myotomy between 1955 and 2020. A long abdominal myotomy (AM) was performed in 83 patients, the Ellis limited transthoracic myotomy (TM) in 30, the laparotomic Heller-Dor (L-HD) in 202, the videolaparoscopic Heller-Dor (VL-HD) in 155. The HD was performed under intraoperative manometric assessment. Starting on 1973 these patients underwent a prospective follow-up program of timed lifelong clinical, radiological, endoscopic evaluations. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 23.06 years [interquantile range (IQR): 15.04-32.06] for AM, 29.22 years (IQR: 13.46-40.17) for TM, 14.85 years (IQR: 11.05-21.56) for L-HD and 7.51 years (IQR: 3.25-9.60) for VL-HD. In AM, relapse of dysphagia occurred in 25/71 (35.21%), in TM in 11/30 (36.66%), in LH-D in 10/201 (4.97%), in VL-HD in 3/155 (1.93%). Erosive-ulcerative esophagitis was diagnosed for AM in 28.16%, for TM in 30%, for L-HD in 8.45%, for VL-HD in 2.58%. Overall, the outcome was satisfactory in 52.11% for AM, 41.9% for TM, 89.05% for L-HD, 96.12% for VL-HD. CONCLUSIONS: The Dor fundoplication drastically reduces postmyotomy gastroesophageal reflux. The Heller-Dor operation is a competitive option for the cure of esophageal achalasia if this operation is performed according to the rules of surgical physiology learned by means of intraoperative manometry.

True Short Esophagus in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Old Controversies With New Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the true short esophagus (TSE) frequency and long-term results of patients undergoing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. BACKGROUND: The existence and treatment of TSE during GERD/HH surgery is controversial. Satisfactory long-term results have been achieved with and without surgical techniques dedicated to TSE. METHODS: In 311 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for GERD/HH, the distance between the endoscopically-localized gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the apex of the diaphragmatic hiatus after maximal thoracic esophagus mobilization was measured. A standard Nissen fundoplication (SN) was performed in cases with an abdominal length >1.5 cm; in cases of TSE (abdominal length <1.5 cm), a Collis-Nissen (CN) or stomach around the stomach fundoplication (SASF) in elderly patients was performed. The fundoplication superior margin was fixed below the hiatus, but over the GEJ. The patients' symptoms, and radiological and endoscopic data were pre/postoperatively recorded. RESULTS: After intrathoracic esophageal mobilization (median 9 cm), TSE was diagnosed in 31.8% of 311 cases. With a median follow-up of 96 months (309 patients), HH relapse was radiologically diagnosed in 3.2% of patients, with excellent, good, fair, and poor outcomes in 45.6%, 44.3%, 6.2%, and 3.9% of cases, respectively, and no significant differences among SN (68.5%), CN (26.4%), and SASF (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: TSE was present in 31.8% of patients routinely submitted to GERD/HH surgery. In the presence of TSE, CN and SASF performed according to determined surgical principles may achieve similar satisfactory results. This finding warrants confirmation with a prospective multicenter study.

Piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional rotary instruments in oral surgery and implantology: Summary and consensus statements of the International Piezoelectric Surgery Academy Consensus Conference 2019.

PURPOSE: Piezoelectric bone surgery was introduced into clinical practice almost 20 years ago as an alternative method for cutting bone in dental surgical procedures, in an attempt to reduce the disadvantages of using conventional rotary instruments. The aim of this Consensus Conference was to evaluate the current evidence concerning the use of piezoelectric surgery in oral surgery and implantology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three working groups conducted three meta-analyses with trial sequential analysis, focusing on the use of piezoelectric surgery in impacted mandibular third molar extraction, lateral sinus floor elevation and implant site preparation. The method of preparation of the systematic reviews, based on comprehensive search strategies and following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was discussed and standardised. RESULTS: Moderate/low evidence suggests that piezoelectric surgery is significantly associated with a more favourable postoperative course (less pain, less trismus) after impacted mandibular third molar extraction than conventional rotary instruments. Moderate evidence suggests that implants inserted with piezoelectric surgery showed improved secondary stability during the early phases of healing compared with those inserted using a drilling technique. Strong/moderate evidence suggests that piezoelectric surgery prolongs the duration of surgery in impacted mandibular third molar extraction, sinus floor elevation and implant site preparation, but it is unclear whether the slight differences in duration of surgery, even if statistically significant, represent a real clinical advantage for either operator or patient. Weak evidence or insufficient data are present to draw definitive conclusions on the other investigated outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Further well-designed trials are needed to fully evaluate the effects of piezoelectric surgery, especially in implant site preparation and sinus floor elevation.

Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the use of piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS) for implant site preparation reduces surgical time, improves implant stability, preserves marginal bone level and improves the survival rate of oral implants compared with conventional drilling techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO (international prospective register of systematic reviews) database (CRD42019142749). The PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Open Grey databases were screened for articles published from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2018. The selection criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies (CCTs) comparing the PBS with conventional rotary instruments for implant site preparation, and reporting any of the selected clinical outcomes (surgical time, implant stability, marginal bone variations and implant failure rate) for both groups. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for CCTs. A meta-analysis was performed, and the power of the meta-analytic findings was assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS: Eight RCTs and one CCT met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The meta-analysis and the TSA showed moderate evidence suggesting that the PBS prolongs surgery duration and improves secondary stability 12 weeks after implant placement compared with conventional drilling techniques. Insufficient data are available in literature to assess if the PBS reduces marginal bone loss and/or improves the implant survival rate compared with conventional drilling techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately powered randomised clinical trials are needed to confirm the PBS positive effect on the secondary stability and to draw conclusions about the influence of PBS on marginal bone stability and implant survival.

Clinical Assessment of Short Implants Retaining Removable Partial Dentures: 4-year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the survival at 1 and 4 years of short implants retaining removable partial dentures (RPDs) in Kennedy Class I and II edentulism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (Kennedy Class I and II) rehabilitated with RPDs were selected for the insertion of one short implant in the distal edentulous ridge, connected to the RPD with a Locator attachment after osseointegration. The following data were recorded at the 1- and 4-year follow-up: bone loss, bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), implant mobility, and survival. RESULTS: Thirty-five implants were placed from September 2012 to April 2014. At the 4-year follow-up, 12 implants showed BOP, and for PD, 15 implants showed 2 mm, 16 implants showed 3 mm, and 2 implants showed 4 mm. One implant showed mobility, and two were lost (survival rate: 94.3%; 95% CI: 80.84 to 99.30). The mean bone loss was 1.04 ± 1.88 mm. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the implant survival rate and the mean bone loss values reported are comparable with those reported by other authors. The use of short implants for retaining RPDs may be considered a viable treatment option for patients with distal edentulism and contraindications for more complex implant rehabilitation.

Thickness Discrimination Thresholds in Patients Wearing Single-Implant Mandibular Overdentures: 6-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To verify whether single-implant-supported mandibular overdentures improve thickness discrimination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A selection of edentulous patients treated with single-implant-supported overdentures underwent interocclusal thickness discrimination tests using dedicated metal strips. Fifteen patients were included, and recordings were repeated five times: with complete dentures in place before placement of implants, the day of the prosthetic connection, and 1 month, 1 year, and 6 years after the connection. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Thickness discrimination improved at the 1-month recall recording, while after 1 year, it remained stable at low levels.

Incidence and risk factors for the development of epidermoid carcinoma in oesophageal achalasia†.

OBJECTIVES: The risk factors for oesophageal achalasia, a precancerous condition that can lead to epidermoid carcinoma, are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine these factors. METHODS: Beginning in 1973, patients presenting with achalasia from 1955 to 2016 periodically underwent clinical assessment, the barium swallow test (the oesophageal diameter and residual barium column were measured) and endoscopy according to a prospective protocol. We included patients with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. RESULTS: Of 681 cases, 583 patients were considered. The median follow-up time was 147.13 months (interquartile range 70.42-257.82 months), and 17 epidermoid carcinomas and 1 carcinosarcoma were diagnosed. After excluding 4 achalasia patients admitted with a cancer diagnosis, the incidence rate of epidermoid carcinomas was 1.61/1000 persons-year, and the cumulative probability of developing cancer at 56.34 years of follow-up was 13%. Risk factors for cancer were a sigmoid oesophagus [risk ratio (RR) = 17.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.13-75.43], duration of achalasia symptoms >280 months (RR = 19.62, 95% CI 4.59-83.80), duration of follow-up >353 months (RR = 5.96, 95% CI 2.50-14.18), oesophageal diameter at diagnosis >71 mm (RR = 21.07, 95% CI 9.29-47.82), residual barium column at diagnosis >23 cm (RR = 24.27, 95% CI 6.93-85.01) and residual barium column at the last follow-up >10 cm (RR = 8.15, 95% CI 2.40-27.62). Conversely, the risk of epidermoid carcinoma was lower when the residual barium swallow decreased by >57% (RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with achalasia carry a substantial risk of developing epidermoid carcinoma. Several factors, such as sigmoid achalasia and dysphagia lasting more than 23 years, are associated with an increased risk of cancer. An effective Heller myotomy may positively influence the carcinogenetic process.

A Systematic Review of the Role of Implant Design in the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla.

PURPOSE: To identify and critically appraise scientific publications evaluating the possible effect of implant design on treatment outcomes in the rehabilitation of patients with a fully edentulous maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scientific reports were sought in three electronic bibliographic databases, combined with searches for meeting abstracts, and in the grey literature. English, German, or Scandinavian scientific publications on prospective or retrospective longitudinal studies with effects of an implant design or feature on the treatment outcomes were eligible. Minimum requirement for inclusion was at least 10 study participants who were followed up for at least 2 years after implant loading. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for selecting data to extract from the individual studies. These were characteristics of the individual studies, risk of bias within individual studies, and the results of individual studies. Three editorial teams independently identified and extracted the data. RESULTS: The search resulted in 998 primary studies, of which 525 met the inclusion criteria and were read in full text. Of these, 105 studies were included in qualitative syntheses. Seventeen studies were designed with an objective to assess effects of implant design or feature on outcomes, 23 studies described tilted implants to enable placement of longer implants, 30 studies reported effects of implants placed in zygomatic bone with or without additional alveolar implants, and 9 studies reported effects of implants placed in pterygoid bone or other bony buttresses with or without additional alveolar implants. Sixteen articles reported bone augmentation with simultaneous or delayed implant placement in patients with a predominantly Cawood-Howell bone class V and VI maxilla. Ten papers reported effects of implant design on outcomes, despite the lack of an a priori stated objective to assess a particular implant design or feature. There is a lack of compelling data to state that one particular implant system or design feature stands out amidst others, when applied to restoring the fully edentulous maxilla with implant-retained prostheses. CONCLUSION: This systematic review failed to identify compelling evidence to conclude that any particular implant or feature affects the treatment outcome in patients with a fully edentulous maxilla.

Functional outcomes for clinical evaluation of implant restorations.

The functional outcomes related to treating patients afflicted with tooth loss are an important hallmark in substantiating prosthodontic intervention. The Oral Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (ORONet) conducted two international workshops to develop a core set of outcome measures, including a functional domain. The process followed the general format used in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) workshops to develop consensus for clinical outcome measures in arthritis research, which included: developing a comprehensive list of potential outcomes in the literature; submitting them to a filter for validity, clinical discrimination, and feasibility; and ranking those measures meeting all the filter criteria for relative value. The search was conducted to include functional assessments of speech, swallowing, mastication, nutrition, sensation, and motor function as they relate to dental implant therapies. This literature review surveyed 173 papers that produced some result of these descriptors in the functional domain. Of these, 67 papers reported on functional assessments and further defined objective and subjective outcomes. Many of these results were patient-perceived improvements in function, while others were objective assessments based on established methodologies and instruments. Objective evaluations of masticatory function and speech may meet criteria for validity and discriminability for selected interventions, but are generally not feasible for routine use in clinical care settings. The current recommendation is to employ a well-validated survey instrument that covers mastication and speech, such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14, short form), recognizing that patient perceptions of function may differ from objective ability.

Psychologic outcomes in implant prosthodontics.

Consensus regarding outcomes of the treatment of tooth loss, especially the psychologic outcomes, is needed to guide discovery of best practices and enable a better understanding of patient management for this chronic condition. This paper presents the findings of the ORONet Psychological Working Group for prosthodontics and aims to identify psychologic outcomes with properties deemed critical to meet clinical trial and clinical practice needs for the future. References obtained using a PubMed/Medline search were reviewed for clinical outcomes measures of interest. Clinical outcomes measures were judged relative to the criteria of truth, discrimination, and feasibility. Of the psychologic outcome measures identified in this systematic review, only the OHIP-14 was thought to be suitable for use in general practice and multi-institutional outcome registries and clinical trials. Development of clinically useful psychologic outcomes for future use could benefit from developmental methods and tools outlined in the patient-related outcomes field of clinical care.

Economic outcomes in prosthodontics.

PURPOSE: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the types of economic measures currently used in implant prosthodontics and determine the degree to which cost of care is considered in the context of any positive outcome of the care provided. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the following set of terms plus some additional hand searching: "dental implants" (Mesh) AND ("cost") OR "maintenance" OR "healthcare policy" OR "access to care" OR "third party" OR "economic") AND (("1995/01/01"[PDat]:'2009/12/31"[PDat]) AND (Humans[Mesh]) AND (English[lang])). RESULTS: After a review of the 466 titles and abstracts identified by the search, 18 articles were accepted for further consideration, as some attempt at economic outcome measures was made. An additional four articles were identified by hand searching. The 22 accepted articles were grouped into four basic categories: (1) measure of costs of treatment (direct, indirect, and maintenance costs), (2) cost-effectiveness mathematical modeling applied to simulate the lifetime paths and cost of treatment, (3) cost-effectiveness analysis/cost minimization, and (4) willingness-to-pay, willingness-to-accept. Attempts at determining the costs of treatment varied widely. When the OMERACT filters were applied to the various measures it was felt that discrimination and/or feasibility was a problem for most of the current economic outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility are currently the gold standard; however, feasibility of such analyses is an issue. Collaboration with health economists to guide future research is highly recommended.

Oral Rehabilitation Outcomes Network-ORONet.

The published literature describing clinical evidence used in treatment decisionmaking for the management of tooth loss continues to be characterized by a lack of consistent outcome measures reflecting not only clinical performance but also a range of patient concerns. Recognizing this problem, an international group of clinicians, educators, and scientists with a focus on prosthodontics formed the Oral Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (ORONet) to promote strategies for improving health based on comprehensive, patient-centered evaluations of comparative effectiveness of therapies for oral rehabilitation. An initial goal of ORONet is to identify outcome measures for prosthodontic therapies that represent multiple domains with patient relevance, are amenable to utilization in both institutional and practice-based environments, and have established validity. Following a model used in rheumatology, the group assessed the prosthodontic literature, with an emphasis on implantbased therapies, for outcomes related to longevity and functional, psychologic, and economic domains. These systematic reviews highlight a need for further development of standardized outcomes that can be integrated across clinical and research environments.

Clinical outcomes measures for assessment of longevity in the dental implant literature: ORONet approach.

The Oral Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (ORONet) Longevity Working Group undertook a search of the literature from 1995 to 2009 on randomized controlled trials related to longevity of osseointegrated implants. Outcomes measures used in these studies were identified and subjected to the OMERACT component criteria of truth, validity, and feasibility. Through this process, it was a challenge to identify clinical outcomes measures that fully met the criteria. An attenuated version of the component criteria was applied, and clinical measures were identified for implant outcomes, prosthetic outcomes, and indices. A recommendation on standardized reporting periods was also presented for future consideration. The endpoint of the evaluation process is to develop consensus on clinical outcomes measures that can be applied across broad populations for osseointegrated implant care. The present ORONet initiative represents a beginning toward continual improvement and consensus development for clinical outcomes measures for osseointegrated implants.

DISH of the cervical spine causing epiglottis impingement.

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterized by calcification and ossification of ligaments and entheses; it mainly affects the vertebral column. We report the case of a patient with pharyngeal dysphagia and episodic aspiration secondary to DISH involvement of the cervical spine, which had caused alteration in the epiglottic tilt mechanism during deglutition.

Flexibility of Bayesian generalized linear mixed models for oral health research.

Many outcome variables in oral research are characterized by positive values and heavy skewness in the right tail. Examples are provided by many distributions of dental variables such as DMF (decayed, missing, filled teeth) scores, oral health impact profile score, gingival index scores, and microbiologic counts. Moreover, heterogeneity in data arises when more than one tooth is studied for each patient, due to the clusterization.Over the past decade, linear mixed models (LMEs) have become a common statistical tool to account for within-subject correlation in data with repeated measures. When a normal error is reasonably assumed, estimates of LMEs are supported by many statistical packages. Such is not the case for skewed data, where generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are required. However, the current software available supports only special cases of GLMMs or relies on crude Laplace-type approximation of integrals. In this study, a Bayesian approach is taken to estimate GLMMs for clustered skewed dental data. A Gamma GLMM and a log-normal model are employed to allow for heterogeneity across clusters, deriving from the patient-operator-tooth susceptibility typical of this clinical context. A comparison to the frequentist framework is also provided. In our case, Gamma GLMM fits data better than the log-normal distribution, while providing more precise estimates compared with the likelihood approach. A key advantage of the Bayesian framework is its ability to readily provide a flexible approach for implementation while simultaneously providing a formal procedure for solving inference problems.

Immediate loading of maxillary fixed prostheses retained by zygomatic and conventional implants: 24-month preliminary data for a series of clinical case reports.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the success rate of immediately loaded conventional implants placed in the premaxilla in association with 2 zygomatic implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients included had worn complete maxillary dentures for at least 2 years. They were required to have no severe systemic pathologies and could not be on any drugs. They could not have any oral infection, uncontrolled periodontal disease, sinusitis, parafunctional signs, alteration of the occlusal plane, or smoking habits. They had to be good candidates for the insertion of 4 or 5 traditional implants in the premaxilla and 2 zygomatic implants without guided bone regeneration. Primary stability had to be achieved. Impressions for prosthetic rehabilitation were made during first-stage surgery. Temporary fixed cross-arch prostheses were inserted 12 to 24 hours after surgery. Permanent cross-arch screw-retained prostheses were placed after 6 months. RESULTS: Seven patients met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study (Caucasian, 4 males and 3 females, mean age 56.8 years). In total, 14 zygomatic and 34 conventional implants were placed. The survival rate for zygomatic and conventional implants and fixed prostheses was 100% after 24 months of functional loading. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results are encouraging, but the long-term clinical prognosis remains to be determined.

[Hepatocellular carcinoma with neoplastic thrombosis of the common hepatic duct]. / Carcinoma epatocellulare con trombosi neoplastica del dotto epatico comune: caso clinico e revisione della letteratura.

Biliary tract involvement in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma usually occurs in advanced stages and is due to tumour compression or infiltration. In a few cases, however, a tumour thrombus may grow into the biliary ducts (bile duct thrombosis). Identification of this condition is important because surgical treatment may be beneficial in selected cases. A 69-year-old man came from another hospital after repeated sessions of radiofrequency thermoablation and alcoholisation of 3 nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma. At admission to our unit, the nodule in S5-S8 was still viable and a neoplastic thrombus had invaded the right and common bile ducts. S5-S8 sub-segmentectomy, S6 wedge resection and removal of the tumour thrombus were performed. Seventeen months later the tumour thrombus recurred in the hepatic ducts without evidence of intrahepatic recurrence and was again removed. Eight months later a large metastatic lymph node appeared at the hepatic hilum, without evidence of liver recurrence or distant metastases, and the patient underwent lymphadenectomy. Eighteen months after the last procedure the patient is alive without recurrence. The appearance of bile duct thrombosis in the natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma does not necessarily entail an unfavourable prognosis. An early diagnosis is crucial to select the appropriate treatment. Biliary decompression with removal of tumour debris and blood clots and curative resection of the hepatocellular carcinoma can result in effective palliation and occasional long-term survival. Also in the presence of intrabiliary, hepatic or limited extrahepatic recurrence, surgical exeresis is the best therapeutic choice in selected cases.

Bone morphogenetic proteins and bone defects: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of scientific literature. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine whether bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are more effective in treating bone defects than traditional techniques, such as grafting autologous bone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: BMPs were used in several human randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There are both logical arguments and an empirical basis for using RCTs to evaluate the effects of health care interventions and restrict systematic reviews to such a kind of study design. METHODS: An electronic search was made in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE (through MeSH and Emtree), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, extended to May 31, 2006, with no linguistic restrictions. RCTs that compare bone regeneration achieved through BMPs versus that obtained by traditional methods entered the study. RESULTS: The 17 publications that met the criteria, divided into subgroups by type of bone, were tabulated by salient characteristics and evaluated through the items proposed by van Tulder et al. However, as the studies differed widely (in terms of site, sample size, dosage of active principle, carrier, clinical and radiologic data recording), it was possible to carry out a metaanalysis of clinical and radiologic outcome only for the subgroup that evaluated the vertebrae, where it was observed that BMPs offer a slightly but statistically significant greater efficacy than do traditional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BMPs at the vertebrae can eliminate the need for surgery to harvest autologous bone. The only large study carried out on the other sites suggests that BMPs should be used at a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL to treat fractures of the tibia. However, further RCTs of good methodological quality are advisable so as to clarify the effectiveness of BMPs in clinical practice.